Atch 9 PP Questionnaire.doc

HTC71124RD002

Attachment 9 When filled in, this document becomes CUI

Source Selection Information - See FAR 3.104

Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

USTRANSCOM

Analysis of Mobility Platform (AMP)

HTC71124RD002

Please provide concise comments regarding your overall assessment of the contractor’s performance on the contract or workload identified below. Your ratings should include comments for any area rated Exceptional or lower than Satisfactory. Rating definitions are provided on the last page. Please respond by sending the entire completed questionnaire, in PDF format, via e-mail to both of the individuals below. Please complete and submit no later than 0900 Central Time on 02 April 2024 to both lisa.a.kraft.civ@mail.mil and amy.m.miller50.civ@mail.mil.

NOTE: CPARS may be reviewed for the contractors in addition to the responses to this questionnaire. Although you may have filed a CPARS for the contract listed, we would appreciate your response to this questionnaire because some of the questions relate to areas not covered by CPARS.

I. WORK PERFORMED IDENTIFICATION

Contractor (Company/Division):

Contract Number and Type of Contract (FFP, CPFF, etc):

Title of the Work Performed:

Brief Description of Work Performed:

Life Cycle Dollar value:

Period of Performance:

II. RESPONDENT(S) TO QUESTIONNAIRE

Name:

Position/Title:

Business Address:

Relation to Program:

Email Address : _________________________________________________________________________

Phone: (DSN)_____________________________(Commercial)__________________________________ Other suggested points of contact:

Please note that if your responses indicate a weakness in the contractor’s performance, a notification may be submitted to the contractor, and they may be made aware of the comment. The contractor will not be made aware of the commentor’s name or office.

III. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

NOTE: Remarks are not limited.

1. Staffing

a. Were the types of personnel (skill and expertise) the contractor used adequate to accomplish the effort without Government intervention?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

REMARKS:

b. Did the contractor provide replacement personnel of the same quality and skills of vacancies with minimum disruption to the support effort?

c. How effective was the contractor in aligning and re-aligning resources (personnel and other ) to meet varying workloads?

2. Technical

a. How would you rate the contractor's ability to meet the Performance Work Statement requirements?

b. How effective was the contractor in accomplishing planned project activities/requirements within the established milestones/timeframes?

c. How effective was the contractor in accomplishing quality checks to ensure that the final deliverables met the Performance Work Statement requirements?

d. Were there any penalties for non-performance assessed against the contractor and, if so, to what extent?

Yes _____ No _______

3. Key Areas

a. Experience in model development of strategic, theater, and/or end-to-end / global deployment process simulations (discrete event or otherwise).

If the above experience is applicable, provide a description of the effort performed and a performance rating.

b. Experience in model development of air refueling processes, at the campaign level or otherwise.

If the above experience is applicable, provide a description of the effort performed and a performance rating.

c. Experience optimizing large deployment and distribution scenarios.

If the above experience is applicable, provide a description of the effort performed and a performance rating.

d. Experience developing/maintaining a very large (e.g., 1-2M lines of code) simulation model code base.

If the above experience is applicable, provide a description of the effort performed and a performance rating.

e. Experience analyzing large data sets using visualization tools/techniques.

If the above experience is applicable, provide a description of the effort performed and a performance rating.

f. Experience developing, maintaining, and administering complex software applications in the Cloud One/Platform One/Party Bus environment.

If the above experience is applicable, provide a description of the effort performed and a performance rating.

g. Experience providing software development and sustainment support for a DoD program adhering to Risk Management Framework (RMF) requirements.

If the above experience is applicable, provide a description of the effort performed and a performance rating.

4. Contractor’s Overall Performance

5. Would you award to this contractor in the future?

Yes ___________ No__________

If “No”, why?

Any additional comments:

PAGE

When Filled In, this document becomes CUI