Atch 7 PP Ref Sheet.docx
DOCX document 26 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Analysis of Mobility Platform (AMP)
- Solicitation number
- HTC71124RD002
About this file
This presolicitation notice outlines requirements for the Analysis of Mobility Platform program. The United States Transportation Command Joint Distribution Process Analysis Center will solicit proposals for a single-award indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contract to provide support across 12 task areas involving modeling, simulation, analysis, software maintenance, security, and cloud migration for tools used to analyze the joint deployment distribution enterprise. The five-year IDIQ ordering period runs from August 2024 to July 2029, with the potential to extend an additional six months. The first task order will cover a one-year base period and four one-year options. Proposals are due on or around March 1, 2024, and the government will utilize best value source selection procedures to award to the offeror providing the best value.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Atch 4 DD254 and Addendum.pdf | ||
| Atch 1 20240212 AMP IDIQ PWS v1 FINAL.pdf | ||
| Atch 11 TO1 Cost Price Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Atch 13 AMP GFE 20240207.pdf | ||
| Atch 2 20240212 AMP_PWS_TO01 - v1 FINAL.pdf | ||
| Draft HTC71124RD002.pdf | ||
| Atch 8 PP Log.docx | DOCX document | |
| Atch 3 2024.01.17 AMP TO 01 QASP.pdf | ||
| Atch 5 TDP-File_Name_List.pdf | ||
| Atch 10 Staffing Matrix TO 1.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Atch 12 AMP SB_SubconPlan_Template.doc | DOC document | |
| Atch 6 NDA TDP.docx | DOCX document | |
| Atch 9 PP Questionnaire.doc | DOC document | |
| Atch 14 QA Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CUI
Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
RFP Attachment 7 Past Performance Reference # ____
RFP HTC71124RD002
Analysis of Mobility Platform (AMP)
A. Contract Information
| Contractor Name: |
| Contract Number: |
| Task Order Number: |
Performed as the ___ Prime ___ Subcontractor[footnoteRef:1] (if performed as the subcontractor, complete Block C of the form) [1: Offeror shall identify the approximate dollar value of the work performed that is applicable to the contractor’s role as either a prime or sub-contractor specifically for this performance area. Offeror should not include the total dollar value of the contract unless they performed 100% of the effort and it was completely in support of this performance area.]
| Period of Performance (e.g., DD MMM YY – DD MMM YY) |
| CAGE Code |
| Contract Type (FFP/CPAF, etc.): |
| Total Dollar Value of Contract |
(If Known)
B. Past Performance Reference Point of Contact (POC)
| Program/Reference POC: |
| Contracting/Acquisition POC: |
Name
Name
Title
Title
Telephone No.
Telephone No.
E-mail Address
E-mail Address
C. Subcontract Information
| Subcontract Number |
| Subcontract Value |
| Period of Performance (e.g., DD MMM YY – DD MMM YY) |
Prime Contractor POC (Name/Phone/Email):
D. Small Business Past Performance
Was a Small Business Subcontracting Plan Required?
Yes _______ No ________ Were all Small Business Subcontracting goals met?
Yes _________ No ________
| Contracting Officer (Name/Phone/Email) responsible for accepting/rejecting applicable Electronic Subcontractor Reporting System (eSRS) report. |
| Name: ________________________________________ |
Phone: ________________________________________ Email: ________________________________________
Please provide a detailed explanation as to why any Small Business Subcontracting goals were not met and what remedies were employed to meet future goals.
Prime Contractor POC (Name/Phone/Email):
| Performance Area 1: |
| Experience in model development of strategic, theater, and/or end-to-end / global deployment process simulations (discrete event or otherwise). |
Explain how this reference is relevant
| Performance Area 2: |
| Experience in model development of air refueling processes, at the campaign level or otherwise. |
Explain how this reference is relevant
| Performance Area 3: |
| Experience optimizing large deployment and distribution scenarios. |
Explain how this reference is relevant
| Performance Area 4: |
| Experience developing/maintaining a very large (e.g., 1-2M lines of code) simulation model code base. |
Explain how this reference is relevant
| Performance Area 5: |
| Experience analyzing large data sets using visualization tools/techniques. |
Explain how this reference is relevant
| Performance Area 6: |
| Experience developing, maintaining, and administering complex software applications in the Cloud One/Platform One/Party Bus environment. |
Explain how this reference is relevant
| Performance Area 7: |
| Experience providing software development and sustainment support for a DoD program adhering to Risk Management Framework (RMF) requirements. |
Explain how this reference is relevant
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .