Atch-08 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 49 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- HT001126RE011
- Issued by
-
Defense Health Agency
About this file
The document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for a Defense Health Agency (DHA) data governance contract (Solicitation Number: HT001126RE011). The questionnaire provides a comprehensive evaluation framework for rating contractor performance across 10 specific areas, using a rating scale from Poor/Unsatisfactory to Excellent, with categories including delivery schedule compliance, business practices, contract requirements conformance, data repository development, data governance practices, AI/ML support capabilities, and overall customer satisfaction.
The questionnaire is designed to assess a contractor's performance on a strategic data transformation project aimed at advancing enterprise data readiness across the Military Health System. Key evaluation areas include developing a baseline data inventory, establishing a centralized metadata repository, implementing automated metadata harvesting tools, conducting an Analysis of Alternatives for an enterprise data catalog, and evaluating self-service data access portals. Evaluators are asked to rate the contractor's performance and indicate whether they would purchase services from the contractor again, with completed surveys to be sent to specific email addresses provided in the document.
View the file
Other files
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
HT 001126 R E011, Attachment 08
PRESENT AND PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Offeror’s/Bidder’s Name (Company/Division): Reference Information TableBusiness Name of Reference & Address
Point of Contact
Phone number
E-mail address
Contract Number
Type
Contract Value
a. Original
b. Value at Completion
c. Reason for any Changes
Period of Performance
a. Date Completed/To Be Completed
b. Reason for Any Change
Description of Effort
HT 001126 R E011, Attachment 08
Evaluation KEY: Please use the following abbreviations to assign an applicable rating for questions 1 thru 6 below:
| P/U |
| S |
| G |
| VG |
| E |
| N |
| Poor Unsatisfactory |
| Satisfactory |
| Good |
| Very Good |
| Excellent |
| Neutral |
| Does not meet minimum acceptable standards in one or more areas; remedial action required in one or more areas; deficiencies in one or more areas, which adversely affect overall performance. |
| Meets or slightly exceeds minimum acceptable standards; adequate results; reportable deficiencies with identifiable, but not substantial, effects on overall performance. |
| Effective performance; fully responsive to contract requirements; reportable deficiencies, but with little identifiable effect on overall performance. |
| Very effective performance; fully responsive to contract requirements; contract requirements accomplished in a timely, efficient, and economical manner for the most part; only minor deficiencies with minimal effect on overall performance |
| Of exceptional merit; exemplary performance in a timely, efficient, and economical manner; very minor (if any) deficiencies with no adverse effect on overall performance |
| No record of relevant past performance or past performance information is not available |
Return completed surveys to andrea.v.rivas.civ@health.mil and linda.m.walker38.civ@health.mil
1. How would you rate the Contractor’s compliance with the delivery schedule / performance milestones?
Comments:
P/U |_| S |_| G |_| VG|_| E |_|
N |_|
2. How would you rate the Contractor’s business practices (e.g. maintaining a positive working relationship, business ethics, timely and effectively resolution of any problems etc.)?
Comments:
P/U |_| S |_| G |_| VG|_| E |_|
N |_|
3. How would you rate the Contractor’s record of conforming to contract requirements and to standards of good workmanship/quality of the product or service/timeliness of performance/report submission?
Comments:
P/U |_| S |_| G |_| VG|_| E |_|
N |_|
4. How would you rate the Contractor’s previous work for developing a searchable metadata repository and performance of data governance/management practices?
Comments:
P/U |_| S |_| G |_| VG|_| E |_|
N |_|
5. How would you rate the Contractor’s ability to measure compliance with data quality (DQ) rules, contract-based access controls, and semantic tagging protocols.
Comments:
P/U |_| S |_| G |_| VG|_| E |_|
6. How would you rate the Contractor’s previous work to evaluate the data mesh’s ability to support responsible, scalable, and secure use of artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) across a large enterprise?
P/U |_| S |_| G |_| VG|_| E |_|
7. How would you rate the Contractor’s overall compliance with the terms and conditions of your purchase order /contract?
P/U |_| S |_| G |_| VG|_| E |_|
8. How would you rate the Contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior and commitment to customer satisfaction; and generally, the contractor’s business-like concern for the interest of the customer?
P/U |_| S |_| G |_| VG|_| E |_|
9. How would you rate the Contractor’s overall performance? Comments:
P/U |_| S |_| G |_| VG|_| E |_|
10. Would you purchase services from this Contractor again? Comments:
YES |_| NO |_|
EVALUATOR NAME/TITLE
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .