Performance_Questionnaire_based_on_CPARS_Template.docx

DOCX document 16 KB Posted

Attached to
CGC THETIS DRYDOCK REPAIRS Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
HSCG80-13-R-P45936
Issued by
Department of Homeland Security US Coast Guard

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to CGC THETIS DRYDOCK REPAIRS, newest first.
File Type Posted
Amendment_A00003_THETIS.pdf PDF
905-WMEC_588_10_6_A_C.pdf PDF
905-WMEC_801_29_2_-_-.pdf PDF
905-WMEC_588_10_6_B_C.pdf PDF
Blank_Schedule_B_CGC_THETIS_Rev-2.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
905-WMEC_588_2_2_-_H.pdf PDF
905-WMEC_588_10_1_-_C.pdf PDF
905-WMEC_801_29_3_-_-.pdf PDF
905-WMEC_588_10_3_-_C.pdf PDF
905-WMEC_588_10_7_-_C.pdf PDF
905-WMEC_588_10_2_-_C.pdf PDF
905-WMEC_154_2_2_-_B.tiff TIFF file
905-WMEC_588_10_4_-_C.pdf PDF
905-WMEC_801_29_1_-_-.pdf PDF
CGC_THETIS_Second_Set_of_Question_and_Answers_Amend_00001.doc DOC document
905-WMEC_588_2_1_-_H.pdf PDF
905-WMEC_154_2_1_-_B.tiff TIFF file
905-WMEC_588_10_5_-_C.pdf PDF
CGC_THETIS_Spec_Rev-2.pdf PDF
SF30_Amendment_A00002_THETIS.pdf PDF
RFP_THETIS_Feb_6_2013.pdf PDF
SF30_Amendment_THETIS.pdf PDF
Blank_Schedule_B_Rev-1.pdf PDF
CGC_THETIS_First_Set_of_Question_and_Answers_Amend_00001.docx DOCX document
THETIS_Spec_Rev-1.pdf PDF
Blank_Schedule_B_Rev-0_CGC_THETIS_.pdf PDF
CGC_THETIS_Rev-_Spec_18_Dec_12.pdf PDF
RFP_THETIS_Jan_17_2013.doc DOC document
Show all 28

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTONNAIRE

The same ratings used in the Contractor Performance Assessment Review System shall be used to evaluate Past Performance in this questionnaire.

A common five level assessment rating system is used to evaluate a contractor’s performance. Ratings range from Unsatisfactory to Exceptional. Here is a breakdown of each category:

· Quality of Products or Service

· Schedule

· Cost Control

· Business Relations

· Management of Key Personnel

· Utilization of Small Business

1 = Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
2 = Marginal
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
3 = Satisfactory
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
4 = Very Good
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Governments benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
5 = Exceptional
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Governments benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

The ratings used in the Contractor Performance Assessment Review System shall be used to evaluate Past Performance.

0
1
2
3
4
N/A
1.
Quality of Product or Service – please rate

Comments:

2.
Schedule - Timeliness of Performance – please rate

Comments:

3.
Cost Control – please rate

Comments:

4.
Business Relations – please rate

Comments:

5
Management of Key Personnel – please rate

Comments:

6
Utilization of Small Business

Comments:

Were Subcontractors Used? ____Yes _____No Comments for Subcontracts

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .