Amendment_0001 _HSCG50-16-R-PFDAH1_dated_26_Jul_2016.pdf

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION

NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO.

IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

HSCG50-16-R-PFDAH1; ASTORIA FAMILY HOUSING PHASE 2 SECTOR COLUMBIA RIVER, ASTORIA, OR.

The purpose of this amendment is to provide revisions to the Solicitation and provide drawing replacements.

USCG FDCC DET SEATTLE

915 SECOND AVE, RM 2664

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98174-1011

HSCG50-16-R-PFDAH1

1 2

07/26/2016

07/15/2016

HSCG50-16-R-PFDAH1

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

A. CHANGES TO THE SOLICITATION/SPECIFICATIONS/DRAWINGS:

1. Replace the Site layout and maintenance floor plan sheets A-103 and A1-04 with the attached

Revised Maintenance Building floor plan dated 3-21-16 and revised concept site plan dated 3-21-16., attached to this amendment. The revised sheets have several additional requirements to be incorporated in addition to the other requirements of this RFP. There are dimensional changes and room name changes on the revised drawings where in conflict the drawings with this amendment shall take precedence. Spaces on the revised drawing that are converted to offices or conference rooms from storage and shop spaces shall follow the guidelines for office spaces for telecom HVAC, lighting and electrical requirements listed in the RFP and the additional requirements listed on the drawings.

2. Solicitation, Sections L and M have been revised. Page changes have been provided.

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged. The Proposal due date IS NOT EXTENDED. Offerors are reminded to acknowledge receipt of this amendment in Block 19 of the SF 1442 submitted in response to the subject RFP.

END OF AMENDMENT

(b) The copy of any protest shall be received in the office designated above within one day of filing a protest with the GAO.

L.6 52.236-27 SITE VISIT (CONSTRUCTION) (FEB 1995)

(a) The clauses at 52.236-2, Differing Site Conditions, and 52.236-3, Site Investigations and Conditions Affecting the Work, will be included in any contract awarded as a result of this solicitation. Accordingly, offerors or quoters are urged and expected to inspect the site where the work will be performed.

(b) One organized site visit will be scheduled for 09:00 AM local time 03 August 2016. Upon arrival please park on the street, and check-in at the housing office. The housing office is located in the center of the housing area at 200 W. Klaskanine, Astoria, OR 97103. If you need additional assistance on the day of the site visit please contact Mr. Gabriel Perez at (206) 220-7424. Please contact Gabe Perez via e-mail at Gabriel.d.perez@uscg.mil with a list of attendees no later than 48 hours prior to the site visit. Although the site visit IS NOT mandatory, you are highly encouraged that you have your team and any major subcontractors attend the meeting. No other site visit will be allowed.

L.7 SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS

(a) Offerors shall submit proposals, in response to this solicitation, in three separate volumes as follows:

VOLUME I, TECHNICAL. Include all information required for evaluation, excluding any reference to price.

Offerors shall provide 1 original and 3 copies of Volume I. Address all required evaluation criteria, as specified herein.

VOLUME II, PRICE. Include all information required for evaluation as well as the required completed solicitation sections. Offerors shall provide 1 original of Volume II. Address all required evaluation criteria, as specified herein.

VOLUME III, ORGANIZATION CONFLICT OF INTEREST (OCI). Include all information required as well as the required completed solicitation section H.7. Offerors shall provide 1 original and 1 copy of Volume III.

If Offeror DOES NOT propose to use Tetratech subcontractors (O’Brien & Associates; OTAK Inc; Shannon & Wilson; and Wood Harbinger) either as a Joint Venture partner or as subcontractors, provide a statement confirming so.

Important Note: Instructions for preparation and organization of both Technical, Price and OCI proposals are summarized below. In order to effectively and equitably evaluate Technical, Price and OCI proposals, the Source Selection Evaluation Board must receive information sufficiently detailed to clearly describe the Offeror's approach and performance capabilities.

(b) Submit your proposal packages to the Facilities Design and Construction Center, Seattle at the address shown in Block 8 of Standard Form 1442. The Government must receive your proposal no later than the time and date specified in Block 13 of Standard Form 1442.

(c) Proposal Format: Do not exceed the page limitations set forth below. Technical Proposals will be 8 ½” x 11” paper except for fold outs used for charts, tables or diagrams which may not exceed 11” x 17”. A page is defined as one face of a sheet of paper containing information. Typing shall not be less than 12 font, Arial. Total page limitation for technical proposals is 30 pages. Past Performance Questionnaires/CCASS forms, “draft LEED checklist”, drawings, and schedule and Resumes are excluded from the page limitation. Individual resumes shall not exceed 2 pages.

mailto:Gabriel.d.perez@uscg.mil

(d) Proposal format: Do not exceed the page limitation set forth below. OCI Information and OCI Mitigation Plan will be singled paged on 8 ½” x 11” paper. Typing shall not be less than 12 font, Arial. Total page limitation for OCI Information is 3 pages. Total page limitation for OCI Mitigation Plan is 10 pages.

(d) Requirements for Proposal Content: The proposal shall concisely describe the Offeror’s response to the requirements of the solicitation. Elaborate artwork, expensive paper or binding and expensive visual or other aids are not necessary. Additionally, use of general or vague statements such as “standard procedures will be used” or “good business practices will be employed” is not acceptable.

L.8 VOLUME I – TECHNICAL PROPOSAL PREPARATION

The technical proposal shall address the evaluation factors listed in Section M.3, Evaluation Factors for Award, and consist of sufficient documentation to show evidence that the Offeror meets the requirements as specified below:

The government will evaluate each proposal on the following criteria.

1. Means and Methods

2. Project Organization and Management Capabilities

3. Past Performance

TECHNICAL FACTORS

Factor 1: Means and Methods

Narrative: Provide a detailed written narrative describing the Contractor’s proposed methods to address the following:

• Risk Analysis. Provide a detailed explanation of your proposed project design approach and site logistics plan, particularly related to any items which pose risks to schedule and quality of work. Include a discussion of construction methods that would minimize risks associated with weather, as it affects schedule, sequencing of activities, quality of materials, and finished quality of construction. Explain all noise, dust, and erosion control measures that will be taken. Explain all measures that will be taken to protect the residents from the construction activities and minimize disruption to residents.

• Permits. The identification of, and strategy for, obtaining and complying with all required permits and environmental requirements, applicable, but not limited, to the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan and wetland delineation guidance provided by the Oregon Department of State Lands.

• Easements. The identification of and strategy for providing timely survey documentation required for roadway and utility easements. Contractor shall discuss coordination requirements with the City of Astoria and local utilities with respect to utility hook-ups, easements, and rights-of-way.

• Schedule and Phasing. Provide a concept schedule from contract award*, through design, construction, contract completion, and warranty period, identifying critical path activities and milestones, to include submittal of easement survey. Provide sufficient detail in the schedule to clearly show stages of construction. The schedule should clearly show the logic and sequence of events necessary for the successful execution of the project. Include a discussion of how the schedule will be monitored and controlled, and the method for keeping the Coast Guard abreast of site activities. Schedule shall include base bid items and option item. *For evaluation purposes only, develop concept schedule with a start date of November 01, 2016. THIS DATE IS NOT AN ESTIMATE AWARD DATE.

• Technical Approach. Project design and construction approach for the project in Astoria, Oregon.

Clearly address architectural / mechanical / sustainability design, weather resistant features, and associated site work to display full understanding of project scope. Include performance elements, including exterior envelope, energy considerations, maintenance considerations, and the approach to achieve LEED for Homes Silver certification.Provide a description of the Contractor’s method to achieve LEED Silver rating for housing. Provide a draft LEED checklist describing each credit which will be achieved, and its applicability to the project. Discuss performance elements, including exterior envelope, energy considerations, and maintenance considerations. Discuss innovative, creative, or cost saving technical proposals (without identifying actual costs in the technical proposal). Higher ratings may be received for innovative, creative, or cost saving technical proposals (without identifying actual costs in the technical proposal).

Drawings:

• Provide floor plans of all proposed units and, at minimum, front elevations of each building type. Higher ratings may be received for designs that closely match existing Astoria Family Housing structures.

• Provide a drawing of the proposed exterior wall section, including head, jamb, and sill details of window openings. Details shall include weather resistant components and final trim/siding interface.

Factor 2: Project Organization and Management Capabilities

Submittal requirements:

Narrative:

• Provide a narrative describing the project organization, its management capabilities, its commitment to the project requirements, and its ability to execute a quality control plan. Describe the management and quality control experience on two projects of similar size and scope to this one (i.e., new wood frame construction). A higher rating may be given for projects performed that received a LEED silver rating or higher. Submit location, owner, dollar value of performed work, and contact information.

Sufficient information shall be provided in order for the Government to evaluate the narrative in accordance with the stated evaluation criteria/factors.

Organizational Chart:

• The organizational chart shall be of sufficient detail to provide a clear picture of the project organization, showing all key personnel and their relationships to one another. It shall also indicate lines of authority for the QA/QC program that avoid conflicts of interest.

Factor 3: Past Performance

Submittal requirements:

• Submit only three (3) projects of similar size, scope, and complexity to this project completed within the last six (6) years. Similar size, scope and complexity means projects of similar area/volume, construction type, functional use, and/or logistically challenging. If no Construction Contractor Appraisal Support System (CCASS) or Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) evaluation exists for the projects submitted for this proposal, the attached Past Performance Questionnaire may be used.

Forms similar to the one attached used for other agencies may also be used. Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) shall be from the Prime Contractor. Two of these three projects shall be the same as the Prime Contractor’s relevant past project experience submitted for Factor 2.

Provide contact information including name, email address and phone number corresponding to each PPQ submitted. Provide period of performance, name of agency/company, title of contract, name, address and current telephone number of contract administrator/contracting officer.

L.9 VOLUME II – PRICE PROPOSAL PREPARATION

1. Price.

The price proposal shall consist of the following solicitation/contract section:

• Section A: Solicitation/Contract Form (SF 1442). Offerors shall complete blocks 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20a, b and c.

• Section B: Supplies or Services and Prices/Costs. Total lump sum proposal price.

• Section K: Representations, Certifications and Other Statements of Offerors. This section shall be completed by the Offerors and submitted with the proposal.

• Proof of current VETS-100.

L.10 VOLUME III – ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST

1. Offerors shall submit Organizational Conflict of Interest Information and an Organizational Conflict of Interest Mitigation Plan, if Offeror proposes to use Tetra-Tech subcontractors (O’Brien & Associates;

OTAK Inc; Shannon & Wilson; Sparling; and Wood Harbinger) either as a Joint Venture partner or as a subcontractor.

a. The Organizational Conflict of Interest Information shall identify:

1. The extent to which the potential subcontractor provided input into the specification requirement for its particular discipline and for the overall specification.

2. The extent to which the potential subcontractor has provided input into answering the RFIs for this solicitation.

3. The extent to which the potential subcontractor is expected to provide input into Tetratech’s obligation to provide construction support services and field support services.

4. The documents/information that the prospective subcontractor has access to because of its performance as a subcontractor for Tetratech that are not available to all potential offerors.

b. The OCI Mitigation Plan shall identify:

• The specific relationships between Prime A&E and its sub-contractors/sub-consultants (first or second tier) and the sub-contractor/sub-consultant(s) role in the RFP development that you are proposing to include on your team;

• Identify the OCI risks and your plan to mitigate them;

• Discuss organizational, physical workspace, accounting (cost estimating, labor rates), computer, communication, and personnel policy separation that will be used as an OCI mitigation tool.

• Include corporate organization chart to demonstrate effectiveness of firewalls;

• Discuss how goals and reward systems are separated between conflicting organizations;

• Discuss corporate oversight of OCI mitigation.

• Discuss experience in identifying and controlling for OCIs;

• Discuss communications network security;

• Discuss Employee OCI awareness; and

• Describe process of informing Government of additional mitigation measures, and steps to mitigate if a new conflict arises after award.

2. If Offeror DOES NOT propose to use Tetra-Tech subcontractors either as a Joint Venture partner or as subcontractors, provide a statement confirming so.

SECTION M

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

M.1 NOTICE TO OFFERORS

The Government intends to make award without discussions. Therefore, proposals should be initially submitted on the most favorable terms, from a price and technical standpoint. However, the government reserves the right to open up discussions should it be determined to be in the best interest of the government.

M.2 EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The Proposed contract will be awarded to the responsible Offeror offering the best value to the Government. It is in the best interest of the Government to consider tradeoffs between price and non-price related factors. The Government reserves the right to award to other than the lowest priced Offeror. The total evaluated price shall consist of the Base Items, and Option Item. In selecting the best overall offer, the Government will consider the value of each offer terms of the evaluated technical quality offered for the price. Offerors are cautioned that the government intends to elect to award the contract without discussions; therefore, initial proposals should represent the best possible effort. To make a determination, the Government shall evaluate each offeror on the following criteria:

Factor 1, Means and Methods is more important than Factor 2, Project Organization and Management Capabilities which is more important than Factor 3, Past Performance. All evaluation factors other than Price, when combined, are approximately equal to Price.

1. Technical

M.4 EVALUATION OF ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND ORGANIZATIONAL

CONFLICT OF INTEREST MITIGATION PLANS.

In determining whether this contract can be awarded to an offeror, the Government will determine whether an Organizational Conflict of Interest exists and, if so, whether it has been or can be successfully mitigated. In making this determination, the Government will consider the offeror’s submissions, its analysis of the design-build contract requirements, and its knowledge of the subcontractors’ input into this solicitation. The Mitigation Plan will be evaluated for its practicality and reasonableness in mitigating the OCI. The Government will make its determination in accordance with the standard stated in FAR Subpart 9.5 Organizational and Consultant Conflicts of Interest, HSAR Subpart 3009.5, Organizational Conflicts of Interest, and applicable case law.

Factor 1: Means and Methods

Evaluation Method:

Overall, this factor shall be evaluated based on a subjective assessment of the ability of the Offeror to provide an integrated approach to project execution. Evaluation of the Means and Methods Factor will be based on the Offeror’s:

Narrative:

• Understanding of the project scope.

• Understanding of design complexity.

• Understanding of construction activities and their logistics relative to the project site.

• CapaAbility to monitor, control, and communicate the schedule the and complete the project within the proposed contract duration, recognizing seasonal constraints and permit requirements. The Government will award the contract based on contract completion within 730 calendar days after award of the contract.

• Understanding of the Easement and Permitting process to include strategy to identify and obtain both permits and surveys, and feasibility of proposed plan for coordination with the City of Astoria and local utilities for easements, utility hook-ups and rights-of-way.

• Description of how the Offeror intends to identify and manage risks associated with the project, including recognition of site constraints and weather concerns, and the proposed mitigation strategies for each risk.

• Plans to protect residents from the construction activities, and minimize the impact of noise, dust, erosion and disruption to residents.

• Technical Approach will be evaluated for o Description of features related to performance elements to include sustainability, energy conservation, durability, maintenance, LEED approach and resistance to extreme weather.

•o Higher ratings may be given for innovative, creative, or cost saving technical proposals.

• Drawings of the proposed building floor plans, elevations, and exterior wall sections, including durability of design and materials, and understanding of key performance elements required to achieve high-performing housing in Astoria.

Drawings:

• Proposed building floor plans and front elevations will be evaluated to ensure that they reflect the minimum and maximum standards as established in the specifications (Section 01800, 1.1.1.1 Space Requirements, and Appendix A). Elevations will also be compared to the existing Astoria Housing exteriors).

• The drawing for exterior wall section will be evaluated for durability and demonstration of understanding of the requirement in accordance with the specifications/drawings; including head, jamb, and sill details of window opening, and weather resistant components and final trim/siding interface.

Factor 2: Project Organization and Management Capabilities

• Overall in this factor the Government will evaluate the Offeror’s proposal related to the quality and depth of project organizational experience, and on the ability of the Offeror to provide an integrated approach to project execution.

• The narrative will be evaluated on the quality and depth of experience, as it relates to the size, scope, and complexity of this project, as well as against industry practice and RFP requirements. Relevant projects will be evaluated based on their similarity to the proposed work.

• The organizational chart will be evaluated for lines of authority, span of control, and risk.

Factor 3: Past Performance

• The Government will evaluate the quality and extent of the Offeror’s past performance as it relates to this project in similar size, scope and complexity performed within the last six (6) years. Similar size, scope and complexity means projects of similar area/volume, construction type, functional use, and/or logistically challenging. Projects submitted outside these parameters, may be assigned lower ratings. The Government will use information submitted by the Offeror and other sources such as PPIRS and/or other Federal Government offices and commercial sources, to assess past performance. A higher rating may be given for projects performed that received a LEED silver rating or higher. Past performance will be evaluated in accordance with FAR 15.305(a)(2). In accordance with FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv) an Offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, shall receive a rating of neutral.

• Only the first three Past Performance Questionnaires submitted by the Offeror will be evaluated;

additional questionnaires submitted by the Offeror will not be considered.

2. Price

Price Evaluation:

The total evaluated price shall consist of the Base Items plus Option Item as shown in Section B, Supplies or Services and Price/Costs.

The Government may use various price analysis techniques and procedures to evaluate the overall price. Examples of such techniques include, but are not limited to the following:

1. Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the solicitation.

2. Comparison of proposed prices with independent Government cost estimates.

3. Comparison of proposed prices with prices obtained through market research for the same or similar items.

4. Analysis of data other than certified cost or pricing data provided by the Offeror if requested by the

Government.

M.3 EVALUATION OF ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND ORGANIZATIONAL

CONFLICT OF INTEREST MITIGATION PLANS.

In determining whether this contract can be awarded to an offeror, the Government will determine whether an Organizational Conflict of Interest exists and, if so, whether it has been or can be successfully mitigated. In making this determination, the Government will consider the offeror’s submissions, its analysis of the design-build contract requirements, and its knowledge of the subcontractors’ input into this solicitation. The Mitigation Plan will be evaluated for its practicality and reasonableness in mitigating the OCI. The Government will make its determination in accordance with the standard stated in FAR Subpart 9.5 Organizational and Consultant Conflicts of Interest, HSAR Subpart 3009.5, Organizational Conflicts of Interest, and applicable case law.

Male Head Female Head

Locker Room

Conference Room

Three person office

Secured Storage

CPO Office

Waiting Area

LHO Office

Kitchen Area

Carpentry Shop

C o r r i d o r

Electrical shop

Storage Area

Desk

Desk

Desk Desk

Desk

Desk

FILES

Entrance

Shop Entrance

Deep Sink

Bench Bench

Mechanical Room

Storage Entrance

Doors

Comp Room

Toilets

50’

100’

40’ 16’ 12’ 10’ 10’ 14’

42’

1” = 8’

Chair

Desk

Sink

Locker

Shower Shower

Computer

TV

Storage shelves

Windows

Carpentry 4 Male Heads 1 Female Head 1 Conference 3 LHO Office 1 Waiting area 1 Three person 4 Electrical 1

No Windows in storage area

Storage shelves

4’

MMcAll Text Box Shop entrance door and storage entrance door shall be min 10'-0" roll-up doors lockable from the inside and both motor and chain operated.

All other man doors shown will have door closers and kick plates on both sides.

MMcAll Text Box Doors

MMcAll Line

MMcAll Line

MMcAll Line

MMcAll Line

MMcAll Line

MMcAll Line

MMcAll Line

MMcAll Line

MMcAll Text Box Provide additional doors on exterior as needed for exiting requirements

MMcAll Text Box In addition to the outlets required in the RFP provide 8 recessed flush mounted duplex 20 amp 120 v floor outlets with covers in the carpentry shop area. Recessed outlet boxes must be traffic rated. Floor out lets must be on 4 separate circuits and disconnect with the 1 power off button for all outlets within this space.

MMcAll Text Box Provide 230v 60 amp breaker and outlet for welder and provide exhaust system.

MMcAll Line

MMcAll Text Box Double door

MMcAll Line

MMcAll Text Box provide a minimum of 1 exterior hydrant centered on each face of the building.

MMcAll Text Box provide expanded metal lockable cage full hieght wall and door

MMcAll Line

MMcAll Line

MMcAll Line

MMcAll Line

MMcAll Text Box

REVISED MAINTENANCE FLOOR PLAN DATED 3-21-16

MMcAll Text Box Provide flush mounted 2 duplex 20am 120 volt floor boxes in center of the Conference room in addition to other outlet requirements.

MMcAll Text Box Furnish and install overhead air distribution system and 2 retractable air hose systems with 50" of hose on each. Space reels 20 feet apart from the center of Carpenter shop. Provide piping to each of the compressed air points of connections shown.

MMcAll Oval

MMcAll Oval

MMcAll Oval

MMcAll Oval

MMcAll Oval

MMcAll Oval

MMcAll Oval

MMcAll Oval

MMcAll Text Box Compressed air point of connection

MMcAll Line

MMcAll Line

MMcAll Line

MMcAll Line

MMcAll Line

MMcAll Text Box Provide new two lane ac paved road to new maintenance building. Install road and provide lighting curbs gutters and sidewalks as required to meet State DOT and City of Astoria standards. Provide and stripping, wheel stops and parking spaces for 10 vehicles (9' x18' spaces min). Delivery truck can be assumed to back in for large loads. Provide K rail barrier at edge of road and parking area where necessary to keep vehicles from leaving paved area.

Insure access to existing office and garages remains usable during and after completion of new facility.

locate maintenance building in general area shown .adjust grades as necessary to provide parking and roads. demolish existing playground shown under new maintenance facility entirely. Provide bollards by all roll-up doors Provide a dumpster pad at least 8'x 12' Coordinate and pay for any utility connections directly with the utility provider and or City of Astoria.

MMcAll Text Box

REVISE MAINTENANCE BUILDING CONCEPT

SITE PLAN. Dated 3-21-16