25QE044_Attachment_8_AMD 0001_PPQ.docx
DOCX document 85 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- HE125425QE044
- Issued by
-
Department of Defense Education Activity
About this file
This document is a Present and Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) for a K-12 Visual Arts Resource and Professional Learning Platform contract solicited by the Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA). The PPQ is part of solicitation HE125425QE044, which seeks a single Firm-Fixed Price Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract with a potential 5-year period consisting of a one-year base period and four one-year option periods, plus an additional 6-month service extension.
The questionnaire is designed to collect performance evaluation information from previous customers, with seven rating categories covering contractor performance aspects such as contract deliverable compliance, business practices, overall performance, resource quality, communication, and potential for future service procurement. Respondents can rate performance levels from Poor/Unsatisfactory to Excellent using a standardized evaluation key. The completed questionnaire should be submitted via email to the DoDEA contracting specialists Adwoa Essel-Akoli and Duke Santos at their specified email addresses in Alexandria, VA.
View the file
Other files
Show all 17
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) Source Selection Information - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
HE125425QE044 Attachment 2
PRESENT AND PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
This Questionnaire Pertains to: Viisual Arts Resource and Professional Learning Platform
The Offeror must complete the “To be completed by Offeror” section prior to sending the PPQ to the Offeror’s Reference/Customer. The Offeror’s Reference/Customer must complete the PPQ’s evaluation section and return the completed PPQ via e-mail to the attention of:
Department of Defense Education Activity Attn: Contract Specialist: Ms. Adwoa Essel-Akoli Contracting Officer: Mr Duke Santos 4800 Mark Center Drive, 5th Floor, Suite #05H02-10 Alexandria, VA 22350 E-Mail: Adwoa.Essel-Akoli@dodea.edu E-Mail: Dukes.Santos@dodea.edu
This information section is to be completed by the Offeror.
| Contractor Information: | |
| Firm Name: Click or tap here to enter text. | N/CAGE Code: Click or tap here to enter text. |
| Address: Click or tap here to enter text. | Unique Entity ID: Click or tap here to enter text. |
| Phone Number: Click or tap here to enter text. | Email Address: Click or tap here to enter text. |
| Point of Contact: Click or tap here to enter text. | Point of Contact Number: Click or tap here to enter text. |
Work Performed as: ☐Prime Contractor ☐Subcontractor ☐Joint Venture ☐Other (Explain)
Percent of project work performed: Click or tap here to enter text.
If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #): Click or tap here to enter text.
| Reference Information: | |
| Business Name of Reference: | Address: Click or tap here to enter text. |
Click or tap here to enter text.
| Phone Number: Click or tap here to enter text. | Email Address: Click or tap here to enter text. |
| Point of Contact: Click or tap here to enter text. | Point of Contact Number: Click or tap here to enter text. |
Contract Number: Click or tap here to enter text. Final Contract Value: Click or tap here to enter text.
Contract Type: ☐Firm Fixed Price ☐Cost Reimbursement ☐Other (Explain)
Period of Performance: Click or tap here to enter text.
Present and Past Performance Questionnaire
Source Selection Information1 - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
HE125425QE044 Attachment 2
This evaluation section is to be completed by the Offeror’s customer.
Evaluation KEY: Please use the following abbreviations to assign an applicable rating for questions 1 thru 6 below:
| P/U |
| S |
| G |
| VG |
| E |
| N |
| Poor/Unsatisfactory |
| Satisfactory |
| Good |
| Very Good |
| Excellent |
| Neutral/N/A |
| Does not meet minimum acceptable standards in one or more areas; remedial action required in one or more areas; deficiencies in one or more areas which adversely affect overall performance. |
| Meets or slightly exceeds minimum acceptable standards; adequate results; reportable deficiencies with identifiable, but not substantial, effects on overall performance. |
| Effective performance; fully responsive to contract requirements; reportable deficiencies, but with little identifiable effect on overall performance. |
| Very effective performance; fully responsive to contract requirements; contract requirements accomplished in a timely, efficient, and economical manner for the most part; only minor deficiencies with minimal effect on overall performance. |
| Of exceptional merit; exemplary performance in a timely, efficient, and economical manner; very minor (if any) deficiencies with no adverse effect on overall performance. |
| No record of relevant past performance or past performance information is not available. |
1. How would you rate the Contractor’s compliance with the delivery of contract deliverables or contract requirements? Comments:
| P ☐ |
| S☐ |
| G☐ |
| VG☐ |
| E☐ |
| N☐ |
2. How would you rate the Contractor’s business practices(e.g. maintaining a positive working relationship, business ethics, timely and effectively resolution of any problems)? Comments:
| P ☐ |
| S☐ |
| G☐ |
| VG☐ |
| E☐ |
| N☐ |
3. How would you rate the Contractor’s overall performance? Comments:
| P ☐ |
| S☐ |
| G☐ |
| VG☐ |
| E☐ |
| N☐ |
4. How would you rate the vendor’s record of conforming to contract requirements and to standards of good quality of their resources and services provided?Comments:
| P ☐ |
| S☐ |
| G☐ |
| VG☐ |
| E☐ |
| N☐ |
5. Would you purchase services/supply from this vender again? Comments:
| P ☐ |
| S☐ |
| G☐ |
| VG☐ |
| E☐ |
| N☐ |
6. How would you rate the Contractor’s performance in providing timely and accurate reports and other contract deliverables? Comments:
| P ☐ |
| S☐ |
| G☐ |
| VG☐ |
| E☐ |
| N☐ |
7. How would you rate the Contractor’s communication? Have they communicated issues as necessary to ensure all stakeholders were informed? Comments:
| P ☐ |
| S☐ |
| G☐ |
| VG☐ |
| E☐ |
| N☐ |
HE125425QE044 Attachment 2
Explain any problems and resolutions.
Brief Description of Effort to include relevancy to the solicitation requirements of the RFP.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .