HDTRA1-07-R-0004Questions-Answers14Sep07.pdf

Question Response

1. Reference Section L.6.4.1, Assumptions, Optional Work, Page 4 of Amendment No 1- The Matrix of Work Planned for BTRIC Task Order 1 attached to Amendment 2 added a second MORU on Page 4 of the Optional Work not reflected in the Assumptions issued under Amendment No.1.

Accordingly, please clarify how many MORU’s need to be priced in the cost proposal?

There is only one MORU.

The one MORU listed in L.6.4.1.1.g. and the one MORU listed in the matrix are the same.

2.

The response to questions just released on 9 September notes the matrix "displays previously provided information," and again "DTRA is merely supplementing this section with a restatement of the same information provided previously."

Since this is the first time we have seen a list of EMS locations by city, we are concerned that we apparently missed that and perhaps other important data. Can you point us to where this information was provided previously?

The matrix only attached city names to what was previously referred to in section L as locations H-1 through H-25.

3.

The matrix sent with Amendment 02 adds one MORU (see "Optional Work") not in Section L from Amendment 01.

The matrix sent with Amendment 02 does not include the Optional CRL that is listed in Section L from Amendment 01.

1. There is only one MORU. The one MORU listed in L.6.4.1.1.g. and the one MORU listed in the matrix are the same.

2. The Human only CRL information included in section L.6.4.1.2.a is correct and should have been included in the

Barring any further guidance, we will assume the additions are valid and the deletion is not -- just wanted to let you know of the discrepancies in case they hadn't already been brought to your attention.

matrix. The matrix has been revised to include this information.