HDTRA1-07-R-0004ATTACHMENT6BTRICL-1L-2Questionnaires.doc
DOC document 217 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Biological Threat Reduction Integration Contracts (BTRIC) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- HDTRA1-07-R-0004
- Issued by
- Defense Threat Reduction Agency
About this file
L1 and L2 Past Performance Questionnaires
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 33
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 6 L - 1: PRESENT AND PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
SOLICITATION NUMBER – DTRA (HDTRA1-07-R-0004)
Provide the information requested in this form for each contract being described. Provide concise comments regarding the Offeror’s performance on the identified contracts. Provide a separate completed form for each contract submitted. Limit the number of past efforts submitted and the length of each submission to the limitations set forth in paragraph 3.1 and Table 1-2 of this section.
A.
Offeror Name (Company/Division):
CAGE Code:
DUNS Number:
(NOTE: If the company or division performing this effort is different than the Offeror or the relevance of this effort to the current acquisition is impacted by any company/corporate organizational change, note those changes. Refer to the “Organizational Structure Change History” provided as part of the Relevant Present and Past Performance Volume.)
B.
Contract Title:
C.
Contract Specifics:
1. Contracting Agency or Customer:
2. Contract Number:
3. Contract Type:
4. Period of Performance:
5. Original Contract $ Value:
(Do not include unexercised options)
6. Current Contract $ Value:
(Do not include unexercised options)
7. If the amounts for 5 and 6 above are different, provide a brief description of the reason:
D.
Brief Description of Effort as ___Prime or ___Subcontractor
(Please highlight portions considered most relevant to current acquisition)
E.
Completion Date:
1. Original Date:
2. Current Schedule:
3. Estimate at Completion:
4. Causes of any change:
F.
Primary Customer Points of Contact:
(For Government contracts, provide current information on all three individuals. For commercial contracts, provide points of contact fulfilling these same roles.)
1. Program Manager:
Name
Office
Address_________________________________
Telephone_________________________________
Fax
2. Contracting Officer:
3. Administrative
Contracting Officer
G. Address any technical (or other) area about this contract or program considered directly applicable to BTRP objectives. Explain what aspects of the contracts are deemed relevant to the proposed effort, and to what aspects of the proposed effort they relate. Categorize the relevant information into the areas delineated BTRIC SOO.
H. For each of the applicable sub-factors under the Mission Capability factor in Section M, illustrate how the Offeror’s experience on the contract or program applies to that sub-factor.
I. Specify, by name, any key individual(s) who participated in this program and are proposed to support the BTRIC and their role contractual role.
J. Describe the nature or portion of the work on the proposed effort to be performed by the business entity being reported here. Also, estimate the percentage of the total proposed effort to be performed by this entity and whether this entity will be performing as the prime, subcontractor, or a corporate division related to the prime (define relationship).
K. Discuss the number and severity of problems in the referenced contract and the effectiveness of corrective actions taken to resolve the problems.
L. Describe any past or present litigation or administrative proceedings pertaining to the referenced contract, including the results if the proceedings are complete or the current status if the proceedings are on-going.
ATTACHMENT 6 L - 2: PRESENT AND PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SOLICITATION NUMBER – DTRA (HDTRA1-07-R-0004)
Please complete this questionnaire. Handwritten responses are sufficient. If more space is needed, please attach additional pages or write on the back. However, include only relevant information. Responses will be treated as source selection sensitive information. This information shall be submitted no later than the proposal due date.
Email PDF version to: BTRIC_INFO@dtra.mil.
Background Information (for person filling out the survey):
| Name: |
| Rank and Service, if Military: |
| Title: |
| Organization: |
| Phone (commercial, not DSN): |
| FAX: |
| e-mail Address: |
| Dates of Involvement |
From:
To:
Mailing Address:
Contract Information (for the contract involved):
| Company Being Rated: |
| Contract Number: |
| Division, if any: |
| Total Contract Value: $ |
| Brief Description of Work: |
| Complete |
formcheckbox
Ongoing formcheckbox
| Award date: |
| Period of Performance: |
| Cost: |
| Negotiated price or cost at award |
| Current estimated contract dollar amount: |
Below Estimate formcheckbox
On
Target formcheckbox
Above Estimate formcheckbox by
| Schedule: |
| Behind |
formcheckbox
On formcheckbox
Ahead formcheckbox by months
| Signature: |
| Date: |
Based on your knowledge of the contract identified above, please provide your assessment of how well the contractor performed on each of the following topics. Only performance in the past five years is relevant. (Please check the appropriate rating and comment on all responses other than those rated Satisfactory or N/A)
Rating Definitions
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
| Indicates performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded many requirements and many requirements to the Government’s benefit. Area of evaluation contains few minor problems for which corrective action(s) taken by the contractor appear/were highly effective |
| Indicates performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded some requirements to the Government’s benefit. Area of evaluation contains few minor problems for which corrective action taken by the contractor appear/were effective |
| Indicates performance meets/met contractual requirements. The area of evaluation contains some minor problems for which the corrective actions taken by the contractor appear/were satisfactory |
| Indicates performance meets/met contractual requirements. The area of evaluation contains serious problem(s) for which corrective actions to be taken by the contractor has/have not yet been identified, or appear only marginally effective, or have not been fully implemented |
| Indicates the contractor is in danger of not being able to satisfy contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The area of evaluation contains serious problems for which the corrective actions either taken or to be taken by the contractor appear ineffective |
| Performance is this area is not applicable to the assessed effort. Unable to provide a score. |
A. MANAGEMENT
1.
Ability of the contractor to manage its teaming and subcontractor relationships formcheckbox Exceptional (Please Comment) formcheckbox Very Good
(Please Comment) formcheckbox Satisfactory formcheckbox Marginal (Please Comment) formcheckbox Unsatisfactory (Please Comment) formcheckbox Not Applicable
Comment:
2.
Effectiveness of the contractor’s business relationships with customers and other official participants in a task formcheckbox Exceptional (Please Comment) formcheckbox Very Good
(Please Comment) formcheckbox Satisfactory formcheckbox Marginal (Please Comment) formcheckbox Unsatisfactory (Please Comment) formcheckbox
Comment:
3.
Qualifications of contractor key management personnel with respect to international project management.
formcheckbox Exceptional (Please Comment) formcheckbox Very Good
(Please Comment) formcheckbox Satisfactory formcheckbox Marginal (Please Comment) formcheckbox Unsatisfactory (Please Comment) formcheckbox
Comment:
4. Ability of the contractor to integrate the activities of multiple government and non-government, foreign and domestic entities to accomplish a task.
formcheckbox Exceptional (Please Comment) formcheckbox Very Good
(Please Comment) formcheckbox Satisfactory formcheckbox Marginal (Please Comment) formcheckbox Unsatisfactory (Please Comment) formcheckbox
Comment:
5.
Ability of the contractor to plan and implement a cost effective personnel plan that provides the optimal mix of U.S. based versus in-country activity, foreign nationals, ex-patriots, and U.S. contractor support.
formcheckbox Exceptional (Please Comment) formcheckbox Very Good
(Please Comment) formcheckbox Satisfactory formcheckbox Marginal (Please Comment) formcheckbox Unsatisfactory (Please Comment) formcheckbox
Comment:
6. Ability to implement appropriate initial and sustaining training and logistics required to accomplish the project.
formcheckbox Exceptional (Please Comment) formcheckbox Very Good
(Please Comment) formcheckbox Satisfactory formcheckbox Marginal (Please Comment) formcheckbox Unsatisfactory (Please Comment) formcheckbox
Comment:
7.
Ability of the contractor to identify risks, solve problems and incorporate lessons learned formcheckbox Exceptional (Please Comment) formcheckbox Very Good
(Please Comment) formcheckbox Satisfactory formcheckbox Marginal (Please Comment) formcheckbox Unsatisfactory (Please Comment) formcheckbox
Comment:
8.
Ability of the contractor to effectively use the Earned Value Management System.
formcheckbox Exceptional (Please Comment) formcheckbox Very Good
(Please Comment) formcheckbox Satisfactory formcheckbox Marginal (Please Comment) formcheckbox Unsatisfactory (Please Comment) formcheckbox
Comment:
9.
Ability to develop and manage the Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) and/or Integrated Master Plan (IMP) formcheckbox Exceptional (Please Comment) formcheckbox Very Good
(Please Comment) formcheckbox Satisfactory formcheckbox Marginal (Please Comment) formcheckbox Unsatisfactory (Please Comment) formcheckbox
Comment:
10.
Ability of the contractor to complete work according to the agreed-to schedule or identify, correct, and communicate causes of any schedule variances.
formcheckbox Exceptional (Please Comment) formcheckbox Very Good
(Please Comment) formcheckbox Satisfactory formcheckbox Marginal (Please Comment) formcheckbox Unsatisfactory (Please Comment) formcheckbox
Comment:
B. TECHNICAL
1. Ability of the contractor to understand project technical requirements to include biological safety and security requirements.
formcheckbox Exceptional (Please Comment) formcheckbox Very Good
(Please Comment) formcheckbox Satisfactory formcheckbox Marginal (Please Comment) formcheckbox Unsatisfactory (Please Comment) formcheckbox
Comment:
2. Ability to access and address the end user's (i.e. recipient state) requirements.
formcheckbox Exceptional (Please Comment) formcheckbox Very Good
(Please Comment) formcheckbox Satisfactory formcheckbox Marginal (Please Comment) formcheckbox Unsatisfactory (Please Comment) formcheckbox
Comment:
3.
The quality of the product/service.
formcheckbox Exceptional (Please Comment) formcheckbox Very Good
(Please Comment) formcheckbox Satisfactory formcheckbox Marginal (Please Comment) formcheckbox Unsatisfactory (Please Comment) formcheckbox
Comment:
4.
The effectiveness of the contractor's solutions to complex technical problems.
formcheckbox Exceptional (Please Comment) formcheckbox Very Good
(Please Comment) formcheckbox Satisfactory formcheckbox Marginal (Please Comment) formcheckbox Unsatisfactory (Please Comment) formcheckbox
Comment:
5.
The quality of technical reports. Were conclusions and findings supportable by analytical data, free of technical errors, concise, and organized satisfactorily?
formcheckbox Exceptional (Please Comment) formcheckbox Very Good
(Please Comment) formcheckbox Satisfactory formcheckbox Marginal (Please Comment) formcheckbox Unsatisfactory (Please Comment) formcheckbox
Comment:
6.
Ability to implement the systems engineering process.
formcheckbox Exceptional (Please Comment) formcheckbox Very Good
(Please Comment) formcheckbox Satisfactory formcheckbox Marginal (Please Comment) formcheckbox Unsatisfactory (Please Comment) formcheckbox
Comment:
7.
Ability to plan for and provide integrated logistics support formcheckbox Exceptional (Please Comment) formcheckbox Very Good
(Please Comment) formcheckbox Satisfactory formcheckbox Marginal (Please Comment) formcheckbox Unsatisfactory (Please Comment) formcheckbox
Comment:
8.
Ability to identify and execute system test and evaluation requirements.
formcheckbox Exceptional (Please Comment) formcheckbox Very Good
(Please Comment) formcheckbox Satisfactory formcheckbox Marginal (Please Comment) formcheckbox Unsatisfactory (Please Comment) formcheckbox
Comment:
C. FOREIGN OPERATIONS
1. Overall relationships with recipient state Government agencies, contractors, and communities formcheckbox Exceptional (Please Comment) formcheckbox Very Good
(Please Comment) formcheckbox Satisfactory formcheckbox Marginal (Please Comment) formcheckbox Unsatisfactory (Please Comment) formcheckbox
Comment:
2.
Ability of the contractor to interface with recipient state Government agencies, contractors, mission area planners, and operators on safety and environmental matters.
formcheckbox Exceptional (Please Comment) formcheckbox Very Good
(Please Comment) formcheckbox Satisfactory formcheckbox Marginal (Please Comment) formcheckbox Unsatisfactory (Please Comment) formcheckbox
Comment:
3.
Ability to apply policy and practices for specific projects.
formcheckbox Exceptional (Please Comment) formcheckbox Very Good
(Please Comment) formcheckbox Satisfactory formcheckbox Marginal (Please Comment) formcheckbox Unsatisfactory (Please Comment) formcheckbox
Comment:
4.
Ability of the contractor to identify, access, and mitigate safety risks that would include transportation, handling, and disposal requirements of hazardous materials and wastes.
formcheckbox Exceptional (Please Comment) formcheckbox Very Good
(Please Comment) formcheckbox Satisfactory formcheckbox Marginal (Please Comment) formcheckbox Unsatisfactory (Please Comment) formcheckbox
Comment:
Ability of the contractor to obtain licenses and permits for operations and construction formcheckbox Exceptional (Please Comment) formcheckbox Satisfactory formcheckbox Marginal (Please Comment) formcheckbox Unsatisfactory (Please Comment) formcheckbox
Comment:
6.
Ability of the contractor to provide required workforce support (e.g., good lodging, transportation, safety, medical, and legal services) formcheckbox Exceptional (Please Comment) formcheckbox Very Good
(Please Comment) formcheckbox Satisfactory formcheckbox Marginal (Please Comment) formcheckbox Unsatisfactory (Please Comment) formcheckbox
Comment:
7.
Ability of the contractor to operate in multiple cultures formcheckbox Exceptional (Please Comment) formcheckbox Very Good
(Please Comment) formcheckbox Satisfactory formcheckbox Marginal (Please Comment) formcheckbox Unsatisfactory (Please Comment) formcheckbox
Comment:
D. COST
1. Ability of the contractor to complete work within the negotiated price/cost. Describe the reasons for changes to contract value (e.g., scope changes, overrun/underrun, Government-imposed schedule changes) formcheckbox Exceptional (Please Comment) formcheckbox Very Good
(Please Comment) formcheckbox Satisfactory formcheckbox Marginal (Please Comment) formcheckbox Unsatisfactory (Please Comment) formcheckbox
Comment:
2 Ability of the contractor to achieve cost reductions in on-going projects.
formcheckbox Exceptional (Please Comment) formcheckbox Very Good
(Please Comment) formcheckbox Satisfactory formcheckbox Marginal (Please Comment) formcheckbox Unsatisfactory (Please Comment) formcheckbox
Comment:
3. Ability of the contractor to deliver accurate and timely cost reporting.
formcheckbox Exceptional (Please Comment) formcheckbox Very Good
(Please Comment) formcheckbox Satisfactory formcheckbox Marginal (Please Comment) formcheckbox Unsatisfactory (Please Comment) formcheckbox
Comment:
Performance Survey
The foregoing inquiry should have allowed you to provide us with a reasonable assessment of the way in which the subject contractor has performed on recent contracts. The following questions are intended to allow you an opportunity to expand on your evaluation and provide us with a more comprehensive understanding of company performance.
PROGRAM EXECUTION
1. Were Contractors responsive to requests for proposed task orders?
2. If changes were required, what were the reasons and how did it affect cost?
OVERALL
1. What is your overall rating of the contractor’s performance?
2. Knowing what you do today, would you award this contract to this contractor again?
Yes formcheckbox No formcheckbox
3. Identify the contractor’s overall strengths and weaknesses.
4. Are you aware of any other contracted efforts performed by this contractor similar in nature to this contract? Please identify contract, program, and point of contact.
5. Is there anyone else we should send this questionnaire to? Please identify by name, organization, phone number, or email address.
6. If you have any other comments that you would like to make (e.g. especially noteworthy performance, how to improve this survey, etc.) include them here also. Continue on another sheet, if necessary.
08/02/07 11:36 AM
HDTRA1-07-R-0004
Attachment Number L-1
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .