H9240318R0001_Amendment_01.docx

H9240318R0001

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 16-Jul-2018 04:00 PM to 29-Aug-2018 04:00 PM.

The following have been modified:

DESCRIPTION

General Description This RFP is for a seven year Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract with Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Contract Line Items (CLINS). In order to satisfy the minimum guarantee, an order of $150,000.00 will be placed at the time of award. There are NO orders guaranteed above the stated minimum. The maximum contract value is $95,000,000.00, which may consist of any combination of CLINs and quantities.

To facilitate Delivery Order execution, the variations of the items listed in the solicitation (CLINs 1001-2029) are included within Attachment 05 Total Evaluated Price (TEP) Spreadsheet.

5-Year Basic Ordering Period Year 1 Ordering Period: 2018 – 2019 (actual date based on date of contract award) Year 2 Ordering Period: 2019 – 2020 Year 3 Ordering Period: 2020 – 2021 Year 4 Ordering Period: 2021 – 2022 Year 5 Ordering Period: 2022 – 2023

Option 2-Year Ordering Period Year 6 Ordering Period: 2023 – 2024 Year 7 Ordering Period: 2024 – 2025

SECTION E - INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

The Acceptance/Inspection Schedule for CLIN 1005 has been changed from:

To:

The Acceptance/Inspection Schedule for CLIN 1022 has been changed from:

The Acceptance/Inspection Schedule for CLIN 2005 has been changed from:

The Acceptance/Inspection Schedule for CLIN 2022 has been changed from:

SECTION F - DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE

52.211-9 DESIRED AND REQUIRED TIME OF DELIVERY (JUN 1997)

(a) The Government desires delivery to be made according to the following schedule:

DESIRED DELIVERY SCHEDULE

UIC: H92231

HQ USSOCOM SOFSA

SPEAR WAREHOUSE MGR

BLDG 221, DOOR 12

LEXINGTON, KY 40516-9723

FOB: DESTINATION

X001 - X029 AOR1 and AOR2 Helmet Covers (AOR1 and AOR2 helmet covers have a required delivery of 60 days.

HQ USSOCOM SOFSA

SPEAR WAREHOUSE MGR

BLDG 221, DOOR 12

LEXINGTON, KY 40516-9723

FOB: DESTINATION

Offers that propose delivery of a quantity under such terms or conditions that delivery will not clearly fall within the applicable required delivery period specified above, will be considered nonresponsive and rejected. If the offeror proposes no other delivery schedule, the desired delivery schedule above will apply.

REQUIRED DELIVERY SCHEDULE

UIC: H92231

SPEAR WAREHOUSE MGR

BLDG 221, DOOR 12

LEXINGTON, KY 40516-9723

FOB: DESTINATION

X001 - X029 AOR1 and AOR2 Helmet Covers (AOR1 and AOR2 helmet covers have a required delivery of 60 days.

UIC: H92231

HQ USSOCOM SOFSA

SPEAR WAREHOUSE MGR

BLDG 221, DOOR 12

LEXINGTON, KY 40516-9723

If the offeror is unable to meet the desired delivery schedule, it may, without prejudicing evaluation of its offer, propose a delivery schedule below. However, the offeror's proposed delivery schedule must not extend the delivery period beyond the time for delivery in the Government's required delivery schedule as follows:

OFFEROR'S PROPOSED DELIVERY SCHEDULE

X001 - X029

UIC: H92231

SPEAR WAREHOUSE MGR

BLDG 221, DOOR 12

LEXINGTON, KY 40516-9723

X001 - X029

UIC: H92231

SPEAR WAREHOUSE MGR

BLDG 221, DOOR 12

LEXINGTON, KY 40516-9723

AOR1 and AOR2 Helmet Covers

(b) Attention is directed to the Contract Award provision of the solicitation that provides that a written award or acceptance of offer mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror results in a binding contract. The Government will mail or otherwise furnish to the offeror an award or notice of award not later than the day the award is dated. Therefore, the offeror shall compute the time available for performance beginning with the actual date of award, rather than the date the written notice of award is received from the Contracting Officer through the ordinary mails. However, the Government will evaluate an offer that proposes delivery based on the Contractor's date of receipt of the contract or notice of award by adding (1) five calendar days for delivery of the award through the ordinary mails, or (2) one working day if the solicitation states that the contract or notice of award will be transmitted electronically. (The term "working day" excludes weekends and U.S. Federal holidays.) If, as so computed, the offered delivery date is later than the required delivery date, the offer will be considered nonresponsive and rejected.

(End of clause)

SECTION I - CONTRACT CLAUSES

The following were previously included by reference and are now included by full text:

52.216-27 SINGLE OR MULTIPLE AWARDS. (OCT 1995)

The Government may elect to award a single delivery order contract or task order contract or to award multiple delivery order contracts or task order contracts for the same or similar supplies or services to two or more sources under this solicitation.

(End of provision)

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

TOC

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

The following have been added by full text:

SECTION

SECTION L

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS.

L.1.1 All Electronic Solicitation Release. This is an all-electronic solicitation release. No Government paper hard copies will be mailed. Amendments to the solicitation will be posted to www.fedbizopps.gov. It is the responsibility of each offeror to review the webpage for notice of amendments, updates, or changes to current information. The exclusive responsibility for the source selection will reside with the Government. Proprietary information submitted in response to this solicitation will be protected from unauthorized disclosure as required by Subsection 27 of the Office of Procurement Policy Act as amended (41 U.S.C. 423) as implemented in the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR). The proposal and corresponding program will be unclassified and treated as Source Selection Sensitive Information.

L.1.2 All proposals must be complete, self-sufficient, and respond directly to the requirements of the solicitation. Any commitments made in the proposal shall become part of the resultant contract. Any significant inconsistency, if unexplained, raises a fundamental issue of the offeror’s understanding and/or ability to perform under a contract. Mere parroting of the requirements without explanation or demonstration of how the proposal meets the Government’s requirements is unacceptable. In no case shall words like “we will comply with the requirements of the contract,” or equivalent statements, be acceptable to meet the requirements of this solicitation. Offerors are cautioned that any deficiency in any factor or subfactor of the evaluation may be grounds for exclusion of the offeror’s proposal from further consideration for award. Failure to comply with these instructions may result in an offeror’s proposal being rejected and excluded from further consideration for award.

L.1.3 Proposals must provide adequate information to enable Government evaluators to determine the offeror’s capability to meet the Government’s requirements. All submission Volumes contained in this Section L will be evaluated IAW the processes, procedures, and evaluation Factors and Subfactors set forth in Section M. Volume submission instructions prescribed in this Section L refer to the applicable evaluation criteria in Section M. All evaluation criteria set forth in Section M refers back to the applicable submission instructions in this Section L. Offerors are encouraged to thoroughly review both sections when preparing Volumes for submission.

L.1.4 Mailing Instructions for Proposals.

L.1.4.1 Hand carrying proposals is not permitted. Electronic proposals shall be clearly marked and mailed to the following address and received by the date specified in Table 1 - Proposed Contents and Instructions of Subsection L.1.7:

Re: Solicitation Number H92403-18-R-0001 7701 Tampa Point Blvd.

MacDill AFB, FL 33621-5323

L.1.4.2 Product Demonstration Models (PDMs) shall be mailed or delivered to the following address and received by the date specified in Table 1- Proposal Contents and Instructions of Subsection L.1.7:

USSOCOM/NSRDEC

PM-SOF SSES

ATTN: RDNS-SEW-PS, Nicholas Tsantinis Bldg 4, Room D017 15 General Greene Avenue Natick, MA 01760-5019

L.1.5 Page Size and Format. Format of the proposal volumes (and any resulting responses to Evaluations Notices (ENs)) shall be as follows: a page is defined as each face of a sheet of paper containing information. Page size shall be 8.5 x 11 inches, not including foldouts. Foldouts shall not exceed 11 x 17 inches and may be used only for large tables, charts, graphs, diagrams and schematics, not for pages of text. Pages shall be single spaced. Except for the reproduced sections of the solicitation document, the text size shall be no less than what is equivalent to Microsoft Word, Times New Roman, 12 point, uncompressed font. Tracking, kerning and leading values shall not be changed from the default values of the word processing or page layout software. Use at least 1 inch margins on the top and bottom and 1 inch on the side margins. Pages shall be numbered sequentially by volume. Embedded tables, charts, graphs and figures shall be used wherever practical and shall be uncomplicated and legible. For tables, graphs and figures, the text shall be no smaller than 8 point.

L.1.6 Electronic Format.

L.1.6.1 Electronic copies shall be mailed on CD-ROMs/DVDs, read-only memory. A proposal submitted in other than read-only memory format will not be evaluated. Changes, as a result of negotiations, shall be conformed on CD-ROMs/DVDs and have changed information clearly marked by a vertical line in the right margin. Modeling and Simulation data must be provided on separate CD-ROMs/DVDs and marked accordingly directly onto the media (i.e., permanent marker). These media discs must not have adhesive labels attached. All appropriate markings including those prescribed IAW FAR 52.215-1, Restriction on Disclosure and Use of Data, and 3.104, Disclosure, Protection, and Marking of Contractor's Bid or Proposal Information, Source Selection Information, and classification will be applied.

L.1.6.2 For the electronic copy, indicate on each CD-ROM/DVD the volume number and title. Use separate files to permit rapid location of all portions, including exhibits, annexes, and attachments, if any. Each volume shall be in a different directory on a CD. If files are compressed, the necessary decompression program must be included. The electronic copies of the proposal shall be submitted in a format readable by Microsoft (MS) Office Word 2007, MS Office Excel 2007, MS Office Project 2007, and MS Office Power Point 2007, pdf as applicable. Video files should not be embedded in other files. Each volume shall contain a more detailed table of contents to delineate the subparagraphs within that volume. Tab indexing shall be used to identify sections. Each volume shall contain a glossary of all abbreviations and acronyms used, with an explanation for each.

a) Submit Picture documentation in JPEG (*.jpg) or PNG (*.png) compatible format.

b) Submit Video media in Microsoft Windows Media File (*.wmv) compatible format

L.1.7 Submissions. Volumes 1, 3, 4a and 4b must contain the following information which is not included in the page count:

a) Cover and title page

b) Offeror’s name, address and Point of Contact (POC) information (name/telephone/email)

c) Solicitation number

d) Proposal volume number

e) Table of Contents: must provide sufficient detail to enable easy location of important elements

An offeror’s proposal must comply with the instructions set forth in the following table:

Table 1- Proposal Contents and Instructions

29 Aug 18 Electronic via Mail IAW L.1.3.1

29 Aug 18 Mail or Deliver IAW L.1.4.2

29 Aug 18 Electronic via Mail IAW L.1.4.2

29 Aug 18 Electronic via Mail IAW L.1.4.1 - PPQs via email IAW L.2.5.2

29 Aug 18

L.1.8 Notice of Intent (NOI). An NOI is required by each offeror that intends to submit a proposal. Only those offerors who submit an NOI will receive the solicitation attachments and may submit a proposal. Offerors may submit the NOI at any time after the release of this solicitation to gain access to the supporting documents. The date of the NOI nor the date offerors receive the solicitation attachments shall not impact the proposal due date. The NOI shall be submitted in contractor format and emailed to laura.fuller@socom.mil and stephanie.simpson@socom.mil. The NOI shall include the following:

a) Company name, cage code number, DUNS number, state of incorporation, corporate license number,

b) POC name, phone number and email to receive solicitation attachments,

c) Identify if foreign owned or a controlled company with full identification of the parent corporation,

d) Country of affiliation, and

e) Identify whether subcontractors are foreign, identify vendor, foreign country of affiliation and what constitutes the foreign content of their product(s).

L.2 Proposal Content by Volume:

L.2.1 Volume 1 – Qualifying Criteria. (Evaluated IAW M.2.1) Contents of this Volume shall contain:

L.2.1.1 Completed Standard Form (SF 33) & Attachments. (Evaluated IAW M.2.1.1) Volume 1 shall include a completed and signed copy of the Standard Form (SF) 33 to include Sections A through K with appropriate “fill-ins” completed and each amendment, if applicable, either acknowledged (SF 33 block 14) or signed and returned. With respect to Section B, offerors shall fill in all Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) pricing, however, if an offeror is proposing a four-size helmet suite, size five in the proposal shall be marked as N/A. Offerors are required to complete RFP Attachment 05, Total Evaluated Price Spreadsheet, in addition to Section B of the SF-33. The offeror shall complete the Total Evaluated Price (TEP) spreadsheet with unit prices for all sizes/ colors of all CLINs across all years. The formulas embedded within the TEP will be used to calculate the averages and summation.

L2.1.2 Exceptions to Solicitation Requirements and Consistency. (Evaluated IAW M.2.1.2) Proposals are required to meet all solicitation requirements such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to volume contents as specified in this Section L. Each exception, if taken, shall be specifically stated and related to each paragraph and/or specific part of the solicitation to which the exception is taken. Offerors shall provide rationale in support of the exception and fully explain its impact, if any, on the performance, schedule, price, and specific requirements of the solicitation. The proposal shall be consistent across all volumes (i.e., the PDMs in Volume 2 must be consistent with the technical proposal in Volume 3) and shall reflect the understanding and ability to perform according to the requirements of the contract. Any apparent inconsistency between the promised performance and price must be explained.

L.2.1.3 Small Business Subcontracting Plan (SBSP). (Evaluated IAW M.2.1.3) Small businesses are exempt from providing a SBSP IAW FAR 19.702(b)(1). Offerors other than small businesses shall submit a SBSP that complies with all 15 sections of FAR Clause 52.219-9(d) contained in the solicitation. The offeror’s SBSP submission must provide sufficient information to support the Government’s review to determine if it is acceptable. Otherwise, an offeror will be ineligible to receive the contract award.

L.2.1.4 Negotiation POC. (Evaluated IAW M.2.1.4) Offerors shall submit a list of names and telephone numbers of persons authorized to conduct negotiations.

L.2.2 Volume 2 – Product Demonstration Models (PDMs). (Evaluated IAW M.2.2) At no cost to the Government, the offeror shall submit production representative PDMs in the quantities listed below in Table 2 and Table 3. The PDMs shall be marked IAW paragraphs 3.22, 3.22.1, and 3.22.2 of Attachment 01– Performance Specification Family of Tactical Headborne Systems (FTHS) Coxswain Helmet System (PSpec). Printed instructions shall be submitted physically with each PDM and shall be IAW Section 3.21 of the PSpec. The PDMs shall be packaged IAW PSpec Section 4 with the exception that the RFP number will be used instead of the contract number and a DD Form 250 and copy of the Government production lot test approval is not required. The vendor shall also electronically submit “build sheets” detailing information on the build and layup of the PDMs including all materials, and quantities of such materials, their layup and processing parameters/conditions used in their manufacture.

Table 2: Volume 1 PDM Submission Quantities; 4-Size Suite

Size 1 Quantity

(QTY)

Size 2

QTY

Size 3

QTY

Size 4

QTY

ONE SIZE

**If Offered

Table 3: Volume 1 PDM Submission Quantities; 5-Size Suite

Size 1 Quantity

(QTY)

Size 2

QTY

Size 3

QTY

Size 4

QTY

Size 5

QTY

ONE SIZE

**If Offered

L.2.3 Volume 3 – Technical

L.2.3.1 Weight of PDMs. Submission is of PDMs IAW L.2.2 will be used for this subsection (Evaluated IAW M.2.3.1)

L.2.3.2 Technical Approach, Schedule and Production Capability/Management. (Evaluated IAW M.2.3.2) Proposals shall thoroughly discuss and demonstrate how the proposed item(s) meet the requirements of Sections 1.2, 1.2.1, 1.2.2, 1.2.3, 3.1.2, 3.1.3, 3.1.4, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 3.6.1, 3.7, 3.7.1, 3.8, 3.8.1, 3.8.2, 3.8.3, 3.8.4, 3.9, 3.10, 3.11, 3.12, 3.13, 3.14, 3.15, 3.16, 3.17, 3.18, 3.19, 3.20, 3.22, 3.22.1, 3.22.2, 3.26, 4, and 5 of the PSpec. The proposal shall provide technical detail sufficient to address each performance parameter, such as (but not limited to) independent test data, design considerations, product literature, and technical specification sheets related to the performance of these items. Technical detail shall be sufficient to allow the Government to properly evaluate the proposed items’ ability to meet these sections in the PSpec. The offeror shall identify any high risk area(s) and area(s) of non-compliance with the PSpec or RFP requirements. Offerors shall provide clear explanation for any risk and area of non-compliance identified, along with demonstration of ability to comply with all requirements during item production.

L.2.3.2.1 Independent Test Data. (Evaluated IAW M.2.3.2) Offerors shall submit independent test data IAW RFP Attachment 02, Vendor Data. The test data shall be from Chesapeake Testing (4603B Compass Point Road, Belcamp, MD 21017), except for the visor data submission which shall be from ICS Laboratories (1072 Industrial Parkway North, Brunswick, OH 44212). The test data shall clearly demonstrate to the Government that the proposed design will meet the requirements of RFP Attachment 02, Vendor Data. Only test data generated at Chesapeake Testing and ICS Laboratories will be accepted.

L.2.3.2.2 Configuration Management Plan (CMP). (Evaluated IAW M.2.3.2) Offerors shall submit a CMP in accordance with Section 3.23 of the PSpec.

L.2.3.2.3 Quality Control Plan (QCP). (Evaluated IAW M.2.3.2) Offerors shall submit a QCP IAW Section 3.24 of the PSpec.

L.2.3.2.4 Schedule and Production Capability/Management. (Evaluated IAW M.2.3.2) The proposal shall thoroughly discuss and clearly demonstrate the offeror’s ability to meet the proposed delivery schedule as stated in FAR Clause 52.211-9 and the impact facilities, equipment and personnel has on the desired, required and proposed delivery schedules. The proposal shall provide detailed description of the facilities and the equipment capacity and capability to be used in production. The proposal shall clearly demonstrate the offeror’s monthly capacity and clearly explain its ability to meet the required delivery schedule, and as an objective, the desired delivery schedule.

The proposal shall include the offeror’s appointed Program Manager’s education, experience, and dedication to demonstrate successful management of the program throughout the contract period of performance and warranty period. The proposal shall include a thorough description of the offeror’s proposed management of the Coxswain Helmet System production to include the roles and responsibilities of personnel charged with implementing production, quality assurance, lot testing, and overseeing delivery. The offeror shall provide sufficient detail to indicate adequate supply chain management to meet the contract delivery requirements as outlined in FAR Clause 52.211-9 of the solicitation. The offeror shall discuss in detail the proposed warranty IAW Sections 3.18 and 3.19 of the PSpec.

L.2.3.2.5 Small Business Participation. (Evaluated IAW M.2.3.2) IAW DFARS 215.304, both LARGE AND SMALL businesses shall address small business participation. This requirement is separate from the SBSP required by FAR 19.702(a)(1) and in Section L.2.1.3. Offers shall specifically identify small business firms and the complexity and variety of work those small business firms are to perform. Additionally, offerors shall state their extent of commitment to use such firms.

a) Note for Small Businesses: Small businesses should consider their own self-performance in addition to subcontracting to small businesses.

b) Note for Large Businesses: Small business firms specifically identified shall also be listed in the SBSP submitted IAW L.2.1.3.

L.2.4 Volume 4a – Past and Present Performance Summary Sheet. (Used to evaluate Past and Present Performance IAW M.2.4)

L.2.4.1 Limitations. Offerors may propose a maximum of 5 recent Government contract efforts as prime and a maximum of 5 recent contract efforts total for major subcontractors, teaming partners, and or/joint ventures.

a) Recency as evaluated in M.2.4.3.1 is defined as within three years from the date of issuance of the solicitation. Note, if a contract effort proposed does not meet the definition of recency, it will not be evaluated.

b) Major is defined as subcontractors, teaming partners, or joint ventures who are projected to perform 25% or more of the total contract effort. Each ballistic and non-ballistic impact raw material supplier shall also be considered a major subcontractor.

L.2.4.2 Contents. As stated in Table 1- Proposed Contents and Instructions, both Vol 4a and 4b Past and Present Performance are due on 29 Aug 2018 and shall include the following information for each contract effort proposed for Past and Present Performance evaluation:

a) Contract Number

b) Contract Name

c) Name of Contracting Organization

d) Customer Supported

e) Contracting Officer name, email address, and phone number

f) Period of Performance

g) Name, phone number, organization, and email of individual sent the PPQ

Additionally, for prime contract efforts only by other than small businesses, state a yes/no answer to the following question: Was a SBSP required for the contract effort by the offeror?

L.2.5 Volume 4b – Past and Present Performance. (Used to evaluate Past and Present Performance IAW M.2.4 Contents include:

L.2.5.1 Contract Efforts for Past and Present Performance Evaluation. Contract efforts submitted for this Volume 4b shall match exactly the contract efforts and order proposed in Volume 4a. Information on each contract effort shall be clearly separated in the volume and logically presented in the table of contents. The beginning of each contract effort information proposed shall encompass the following in bullets:

a) Contract Number

b) Contract Name

c) Total Value

d) Current Value

e) Period of Performance

f) Total items delivered to date

Additionally, include the name, phone number, organization, and email of any individual sent the PPQ if not included in Volume 4a’s submission.

L.2.5.1.1 Relevance Information. (Used in the evaluation of Relevancy IAW M.2.4.3.2, M.2.4.3.2.1, and M.2.4.3.2.2) Each Past and Present Performance effort proposed for evaluation shall include specific descriptions on how the scope, magnitude, and complexity of work involved for each contract effort was/is similar to this requirement. Information provided shall contain at least the following:

a) Scope: detail how the product/service of the contract effort is/was similar in type of product to that of the Coxswain Helmet.

b) Magnitude: detail how the total value, current value, and production demands is/was similar to this requirement.

c) Complexity: detail how the technical similarities of the design, manufacture, and construction of the proposed effort is/was similar to this requirement.

d) Relevancy for proposed major subcontractors is defined by that which reflects experience in the area of expertise the major subcontractor is proposed to actually perform under this contract

L.2.5.1.2 Compliance with Small Business Subcontracting Plans. For each contract effort proposed for evaluation that required a SBSP by the offeror, the offeror shall include SF 294s and SF295s for those contract efforts in this volume. If goals were not met on SF 294/295s, offerors shall specify reasons goals were not met.

L.2.5.1.3 Consent Letters. If contract efforts proposed for evaluation were for major subcontractors, teaming partners, and or/joint ventures, offerors shall include in this volume consent letters from those companies authorizing their release of adverse Past and Present Performance so the offeror(s) can respond to such information.

L.2.5.1.4 No Past or Present Performance Statement. If the offeror does not have any recent contract efforts for evaluation as the prime or for subcontractors/teaming partners/joint venture partners, the offeror shall indicate so in this volume. Failure to indicate no prior recent past performance will be considered a deficiency in the proposal.

L.2.5.2 Past and Present Performance Questionnaires – Not Submitted by Offeror (Used in the evaluation of Quality IAW M.2.4.3.3). For each contract effort proposed for Past and Present Performance evaluation, the Contractor shall send RFP Attachment 04 - Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) to the end user/customer of the contract. Instruct the end user/customer to email the complete PPQs to stephanie.simpson@socom.mil prior to 29 Aug 18 in accordance with the instructions in the PPQ. PPQs will not be accepted if sent by the offeror in response to the solicitation, they must come directly from the responder.

L.2.6 Volume 5 – PDMs for First Article Testing (FAT). Offerors will submit this volume only when notified IAW Section M.2.6. The notification will include the due date and time for this volume to be submitted. Once notified, offerors, at no cost to the Government, shall submit production representative PDMs in the quantities listed below in Table 4 and Table 5. These PDMs shall be of the exact same design and manufacture and shall be exactly the same as those submitted with Volume 2. The PDMs shall be marked IAW Paragraphs 3.22, 3.22.1, and 3.22.2 of the PSpec. Printed instructions shall be submitted physically with each PDM and shall be IAW Section 3.21 of the PSpec. The PDMs shall be packaged IAW PSpec Section 4 with the exception that the RFP number will be used instead of the contract number and a DD Form 250 and copy of the Government production lot test approval is not required. The vendor shall also electronically submit “build sheets” detailing information on the build and layup of the PDMs including all materials, and quantities of such materials, their layup and processing parameters/conditions used in their manufacture.

Table 4: Volume 5 PDM Submission Quantities; 4-Size Suite

QTY

Size 3

QTY

Size 4

QTY

**If offered

Table 5: Volume 5 PDM Submission Quantities; 5-Size Suite

Size 1 Quantity (QTY) Size 2

QTY

Size 3

QTY

Size 4

QTY

Size 5

QTY

**If Offered

The following have been deleted:

SECTION L

SECTION L

(End of Summary of Changes) image1.wmf