Attachment_6_-_PP_Questionnaire.doc

Past Performance Evaluation Survey Please return directly to: nswk2@socom.mil and Michelle.L.Riisma.civ@socom.mil with “PP Reference for M-SOFS RFP H92240-20-R-0001” in the subject line.

Dear Sir or Madam:

The mission of the Naval Special Warfare Command (NSWC) is to provide maritime special operations forces to conduct full-spectrum operations, unilaterally or with partners, to support national objectives. NSWC requires services to provide maritime subject matter expertise through logistics support services, equipment related services and knowledge based services in support of NSWC’s enterprise requirements for Maritime Special Operations Forces (M-SOF) missions. Services shall be provided in various locations throughout the United States of America and potential Outside the Continental United States of America (OCONUS). An offeror interested in proposing on this work has identified you as a Point of Contact (POC) on a past or present contract which the offeror deems relevant to this effort. We are, therefore, requesting your assistance in completing the attached Past Performance Assessment Questionnaire so that we may evaluate the offeror under the past performance factor.

Please provide your comments regarding the overall assessment of the offeror’s performance on the contract identified and any additional information that your organization deems relevant to our evaluation team. It is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators.

Please complete and submit the Questionnaire as soon as possible via e-mail to the address above or contact Michelle Riisma at 619-243-4525 if you have any questions. Thank you very much in advance for your assistance.

Michelle Riisma Contracting Officer Naval Special Warfare Contracting

Part I - REFERENCE CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION (To be completed by the Offeror)

Contractor Information (Firm Name, Address):

Contract Number:

Worked Performed as (Prime, SubContractor, JV)

Award Date:

Task Order/Contract (do not combine task orders to reach higher dollar value)

Total Obligated Value (do not sum the value of all task orders for a performance period)

Period of Performance

Complexity (High, Medium, Routine)

Classified or Unclassified

Specific Nature of the Contractual Effort (Prime or SubContractor, if Sub what percentage of work or value of task order)

IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

POC Name

Title

Telephone

Email Address

CAGE Code

PART II - EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) The following questions pertain to the contractor’s record of past (within the past five years) and current performance. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that our information be as factual and accurate as possible. Please provide examples and/or explanations (use additional pages if necessary). The following adjectival ratings shall be used in your response.

Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.

Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.

1. Compliance of performed services to specification requirements and standards of good workmanship; as they relate to performance of overarching support to maritime Special Operations Forces (SOF) services.

FORMCHECKBOX

Outstanding (Please comment below)

FORMCHECKBOX

Good

FORMCHECKBOX

Acceptable

FORMCHECKBOX

Marginal (Please comment below)

FORMCHECKBOX

Unsatisfactory (Please comment below)

Comments:

2. Effectiveness of SOF services (to include use and control of subcontractors).

FORMCHECKBOX

Outstanding (Please comment below)

FORMCHECKBOX

Good

FORMCHECKBOX

Acceptable

FORMCHECKBOX

Marginal (Please comment below)

FORMCHECKBOX

Unsatisfactory (Please comment below)

Comments:

3. Ability to maintain consistent, continuous high quality services without gaps or significant government oversight.

FORMCHECKBOX

Outstanding (Please comment below)

FORMCHECKBOX

Good

FORMCHECKBOX

Acceptable

FORMCHECKBOX

Marginal (Please comment below)

FORMCHECKBOX

Unsatisfactory (Please comment below)

Comments:

4. Ability to provide qualified personnel (logistics support, technical specialists, PMs, etc) at multiple locations when required.

FORMCHECKBOX

Outstanding (Please comment below)

FORMCHECKBOX

Good

FORMCHECKBOX

Acceptable

FORMCHECKBOX

Marginal (Please comment below)

FORMCHECKBOX

Unsatisfactory (Please comment below)

Comments:

5. Capability to provide logistical and life support services for multiple locations simultaneously.

FORMCHECKBOX

Outstanding (Please comment below)

FORMCHECKBOX

Good

FORMCHECKBOX

Acceptable

FORMCHECKBOX

Marginal (Please comment below)

FORMCHECKBOX

Unsatisfactory (Please comment below)

Comments:

6. Capability to manage multiple subcontractors at multiple locations

FORMCHECKBOX

Outstanding (Please comment below)

FORMCHECKBOX

Good

FORMCHECKBOX

Acceptable

FORMCHECKBOX

Marginal (Please comment below)

FORMCHECKBOX

Unsatisfactory (Please comment below)

Comments:

7. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern.

FORMCHECKBOX

Outstanding (Please comment below)

FORMCHECKBOX

Good

FORMCHECKBOX

Acceptable

FORMCHECKBOX

Marginal (Please comment below)

FORMCHECKBOX

Unsatisfactory (Please comment below) Comments:

8. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

UNCLASSIFIED