Attachment_3_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.doc
DOC document 55 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Career Transition Seminar Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- H92240-19-Q-1012
- Issued by
- United States Special Operations Command
About this file
Attachment 3 - Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| ISSUED_Q&As_H92240-19-Q-1012.pdf | ||
| REV_3.27.2019_Attachment_1_-_Statement_of_Objectives.pdf | ||
| RFQ_-_Combined_Synopsis_Solicitation.pdf | ||
| Attachment_2_-_ELIN_TABLE.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_1_-_Statement_of_Objectives.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 3 – Past Performance Questionnaire H92240-19-Q-1012
Past Performance Questionnaire Please return directly to: taylor.laman@socom.mil with “PP Reference H92450-19-Q-1012” in the subject line. Please return by the due date of 8 April 2019.
Dear Sir or Madam:
Naval Special Warfare Command is acquiring Career Transitional Seminars to fulfill its mission. An offeror interested in proposing on this work has identified you as a Point of Contact (POC) on a past or present contract which the offeror deems relevant to this effort. We are, therefore, requesting your assistance in completing the attached Past Performance Questionnaire so that we may evaluate the offeror under the Factor of past performance.
Please provide your comments regarding the overall assessment of the offeror’s performance on the contract identified and any additional information that your organization deems relevant to our evaluation team. It is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators.
Please complete and submit the Questionnaire as soon as possible via e-mail to the address above or contact Taylor Laman at 619-537-1676 if you have any questions. Thank you very much in advance for your assistance.
TAYLOR LAMAN
Contract Specialist
AMANDA BLACKWOOD
Contracting Officer Part I - REFERENCE CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION (To be completed by the Offeror)
Contractor/Company Name/Division and Address:
Contract Number:
Prime Contractor Name:
Award Date:
Contract Type:
Total Obligated Value:
Period of Performance:
Specific Nature of the Contractual Effort
IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE
Name:
Title:
Telephone:
Email Address:
PART II - EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) The following questions pertain to the contractor’s record of past (within the past three years) and current performance. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that our information be as factual and accurate as possible. Please provide examples and/or explanations (use additional pages if necessary). The following adjectival ratings shall be used in your response.
Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.
Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.
1. Compliance of performed services to specification requirements that were initially requested.
FORMCHECKBOX
Outstanding (Please comment below)
FORMCHECKBOX
Good
FORMCHECKBOX
Acceptable
FORMCHECKBOX
Marginal (Please comment below)
FORMCHECKBOX
Unsatisfactory (Please comment below)
Comments:
2. Effectiveness of Training (Clear, Relatable).
FORMCHECKBOX
Outstanding (Please comment below)
FORMCHECKBOX
Good
FORMCHECKBOX
Acceptable
FORMCHECKBOX
Marginal (Please comment below)
FORMCHECKBOX
Unsatisfactory (Please comment below)
Comments:
3. Ability to maintain consistent, continuous high quality services without gaps or significant government oversight.
FORMCHECKBOX
Outstanding (Please comment below)
FORMCHECKBOX
Good
FORMCHECKBOX
Acceptable
FORMCHECKBOX
Marginal (Please comment below)
FORMCHECKBOX
Unsatisfactory (Please comment below)
Comments:
4. Capability to coordinate all trainings.
FORMCHECKBOX
Outstanding (Please comment below)
FORMCHECKBOX
Good
FORMCHECKBOX
Acceptable
FORMCHECKBOX
Marginal (Please comment below)
FORMCHECKBOX
Unsatisfactory (Please comment below)
Comments:
5. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest.
FORMCHECKBOX
Outstanding (Please comment below)
FORMCHECKBOX
Good
FORMCHECKBOX
Acceptable
FORMCHECKBOX
Marginal (Please comment below)
FORMCHECKBOX
Unsatisfactory (Please comment below) Comments:
6. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
UNCLAS//FOUO (Upon completion)
File details come from the government source that posted it.