Section E Attachment D Past Performance Questionnaire Amendment 0004.docx
DOCX document 31 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Administrative and Technical Support Services
- Solicitation number
- GS-08P-11-JE-D-0006
About this file
Amendment 0004 Section E Attachment D Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files
Show all 43
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Past Performance Questionnaire
Note: Completed questionnaires shall be considered confidential information and may not be seen or reviewed by the contractor/Offeror. Mail or email completed questionnaires directly to:
Attention: Amy Lineberry, Contracting Officer General Services Administration Denver Federal Center Bldg. 41, P.O. Box 25546 (8P2PQ) Denver, CO 80225-0548 amy.lineberry@gsa.gov Name:________________________________________________________________ Company:
Role/position:
Current Telephone No.:
(Use this cover sheet for each past performance questionnaire submitted)
USE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR THE OFFERING COMPANY’S PAST PERFORMANCE
CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE
WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 3.104
U.S. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
PUBLIC BUILDINGS SERVICE
ROCKY MOUNTAIN REGION
OVERVIEW
The Offeror shown below is submitting qualifications for the Administrative and Technical Support Service Contract for GSA, Region 8, and provided your name as a customer reference. Part of our evaluation process requires information on the Offeror’s past performance. Your participation is important to us and responses are required by Thursday, March 22, 2011 2:30 PM (Mountain Time) for inclusion in our evaluation. Your assistance is greatly appreciated.
SECTION 1: Contract Identification To be completed by the Offeror and provided to the customer referenced
Name of Offeror being evaluated: _______________________________________
Project Number/Title: _________________________________________________
Project Location:_____________________________________________________
Project Description: ___________________________________________________
Project Award Amount: $_______________________________________________
Project Final Dollar Amount: $___________________________________________
Year Completed: _________ Program Manager: _________________________
SECTION 2: Respondent Identification
Name of Evaluator: ________________________________________________ Relation to Contract/Project: ___________________________________________ Company Name: ____________________________________________________ Phone Number (Commercial/DSN): ____________________________________ Email Address: ____________________________________________________
SECTION 3: Rating of Offeror To be completed by the customer:
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:
Score Performance Level
5 EXCELLENT - The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s or customer’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
4 VERY GOOD- The contractor’s performance meets or exceeds contractual requirements to the Government’s or customer’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
3 ACCEPTABLE – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appears, or were, satisfactory.
2 MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
1 UNACCEPTABLE – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score.
| 5 |
| 4 |
| 3 |
| 2 |
| 1 |
| N |
Management Professional conduct
Cooperation/responsiveness –timely, solicits feedback, suggests alternatives
Offeror is easy to work with, friendly, courteous
Oversight of project management
Quickly/professionally resolves issues/disputes
Review/resolution of project issues
Appropriately awarded and monetarily recognized employees for accomplished work and/or exceeding expectations
Maintained continuity of contract employees over the term of the contract/project
To what extent did they adhere to the proposed staffing plan
To what extent did they minimize trunover
SECTION 4: Narrative Summary Please indicate in writing any additional comments you have of the Offeror and suggestions you may have concerning the following categories:
Strengths of performance: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Weaknesses of performance: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Additional Thoughts: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Would you hire this firm again? __________________________________________________________
USE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR OFFERING COMPANY’S PAST PERFORMANCE
SECTION 5: Submission Thank you for taking the time to fill out this questionnaire. As stated above, when filled in this document is source selection sensitive information IAW FAR 3.104. When completed please mail, hand-deliver, or email directly to:
U.S. General Services Administration Public Buildings Services P.O. Box 25546
| Denver, Colorado 80225-0546 | PHONE: (303) 236-2559 |
| ATTN: Amy Lineberry (8P2PQ) | EMAIL: amy.lineberry@gsa.gov |
Respondent Signature: _________________________________________ Date:_______________
USE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR THE PROGRAM MANAGER AND THE CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR’S PAST PERFORMANCE
CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE
WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 3.104
U.S. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
The Offeror shown below is submitting qualifications for the Program Manager and the Contract Administrator on the Administrative and Technical Support Services Contract for GSA, Region 8 and provided your name as a customer reference. Part of our evaluation process requires information on the Offeror’s past performance. Your participation is important to us and responses are required by Thursday, March 22, 2011 2:30 PM (Mountain Time) for inclusion in our evaluation. Your assistance is greatly appreciated.
Name of Offeror being evaluated: _______________________________________
Project Number/Title: _________________________________________________
Project Location:_____________________________________________________
Project Description: ___________________________________________________
Project Award Amount: $_______________________________________________
Year Completed: _________ Program Manager: __________________
Relation to Contract/Project: ___________________________________________ Company Name: ____________________________________________________ Phone Number (Commercial/DSN): ____________________________________
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:
Score Performance Level
5 EXCELLENT - The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s or customer’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
4 VERY GOOD- The contractor’s performance meets or exceeds contractual requirements to the Government’s or customer’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
3 ACCEPTABLE – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appears, or were, satisfactory.
2 MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
1 UNACCEPTABLE – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score.
| 5 |
| 4 |
| 3 |
| 2 |
| 1 |
| N |
Professional conduct
Cooperation/responsiveness –timely, solicits feedback, suggests alternatives
Offeror is easy to work with, friendly, courteous
Oversight of project management
Quickly/professionally resolves issues/disputes
To what extent were they in compliance with the Service Contract Act
To what extent were they able to successfully manage a telework program
| 5 |
| 4 |
| 3 |
| 2 |
| 1 |
| N |
Performance Submittals provided on time/schedule
Adequacy / Accuracy of submittals
Timeliness of response to comments
Quickly identifies issues for resolution
| 5 |
| 4 |
| 3 |
| 2 |
| 1 |
| N |
Closeout Submission of required documentation
Timeliness of submissions
Format of closeout documentation
Please indicate in writing any additional comments you have of the Offeror and suggestions you may have concerning the following categories:
Strengths of performance: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Weaknesses of performance: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Additional Thoughts: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Would you work with this individual again? _________________________________________________
USE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR THE PROGRAM MANAGER AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR’S PAST PERFORMANCE
SECTION 5: Submission Thank you for taking the time to fill out this questionnaire. As stated above, when filled in this document is source selection sensitive information IAW FAR 3.104. When completed please mail, hand-deliver, or email directly to:
U.S. General Services Administration Public Buildings Services P.O. Box 25546
| Denver, Colorado 80225-0546 | PHONE: (303) 236-2559 |
| ATTN: Amy Lineberry (8P2PQ) | EMAIL: amy.lineberry@gsa.gov |
Respondent Signature: _________________________________________ Date: _______________
USE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR THE HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGER’S PAST PERFORMANCE
CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE
WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 3.104
U.S. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
The Offeror shown below is submitting qualifications for the Human Resource Manager on the Administrative and Technical Support Services Contract for GSA, Region 8 and provided your name as a customer reference. Part of our evaluation process requires information on the Offeror’s past performance. Your participation is important to us and responses are required by Thursday, March 22, 2011 2:30 PM (Mountain Time) for inclusion in our evaluation. Your assistance is greatly appreciated.
Name of Offeror being evaluated: _______________________________________
Project Number/Title: _________________________________________________
Project Location:_____________________________________________________
Project Description: ___________________________________________________
Project Award Amount: $_______________________________________________
Year Completed: _________ Program Manager: __________________
Relation to Contract/Project: ___________________________________________ Company Name: ____________________________________________________ Phone Number (Commercial/DSN): ____________________________________
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:
Score Performance Level
5 EXCELLENT - The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s or customer’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
4 VERY GOOD- The contractor’s performance meets or exceeds contractual requirements to the Government’s or customer’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
3 ACCEPTABLE – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appears, or were, satisfactory.
2 MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
1 UNACCEPTABLE – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score.
| 5 |
| 4 |
| 3 |
| 2 |
| 1 |
| N |
Professional conduct
Cooperation/responsiveness –timely, solicits feedback, suggests alternatives
Offeror is easy to work with, friendly, courteous
Oversight of project management
Quickly/professionally resolves issues/disputes
| 5 |
| 4 |
| 3 |
| 2 |
| 1 |
| N |
Performance Demonstrate ability to effectively recruit and retain qualified staff
Demonstrate ability to maintain business relations
Timeliness of response to filling vacancies
Timeliness of employee performance issues for resolution
| 5 |
| 4 |
| 3 |
| 2 |
| 1 |
| N |
Closeout Submission of required documentation
Timeliness of submissions
Format of closeout documentation
Please indicate in writing any additional comments you have of the Offeror and suggestions you may have concerning the following categories:
Strengths of performance: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Weaknesses of performance: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Additional Thoughts: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Would you work with this individual again? _________________________________________________
USE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR THE HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGER’S PAST PERFORMANCE
SECTION 5: Submission Thank you for taking the time to fill out this questionnaire. As stated above, when filled in this document is source selection sensitive information IAW FAR 3.104. When completed please mail, hand-deliver, or email directly to:
U.S. General Services Administration Public Buildings Services P.O. Box 25546
| Denver, Colorado 80225-0546 | PHONE: (303) 236-2559 |
| ATTN: Amy Lineberry (8P2PQ) | EMAIL: amy.lineberry@gsa.gov |
Respondent Signature: _________________________________________ Date: _______________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .