SECTION_J.8.,_ATT._(8)_OASIS_SB_PAST_PERFORMANCE_RATING_FORM_ON_RAMP.docx

DOCX document 40 KB Posted

Attached to
OASIS SB Pools 1, 3, & 4 On-Ramp
Solicitation number
GS00Q13DR0002P1P3P4
Issued by

About this file

This document provides a past performance rating form template and instructions for evaluating offerors under Solicitation Number GS00Q13DR0002P1P3P4 for the OASIS SB Pools 1, 3, and 4 On-Ramp opportunity. The rating form includes five performance criteria of quality of service, schedule, cost control, business relations, and management of key personnel. Raters are instructed to select an adjectival rating of exceptional, very good, satisfactory, marginal, or unsatisfactory for each criterion. The solicitation is reopening until June 20, 2019 to allow new offers for OASIS SB Pools 1, 3, and 4. Offerors may utilize experience of first tier subcontractors. The General Services Administration will host an industry day on May 7, 2019 to review the solicitation and demonstration the Symphony system for proposal submission.

OASIS SB Pools 1, 3, 4 Att. J.8

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
AMD 10_SF30_GS00Q-13-DR-0002_OASIS_SB_P1P3P4_On-Ramp Post closing_7.15.2021.pdf PDF
2. AMD 09_ SF30_GS00Q-13-DR-0002_OASIS_SB_P1P3P4_On-Ramp_Amd_09 Post closing amd (3) (1).pdf PDF
1. AMD 09 _READ ME FIRST -- NOTICE OF AMENDMENT6.30.2021 (2).pdf PDF
3. AMD 09_ SECTION_J.2._ATT._(2)_OASIS_DIRECT_LABOR_RANGES_-_Amd_09.pdf PDF
5. AMD 09_ Conformed Solicitation_GS00Q-13-DR-0002_OASIS_SB_P1P3P4_On-Ramp_-_Amd_09_6.30.2021.pdf PDF
4. AMD 09_ SECTION_J.9._ATT._(9)_COST_PRICE_TEMPLATE_ON_RAMP_-_Amd_09.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
OASIS SB Pool 1 Award Announcement Phase 1 Rolling Awards.pdf PDF
Block_14_Continuation_Page.docx DOCX document
SF30_GS00Q-13-DR-0002_OASIS_SB_P1P3P4_On-Ramp_Amd_08.pdf PDF
SF30_GS00Q-13-DR-0002_OASIS_SB_P1P3P4_On-Ramp_Amd_07.pdf PDF
Block_14_Continuation_Page.docx DOCX document
Solicitation_GS00Q-13-DR-0002_OASIS_SB_P1P3P4_On-Ramp_-_Amd_06.pdf PDF
SF30_GS00Q-13-DR-0002_OASIS_SB_P1P3P4_On-Ramp_Amd_06.pdf PDF
SECTION_J.17._ATT._(17)_Questions_and_Answers_continued_-_Amd_05.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Solicitation_GS00Q-13-DR-0002_OASIS_SB_P1P3P4_On-Ramp_-_Amd_05.pdf PDF
Block_14_Continuation_Page.docx DOCX document
SF30_GS00Q-13-DR-0002_OASIS_SB_P1P3P4_On-Ramp_Amd_05.pdf PDF
SECTION_J.2._ATT._(2)_OASIS_DIRECT_LABOR_RANGES_-_Amd_04.pdf PDF
SECTION_J.6._ATT._(6)_OASIS_SB_MODIFIED_PRE-AWARD_SURVEY_(SF_1408)_ON_RAMP_-_Amd_04.docx DOCX document
SECTION_J.16._ATT._(16)_OASIS_FSSCTA_Performance_Verification_Letter_-_Amd_04.docx DOCX document
SECTION_J.19._ATT._(19)_SYMPHONY_INSTRUCTIONS_-_Amd_04.docx DOCX document
SECTION_J.1._ATT._(1)_OASIS_SB_LABOR_CATEGORIES_AND_DEFINITIONS_POOL_1,_3,_4_ON_RAMP_-_Amd_04.docx DOCX document
SECTION_J.17._ATT._(17)_Questions_and_Answers_-_Amd_04.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Solicitation_GS00Q-13-DR-0002_OASIS_SB_P1P3P4_On-Ramp_-_Amd_04.pdf PDF
SECTION_J.20._ATT._(20)_OASIS_SB_CTA_AGREEMENT_-_Amd_04.docx DOCX document
SECTION_J.8._ATT._(8)_OASIS_SB_PAST_PERFORMANCE_RATING_FORM_ON_RAMP_-_Amd_04.docx DOCX document
SF30_GS00Q-13-DR-0002_OASIS_SB_P1P3P4_On-Ramp_Amd_04.pdf PDF
SF33_Solicitation_GS00Q-13-DR-0002_OASIS_SB_P1P3P4_-_Amd_04.pdf PDF
SECTION_J.9._ATT._(9)_COST_PRICE_TEMPLATE_ON_RAMP_-_Amd_04.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
SECTION_J.13._ATT._(13)_OASIS_SB_GSA_FORM_527_ON_RAMP_-_Amd_04.pdf PDF
SECTION_J.11._ATT._(11)_OASIS_SB_REPS_AND_CERTS_ON_RAMP_-_Amd_04.docx DOCX document
SECTION_J.5._ATT._(5)_OASIS_SB_SAMPLE_SELF_SCORING_WORKSHEET_ON_RAMP_-_Amd_04.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
SECTION_J.14._ATT._(14)_OASIS_SB_NAICS_OR_PSC_CODE_CORRECTION_LETTER_ON_RAMP_-_Amd_04.docx DOCX document
SECTION_J.15._ATT._(15)_OASIS_SB_NAICS_CODE_CHANGE_LETTER_ON_RAMP_-_Amd_04.docx DOCX document
SECTION_J.12._ATT._(12)_OASIS_SB_SUBCONTRACTING_PLAN_TEMPLATE_ON_RAMP_-_Amd_04.docx DOCX document
SF30_GS00Q-13-DR-0002_OASIS_SB_P1P3P4_On-Ramp_Amd_03.pdf PDF
Solicitation_GS00Q-13-DR-0002_OASIS_SB_P1P3P4_On-Ramp_-_Amd_02.pdf PDF
SF30_GS00Q-13-DR-0002_OASIS_SB_P1P3P4_On-Ramp_Amd_02.pdf PDF
SECTION_J.19._ATT._(19)_SYMPHONY_INSTRUCTIONS_-_Amd_01.docx DOCX document
SF30_GS00Q-13-DR-0002_OASIS_SB_P1P3P4_On-Ramp_Amd_01.pdf PDF
Block_14_Continuation_Page.docx DOCX document
SECTION_J.2.,_ATT_(2)_OASIS_DIRECT_LABOR_RANGES.pdf PDF
SECTION_J.5._ATT._(5)OASIS_SB_SAMPLE_SELF_SCORING_WORKSHEET_ON_RAMP.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
SECTION_J.9.,_ATT._(9)_COST_PRICE_TEMPLATE_ON_RAMP.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Solicitation_GS00Q-13-DR-0002_OASIS_SB_P1P3P4_On-Ramp.pdf PDF
SECTION_J.19._ATT._(19)_SYMPHONY_INSTRUCTIONS.docx DOCX document
SECTION_J.11.,_ATT._(11)_OASIS_SB_REPS_AND_CERTS_ON_RAMP.docx DOCX document
SECTION_J.1.,_ATT._(1)_OASIS_SB_LABOR_CATEGORIES_AND_DEFINITIONS_POOL_1,_3,_4_ON_RAMP.docx DOCX document
SECTION_J.20_ATT._(20)_OASIS_SB_CTA_AGREEMENT.docx DOCX document
SECTION_J.16_Attachment_(16)_OASIS_FSSCTA_Performance_Verification_Letter.docx DOCX document
Show 40 more

Latest 50 of 57 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

OASIS SMALL BUSINESS SOLICITATION

ON-RAMP (POOL 1, 3, 4)

SOLICITATION NO. GS00Q-13-DR-0002

SECTION J.8. ATTACHMENT (8)

PAST PERFORMANCE RATING FORM

INSTRUCTIONS

If applicable in accordance with Section L.5.4. of the solicitation, the Offeror must provide this Past Performance Rating Form to the Contracting Officer, Contracting Officer Representative or Program Manager of the awarding agency responsible for the project. No other format is allowable. The awarding agency must provide the form back to the Offeror in .pdf format for the Offeror to be able to fill out their Self Scoring Worksheet and to submit the form with their proposal. The awarding agency may at their discretion provide the OASIS Program Management Office a copy by e-mailing it to OASISSB@gsa.gov

PAST PERFORMANCE PROJECT IDENTIFICATON (To be filled out by the Offeror):

CONTRACTOR NAME:
Click here to enter text.
CONTRACT or ORDER NUMBER:
Click here to enter text.
PROJECT TITLE:
Click here to enter text.
TOTAL PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE, INCLUDING OPTIONS
Click here to enter text.

PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE INFORMATION (To be filled out by the Rater):

NAME:
Click here to enter text.
TITLE:
Click here to enter text.
AGENCY or CUSTOMER:
Click here to enter text.
PHONE:
Click here to enter text.
E-MAIL
Click here to enter text.

For each of the Five (5) criteria listed below, the rater must choose One (1) Adjectival Rating by checking the box, as applicable. At a minimum, for any rating that is checked Marginal or Unsatisfactory, please submit additional comments to substantiate the rating. If Cost Control is N/A, Please explain why.

1. QUALITY OF SERVICE

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

Click here to enter text.

2. SCHEDULE

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Click here to enter text.

3. COST CONTROL

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A

Click here to enter text.

4. BUSINESS RELATIONS

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Click here to enter text.

5. MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Click here to enter text.

Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .