SECTION_J.8.,_ATT._(8)_OASIS_SB_PAST_PERFORMANCE_RATING_FORM_ON_RAMP.docx
DOCX document 40 KB Posted
- Attached to
- OASIS SB Pools 1, 3, & 4 On-Ramp
- Solicitation number
- GS00Q13DR0002P1P3P4
About this file
This document provides a past performance rating form template and instructions for evaluating offerors under Solicitation Number GS00Q13DR0002P1P3P4 for the OASIS SB Pools 1, 3, and 4 On-Ramp opportunity. The rating form includes five performance criteria of quality of service, schedule, cost control, business relations, and management of key personnel. Raters are instructed to select an adjectival rating of exceptional, very good, satisfactory, marginal, or unsatisfactory for each criterion. The solicitation is reopening until June 20, 2019 to allow new offers for OASIS SB Pools 1, 3, and 4. Offerors may utilize experience of first tier subcontractors. The General Services Administration will host an industry day on May 7, 2019 to review the solicitation and demonstration the Symphony system for proposal submission.
OASIS SB Pools 1, 3, 4 Att. J.8
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 57 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
OASIS SMALL BUSINESS SOLICITATION
ON-RAMP (POOL 1, 3, 4)
SOLICITATION NO. GS00Q-13-DR-0002
SECTION J.8. ATTACHMENT (8)
PAST PERFORMANCE RATING FORM
INSTRUCTIONS
If applicable in accordance with Section L.5.4. of the solicitation, the Offeror must provide this Past Performance Rating Form to the Contracting Officer, Contracting Officer Representative or Program Manager of the awarding agency responsible for the project. No other format is allowable. The awarding agency must provide the form back to the Offeror in .pdf format for the Offeror to be able to fill out their Self Scoring Worksheet and to submit the form with their proposal. The awarding agency may at their discretion provide the OASIS Program Management Office a copy by e-mailing it to OASISSB@gsa.gov
PAST PERFORMANCE PROJECT IDENTIFICATON (To be filled out by the Offeror):
| CONTRACTOR NAME: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| CONTRACT or ORDER NUMBER: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| PROJECT TITLE: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| TOTAL PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE, INCLUDING OPTIONS |
| Click here to enter text. |
PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE INFORMATION (To be filled out by the Rater):
| NAME: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| TITLE: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| AGENCY or CUSTOMER: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| PHONE: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| Click here to enter text. |
For each of the Five (5) criteria listed below, the rater must choose One (1) Adjectival Rating by checking the box, as applicable. At a minimum, for any rating that is checked Marginal or Unsatisfactory, please submit additional comments to substantiate the rating. If Cost Control is N/A, Please explain why.
1. QUALITY OF SERVICE
| RATING |
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory
Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
Click here to enter text.
2. SCHEDULE
| RATING |
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Click here to enter text.
3. COST CONTROL
| RATING |
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N/A
Click here to enter text.
4. BUSINESS RELATIONS
| RATING |
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Click here to enter text.
5. MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL
| RATING |
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Click here to enter text.
Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .