Final_Evaluation_Sheet.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 44 KB Posted Aug 4, 2026

Attached to: Nebraska Olmstead Plan Evaluation
Solicitation number: 125999 O3
Issued by: Lancaster County, Nebraska

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI · Aug 10, 2026

This Final Evaluation Sheet documents the competitive scoring results for RFP 125999 O3, a Nebraska Olmstead Plan Evaluation service contract issued by the State of Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services. The solicitation solicited proposals from qualified bidders to provide comprehensive evaluation services for the state's Olmstead Plan, with proposals due July 27, 2026, at 2:00 p.m. Central Time and a contract start date of September 1, 2026. The contract term is two years with no renewal options, though DHHS reserves the right to extend when mutually agreeable. The evaluation period occurred July 28 through August 5, 2026, with Intent to Award expected in August 2026.

Five proposals were received and evaluated on a 100-point scale comprising three categories: Corporate Overview (25 points), Technical Response (55 points), and Cost (20 points). Partners for Insightful Evaluation (PIE) ranked first overall with 87.7 total points, including the lowest submitted cost of $96,000, which earned the maximum 20 cost points. University of Nebraska Public Policy Center Lump Sum Proposal ranked second with 73.37 points and a cost of $159,162. University of Nebraska Public Policy Center Item by Item Proposal ranked third with 71.53 points and a cost of $176,878. Technical Assistance Collaborative, Inc. ranked fourth with 63.69 points and a cost of $382,900. Public Consulting Group LLC ranked fifth with 60.21 points and the highest cost of $662,161.20. Cost points were calculated proportionally using the formula: (Lowest Cost Submitted ÷ Cost Submitted) × Maximum Possible Points, with all bidders evaluated by four independent evaluators whose scores were averaged.

View the file

Other files

File	Type	Posted
Technical Assistance Collaborative, Inc.pdf	PDF	Aug 4, 2026
Partners for Insightful Evaluation (PIE).pdf	PDF	Aug 4, 2026
University of Nebraska Public Policy Center Item by Proposal.pdf	PDF	Aug 4, 2026
List of Respondents.docx	DOCX document	Aug 4, 2026
Award Notice.pdf	PDF	Aug 4, 2026
Public Consulting Group, LLC.pdf	PDF	Aug 4, 2026
University of Nebraska Public Policy Center Lump Sum Proposal.pdf	PDF	Aug 4, 2026
Addendum two SOE.docx	DOCX document	Jul 27, 2026
Addendum one-Q&A.pdf	PDF	Jul 17, 2026
125999 O3 Olmstead RFP.pdf	PDF	Jun 30, 2026
125999 O3 Cost Sheet.pdf	PDF	Jun 30, 2026
125999 O3 Evaluation Criteria.pdf	PDF	Jun 30, 2026
125999 O3 Technical Requirements.pdf	PDF	Jun 30, 2026

Show all 13

On GovTribe

Work with this file

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Final Evaluation - Scored

FINAL EVALUATION SHEET

SOLICITATION NUMBER: 125999 O3

Olmstead Plan Evaluation

Opening Date: July 29, 2026, 2:00 PM

Evaluation Criteria	Possible Points	University of Nebraska Public Policy Center Item by Item Proposal 1	University of Nebraska Public Policy Center Lump Sum Proposal 2	Technical Assistance Collaborative, Inc	Partners for Insightful Evaluation (PIE)	Public Consulting Group
Part 1 - Corporate Overview	25	19.13	19.13	17.5	20.95	17.63
Part 2 - Technical Response	55	41.55	42.18	41.18	46.75	39.68
Part 3 - Cost*	20	10.85	12.06	5.01	20	2.9
Total Points	100	71.53	73.37	63.69	87.7	60.21
Ranking		3	2	4	1	5
* Points to Award = Lowest Cost Submitted ÷ Cost Submitted x Maximum Possible Points

&"Arial,Italic"&8&A SPB Form 41 Last Revised 11-1-2025 Page &P

Final Eval - Total Cost

FINAL EVALUATION SHEET

SOLICITATION NUMBER: 125999 O3

Olmstead Plan Evaluation

Opening Date: July 29, 2026, 2:00 PM

	University of Nebraska Public Policy Center Item by Item Proposal 1	University of Nebraska Public Policy Center Lump Sum Proposal 2	Technical Assistance Collaborative, Inc	Partners for Insightful Evaluation (PIE)	Public Consulting Group
Total Cost Submitted	$176,878.00	$159,162.00	$382,900.00	$96,000.00	$662,161.20
Ranking	3	2	4	1	5

&"Arial,Italic"&8&A SPB Form 41 Last Revised 11 -1-2025 Page &P

COST PROPOSAL EVALUATION WKST

COST PROPOSAL EVALUATION WORKSHEET

RFP Number 125999 03

Olmstead Plan Evaluation

Opening Date: July 29th, 2:00 p.m.

Bidder	Lowest Cost Submitted	Cost Submitted	Maximum Possible Cost Points	Points to Award*
University of Nebraska-Lincoln 1	$ 96,000.0000	$ 176,878.0000	20	10.85
University of Nebraska-Lincoln 2	$ 96,000.0000	$ 159,162.0000	20	12.06
Technical Assistance Collaborative, Inc	$ 96,000.0000	$ 382,900.0000	20	5.01
Partners for Insightful Evaluation (PIE)	$ 96,000.0000	$ 96,000.0000	20	20
Public Consulting Group LLC	$ 96,000.0000	$ 662,161.2000	20	2.90
* Points to Award = Lowest Cost Submitted ÷ Cost Submitted x Maximum Possible Points.

&"Arial,Italic"&8&A SPB Form S-9 Rev. 5-1-2024 State Purchasing Bureau

University of Nebraksa Public 1

		RFP 125999 O3 Nebraksa Olmstead Plan Evaluation
		Average Summary
		RFP Section	RFP Ref
Page	RFP Scoring Requirements	Max Scoring	Evaluator #1	Evaluator #2	Evaluator #3	Evaluator #4	Average Score
		CORPORATE OVERVIEW 25 POINTS
		(VII)(A)(1)(B)	26-28	Financial Strength and Contract Performance	5	5.00	5.00	4.00	5.00	4.75
				Financial Stability of the Organization and Contract Performance; The character, integrity, reputation, judgment, experience and efficiency of the bidder.
				BIDDER’S CORPORATE EXPERIENCE	10	7.00	7.00	5.00	9.50	7.13
				Past Experience listed in the matrix for similar projects in size, scope and complexity; Ability, capacity, and stability of the bidder to deliver and implement the program requirements of the RFP.
				BIDDERS PROPOSED PERSONNEL/MANAGEMENT APPROACH/SUBCONTRACTORS	10	6.50	7.00	6.00	9.50	7.25
				The proposed team being assigned to manage DHHS's project. Resumes outlining qualifications as key indicator to skill mixes and assessing experience of individuals. Examine information regarding utilization of subcontractors.
		Corporate Overview Total				18.50	19.00	15.00	24.00	19.13

		RFP Section(s)	RFP Ref
Page / Attachment	RFP Scoring Requirements	Max Scoring	Evaluator #1	Evaluator #2	Evaluator #3	Evaluator #4	Average Score
		TECHNICAL RESPONSE 55 POINTS
		Understanding of the Project Requirements Including Project Overview, Environment, Minimum Qualifications and Scope of Work
		(VI)(A-C)	24-25 and Attachment A - Technical Requirements	Understanding the Project Description	5	4.00	3.00	3.50	4.80	3.83

	Understanding of the Scope of Services	10	7.00	6.00	6.50	9.60	7.28
	Work Plan	15	12.00	8.00	9.00	14.40	10.85
	Technical Requirements (Attachment A)	15	12.00	10.00	9.00	14.40	11.35
	Deliverables and Due Dates	10	7.00	10.00	6.00	10.00	8.25
Technical Response Total			42.00	37.00	34.00	53.20	41.55

University of Nebraksa Public 2

		RFP 125999 O3 Nebraksa Olmstead Plan Evaluation
		Average Summary
		RFP Section	RFP Ref
Page	RFP Scoring Requirements	Max Scoring	Evaluator #1	Evaluator #2	Evaluator #3	Evaluator #4	Average Score
		CORPORATE OVERVIEW 25 POINTS
		(VII)(A)(1)(B)	26-28	Financial Strength and Contract Performance	5	5.00	5.00	4.00	5.00	4.75
				Financial Stability of the Organization and Contract Performance; The character, integrity, reputation, judgment, experience and efficiency of the bidder.
				BIDDER’S CORPORATE EXPERIENCE	10	7.00	7.00	5.00	9.50	7.13
				Past Experience listed in the matrix for similar projects in size, scope and complexity; Ability, capacity, and stability of the bidder to deliver and implement the program requirements of the RFP.
				BIDDERS PROPOSED PERSONNEL/MANAGEMENT APPROACH/SUBCONTRACTORS	10	6.50	7.00	6.00	9.50	7.25
				The proposed team being assigned to manage DHHS's project. Resumes outlining qualifications as key indicator to skill mixes and assessing experience of individuals. Examine information regarding utilization of subcontractors.
		Corporate Overview Total				18.50	19.00	15.00	24.00	19.13

		RFP Section(s)	RFP Ref
Page / Attachment	RFP Scoring Requirements	Max Scoring	Evaluator #1	Evaluator #2	Evaluator #3	Evaluator #4	Average Score
		TECHNICAL RESPONSE 55 POINTS
		Understanding of the Project Requirements Including Project Overview, Environment, Minimum Qualifications and Scope of Work
		(VI)(A-C)	24-25 and Attachment A - Technical Requirements	Understanding the Project Description	5	4.00	3.00	3.50	4.80	3.83

	Understanding of the Scope of Services	10	7.00	7.00	6.00	9.60	7.40
	Work Plan	15	12.00	8.00	9.00	14.40	10.85
	Technical Requirements (Attachment A)	15	12.00	12.00	9.00	14.40	11.85
	Deliverables and Due Dates	10	7.00	10.00	6.00	10.00	8.25
Technical Response Total			42.00	40.00	33.50	53.20	42.18

Technical Assistance Collaborat

		RFP 125999 O3 Nebraksa Olmstead Plan Evaluation
		Average Summary
		RFP Section	RFP Ref
Page	RFP Scoring Requirements	Max Scoring	Evaluator #1	Evaluator #2	Evaluator #3	Evaluator #4	Average Score
		CORPORATE OVERVIEW 25 POINTS
		(VII)(A)(1)(B)	26-28	Financial Strength and Contract Performance	5	4.00	4.00	3.00	5.00	4.00
				Financial Stability of the Organization and Contract Performance; The character, integrity, reputation, judgment, experience and efficiency of the bidder.
				BIDDER’S CORPORATE EXPERIENCE	10	9.00	5.00	3.00	9.50	6.63
				Past Experience listed in the matrix for similar projects in size, scope and complexity; Ability, capacity, and stability of the bidder to deliver and implement the program requirements of the RFP.
				BIDDERS PROPOSED PERSONNEL/MANAGEMENT APPROACH/SUBCONTRACTORS	10	8.00	3.00	6.50	10.00	6.88
				The proposed team being assigned to manage DHHS's project. Resumes outlining qualifications as key indicator to skill mixes and assessing experience of individuals. Examine information regarding utilization of subcontractors.
		Corporate Overview Total				21.00	12.00	12.50	24.50	17.50

		RFP Section(s)	RFP Ref
Page / Attachment	RFP Scoring Requirements	Max Scoring	Evaluator #1	Evaluator #2	Evaluator #3	Evaluator #4	Average Score
		TECHNICAL RESPONSE 55 POINTS
		Understanding of the Project Requirements Including Project Overview, Environment, Minimum Qualifications and Scope of Work
		(VI)(A-C)	24-25 and Attachment A - Technical Requirements	Understanding the Project Description	5	4.00	2.00	4.00	5.00	3.75

	Understanding of the Scope of Services	10	8.00	4.00	7.00	10.00	7.25
	Work Plan	15	12.50	4.00	8.50	15.00	10.00
	Technical Requirements (Attachment A)	15	13.00	8.00	10.00	14.70	11.43
	Deliverables and Due Dates	10	7.00	8.00	10.00	10.00	8.75
Technical Response Total			44.50	26.00	39.50	54.70	41.18

Partners for Insightful Eval

		RFP 125999 O3 Nebraksa Olmstead Plan Evaluation
		Average Summary
		RFP Section	RFP Ref
Page	RFP Scoring Requirements	Max Scoring	Evaluator #1	Evaluator #2	Evaluator #3	Evaluator #4	Average Score
		CORPORATE OVERVIEW 25 POINTS
		(VII)(A)(1)(B)	26-28	Financial Strength and Contract Performance	5	4.00	5.00	3.00	4.80	4.20
				Financial Stability of the Organization and Contract Performance; The character, integrity, reputation, judgment, experience and efficiency of the bidder.
				BIDDER’S CORPORATE EXPERIENCE	10	9.00	9.00	6.00	9.50	8.38
				Past Experience listed in the matrix for similar projects in size, scope and complexity; Ability, capacity, and stability of the bidder to deliver and implement the program requirements of the RFP.
				BIDDERS PROPOSED PERSONNEL/MANAGEMENT APPROACH/SUBCONTRACTORS	10	9.50	9.00	5.00	10.00	8.38
				The proposed team being assigned to manage DHHS's project. Resumes outlining qualifications as key indicator to skill mixes and assessing experience of individuals. Examine information regarding utilization of subcontractors.
		Corporate Overview Total				22.50	23.00	14.00	24.30	20.95

		RFP Section(s)	RFP Ref
Page / Attachment	RFP Scoring Requirements	Max Scoring	Evaluator #1	Evaluator #2	Evaluator #3	Evaluator #4	Average Score
		TECHNICAL RESPONSE 55 POINTS
		Understanding of the Project Requirements Including Project Overview, Environment, Minimum Qualifications and Scope of Work
		(VI)(A-C)	24-25 and Attachment A - Technical Requirements	Understanding the Project Description	5	4.00	4.00	4.00	5.00	4.25

	Understanding of the Scope of Services	10	8.00	8.00	8.00	10.00	8.50
	Work Plan	15	13.00	13.00	10.00	15.00	12.75
	Technical Requirements (Attachment A)	15	13.50	12.00	8.50	15.00	12.25
	Deliverables and Due Dates	10	8.00	10.00	8.00	10.00	9.00
Technical Response Total			46.50	47.00	38.50	55.00	46.75

Public Consulting Group

		RFP 125999 O3 Nebraksa Olmstead Plan Evaluation
		Average Summary
		RFP Section	RFP Ref
Page	RFP Scoring Requirements	Max Scoring	Evaluator #1	Evaluator #2	Evaluator #3	Evaluator #4	Average Score
		CORPORATE OVERVIEW 25 POINTS
		(VII)(A)(1)(B)	26-28	Financial Strength and Contract Performance	5	4.00	3.00	4.50	5.00	4.13
				Financial Stability of the Organization and Contract Performance; The character, integrity, reputation, judgment, experience and efficiency of the bidder.
				BIDDER’S CORPORATE EXPERIENCE	10	7.50	2.00	7.50	9.50	6.63
				Past Experience listed in the matrix for similar projects in size, scope and complexity; Ability, capacity, and stability of the bidder to deliver and implement the program requirements of the RFP.
				BIDDERS PROPOSED PERSONNEL/MANAGEMENT APPROACH/SUBCONTRACTORS	10	7.50	3.00	7.00	10.00	6.88
				The proposed team being assigned to manage DHHS's project. Resumes outlining qualifications as key indicator to skill mixes and assessing experience of individuals. Examine information regarding utilization of subcontractors.
		Corporate Overview Total				19.00	8.00	19.00	24.50	17.63

		RFP Section(s)	RFP Ref
Page / Attachment	RFP Scoring Requirements	Max Scoring	Evaluator #1	Evaluator #2	Evaluator #3	Evaluator #4	Average Score
		TECHNICAL RESPONSE 55 POINTS
		Understanding of the Project Requirements Including Project Overview, Environment, Minimum Qualifications and Scope of Work
		(VI)(A-C)	24-25 and Attachment A - Technical Requirements	Understanding the Project Description	5	4.00	2.00	4.00	4.80	3.70

	Understanding of the Scope of Services	10	7.00	4.00	7.00	10.00	7.00
	Work Plan	15	12.00	4.00	8.00	15.00	9.75
	Technical Requirements (Attachment A)	15	12.00	6.00	9.00	14.40	10.35
	Deliverables and Due Dates	10	8.00	8.00	9.50	10.00	8.88
Technical Response Total			43.00	24.00	37.50	54.20	39.68

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Aug 17, 2026.