(Final)_CA-PM_SOQ_Written_Proposal_Evaluation_revised_scoring.docx
DOCX document 364 KB Posted
- Attached to
- ARCHITECT-ENGINEER SERVICES FOR CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION-PROJECT MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES
- Solicitation number
- 060-2730-RFQ-CAPM-JC
- Issued by
- Orange County, California
About this file
This is a written proposal evaluation criteria document for the Orange County Sheriff-Coroner Department (OCSD) Research & Development Division Facilities Planning Unit in California, establishing scoring standards for a Request for Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) for on-call Architect/Engineer (A/E) Contract Administration-Project Management (CA-PM) Support Services. The County of Orange seeks to develop a slate of qualified contractors to provide CA-PM support services for various projects on a usage contract basis. Respondents must submit Statements of Qualifications by October 23, 2026, at 2:00 P.M. PDT, with all questions and requests for interpretation due by October 9, 2026, at 3:30 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time. The RFQ (SOQ:060-2730-RFQ-CAPM-JC) requires firms to demonstrate specific experience with CA-PM services including project development, planning and design phases, bidding phase, construction phase, and project closeout activities. Submissions must address the detailed Scope of Work provided in Attachment A and comply with all minimum qualifications and requirements outlined in the solicitation.
The evaluation process uses a 1,000-point scoring rubric assessing seven criteria: Technical Expertise (300 points), which requires five related CA-PM projects within the past ten years; Understanding of Scope (150 points); Key Personnel & References (150 points); Approach & Understanding of Projects (100 points); Control of Cost & Schedules (100 points); Organization & Compliance with Model County Contract/SOW (100 points); and Additional Information/Other (100 points), which considers staff availability, commitment to fast-tracked projects, proximity to OCSD work sites, and prior County project experience. Evaluation criteria emphasize the firm's ability to manage costs and schedules, provide qualified personnel with relevant licenses and certifications, and demonstrate professional proposal presentation with proper organization and adherence to submission requirements.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION
FACILITIES PLANNING UNIT
Facilities Planning Unit
CA-PM - SOQ Written Proposal Evaluation Criteria
WRITTEN PROPOSAL EVALUATION CRITERIA
REQUEST FOR STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
ON-CALL A/E CA-PM SERVICES
Firm: _________________________ Evaluator: _____________________ Date: ____________
| EVALUATION CRITERIA |
| WEIGHT |
| SCORE |
(0-5) WEIGHT x
SCORE/5
COMMENTS
| I. TECHNICAL EXPERTISE |
| 300 |
· Specific related CA-PM experience (five projects within the past ten years)
· Knowledge, skills, experience, and qualifications based on Scope of Work (SOW)
| II. UNDERSTANDING OF SCOPE |
| 150 |
· Understanding the Scope of Support Services, which includes and is not limited to – Project Development, Planning Design Phase, Bidding Phase, Construction Phase, and Project Closeout
| III. KEY PERSONNEL & REFERENCES |
| 150 |
· Proposed Project Team(s) Names, Titles, Roles, Qualifications, and Resumes of key personnel (Includes licenses and certifications, years of related experience, references and length of time with firm)
· Identify specific knowledge and disciplines of key personnel and subcontractors
| IV. APPROACH & UNDERSTANDING OF PROJECTS |
| 100 |
· Understanding of project and objectives
· Work Plan Approach and Management Schedule
| V. CONTROL OF COST & SCHEDULES |
| 100 |
· Capability to plan, perform project progress reports, cost and audit tracking, and billing documentation
· Identify scheduling software
· Identify specific management experience
· Describe techniques used to bring projects on time and within budget
| VI. ORGANIZATION & COMPLIANCE W/ MODEL COUNTY CONTRACT/ SOW |
| 100 |
· Thoughtfully and professionally assembled –Cover Sheet, Table of Contents, Pagination, Tabs/exhibits (if required), Page layout, Grammar, Spelling and diction, and Clear graphic exhibits
· Requirements are addressed and adhered to, Easy to follow and understand
| VII. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION/ OTHER |
| 100 |
· Availability of key staff; Commitment to make staff available for the project
· Commitment to the fast tracked nature of the project
· Proximity of OCSD work sites
· Recent OCSD and/or other County project experience
| TOTAL SCORE |
| 1,000 |
*Maximum Total Score = 1,000 Pts.
CA-PM - SOQ Written Proposal Evaluation Criteria image1.png image2.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .