Attachment-6_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 20 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Custodial Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA9301-17-R-0002
About this file
Attachment 6: Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 29
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Past and Present Performance Questionnaire 23 March 2017
SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation
TO:
You have been identified as a point of contact for a past and/or present performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire. This firm is currently being considered for a Base Custodial Services contract at Edwards AFB, CA.
Your prompt attention to this questionnaire will be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions concerning this request, I can be contacted at ________________________________.
Please submit completed questionnaire to the Government Contract Specialist identified on the attached questionnaire.
Contractor Signature
1 Attachment:
Past and Present Performance Questionnaire
A. GENERAL INFORMATION:
Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate
| Contractor’s Name: | ____________________ | Address: |
| Telephone Number: | ____________________ | |
| Fax Number: | ____________________ | |
| Point of Contact: | ____________________ |
Project Title and Brief Description of Work*: ______________________________________________________________________________
Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ________________ Dollar Amount:$__________
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror*: _____________________
* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent: _____________________ Title: ______________________ Address: ___________________________________________________________ Telephone Number: __________________________________________________ Fax Number: ________________________________________________________ Email Address: ______________________________________________________
C. SEND COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO (E-mail is Preferred Method):
| Aimee Amador | Matthew Bawden Charles Richardson | |
| AFTC/PZIOB | AFTC/PZIOB AFTC/PZIOB |
aimee.amador@us.af.mil matthew.bawden.3@us.af.mil charles.richardson.16@us.af.mil
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION:
Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation or N/A if performance in this area is not applicable to the effort addressed.
PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| Exceptional |
| Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Neutral |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeded many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeded some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. |
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: _______________ CONTRACT #: _______________
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
| Contractor Performance or Situation |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| N/A |
| 1. |
| How well did the contractor implement an orderly transition from the incumbent contractor? |
| 2. |
| How well did the contractor comply with contractual terms and conditions including the preparation and timely/accurate submission of any required documents? |
| 3. |
| How well did the contractor attract and retain qualified and fully trained personnel at all levels within their organization to ensure contract compliance? |
| 4. |
| How well did the contractor manage personnel clearances in order to regularly service secured locations? |
| 5. |
| How well does the contractor’s organization provide the necessary manning, training, equipment, and supplies to meet contractual requirements? |
| 6. |
| How would you rate the contractor’s critical key management and technical staff in terms of expertise, knowledge and qualifications? |
| 7. |
| Rate contractor’s ability to respond to workload fluctuations, e.g. budgetary fluctuations that resulted in increased or decreased activities. |
| 8. |
| How willing was the contractor to improve and correct noncompliance issues or concerns? |
| 9. |
| How well did the contractor comply with all Federal, State, EPA, OSHA and local regulatory requirement’s? |
| 10. |
| How well did the contractor handle, remove, document and properly dispose of hazardous /non-hazardous wastes. |
| 11. |
| How well did the contractor meet the special performance requirements at Child Development Centers (or equivalent)? If the Contractor did not perform at Child Development Centers (or equivalent), rate as N/A. |
| 12. |
| How well did the contractor meet the special performance requirements at Fitness Centers? If the Contractor did not perform at Fitness Centers, rate as N/A. |
| 13. |
| How would you rate the overall performance of the contractor under this contract? |
| 14. |
| Was the contractor ever issued a default, cure or show cause notice, Notice of Violation under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” |
| YES/NO |
| 15. |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” |
| YES/NO |
| 16. |
| If a Government Contract, is the contractor rated in CPARS? |
| YES/NO |
Remarks (provide detail regarding unfavorable ratings, especially those concerning performance at child development centers and fitness centers):
FA9301-17-R-0002
Attachment 6
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .