Attachment_3_OWS_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_R1.doc
DOC document 91 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Oil Water Separators Maintenance & Repair
- Solicitation number
- FA9301-13-R-0002
About this file
Attachment 3 to the RFP- Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| OWS_Remaining_QA.docx | DOCX document | |
| Exhibit_F_Amend_1.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Exhibit_B_Amend_1.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Exhibit_E_Amend_1.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Exhibit_D_Amend_1.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Exhibit_C_Amend_1.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| OWS_RFP_AMEND1.doc | DOC document | |
| PWS_Amend_1.doc | DOC document | |
| Exhibit_A_Amend_1.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| OWS_Q_and_A.docx | DOCX document | |
| OWS_RFP_CONFORMED.doc | DOC document | |
| OWS_Site_Visit_Presentation.pptx | PPTX presentation | |
| FA9301-13-R-0002_v2.pdf | ||
| Attachment_2_Wage_Determination.pdf | ||
| Bid_Schedule_and_Requriements_Pricing_Exhibit_A-F.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Attachement_1_PWS.doc | DOC document |
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Source Selection Sensitive Information (See FAR 2.101 & 3.104)
Attachment 3 – Past and Present Performance Questionnaire
SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation
TO:
You have been identified as a point of contact for a past and/or present performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire. This firm is currently being considered for an Oil Water Separator Maintenance Services contract at Edwards AFB, CA.
Your prompt attention to this questionnaire will be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions concerning this request, I can be contacted at ________________________________.
Please submit completed questionnaire to the Government Contract Specialist identified on the attached questionnaire.
Contractor Signature
1 Attachment:
Past and Present Performance Questionnaire
A. GENERAL INFORMATION:
Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate
Contractor’s Name:
Address:
Telephone Number:
Fax Number:
Point of Contact:
Project Title and Brief Description of Work*:
Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ________________ Dollar Amount:$__________
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror*: _____________________
* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
Contractor performed as the ( Prime Contractor ( Sub-Contractor ( Key Personnel
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent:
Title:
Address:
Telephone Number:
Email Address:
C. Voluntary Protection Program (VPP)
Pursuant to Voluntary Protection Program (VPP) requirements, include your Total Case Incident Rate (TCIR) and Days Away, Restricted or Transferred (DART) rate for the three most recently reported years of each contract submitted for consideration.
On page 5 in the remarks portion, explain in detail any submitted rates that exceed industry averages as defined by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (http://www.bls.gov/iif/) according to the applicable contract NAICS code (e.g. for contracts with NAICS codes beginning with 811310, rates exceeding 1.1 for TCIR and 0.5 for DART, based on the most recent reported year of data, 2012).
D. SEND COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO (E-mail is Preferred Method):
Timothy Palen
Richard Barzaghi
AFTC/PZRA
AFTC/PZRA
timothy.palen@edwards.af.mil richard.barzaghi@edwards.af.mil
E. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION:
Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation or N/A if performance in this area is not applicable to the effort addressed.
PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| Exceptional |
| Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Neutral |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeded many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeded some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. |
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.
CONTRACTOR’S NAME:
CONTRACT #:
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
| Contractor Performance or Situation |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| N/A |
| 1. |
| How well did the contractor implement an orderly transition from the incumbent contractor? |
| 2. |
| How well did the contractor comply with contractual terms and conditions including the preparation and timely/accurate submission of any required documents? |
| 3. |
| How well did the contractor attract and retain qualified and fully trained personnel at all levels within their organization to ensure contract compliance? |
| 4. |
| How well does the contractor’s organization provide the necessary manning, equipment supplies to meet requirements? |
| 5. |
| How would you rate the contractor’s critical key management and technical staff in terms of expertise, knowledge and qualifications? |
| 6. |
| Rate contractor’s ability to respond to workload fluctuations, e.g. budgetary fluctuations that resulted in increased or decreased activities. |
| 7. |
| Rate contractor’s ability to respond to and complete routine and emergency service call IAW contract requirements. |
| 8. |
| How effective was the contractor in identifying and solving technical issues in a timely manner to ensure OWS units are operational and effective in removing contaminants from the waste stream? |
| 9. |
| How effective was the contractor’s Preventive Maintenance Plan and inspection program in preventing and correcting deficiencies with OWS equipment, by minimizing equipment breakdowns and service interruptions, extending component service life, and maximizing operating efficiency. |
| 10. |
| How well did the contractor use performance measurements and reporting systems to track performance? |
| 11. |
| How effective and efficient were the contractor’s quality assurance processes to ensure OWS units were properly maintained, fully functional, and operating at maximum efficiency? |
| 12. |
| How well did the contractor comply with all Federal, State, EPA, OSHA and local regulatory requirements? |
| 13. |
| How willing was the contractor to improve and correct noncompliance issues or concerns? |
| 14. |
| How well did the contractor remove, document and properly dispose of hazardous /non-hazardous wastes? |
| 15. |
| How would you rate the overall customer satisfaction rating? |
| 16. |
| Rate the contractor’s overall management of subcontracts. |
| 17. |
| How would you rate the overall performance of the contractor under this contract? |
| 18. |
| Was the contractor ever issued a default, cure or show cause notice, or Notice of Violation under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” |
| YES/NO |
| 19. |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” |
| YES/NO |
| 20. |
| If a Government Contract, is the contractor rated in CPARS? |
| YES/NO |
Remarks:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Attachment 3
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .