14-232-VG_PA_14422.pptx

Aerospace Systems Technical Research Operation Services Industry Day 8 July 2014 Contracting Presenter – Aimee Helm, AFTC/PZRB Technical Presenter – Robert Shah, AFRL/RQRO

Distribution A: Approved for public release; unlimited distribution, PA #14422

Agenda

Distribution A: Approved for public release; unlimited distribution

Industry Day Aerospace Systems Technical Research Operations Services (ASTROS) Vision: Obtain affordable and responsive buildup / modification of rocket test stands and facility operations for demonstrating next generation rocket propulsion technologies Early Industry Involvement Encourage competition Feedback from industry

GOVERNMENT TEAM

POC’s Procuring Contract Officer

Contract Specialists Joshua Vasquez, joshua.vasquez.5@us.af.mil 661-277-8213 Nathan Hansing, nathan.hansing@us.af.mil 661-277-8454

Acquisition Project Manager Jamie Malak, jamie.malak@us.af.mil 661-275-5539 Deputy Acquisition Project Manager Robert Shah, robert.shah.2@us.af.mil 661-275-5915

Edwards Research Site Overview for ASTROS Industry Day

Mr. Michael Huggins Chief, Rocket Propulsion Division Air Force Research Laboratory Edwards Air Force Base, CA

AFMC Mission Goals

Nuclear Technology Life Cycle Management Sustainment

Continue to Strengthen AFMC’s Role in the Nuclear Enterprise Sustain Air Force Capabilities through World-Class Depot Maintenance & Supply Perform World-Class Test and Evaluation Acquire and Support War-Winning Capabilities Advance Today’s & Tomorrow’s Combat Capabilities through Leading-Edge Technology

Test & Evaluation

DISTRIBUTION A Approved for Public Release; distribution unlimited

AF S&T Workforce (AFRL) # People

Professional Tenure S&E Education

* Does not include Students

* Data as of: 31 August 2013 Years of Federal Service

Space Vehicles Space Electronics Space Environmental Impacts & Mitigation Space OE/IR Space Experiments Platforms & Operations Technologies

Materials and Manufacturing Functional Materials & Applications Manufacturing & Industrial Technology Structural Materials & Applications Support for Operations

Sensors Advanced Devices & Components Layered Sensing Exploitation Multi-Int Sensing (RF/EO) Spectrum Warfare

Fuze Technology Munitions AGN&C Munitions System Effects Science Ordinance Sciences Terminal Seeker Sciences

Munitions Aerospace Systems Air Vehicles Control, Power & Thermal Management High Speed Systems Space & Missile Propulsion Turbine Engines

Directed Energy Directed Energy & EO for Space Superiority High Power Electromagnetics Laser Systems Weapons Modeling and Simulation Information Autonomy, C2, & Decision Support Connectivity & Dissemination Cyber Science & Technology Processing & Exploitation Human Performance Bio-effects Decision Making Human Centered ISR Training

AF Office of Scientific Research Aerospace, Chemical & Material Sciences Education & Outreach Mathematics, Information, & life sciences Physics & Electronics

AFRL Technical Competencies

AFRL Locations

AEROSPACE SYSTEMS

MATERIALS & MFG

SENSORS

711th HUMAN PERFORMANCE WING

HEADQUARTERS AFRL

Wright-Patterson AFB, OH

INFORMATION

Rome, NY

MUNITIONS

Eglin AFB, FL 711th HUMAN PERFORMANCE WING Ft Sam Houston, TX

DIRECTED ENERGY

Maui Research Site, HI

SPACE VEHICLES

DIRECTED ENERGY

Kirtland AFB, NM

AEROSPACE

SYSTEMS

Edwards AFB, CA

AFOSR

Arlington, VA

ASIAN OFFICE OF AEROSPACE

RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT

Tokyo, Japan

EUROPEAN OFFICE OF AEROSPACE

RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT

London, UK

SOUTHERN OFFICE OF AEROSPACE

RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT

Santiago, Chile

RQ-West (Edwards AFB CA) RQ-East (Wright Patterson AFB OH)

Where We Fit In Rocket Engines & Motors Satellite Propulsion Advanced Propulsion Fuels and Propellants System Analysis

Air Vehicle Structures Controls Turbine Engines Ramjet Engines Hypersonic Engines Aircraft Power Thermal Management Fuels and Propellants System Analysis

Distribution A: Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited

MOJAVE

BORON

HWY 58

LANCASTER

AVENUE E

HIGHWAY 14

LANCASTER BLVD.

140th STREET EAST

RESERVATION BOUNDARY

SCALE IN MILES

HWY 395

ROSAMOND BLVD.

MERCURY BLVD.

ROCKET SITE ROAD

EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE

Air Force Research Laboratory Site

ROGERS

DRY LAKE

ROSAMOND

DRY LAKE

AFFTC

Edwards AFB

HWY 58

D.C.

Edwards Site: Unique Capability 65 Square Mile Development Facility Air quality constraints do not inhibit research activities Noise abatement not a problem Wind/population corridor does not inhibit research Environmental monitor/control systems in place Flight Test Center relation/support ongoing 135 Major Lab/Engineering Facilities & Buildings 30 Major Active Areas and Stands High Thrust Facilities 19 Liquid Engine stands (up to 8M lbs thrust) 13 Solid Rocket Motor pads (up to 10M lbs thrust) Altitude Facilities (micro-newtons to 50K lbs thrust) Unique geophysical set-up ($2.5B+ investment)

Facilities Bench-level Labs High Thrust Facilities 19 Liquid Engine stands, up to 8,000,000 lbs thrust 13 Solid Rocket Motor pads, up to 10,000,000 lbs thrust

Altitude Facilities From micro-newtons to 50,000 lbs thrust

History of the Rock AF Atlas ICBM/Launch Vehicle Early 1960s on Test Stand 1-95

Titan I & II ICBM Test Stand 1-3 in Early 1960s Titan IV solid rocket booster 1980s – 1990s in Area 1-32 and Test Stand 1-B

F-1 engine testing for the Saturn V Rocket that put Men on the Moon

AF Minuteman I, II and III ICBMs

Space and Missile R&D Building Block Process

6.1 6.2 6.3

Rocket Propulsion Division (RQR) Functional Layout Combustion (C) Propellants (P)

Engines (E)

Motors (M)

In-Space Propulsion (S)

Experimental Demonstration (O) Integration and Operations Finance Safety

Branch Competencies/Expertise RQRC – Combustion Devices Non-Equilibrium Flows, Fuel Stability, Heat Transfer, High Temperature Components, Propellant Fracture Mechanics, Analysis & Assessment

RQRP – Propellants Liquid &, Solid Rocket Propellant Modeling, Synthesis, Characterization, & Development, Polymers, Propellant Fracture Mechanics

RQRO – Experimental Demonstrations World-Class Facilities & Testing Support For Rocket Propulsion Technologies and Systems. Solids, Liquids, In-Space at Atmospheric or Hi-Altitude (including temp control) RQRM – Motors Exploratory and Advanced Development of Solid Propulsion Technologies

RQRE – Engines Exploratory and Advanced Development of Liquid Rocket Engine Technologies

RQRS – In-Space Propulsion Exploratory and Advanced Development of Spacecraft Propulsion Technologies

Programs of Interest (it’s all about the paradigm shifts)

(O) (E) (M) (S)

USET

(C-Analysis) (P-Propellants) (P-Materials) HC Boost

IMLM

MCAT

AF M315E

Elec Prop

TS-2A

A1-32, A1-42 A1-42, EP Lab

(C-Combustion)

IMLM

(Integrated Motor Life Management) In-House:

Validation of A&S modeling capability AFNWC funded supported for ANDES improvement (Automated NDE Data Evaluation System) The WOWs Potential to provide millions in cost avoidance Provide accurate, near-real-time motor health condition (diagnostics) Provide individualized service life estimates (prognostics) Transition opportunity ~ 2018 Goals: Reduce predictive uncertainty of future state of a motor on an individual basis by 20%/50% (near/far term goals) Analysis Command & control

Initial state and inspection data Data processing and storage Sensors to include:

temperature, humidity, case damage, propellant slump, acceleration, and TVA displacement and load First integration of motor specific sensor data to advanced aging models to provide a individualized service life estimate

MCAT

(Motor Component Assessment Technology) What are we doing? Developing new solid rocket motor (SRM) components and M&S tools that decrease inert weight by 20%.

Customer why? High-speed penetrator weapons will enable attack of deeply-buried targets.

Tech Reason? New M&S tools may show possibility of higher efficiencies from SRM designs.

Transition? 3 of 6 FY12 task orders support an AFRL FCC. 1 of 6 FY12 task orders supports AFNWC.

In-House:

Experiments to validate new models The WOWs The AFNWC propellant task is part of a plan that may save $2.1B in future acquisition costs.

We are only gov’t lab doing solid rocket motor R&D for launch & strategic needs.

USET

(Upper Stage Engine Technology Program) Validating new suite of LOx/Hydrogen rocket engine M&S tools through heavily-instrumented 4,000 hp, 90,000 rpm turbopump Risk reduction work ups TRL of components allowing SMC/LR NGE program to enter post-milestone B, saving years on the schedule and $multi-M’s in cost Verify and Validate suite of tools to greatly reduce the amount of physical testing by conducting better M&S during design NGE with SMC/LR and tools used in current NGE risk reduction work, Hydrocarbon Boost, >45 M&S tool-specific transitions to industry, DOD, NASA

In-House:

Test stand Buildup Design of new facility hardware Hardware Fabrication Hardware Installation In-house tool validation and verification On-site rapid data reduction and analysis

The WOWs:

SMC/LR requested TTP transition to NGE Key member of AUSEP (Affordable Upper Stage Engine Program) IPT Conducted Risk Reduction work on USET contract to support AUSEP TRL requirements Most highly instrumented, highest tip speed and suction of any turbopump ever tested

SMC/LR AUSEP Vision Engine

Program Completed, Report in Progress

HC Boost (Hydrocarbon Boost Program)

In-House:

Building subscale test facility to mitigate combustion devices risk Critical combustion research using 219 funds Fuel thermal stability, nozzle cooling, injector design The WOWs:

Design, build, test ORSC LOx/Kerosene Liquid Rocket Engine Tech Demonstrator 250K-lbf with high Throttle Capability (SOTA is 2:1) – Enables mission flexibility 100 Life Cycle with 50 cycle overhaul (SOTA is 20) – Exceeds requirement, provides margin ORSC is a higher performing engine resulting in a smaller launch vehicle or an increase in delivered payload

HCB establishes advanced, modern, domestic LRE Tech Base Required to replace Russian RD-180 on EELV U.S.’s 1st reusable, high-perf HC engine Establishes Ox-rich staged combustion (ORSC) tech base for U.S.

Sustain ailing U.S. rocket engine industry tech development base HCB strongly supports SMC/LR American Kerosene Engine project

Electric Propulsion What are we doing? Developing new technologies that enable less expensive, more maneuverable and more agile s/c Customer Why? Reducing launch mass substantially reduces launch cost, increases payload fraction, and enables missions otherwise not possible (e.g. AEHF) Tech Reason? Plasma propulsion increases Isp by 10x, reducing s/c propellant 10x, enabling lighter and/or more capable s/c Transition?

Test facilities 8 vacuum chambers Thruster design Diagnostics Validation of M&S Mod/Sim Program Advanced numerical methods

The WOWs:

AEHF requested assistance with thruster performance verification; SV-2 onboard diagnostics package flying Developed propulsion module for FalconSat-5 tech demo, including spacecraft interaction diagnostics Cubesat EP propulsion module selected by 2 constellations for flight in 2014 National M&S effort for EP coordinated by AFRL-RZSS

AEHF SV2 Sensor Package

Tech demos: FalconSat-5–demonstrating low power propulsion and spacecraft impact Operational systems: AEHF–enabling high mass spacecraft directly supporting warfighter

AFRL Developed Advanced Monopropellants What are we doing? Providing advanced propellant with higher performance and much lower toxicity than hydrazine Customer why? Faster operational response with reduced costs can be attained with greater mission capabilities Tech Reason? Energetic ionic liquids provide low vapor toxicity and high energy density Transition? Orbital flight experiment on TBD S/C-2014

Small Spacecraft Benefits Trade Analysis 1N – 12N N2H4 Thrusters

NTO/MMH Bipropropellant AFRL Advanced Monopropellant Hydrazine Monopropellant

Advanced monoprops can perform like bipropellant in small craft!

Fully characterized small scale safety & hazard properties Passes all safety requirements DOT approval for transport First successful thruster firings Pilot scale propellant production Advanced monopropellant cost = hydrazine cost Supplying transition programs

What Have We Done Lately?

Recent Technical Achievements Transitioned 200W Hall Thruster to TacSat-2 Delivered 8 CubeSat thrusters to NRO (10x inc in performance USET demo (liquid rocket engine turbopump), M&S transitions & tech transition to customer Hydrocarbon Boost subscale preburner on test stand (testing to begin CY14) Combustion Stability Test Rig/Facility passed last hurdled, testing to begin this quarter (219 funded) New energetic ingredient (furazan class) cleared for large batch (10 lb) scale-up

Questions?

ASTROS

ASTROS Project Manager

Jamie Malak

Contract History Research Operation Support Services (ROSS I & II) Combined three contracts Operational Services Support (OSS) Technical Services Support (TSS) Facility Support Maintenance Services (FSMS) 15 year history ROSS I, $142M, PoP 1999 - 2011 ROSS II, $118M, PoP 2011 - 2016 Competitive source selections

CPAF

Meeting Objectives Objectives of Industry Day Present proposed program Goals Schedule Seek input for acquisition strategy Provide details on Request For Proposals (RFP) Gain concurrence/feedback from industry on this plan.

Send feedback to email addresses listed at www.fbo.gov Q & A responses will be posted under FA9300-15-R-0001 in FBO NLT 27 July 2014

Business Overview Contracting Presenter

Aimee Helm

Contracting Overview Current Contract Requirements to do Business with the Government Acquisition Background Contract Type Contract Structure Acquisition Conditions Oversights Deliverables Tentative Contracting Milestones Base Support/Government Furnished Services Organizational Conflict of Interest Source Selection

Current Contract

ROSS II, FA9300-11-C-0001

Current Contractor: Jacobs Technology Inc.

Contract Type: CPAF, FFP, CPFF Original Total Contract Value: $86M Current Contract Value: $118M NAICS Code: 541712 - Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (Except Biotechnology) SB size standard 1000 Employees

Requirements to do Business with the Government System for Award Management (SAM) required in accordance with FAR 4.1102. Access at: https://www.sam.gov/portal/SAM#1 Core Data (formerly Central Contractor Registration or “CCR”) Representations & Certifications (formally Online Representations and Certifications or “ORCA”) Wide Area Work Flow(WAWF): Contractors will submit payment requests in accordance with the instructions contained in their specific contract. Reference DFARS 252.232-7003. Contact your particular DCMA office for training. Access at: https://wawf.eb.mil/

Acquisition Background Project Name: ASTROS On Site Support – AFRL/RQ- West Anticipated Period of Performance, 10 years 4 Year Basic 2 Year Award Term 2 Year Award Term 2 Year Award Term

Tentative Contract Type Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee + Performance Incentive + Award Term CPFF (X%)+ PI (X%), request Industry input Possible Performance Incentive Criteria Management Technical Cost Schedule

Anticipated Contract Structure Basic contract CLIN structure

Award Term Periods CLIN structure

Acquisition Conditions Security classification Base support Computer security requirements No foreign participation International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) Public Law 98-94 (Export Control)

Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI) Non Disclosure Agreements (NDA) Associate Contractor Agreements (ACA) Unlimited data rights Environmental and safety requirements Hazardous materials

Potential Oversight Monthly Management In-House Reviews Regular updates to Government Program Manager and Work Plan Manager Compliance with Service Summaries Performance Incentive Reviews – fee Award Term Board – added years

Potential Deliverables Work Plan, as required Monthly Funds and Man-Hour Expenditure Report Property Control Plan State Environmental Health and Safety Plan Subcontracting Plan Quality Control Plan Instrumentation Controls Software/Programming

Organizational Conflict of Interest Per Policy Memo 10-C-15 (15 Oct 2010) directed at AFFARS 5352.209-9000:

Prevents conflicting roles which may bias the contractor’s judgment of objectivity, or to preclude the contractor from obtaining an unfair competitive advantage in concurrent or future acquisitions.

Alt III – May not use other company’s proprietary information in any other way or purpose Alt VI – Restrictions are binding to any subcontractors – prime must include in any subcontracts Both Alts apply to this contract Policy Memo 10-C-15 can be found at http://ww3.safaq.hq.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-101018-008.pdf

Tentative Contracting Milestone

Proposal evaluation Jun-Oct 2015

Base Support Office space, furniture, telephones, computers Emergency medical transport Security police support Firefighter support Site specific training (i.e. Desert Tortoise) Custodial Service Use of government fuel supply

Tentative Source Selection Award based on Best Value Evaluation factors Factor 1: Mission Capability Subfactor 1: Technical scenarios Subfactor 2: Program management Subfactor 3: Subcontract management Subfactor 4: Personnel recruitment and retention plan Factor 2: Past Performance Factor 3: Cost/Price Factor 1 is most important. Factors 2 and 3 are equal in importance and of lesser importance than Factor 1.

Factor 1 >(Factor 2 = Factor 3)

Tentative Source Selection

Written & Electronic Proposals Electronic spreadsheets must include formulas Oral Presentations 15 minutes company description/capabilities 45 minutes evaluated Factor 1, subfactors 2, 3 and 4

Technical Overview Technical Presenter

Robert Shah

Technical Overview Current Demographics Major Work Vectors Contract Management Security / ITAR Restrictions

Current Technical Demographics Total number: 95 Skill Sets Include Scientists / Engineers (38) Technicians (57) Mechanics Instrumentation and Controls Machinists Welders Electricians

Major Vectors Provide comprehensive program management responsible for overall program coordination and all individual tasks required to satisfy assigned mission on time and at or under agreed budget Provide appropriate specialized skills related to rocket propulsion systems. Demonstrate flexibility to quickly respond to changing test stand build up requirements and priorities Provide robust, timely and accurate standardized electronic billing and purchasing systems at the CLIN/ACRN/Task level, linking PO & invoice (with % Davis Bacon Act) Maintain required safety, security, quality, code/regulation/logistics compliance and sustainability levels Maintain required configuration management such as drawings, SOPs, etc.

Security Work site is in an access controlled area Badges required Military base requirements Special requirements for visitor access Some classified information may be generated No POVs in test areas Comply with International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) and EAR (Export Administration Regulations) as such items are generated

Security (cont.)

All documents must be reviewed and approved by the Scientific and Technical Information Office (STINFO) prior to release. A vast majority of documentation generated will have limited distribution Contractors have a responsibility to inform their subcontractors and commercial suppliers that they must also comply For further information, please reference:

ITAR, 22 CFR 120-130, http://www.pmddtc.state.gov/regulations_laws/itar.html EAR, 15 CFR 730-774, http://www.access.gpo.gov/bis/ear/ear_data.html

Questions & Discussion

Agenda

image3.jpeg image4.png image8.jpeg image9.png image14.jpeg image15.jpeg image16.png image17.png image12.emf image25.png image26.png image27.png image18.png image19.jpeg image20.png image21.png image22.png image23.png image24.png image28.png image29.png image13.png

Microsoft_Excel_97-2003_Worksheet1.xls Chart1

0 to 10 0 to 10 0 to 10

10 to 20 10 to 20 10 to 20

20 to 30 20 to 30 20 to 30

30 + 30 + 30 +

B.S

M.S.

PhD

Sheet1

B.S M.S. PhD

0 to 10 187 361 360

10 to 20 105 299 254

20 to 30 137 414 230

30 + 114 221 87

To resize chart data range, drag lower right corner of range.

Microsoft_Excel_97-2003_Worksheet2.xls Chart1

PhD

M.S.

B.S.

Sales

33%

0.33

0.47

0.2

Sheet1

Sales 2769

PhD 33% PhD 931 34%

M.S. 47% M.S. 1295 47%

B.S. 20% B.S. 543 20%

100%

To resize chart data range, drag lower right corner of range.

image30.jpeg image31.png image32.wmf image33.wmf image34.jpeg image35.jpeg image36.png image37.jpeg image38.jpeg image39.jpeg image40.jpeg image41.png image49.png image42.png image43.jpeg image44.jpeg image45.jpeg image46.jpeg image47.jpeg image48.jpeg image50.jpeg image51.jpeg image52.jpeg image53.jpeg image54.jpeg image55.jpeg image56.jpeg image57.jpeg image58.jpeg image59.jpeg image60.jpeg image61.jpeg image62.jpeg image63.png image64.jpeg image65.jpeg image66.png image67.jpeg image68.jpeg image69.png image70.jpeg image71.jpeg image72.png image73.jpeg image74.jpeg image83.jpeg image75.jpeg image76.jpeg image77.jpeg image78.png image79.jpeg image80.jpeg image81.jpeg image82.jpeg image92.jpeg image93.jpeg image94.png image95.emf image96.jpeg image84.jpeg image85.jpeg image86.jpeg image87.jpeg image88.jpeg image89.jpeg image90.jpeg image91.jpeg image97.emf image98.jpeg

Microsoft_Excel_97-2003_Worksheet3.xls Chart4

SOTA

N2H4

Phase II

AF315E

Biprop

MMH/N2O4

Intercept ΔV [m/s]

2026.3072374216

2946.3002594379

2725.4927381458

Sheet4

Satellite Mass 120 kg

Propulsion Mass 95 kg

Monoprop:

Dry Mass 0 kg r=1.0 tankage 20%

Biprop:

Thruster Mass 0 kg r=1.0 tankage 30%

SK/ACS Isp 98 s

DV/yr, SK/ACS 10 m/s

Loiter Time 0 yrs

MMH/N2O4

Biprop? 0 0 1

Isp 205 261 312 r 1.01 1.465 1.175

Tankage 0.198019802 0.1365187713 0.2553191489

Prop Dry Mass 18.8118811881 12.9692832765 24.2553191489

SK Propellant 0 0 0

Mass Ratio 2.7389830508 3.1604494382 2.4362850972

Total DV 2026.3072374216 2946.3002594379 2725.4927381458

Monoprop 45%

Biprop 8% image99.jpeg image100.jpeg image101.jpeg image102.jpeg image103.jpeg image104.jpeg image105.png image106.jpeg image107.jpeg image1.png image2.jpeg image5.jpeg image6.jpeg image7.png image10.png image11.jpeg