RFI_7.24.2019.02.docx
DOCX document 13 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Tunnel D Vacuum Pump
- Solicitation number
- FA9101-19-Q-0052
About this file
See attached
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFI_7.24.2019.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFI_7.22.2019.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFI_7.18.2019.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFI_7.17.2019.docx | DOCX document | |
| Containerized_Vacuum_Pump_System_Procurement_SOW_Tunnel_D_FBO_Edit.docx | DOCX document | |
| FA9101-19-Q-0052_Tunnel_D_Vacuum_Pump_Combined_Synopsis.docx | DOCX document | |
| Tunnel_D_Vacuum_Pump_Evaluation_Criteria.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Tunnel D RFI- 7.24.2019
Q. I have another question. I was told that it is better to meet the power requirement than to meet the pumpdown spec.
In that case do they want a spare they can open into the system utilizing a valve, and also closing the other valve to pull out the existing pump with an issue.
A. A “hot spare” of this type (i.e. connected and ready to use, but only operable within the power budget if another pump is down) would be valued if space and cost allow for it, but is not required per the spec.
File details come from the government source that posted it.