RFI_7.18.2019.docx
DOCX document 13 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Tunnel D Vacuum Pump Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA9101-19-Q-0052
About this file
See attached
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFI_7.24.2019.02.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFI_7.24.2019.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFI_7.22.2019.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFI_7.17.2019.docx | DOCX document | |
| FA9101-19-Q-0052_Tunnel_D_Vacuum_Pump_Combined_Synopsis.docx | DOCX document | |
| Containerized_Vacuum_Pump_System_Procurement_SOW_Tunnel_D_FBO_Edit.docx | DOCX document | |
| Tunnel_D_Vacuum_Pump_Evaluation_Criteria.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFI- 7.18.2019
Q. Is there room for two containers?
A. Physical space is not the driving issue. Our firm power budget is 400A @ 480 3ph and pulling additional power from our substation is not within our budget forecast.
One container of this design may be fairly close to the power budget, but they should run performance estimates against our specification – I think we are looking for more CFM at higher pressures than Tunnel 9 was, i.e. more ‘roughing’ capacity than low-end boost.
File details come from the government source that posted it.