Attachment_3_BECOS_Relevancy_PPQ_Draft_RFP.pdf

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104

DRAFT

Past Performance Questionnaire Record Solicitation BECOS

VENDOR NAME:

PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE CONTRACT #:

1. What type of services did / does the contractor provide under the referenced contract number?

Response:

2. The Government will consider a higher relevancy rating on projects that exceed $5,000,000.

The Government will consider a higher relevancy rating on projects that are more complex in nature.

3. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: If “Yes” or “No”, place an “X” in the appropriate column. For each area, using the definitions matrix (E, V, S, M, U), indicate the rating that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U

E V S M U

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements.

The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104

1. Program Management and Quality

Assurance The Contractor:

E VG S M U N/A

A. Provided documents, technical plans, and reports accurate, timely and complete and with demonstrated quality. (did not require excessive revision)

B. Performed site work in compliance with required and applicable regulations.

(such as, health and safety, ARARs, environmental, OSHA, state, federal, professional certifications and registrations)

C. Performed record of decision, decision documents, feasibility studies and / or conceptual site models preparation and amendments timely, as required, and IAW regulation.

D. Implemented RCRA processes and / or CERCLA processes IAW regulation and protective of Human Health and the Environment (an "exceptional or very good" represents completion of combined actions / interrelated pieces of the entire the RCRA and / or CERCLA process).

E. Worked with state regulatory processes IAW regulation and protective of Human Health and the Environment.

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104

2. Regulatory Interaction and

Stakeholder Coordination The Contractor:

E VG S M U N/A

A. Worked proactively and collaboratively with the Government and engaged regulatory agencies well in order to achieve goals such as project and / or performance objectives, reduced Life Cycle Costs, modification of remedies and decision documents.

B. Implemented and / or facilitated Community Involvement, addressed challenging stakeholders and / or collaborated with community stakeholders such as public events, meetings and during work related to Site Closeout, Restoration Advisory Boards, and / or additional outreach.

C. Transitioned work well, providing all the required documents (such as, GIS, mapping, records, and plans) to coordinate contract closeout and assist the incoming contractor successfully without major issues.

D. Performed an effort that required work on multiple areas with more than (5) five contract designated sites such as installations or former installations. (able to coordinate work on multiple sites and areas well)

E. Managed environmental restoration activities on property with multiple owners / stakeholders. Such as local redevelopment authorities, private entities, federal agencies and municipalities.

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104

Narrative:

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104

3. Analysis and Data Management

The Contractor:

E VG S M U N/A

A. Provided reports (such as, work plans and conceptual site models) that demonstrate knowledge and technical acumen in Environmental Remediation and / or Restoration.

B. Applied an innovative approach in order to accelerate site closeout at a site.

C. Exhibited technical acumen in assessing, analyzing, and validating data. (quality data analysis and integrity in sampling data)

D. Designed, installed, operated, maintained, and / or optimized remediation systems, such as, a pump and treat system in a manner that ensures maintenance of the selected remedy.

E. Consistently monitored the current remedy progress and / or tracked site progress issues, communicated progress / metrics, and reported on achievement of cleanup goals and performance objectives. (organized and clear metrics / reporting)

Narrative:

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104

4. Were there any adverse performance issues/problems? If so, how were they resolved? (Please reference questions above by topic area and letter.)

Reports/Letters Y/N

Contract Discrepancy Report Cure Notice Show Cause Notice Suspension of Payment Termination for Convenience/Default Denial of Claim Other

Remarks:

Response by:

Print Name Title

Signature Date