1-PWS_FA8903-16-Q-0005.pdf

FA8903-16-Q-0005

Attachment 1 23 May 2016

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT

FOR

LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT AND REMEDIAL ACTION-

OPERATIONS AT ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION PROGRAM

SITES

LF001, LF012 (WEST), LF014, LF015, LF016, LF017, SS043 AND WP029,

LEON CREEK MITIGATION MONITORING AT ENVIRONMENTAL

RESTORATION PROGRAM SITE LF011 AND RESTORATON

ADVISORY BOARD SUPPORT (Project Numbers: MPLS20167038, MPLS20167038A and MPLS20167010RB)

AT

JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO - LACKLAND, TEXAS

AND

REMEDIAL ACTION-OPERATIONS AT ERP SITE LF002

(Project Number: CYRB20167001)

AT

JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO – CAMP BULLIS, TEXAS

Contract Number: FA8903-16-Q-0005

23 May 2016

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT

PART A - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

In carrying out work under this Task Order (TO), the Contractor shall furnish the personnel, services, equipment, tools, materials, vehicles, facilities supervision and other requirements necessary for the performance of work set forth herein. The Contractor shall be immediately capable of addressing and interpreting all aspects of environmental regulations.

1.0 Scope

1.1 Introduction

This Performance Work Statement (PWS) defines the requirements to conduct Long-Term Management (LTM) and Remedial Action Operations (RA-O) at Environmental Restoration Program (ERP) Sites LF001, LF012, LF014, LF015, LF016, LF017, SS043 and WP029, Leon Creek Mitigation Monitoring at ERP Site LF011, Restoration Advisory Board Support at Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA)-Lackland, Texas and RA-O at ERP Site LF002 at JBSA-Camp Bullis, Texas

Background

Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland (JBSA-LAK) is located in Bexar County, Texas, approximately seven miles southwest of San Antonio. The installation encompasses approximately 8,700 acres and consists of the Lackland Main Base (approximately 2,700 acres), the Lackland Training Annex (approximately 4,000 acres) and the Kelly Field Annex (KFA) (approximately 2,000 acres). All JBSA-LAK sites included in this project are located on the KFA. The sites are regulated under a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Permit and Compliance Plan issued by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ).

Site LF001 – This site is located on the south side of the main drainage ravines from Security Hill and measures approximately 7 acres. It was used as a landfill from 1945 to 1970 and is believed to contain domestic, industrial and commercial wastes. A waste oil burn pit or chemical disposal pit was active during the late 1940s in the north-central portion of the site. In September 2008, the TCEQ approved the Corrective Measures Study (CMS) recommendation for LF001 pursuant to 30 TAC §335.561 RRS No.3, to install redundant soil cover system and institutional controls. This remedy involved addressing former trench subsidence through recompaction of the soil cover and placement of a geosynthetic liner, compacted clay and topsoil to remove depressions where storm water could accumulate and influence infiltration and potential waste leaching. The soil cap system also addressed any potential for contaminant vapor migration from the subsurface to ambient air.

Site LF011 – This site is located near the northwest base boundary, within the Leon Creek flood plain. The 13-acre site was operated as a landfill and waste disposal area from about 1919 through the 1960’s and is believed to have been used for disposal of construction debris and

23 May 2016 general fill for construction. In September 2008, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) approved the Corrective Measure Study (CMS) recommendation for 30 TAC §335.555 RRS No.2, institutional controls only. The institutional control is a deed notice in accordance with 30 TAC §335.560 and documentation through the RRS2 (Closure to Health Based Criteria) process. As part of the remedial action, restoration and repair of the Leon Creek bank sections was conducted to address areas of exposed construction debris and provide long-term protection from erosion during high water conditions. This effort included removal of exposed and deposited waste (construction debris) from areas of Leon Creek. Erosion control measures were constructed along the banks of Leon Creek within portions of LF011 to protect the creek from future soil erosion of the associated waste material. Mitigation for these erosion control measures is performed along 700 feet of the Leon Creek banks downstream of LF011.

Site LF012 – This site is located in the west-central portion of KFA and is bounded by Westover Road to the east and Hall Street to the west (This project covers requirements for the western portion of the site). The site is approximately 26 acres, although waste disposal did not occur over the entire area. LF012 is within the Leon Creek flood plain and consists of western (LF012- West) and eastern (LF012-East) sections that are separated by the creek LF012-West is approximately 18 acres and LF012 East is approximately 8 acres. LF012 was operated for waste disposal between 1942 and 1957; materials dumped into this site consisted of construction debris, general refuse, scrap metal and garbage. LF012-West also received mixed solvents and drummed wastes for disposal. Due to the nature of the site, the remedy evaluation in the CMS determined the need for differing remedial actions for LF012-West and LF012-East. In September 2008, the TCEQ approved the CMS recommendation for LF012-East pursuant to 30 TAC §335.555 RRS No.2, institutional controls only. TCEQ also approved the CMS recommendation for closure of LF012-West pursuant to 30 TAC §335.561 RRS No.3, upgrade of soil cover system, enhanced biodegradation, upgraded groundwater recovery and vertical barrier system and institutional controls. This remedy involved addressing former trench subsidence through re-compaction of the soil cover and placement of additional clay and topsoil to remove depressions where storm water could accumulate and influence infiltration and potential waste leaching. The additional soil was used to establish contour to promote drainage to further limit infiltration. Secondly, the existing groundwater recovery system was replaced with a recovery trench and vertical barrier system in April of 2009 to increase the effectiveness of impacted groundwater capture. Lastly, the former drummed waste disposal area (located on the west side of LF012, abutting Hall Street), considered the source of impacted groundwater at the site, had a barrier wall and redundant cap system installed in March of 2009 to isolate the area from further groundwater degradation.

Site LF014 – This site is located between Westover Road and Leon Creek, in the southeastern corner of KFA. The site is approximately 26 acres, although waste disposal did not occur over this entire area. LF014 can be divided into northwest and southeast sections (LF014-Northwest and -Southeast) each having distinct configurations and disposal histories. LF014-Northwest is comprised of northern and north-central areas and is approximately 18 acres in size. The area was operated as cut-and-fill landfill trenches during the mid-1950s to mid-1960s and reportedly received a variety of different wastes, including mixed solvents, pesticides, waste petroleum hydrocarbons, general refuse, hardfill and electroplating sludge drums. LF014-Southeast is approximately 8 acres. Reportedly, this area was used to dispose of soil and rubble fill. In

23 May 2016

September 2008, the TCEQ approved the CMS recommendation for LF014 pursuant to 30 TAC §335.561 RRS No.3, to upgrade of soil cover system, enhanced biodegradation, upgraded groundwater recovery and vertical barrier system and institutional controls. This remedy involved addressing former trench subsidence through recompaction of the soil cover and placement of additional clay and topsoil to remove depressions where storm water could accumulate and influence infiltration and potential waste leaching. The additional soil was also used to establish contour to promote drainage to further limit infiltration. Furthermore, a barrier wall was installed in March of 2009 to isolate the area from further groundwater degradation.

The existing groundwater recovery system was replaced with a recovery trench and vertical barrier system in May of 2009 to increase the effectiveness of impacted groundwater capture.

Site LF015 – This site borders the west bank of Leon Creek and is approximately 13 acres in size. The site was active from the 1950s to the 1960s and was used as a waste disposal area, waste staging area and former oil-burning pit. Records indicate that this landfill received electroplating sludge, solvents, pesticides, waste petroleum, oil, lubricants, aerosols and 1,2- DCB. Due to the nature of the site, the remedy evaluation in the CMS determined the need for differing remedial actions for LF015-Evaporation Pond Area and LF015. In September 2008, the TCEQ approved the CMS recommendation for closure of the LF015-Evaporation Pond Area pursuant to 30 TAC §335.561 RRS No.3, upgrade of soil cover system, enhanced biodegradation, upgraded groundwater recovery and vertical barrier system and institutional controls. TCEQ approved the remedy for the remainder of LF015 based on the CMS recommendation for 30 TAC §335.561 RRS No.3, to upgrade of soil cover system and institutional controls. This remedy involved addressing former trench subsidence through recompaction of the soil cover and placement of additional clay and topsoil to remove depressions where storm water could accumulate and influence infiltration and potential waste leaching. The additional soil was also used to establish contour to promote drainage to further limit infiltration. The existing groundwater recovery system was replaced with a recovery trench and vertical barrier system in August of 2009 to increase the effectiveness of impacted groundwater capture.

Site LF016 – This site is bounded by LF001, LF015, LF017 and WP029, measures approximately 4 acres and was active from the 1950s to 1960s. The site was active from the 1950s to the 1960s and utilized landfill trenches in the western portion of the site and a waste staging area in the eastern portion. Reports suggest the landfill received a variety of wastes, including electroplating sludge, pesticides, solvents, waste petroleum, oil, lubricants, cresols and 1,2-dichlorobenzene. In September 2008, the TCEQ approved the CMS recommendation for LF016 pursuant to 30 TAC §335.561 RRS No.3, to upgrade of soil cover system and institutional controls. This remedy involved addressing former trench subsidence through recompaction of the soil cover and placement of additional clay and topsoil to remove depressions where storm water could accumulate and influence infiltration and potential waste leaching. The additional soil was also used to establish contour to promote drainage to further limit infiltration.

Site LF017 – This site is located immediately north of the installation boundary and Military Drive, encompasses approximately 22 acres and was active from the late 1950s to the late 1960s.

During that time, trenching occurred along the southern area of the site for the disposal of wastes such as general refuse, electroplating sludge, hardfill, pesticides, solvents, empty containers, 23 May 2016 waste petroleum, oils, lubricants, phenols and 1,4-dichlorobenzene. In September 2008, the TCEQ approved the CMS recommendation for LF017 pursuant to 30 TAC §335.561 RRS No.3, to upgrade of soil cover system and institutional controls. This remedy involved addressing former trench subsidence through recompaction of the soil cover and placement of additional clay and topsoil to remove depressions where storm water could accumulate and influence infiltration and potential waste leaching. The additional soil was also used to establish contour to promote drainage to further limit infiltration.

Site SS043 – This site is located near the center of KFA and is contained primarily within the boundaries of a natural drainage way that exists east of Security Hill. The site encompasses approximately 16 acres and was operated in the 1950s and 1960s as a landfill for construction rubble and other materials. Historical information indicates that a variety of construction debris, industrial waste and general refuse has been placed in various portions of the ravine over time. In September 2008, the TCEQ approved the CMS recommendation for SS043 pursuant to 30 TAC §335.561 RRS No.3, to upgrade of soil cover system and institutional controls. This remedy involved addressing former trench subsidence through recompaction of the soil cover and placement of additional clay and topsoil to remove depressions where storm water could accumulate and influence infiltration and potential waste leaching. The additional soil was also used to establish contour to promote drainage to further limit infiltration.

Site WP029 – This site is located on the southern end of KFA, approximately 800 feet southwest of Leon Creek and is less than one acre in size. It was a sludge-spreading area used during the 1950s and 1960s for land-spreading and air drying waste-activated sludge that contained heavy metals. The site consisted of a settling pond measuring about 50 feet by 100 feet and a drying bed about 50 feet by 250 feet. In September 2008, the TCEQ approved the CMS recommendation for WP029 pursuant to 30 TAC §335.561 RRS No.3, to upgrade of soil cover system and institutional controls. This remedy involved addressing former trench subsidence through recompaction of the soil cover and placement of additional clay and topsoil to remove depressions where storm water could accumulate and influence infiltration and potential waste leaching. The additional soil was also used to establish contour to promote drainage to further limit infiltration.

Joint Base San Antonio-Camp Bullis (JBSA-BUL) is located on 27,993 acres of land primarily in Bexar County, Texas. It is situated approximately 19 miles northwest of downtown San Antonio, Texas and Joint Base San Antonio-Fort Sam Houston. The mission of JBSA-BUL is to provide ranges, training areas, air space and facilities to support federal, state and local government activities. The site is regulated under a RCRA Permit and Hazardous Waste Permit and Compliance Plan issued by the TCEQ.

Site LF002 (aka LF001, Landfill 8 and Site 8) – The site is located in the central area of JBSA- BUL between Lewis Creek and Cunningham Hill. The landfill comprises approximately 6 acres divided by Lewis Valley Rd. A karst hydrogeologic environment underlies LF002, which significantly complicates the groundwater investigation. A portion of the groundwater beneath the site discharges to Lewis Creek, which is a tributary to Salado Creek. During periods of high flow, Salado Creek flows south of JBSA-BUL and recharges the Edwards Aquifer. Groundwater in the Trinity Aquifer, underlying JBSA-BUL, also likely recharges the Edwards Aquifer.

Aerial photographs indicate that disposal activities at LF002 began between 1945 and 1950 and ended between 1952 and 1955. During the Landfill Assessment in 1995, Chemical Agent Identification Sets (CAIS) were discovered. The Army performed a sweep to remove the CAIS debris from the landfill surface but they have not performed any intrusive investigations within the landfill due to health and safety concerns. Since the Landfill Assessment, non-intrusive investigations have been performed at the site (including surface geophysics and passive soil-gas surveys). Investigations have been performed outside the landfill (including groundwater, surface water and sediment sampling and groundwater tracer testing).

The investigations outside the landfill confirmed that chemical warfare agents are not present in the groundwater; however, trichloroethene (TCE) and other chlorinated Vo l a t i l e O r g a n i c C o mp o u n d s ( VOCs) above drinking water regulatory levels (MCLs/PCLs) were detected in groundwater and surface water samples. The source of VOC contamination in the groundwater and surface water downgradient of LF002 has not been confirmed, but it may be the result of neutralizing CAIS with decontamination agent, non-corrosive (DANC), which contained solvents. The T e x a s C o m mi s s i o n o n E n v i r o n me n t a l Q u a l i t y ( TCEQ) issued a Compliance Plan stipulating continued investigation, monitoring and response action.

Between 1997 and 2001, 21 monitoring wells were installed. Groundwater sampling from the monitoring wells and select JBSA-BUL water supply wells and surface water monitoring in nearby Lewis and Salado creeks, usually had been performed on a quarterly basis until 2003 when a stage-based sampling program was implemented. During the stage-based program, water samples are collected during low, moderate and high (flood) flow stages to better assess contaminant transport in the karst system. The calendar-based and more recent stage-based sampling programs indicate that VOCs are not migrating off-post at concentrations above MCLs/PCLs. Groundwater samples collected in 2001 and 2004 from off-site water supply wells located within ¼ mile of the JBSA-BUL boundary did not contain VOCs, further suggesting that LF002 chemicals of concern are not migrating off-post at detectable concentrations.

In 2004, the Final LF002 Work Plan was submitted to comply with Texas Risk Reduction Program rules adopted by the TCEQ. It included an updated conceptual site model and identified the investigation activities required to fill data gaps, including additional groundwater tracing, boreholegeophysics/hydrophysics, repeating the soil gas survey and collecting data to support an ecological risk assessment.

In August 2005, a United States Corps of Engineers Performance-Based Contract (PBC) was awarded. In August 2006, a storm water diversion structure was installed as an interim stabilization measure and six additional monitoring wells were installed.

In 2008, the PBC contractor performed tracer testing and submitted an Affected Property Assessment Report (APAR) and R e m e d i a l A c t i o n P l a n ( RAP) to the state. Five horizontal injection wells were installed to treat groundwater through bioremediation.

Enhanced in situ bioremediation treatment of the site began in 2008 with the injection of Emulsified Vegetable Oil (EVO). In November 2013, the PBC contractor performed reinjection

23 May 2016 of EVO and bacteria to replenish the carbon source and augment the bacterial populations near the site.

Compliance sampling/monitoring is ongoing. Results of the sampling indicate that the plume is stable in extent and that the groundwater contamination continues to be addressed via in situ bioremediation of the source area. However, TCE and other VOCs remain above regulatory levels.

A Class 3 Compliance Plan modification request has been prepared to incorporate the LF002 and another site (OB/OD site) RAPs into the Compliance Plan, but the request has not been submitted due to changes in the OB/OD site use.

1.2 Policy and Requirement Statements

The Contractor shall function as an integral team member in support of the Air Force Civil Engineering Center (AFCEC) mission to include sharing of information with other AFCEC contractors and cooperation with communities, regulators and other government entities.

Requirements include efficient management of this TO including, but not limited to, the submission of accurate, on-time, quality contract deliverables and timely identification and solution of impediments to successful project execution. Technical requirements include, but are not limited to, early involvement in the process to allow for the development of the most cost-effective and technically sound approach or solution. The AFCEC will rely on the Contractor’s expertise in recognizing and addressing problematic issues and successful execution of this TO.

The Contractor shall perform all work in accordance with federal, state and local statutes and regulations.

2.0 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

The Contractor shall identify and comply with all applicable federal, state and local statutes; Air Force/Military instructions, manuals, handbooks, regulations, guidance and policy letters; and Executive Orders (EOs), including all changes and amendments in effect on the date of issuance of this TO. In addition, the Contractor shall refer to the current versions of the Department of Defense (DoD) Policy and Guidelines for Acquisitions Involving Environmental Sampling or Testing. The Contractor shall be responsible for identifying and complying with all applicable requirements as they pertain to the project requirements. Task Order-specific documents include the following (these documents will be provided to the Contractor under separate cover):

Operation and Maintenance Manual of Irrigation System at Zone 1, Lackland Air Force Base, TX, dated March 2011. This document includes the specifications of the system that irrigates ERP Sites LF001, LF012 (West), LF014, LF015, LF016, LF017, SS043 and

WP029.

Final Corrective Measure Implementation Report for Zone 1 Sites, Lackland AFB, TX, dated June 2010. This document includes landfill cap specifications for ERP Sites LF001, LF012 (West), LF014, LF015, LF016, LF017, SS043 and WP029.

23 May 2016

Final Construction Completion Report Zone 1 Landfill Irrigation System, dated September 2010. This document includes as-built drawings for the landfill caps at ERP Sites LF001, LF012 (West), LF014, LF015, LF016, LF017, SS043 and WP029.

Nationwide Permit 13Pre-Construction Notification, Lackland AFB Bank Stabilization Project, October 1, 2008

Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan Update, Joint Base San Antonio, September 2014.

November 2014 Monitoring Report, Leon Creek Mitigation Monitoring Project JBSA- Lackland, Texas, dated December 2014. This document includes the results of quarterly monitoring events conducted in the second quarter of FY 2015 at ERP Site LF011.

February 2015 Monitoring Report, Leon Creek Mitigation Monitoring Project JBSA- Lackland, Texas, dated March 2015. This document includes the results of quarterly monitoring events conducted in the third quarter of FY 2015 at ERP Site LF011.

May 2015 Monitoring Report, Leon Creek Mitigation Monitoring Project JBSA- Lackland, Texas, dated June 2015. This document includes the results of quarterly monitoring events conducted in the fourth quarter of FY 2015 at ERP Site LF011.

Fiscal Year 2015 Monthly Inspection Reports. These documents summarize findings and provide recommendations for Environmental Restoration Program Sites LF001, LF012 (West), LF014, LF015, LF016, LF017, SS043 and WP029.

Final Affected Property Assessment Report, Site 8, Landfill 8 Camp Bullis, Texas dated March 2008.

Final Response Action Plan, Site 8, Landfill 8 Camp Bullis, Texas dated August 2009.

Draft Final Response Action Effectiveness Report, Landfill 8 (Site 8) – 2008 to 2011, Camp Bullis Training Site, San Antonio, Texas dated August 2013.

Final First Semiannual Report for Joint Base San Antonio – Camp Bullis (CB) Training

Site, January to June 2015.

3.0 ADMINISTRATIVE AND MANAGERIAL REQUIREMENTS

The Contractor shall perform management and planning functions, as well as performance measurement and cost status reporting during the course of this effort, as specified in the following paragraphs.

3.1 Coordination with Other Contractors

The Contractor shall cooperate fully with other contractors and government employees. The Contractor shall not commit any act that will interfere with the performance of work by any other Contractor or government employee.

3.2 Special Notification

3.2.1 Health Risks

The Contractor shall immediately report to the CO and the COR, verbal telephone or e-mail notification pursuant to the TO, any issues or incidents which may indicate potential imminent

23 May 2016 risk to contracted, federal, or local personnel, the public at large, or the environment. Following the verbal or e-mail notification, a written notice with supporting documentation, to include photographic documentation whenever appropriate, shall be prepared and delivered within three

(3) working days to the CO. Upon request of the CO, or the COR, the Contractor shall provide pertinent raw laboratory data immediately (not to exceed two [2] weeks) via e-mail and then provide final results and laboratory quality data via standard mail as soon as possible. (Contract Data Requirement List [CDRL] A002)

3.2.2 Identification and Change of Critical Contractor Personnel

The Contractor shall submit an organizational chart displaying key personnel involved in the effort and their respective labor categories. The Contractor shall immediately notify the CO and COR, in writing or email, of any changes in critical Contractor personnel. The Contractor shall obtain CO and COR approval of any proposed changes in project personnel along with the steps taken/proposed to ensure there are no impacts to the schedule or costs associated with individual tasks. The Contractor shall identify to the CO and COR all subcontractors to be used under this TO, issued pursuant to this PWS, prior to signing any subcontract or initiating any work. The Contractor shall provide subcontractor qualifications to the CO and COR prior to subcontractor utilization. (CDRL A001A)

3.3 Laboratories

The Contractor shall select a laboratory that complies with the requirements of the current version of the DoD Quality Systems Manual (QSM). The current version of the QSM can be found at the following website: http://www.navylabs.navy.mil/. The laboratory must also have analytical capabilities sufficient for the methods specified in the SAP and adequate throughput capacity to handle the project’s analytical workload during all field activities. The Contractor shall ensure that the selected laboratory meets all state and federal requirements including state and federal certification/accreditation programs.

3.3.1 General

The Contractor shall develop project specific Data Quality Objectives (DQOs) consistent with the project’s Remedial Action Objectives (RAOs) and designed to ensure data of adequate quality are collected to support project decisions. DQOs shall be developed in consensus with the restoration project team and in accordance with the Uniform Federal Policy-Quality Assurance Project Plan (UFP-QAPP) (UFP-QAPP is a set of consensus documents prepared by the Intergovernmental Data Quality Task Force (IDQTF) to provide instructions for preparing QAPPs for any environmental data collection operation) and USEPA QA/G4, Guidance for the Data Quality Objective Process (most recent version) and documented in the project Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP). The Contractor shall review all DQOs and work with the field team and the laboratory to ensure that the DQOs are met. Analytical problems that the laboratory and the Contractor QA POC cannot resolve shall be brought to the attention of the Contractor’s

23 May 2016 project manager, the AFCEC COR and the restoration team as needed for resolution.

Laboratories may be subject to on-site AFCEC audits of their Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) protocols and procedures. All laboratories shall meet DQOs specified in task order project site-specific SAP(s). The laboratories shall perform QA/QC requirements as specified in the project/site specific SAP. The analytical capabilities of the laboratory shall be sufficient for the methods specified in the SAP and the laboratory shall have sufficient through-put capacity to handle the necessary analytical work-load during all field activities. (CDRL A001B)

3.4 Work Site Requirements

3.4.1 Safety Requirements

The Contractor shall be responsible for protecting the lives and health of employees and other persons on the work site; preventing damage to property, materials, supplies and equipment;

avoiding work interruptions; and complying with Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations and JBSA’s safety requirements. The Contractor shall perform all operations in a prudent, conscientious, safe and professional manner and conform to the safety requirements contained in the contract. The Contractor shall maintain training records onsite and have written Health and Safety Plans (HSPs) on site and available for workers and/or regulatory review. The Contractor shall provide the CO copies of any OSHA Report(s) regarding a project site, submitted during the duration of this TO. (CDRL A001C)

The Contractor shall record and report promptly (within one [1] hour) by telephone, electronic mail or other direct means to the CO or COR, the installation POC and to the military installation’s Safety Office all available facts relating to each instance of damage to Government property or injury to a person. In the event of an accident/mishap, the Contractor shall take reasonable and prudent action to establish control of the accident/mishap scene, prevent further damage to persons or property, preserve evidence until released by the accident/mishap investigative authority through the CO and immediately report the incident. If the government elects to conduct an investigation of the accident/mishap, the Contractor shall cooperate fully and assist government personnel in the conduct of an investigation until said investigation is completed. The Contractor agrees that his personnel and equipment are subject to safety inspections by government personnel while on Federal property.

3.4.2 Work-Site Maintenance

The Contractor shall maintain the work site to prevent the spread of contamination, provide for the integrity of the samples obtained, provide for the safety of all individuals in the vicinity of the work site areas and prevent the release of any contamination to the environment. The work site shall be well marked to prevent inadvertent entry into all work areas. Access to work areas shall be monitored and thoroughly controlled. Standard work zones and access points for controlled operations shall be established and maintained as the site conditions warrant. The Contractor shall ensure compliance with any federal, state and local regulations and QA/QC

23 May 2016 protocols and procedures for decontaminating tools, equipment, or other materials, as required.

The Contractor shall keep the work area free from accumulation of waste and non-essential hazardous materials. The Contractor shall remove non-essential equipment from the work site when not in use. The worksite shall be maintained to present an orderly appearance and to maximize work efficiency. Before completing the work at each work location, the Contractor shall remove from the work premises any rubbish, tools, equipment and materials that are not the property of the government. The Contractor shall properly dispose of all construction debris, investigation derived waste and other waste(s). Upon completing the work, the Contractor shall leave the area clean, neat and orderly and return the work sites to an appropriate condition.

3.4.3 Minimize Impacts to Existing Operations

The Contractor shall coordinate in advance all site visits with the JBSA POC. Frequent communication and coordination with installation personnel will be necessary to accomplish these goals.

3.4.4 Storage

The Contractor shall be responsible for security and weatherproofing of stored material and equipment. Equipment or materials used in the work, requiring storage on the installation, shall be placed at site(s) designated by the JBSA POC. At the completion of the work, the Contractor shall remove all temporary fences and structures (used to protect materials and equipment) from the installation unless otherwise directed by the CO. The Contractor shall clean the storage area of all debris and material and perform repairs as required to return the site to its pre-project condition.

3.4.5 Site Access Badges

The Contractor shall verify that identification credentials presented by all Contractor and subcontractor employees to obtain security badges, passes, cards, or decals used during the duration of this contract are current and correct. As a minimum, verification should be conducted with the Social Security Administration (http://www.ssa.gov/employer/ssnv.htm), the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, Identification & Investigative Services Section (304- 625-5590) and the Form I-9 Employment Eligibility Verification (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis). The Contractor shall monitor its employees to ensure all information remains current and to ensure all security badges or passes are returned to the base POC upon expiration of the badge, upon completion of the project, or when possession of the badge is no longer authorized (e.g., upon removal of contracted personnel from specific projects).

3.4.6 Key Control

The Contractor shall establish and implement methods of ensuring that all keys issued to the Contractor by the government are not lost or misplaced and are not used by unauthorized

23 May 2016 persons. Keys issued shall not be duplicated. The Contractor shall limit access to locked areas to Contractor’s employees only.

The Contractor shall report the occurrences of a lost key to the CO or AFCEE COR and JBSA POC as soon as known. The Contractor shall be required, upon direction of the CO, to re-key or replace the affected lock(s). However, the government, at its option, may replace the affected lock(s) or perform the re-keying itself.

3.4.7 Permits

The Contractor shall be responsible for coordinating and obtaining all the required permits to execute this project. (CDRL A003)

4.0 MANAGEMENT, PLANNING and REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

The Contractor shall plan project activities including the development, implementation and maintenance of project schedules, events, status of resources, report(s) on the activities and progress toward accomplishing project objectives and document for Government review and approval the results of the project efforts.

4.1 Post Award Meeting/Teleconference

The Contractor shall participate in a post-award (kick-off) teleconference with JBSA and AFCEC Representatives. The post-award meeting shall be conducted within one week of Task Order award. For this meeting, the Contractor shall prepare presentation materials, meeting agenda and meeting minutes. (CDRLs B001, B002, B003)

4.2 Progress Meetings

The Contractor shall participate in four (4) quarterly progress teleconferences with JBSA and AFCEC Representatives. For these meetings, the Contractor shall prepare presentation materials, meeting agendas and meeting minutes. (CDRLs B001, B002, B003)

4.3 Presentation Materials

The Contractor shall prepare presentation materials for all meetings included in Section 4.1, 4.2 of this PWS above. (CDRL B003)

4.4 Project Planning Chart

The Contractor shall prepare and submit a Project Planning Chart (PPC) for approval. The PPC shall detail the project schedule and status through the use of Gantt charts, which shall depict percent complete for each task. (CDRL B004)

4.5 Contractor’s Progress, Status and Management Report

23 May 2016

The Contractor shall prepare and submit monthly Contractor’s Progress, Status and Management Reports (CPSMRs). Each CPSMR shall be used to review and evaluate the overall progress of the project, along with any existing or potential problem areas. The CPSMR shall include a summary of the events that occurred during the reporting period, discussion of performance, identification of problems, proposed solutions, corrective actions taken, percent complete/percent expensed, detailed cost information and outstanding issues. The CPSMR shall also include updated project schedule, as applicable. (CDRLB005)

4.6 Plans

The Contractor shall prepare a Quality Program Plan (QPP). The QPP shall include the Work Plan (WP), the Health and Safety Plan (HSP) (as required by 29 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 1910.120) and the Environmental Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP). The project SAP shall include a Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP), which is based on the Uniform Federal Policy QAPP (UFP-QAPP) and a Field Sampling Plan (FSP). Minimum QA/QC requirements identified by the current version of the Department of Defense (DoD) Quality Systems Manual (QSM) shall be incorporated in the UFP-QAPP. The current version of the QSM and UFP- QAPP can be found at the following website: http://www.navylabs.navy.mil. (CDRLs A004, A005, A006)

4.7 Technical Project Reports

The Contractor shall prepare the Technical Project Reports described in Section 5.2 of this PWS below. (CDRLs A001D, A001E, A001F)

PART B - PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT FOR OPERATIONS & SERVICES

5.0 INTRODUCTION

The Contractor shall provide all labor, materials and services necessary to conduct the activities described in the following sections. In the completion of these tasks, the Contractor shall comply with all federal, state and local rules and regulations.

5.1 Continuation of Essential DoD Contractor Services During Crisis

The performance of these services is not expected to be mission essential during time of crisis.

Should a crisis be declared, the CO or his/her representative will verbally advise the Contractor of the revised requirements, followed by written directions.

5.2 Long Term Monitoring and Long Term Operations and Maintenance

23 May 2016

The Contractor shall conduct LTM and RA-O activities at JBSA-LAK ERP Sites LF001, LF012 (West), LF014, LF015, LF016, LF017, SS043 and WP029 for a 12-month period. As part of this effort, the Contractor shall conduct the following activities:

The objectives of the landfill cap is to minimize exposure on the surface of the waste, prevent vertical infiltration of water into wastes which could create contaminated leachate and create a land surface which can support vegetation and/or be used for other purposes. To meet the landfill cap objectives, the Contractor shall perform visual inspections by an engineer of the existing cap at ERP Sites LF001, LF012 (West), LF014, LF015, LF016, LF017, SS043 and WP029 on a monthly basis, or in response to significant weather events to evaluate condition and integrity of the cap at each site and identify surface defects (e.g., depressions, water ponding, erosional features, cracks, etc.;

as well as the effect such defects may have had on the recreational jogging trails existing within the landfill boundaries). For planning purposes assume a total of 12 visual inspections will be required throughout the Period of Performance of this TO; first monthly inspection is anticipated to be conducted during the month of October 2016.

Complete repairs of identified landfill cap defects within one-week of the completion of the visual inspections. For planning purposes assume that a total of 50 cubic yards (cy) of clay, 50 cy of fill and 50 cy of topsoil will be required to conduct the repairs for the 12-month period; these materials shall be placed at the sites and compacted per specifications (Landfill cap specifications can be found in the Final Corrective Measure Implementation Report for Zone 1 Sites, Lackland AFB, TX, dated June 2010).

Provide monthly summary reports on the cap conditions and repairs at each landfill in Landfill Inspection Monthly Summary Reports. (CDRL A001D)

Perform routine maintenance on erosion control rip-rap and along the perimeter fence, where applicable. For planning purposes, assume that a total of 25 cubic yards of rip-rap will be required for the 12-month period; rip-rap shall be placed in the landfill sites per specifications.

Perform one weed control event to include herbicide application by properly trained and certified crews. The herbicide intended for use under this TO must be approved by the Lackland AFB Entomologist prior to use. Prior to application, the Contractor shall provide a copy of Material Safety Data Sheet, label, copy of applicator's certification license, quantity to be applied and date of application to the JBSA POC for input into the Lackland AFB’s tracking database.

Perform routine maintenance in accordance with the Lackland AFB Integrated Natural Resource Management Plan (INRMP) Appendix I-1 through I-3 to include mowing to a sufficient depth (1.5 inch high grass within 10 feet of each side of the trails located on the sites and 6 to 8 inch high grass everywhere else) to protect the grasses, eliminating or removing foreign undesirable vegetation and seeding with Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon) (for planning purposes assume a total of 6 mowing events throughout all the sites and seeding of one-acre area).

Inspect and repair the existing institutional controls, including perimeter fences, access gates and signage, where applicable. For planning purposes, assume replacement of one 8' high - 10' long chain link gate, 50 linear feet of 10’ high chain link fence and four signs for a 12-month period.

23 May 2016

Perform operation of the irrigation system that is used to water all eight sites for a 12-month period. As part of the operation activities, the Contractor shall water the landfill caps on as-needed basis to help facilitate healthy vegetated growth and mitigate undue erosion and potential deterioration of the integrity of the caps at all eight sites; irrigation activities shall be conducted in accordance with the O&M Manual. For planning purposes, assume all eight sites will be irrigated 6 times during the 12-month period and the first irrigation event is anticipated to be conducted in the month of October 2016.

Reclaimed water is used to irrigate all eight sites; therefore, no charges for water will be incurred by the Contractor. Electricity use for the operation of the irrigation system shall be paid by the Contractor (for planning purposes, assume $100 per month for electricity use for a 12-month period). As a minimum, all eight sites must be irrigated four times during the 12-month period; the Contractor shall coordinate with the AFCEC COR to determine the most appropriate dates for these four irrigation events.

Perform inspection and maintenance of the whole irrigation system that is used to water all eight sites for a 12-month period, including the pumping system (lift station pumps, booster pumps, turbine pumps, etc.) and distributions system (pipelines, isolation valves, valve boxes, sprinkler guns, etc.). As part of this effort, the Contractor shall inspect all the irrigation system components on a regular basis to ensure system functionality; parts replacement/repairs shall be conducted as necessary. For planning purposes, assume 12 maintenance events and replacement of 8 sprinkler guns (the irrigation system currently uses Komet Model Twin 101 irrigation guns with 0.71” nozzles and 24 degree trajectories); the irrigation system shall be fully operational prior to the assumed first irrigation event (anticipated to be conducted in the month of October 2016, weather dependent).

Conduct one annual soil sampling event; sampling shall be conducted within the month of December 2016. As part of this effort, collect composite soil samples using a 15-point sampling scheme for each 40 acres to determine impacts of the irrigation water in the soil chemistry; samples shall be collected at an average depth of 0.25ft.The total surface area of the eight ERP sites is approximately 107 acres; therefore, a total of three (3) composite samples shall be collected. The three composite soil samples shall be submitted to the laboratory for pH, conductivity, Kjeldahl nitrogen, total nitrogen, plant available potassium, calcium, magnesium, sulfur, sodium and sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) analyses. Produce one Annual Summary Report to document the results of the soil sampling event and sample locations; the report shall include recommendations for soil amendments (actual soil amendments are not required as part of this effort). (CDRL A001E)

The Contractor shall perform mitigation monitoring along Leon Creek at an area associated with JBSA-LAK ERP Site LF011 (the area is located downstream of ERP Site LF011). As part of this effort, the Contractor shall conduct the following activities:

Perform a site evaluation of Leon Creek four times a year (quarterly) of approximately 1,260 linear feet (0.78 acres) to gather all the required data to determine the following items (first quarterly site evaluation is anticipated to be conducted during the month of October 2016):

23 May 2016

Percent of stream bank and bed erosion Percent physical cover for wildlife Percent of overhanging vegetation Percent of shrubs, trees, herbaceous vegetation, wildlife species observed and diversity of vegetation species Take photographic evidence of site conditions

Prepare Quarterly Monitoring Reports to fully document the findings of the quarterly site evaluations. (CDRL A001F)

For a 12-month period, maintain the trees and shrubs that were planted in 2013 to ensure survival; maintenance activities will include regular watering, mulching, trimming and re-staking (for trees that are leaning). Trees and/or shrubs that perish due to lack of water shall be replaced by the Contractor at no cost to the Government. JBSA-Lackland has available water that can be used by the Contractor to irrigate the trees and shrubs via a valve water source located adjacent to the Mitigation Area. This water has been treated by a Pump & Treat (P&T) System and is suitable for irrigation (no additional testing is required prior to irrigation). No permits are required to use the treated water; however, prior to each watering event, the Contractor shall coordinate with the Contractor that is currently operating the P&T System (initial coordination shall be conducted through the JBSA POC). For planning purposes assume 24 irrigation events for the 12-month period.

The following trees and shrubs were planted in 2013:

24 (10-gallon) Texas Red Oak 17 (10-gallon) Chinkapin Oak 23 (10-gallon) Monterey Oak 26 (10-gallon) Live Oak 19 (10-gallon) Cedar Elm 12 (10-gallon) Mexican Buckeye 23 (10-gallon) Black Walnut 45 (5-gallon) Buttonbush 16 (5-gallon) Coralberry

Within a 12-month period, replace any previously planted trees and/or shrubs that perish for causes other than lack of water. For planning purposes, assume that the following trees and shrubs will be replaced:

3 (10-gallon) Texas Red Oak 3 (10-gallon) Chinkapin Oak 3 (10-gallon) Monterey Oak 3 (10-gallon) Live Oak 2 (10-gallon) Cedar Elm 2 (10-gallon) Mexican Buckeye 2 (10-gallon) Black Walnut 5 (5-gallon) Buttonbush 2 (5-gallon) Coralberry

It is the Contractor’s responsibility to ensure survival of these newly planted trees and/or shrubs. Any of the newly planted trees and/or shrubs that perish during the 12-month

23 May 2016 period shall be replaced by Contractor at no additional cost to the Government. Damage to newly planted trees due to flooding is not the Contractor’s responsibility.

5.3 Process Monitoring

5.3.1 Recordkeeping

The Contractor shall create and maintain in one location written and electronic records sufficient to recreate each sampling, analytical, testing and monitoring event. The Contractor shall make these records available to the government upon request.

The Contractor shall maintain records of and derived from, all activities outlined in the appropriate portion of the SAP or QPP supporting the generation of these sampling and analysis records. The Contractor shall also retain written calculations using information obtained from sampling, analysis monitoring and testing activities, to include all raw data. (CDRL B006)

5.3.2 Sampling for Remedial Action

The Contractor shall conduct RA-O activities at JBSA-BUL ERP Site LF002 for a 12-month period. As part of this effort, the Contractor shall conduct the following activities:

As conditions permit, conduct up to three (3)-rounds of stage-based groundwater sampling during low, moderate and high (flood) flow stages throughout the Period of Performance of this TO o Groundwater sampling will be conducted using low-flow techniques o Sampling will occur at 32 monitoring wells and 14 surface water sampling locations Groundwater sampling will be conducted at the following 20 Point of

Exposure Wells: LF8-2d, LF8-3d, LF8-4d. LF8-5s, LF8-5d. LF8-6d, LF8-7d, LF8-8s, LF8-8i, LF8-8d, LF8-9s, LF8-10s, LF8-10d, LF8-11s, LF8-19s, LF8-20d, LF8-LVC, WSW-53,WSW-64, WSW-75 and the following 12 Corrective Action Observation Wells: LF8-1d, LF8-2s, LF8- 9d, LF8-14s, LF8-16s, LF8-19d, LF8-20s, LF8-20i, LF8-21s, LF8-21i, LF8-21d, WSW-43

Surface water sampling will be conducted at the following 14 surface water sampling locations: Karst 4C-18, LF8-SW01, LF8-SW02, LF8- SW03, LF8-SW04, LF8-SW05, LF8-SW05b, LF8-SW05c, LF8-SW06, LF8-SW08, LF8-SWSG07, Cannonball Cave, Sharon Spring and Stealth Cave

All samples will be analyzed in a laboratory by SW846, Method 8260B for the following selected VOCs from Appendix 2, Table II of Final Response Action Plan for LF002 (Site 8): Tetrachloroethene, 1,1,2,2- Tetrachloroethane, Trichloroethene, 1,1-Dichloroethene, cis-1,2- Dichloroethene, trans-1,2-Dichloroethene and Vinyl Chloride

23 May 2016

Depth to water will be recorded in each monitoring well sampled

Two rounds of remedial effectiveness monitoring sampling will be conducted throughout the Period of Performance of this TO o For planning purposes assume this sampling will be conducted in conjunction with the stage-based groundwater sampling; however, ensure that the two remedial effectiveness monitoring sampling events are conducted six months apart. Currently, this sampling is generally conducted in the first and third quarters o Groundwater sampling will be conducted using low-flow techniques o Sampling will occur at 12 monitoring wells and two surface water sampling locations Groundwater sampling will occur at the following 12 Corrective Action

Observation Wells: LF8-1d, LF8-2s, LF8-9d, LF8-14s, LF8-16s, LF8- 19d, LF8-20s, LF8-20i, LF8-21s, LF8-21i, LF8-21d, WSW-43

Surface water sampling will occur at the following surface water sampling locations: LF8-SW05b and Karst 4C-18

All samples will be analyzed in a laboratory by SW846, Method 8260B for the following selected VOCs from Appendix 2, Table II of Response…