QA_2Apr2013.docx
DOCX document 14 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA8903-12-R-0050
About this file
NM-AZ PBR RFP Q As 02 April 2013 (1 page 5 Questions)
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| NM-AZ_PBR_Final_RFP_Q A_041713.doc | DOC document | |
| NM-AZ_PBR_Final_RFP_Q As_041613.doc | DOC document | |
| NM-AZ_PBR_Final_RFP_Q As.doc | DOC document | |
| FA8903-12-R-0050_0001.pdf | ||
| QA_2Apr2013.docx | DOCX document | |
| QA_4Apr2013.docx | DOCX document | |
| NM-AZ_PBR_Atch_1_SOO_Revision_1_DRAFT_-_03_Apr_13.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_L-3_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_L-6_CLIN_MPS_IMS_Guidance_Template_and_SubCLIN_Structure_NM-AZ_PBR_19_Mar_13.doc | DOC document | |
| NM-AZ_PBR_Final_SECTION_M_Evaluation_Criteria_11_Mar_13.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_L-4_Subcontractor_Consent_Letter_Sample.doc | DOC document | |
| NM-AZ_PBR_Final_RFP_28_Mar_2013.pdf | ||
| RFP_FA8903-12-R-0050_Sched_B_-_Word_Doc.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_L-2_MilestonePaymentSchedule_with_price_19_Mar_13.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_L-5_Client_Authorization_Letter_Sample_NM-AZ.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_L-1_MilestonePaymentSchedule_without_price.xls | XLS spreadsheet |
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
1. Standard Form 33: We assume that this form and any subsequent amendments are to be included in Volume I – Contract Documentation. In which tab should they be included?
Place at Volume 1, 3.2, Standard Form 33 should be completed and signed and any subsequent amendment that may be issued to evidence contractor’s receipt of documents.
2. Section B, Rough Order of Magnitude: The ROM on page 31 of 56 is stated as $40-45M whereas the FBO announcement states $35-42M. May we assume that the RFP has the correct ROM?
Yes, RFP states current ROM.
3. Standard Form 33 and Section K, Representations and Certifications: Because the RFP document is security protected, we are unable to extract the pages for Standard Form 33 and Section K in order to complete them. Please provide either Word or unsecured PDF documents of these sections to facilitate completion by offerors.
IAW 3.9 Representations and Certifications The Offeror's proposal shall include a signed copy of the Representations and Certifications, Section K. The Offeror may submit a signed copy from the Online Representations and Certifications (ORCA) website in lieu of completing the representations and certifications included in the solicitation.
4. SOO Acronyms and Definitions: The SOO refers to Enclosure 4 as the Acronyms and Definitions and Enclosure 5 as Format for Metadata and .pdf Documents; however, the Acronyms and Definitions are not included and the Format for Metadata is listed as Enclosure 4. Please provide the final enclosure for Acronyms and Definitions.
Will be posted.
5. Section L, 4.5 Sub-Factor 1.1, Technical Approach/Summary Table: Per this requirement, “Site ID and Site Name should be copied from SOO Enclosure 1.” In the additional Draft RFP Questions Submitted March 22, 2013, question 2, the government stated “For the sequencing of the sites/CLINs, always follow the RFP Schedule B.” Does this also apply to the Summary Table, and therefore the site IDs and names and the order of the sites should be copied from Section B rather than SOO Enclosure 1?
Follow the RFP format.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .