FA8903-12-R-0050_0001.pdf

SCHEDULE OF CHANGES

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

See Block #2

PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

08 APR 2013

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ.NO.

5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY 772ESS/PKJ CODE FA8903 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

772D ENTERPRISE SOURCING SQUADRON

2261 HUGHES AVE STE 163

JBSA LACKLAND TX 78236-9853

RITA A. LEAL 210-395-8228

rita.leal@us.af.mil

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

FA8903-12-R-0050

X

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, X is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 0 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER.

If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

(X )

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: ( ) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO. ITEM

10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Performance Based Remediation for Luke, Cannon, Holloman, Kirtland - New Mexico/Arizona Group

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print).

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

NAOMI ALVARADO

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

16C. DATE SIGNED

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

BY________________________________________

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070 30-105 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV.10-83)

PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE Prescribed by GSA ConWrite Version 6.14.1 FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Created 08 Apr 2013 4:10 PM

Attachment 1

08 February 2013

Revision 1

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES (SOO)

FOR

PERFORMANCE-BASED REMEDIATION (PBR)

AT

CANNON AFB, NEW MEXICO

HOLLOMAN AFB, NEW MEXICO

KIRTLAND AFB, NEW MEXICO &

LUKE AFB, ARIZONA

CONTRACT NUMBER: FA8903-12-R-0050

08 February 2013

08 February 2013

Revision 1

1.0 SCOPE

This requirement is for environmental remediation activities at Cannon Air Force Base (AFB), New Mexico, Holloman AFB, New Mexico, Kirtland AFB, New Mexico, and Luke AFB, Arizona. This Statement of Objectives (SOO) defines the scope of a full range of construction and engineering activities necessary for investigation, design, remedial action, remedial construction, and environmental remediation activities to achieve minimum performance objectives and stretch goals and support progress to Site Closeout (SC) at eighty-five (85)

Installation Restoration Program (IRP) sites, and twenty-one (21) Military Munitions Response

Program (MMRP) sites in the Performance Based Remediation (PBR) contract.

1.1 Introduction

Cannon AFB

Cannon AFB is home to the 27th Special Operations Wing of the Air Force Special Operations

Command. Cannon AFB is located in Curry County, New Mexico, situated approximately eight miles west of the City of Clovis. The base is situated on 3,789 acres (5.9 square miles) of federally-owned land. Off-base facilities include the currently active Melrose Air Force Range

(formerly Melrose Bombing Range), located about 24 miles west-southwest of the base on approximately 60,010 acres.

Cannon AFB is regulated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6 (EPA) and the

New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) Hazardous Waste Board (HWB). Cannon has an active Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) permit # NM7572124454. It is not on the National Priorities List (NPL).

Holloman AFB

Holloman AFB is located six miles (10 km) southwest of the central business district of

Alamogordo, New Mexico. Holloman AFB occupies approximately 60,000 acres and was first established in 1942 as Alamogordo Army Air Field (AAF) flying primarily B-17s, B-24s, and B-

29s. In 1947, it became the primary site for the testing and development of un-manned aircraft, guided missiles, and other research programs. In 1968, the 49th Tactical Fighter Wing arrived at

HAFB and has conducted fighter aircraft training and operations. Holloman AFB has also served as the German Air Force’s Tactical Training Center since 1996.

Corrective action is regulated by the Holloman AFB RCRA Permit # NM6572124422-2. The

Corrective Action Modules and guidance documents, supporting corrective action, are provided by the NMED HWB.

Kirtland AFB

Kirtland AFB is located in Bernalillo County, in central New Mexico, southeast of and adjacent to the City of Albuquerque. The approximate area of the base is 52,287 acres. Environmental

08 February 2013

Revision 1

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

remediation is being conducted pursuant to RCRA. Regulatory enforcement authority is the

NMED HWB. Kirtland AFB has a RCRA Hazardous Waste Permit #NM9570024423.

At Kirtland AFB, project stakeholders may include, but not be limited to, the Air Force, US

Army Corp of Engineers (USACE), Kirtland AFB, Air National Guard, New Mexico

Environment Division (NMED) Hazardous Waste Board (HWB), the City of Albuquerque and

Albuquerque Bernalillo County Water Utility Authority, Veteran’s Administration Medical

Center, and private landowners. The required level of involvement may differ from site to site and the Contractor will be responsible for obtaining comments with appropriate approval or concurrence on project deliverables consistent with applicable regulatory drivers and agreements for each site.

Luke AFB

Luke AFB covers approximately 4,000 acres west of the Phoenix metropolitan area in Glendale, Arizona. Construction of the facility began on March 29, 1941. Although only a few essential buildings had been completed, training of the first class of pilots began on June 6, 1941. Luke

Air Force Base is the largest and only active-duty F-16 Fighting Falcon training base in the world with more than 200 F-16s assigned. The host command at Luke is the 56th Fighter Wing

(56 FW), under Air Education and Training Command's 19th Air Force.

The eastern portion of Luke AFB currently consists of a variety of light industrial facilities, office buildings occupied by administrative and community services, Base barracks, and outdoor recreation centers. The central and western portions of Luke AFB include the runways; open space; and aircraft operation, training, and maintenance facilities. Base residential housing and commercial areas are located to the east of Luke AFB across Litchfield Park Road. The base population includes about 7,500 military members and 15,000 family members. With about

80,000 retired military members living in greater Phoenix, the base services a total population of more than 100,000 people.

On August 30, 1990, EPA placed Luke AFB on the NPL. On September 27, 1990, the USEPA, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ), Arizona Department of Water

Resources (ADWR), and USAF signed the Federal Facility Agreement (FFA) to establish the procedural framework for conducting the required environmental investigations at Luke AFB.

The OU-2 ROD was signed in 1994 and listed Luke AFB as a Federal Superfund site. The OU-1

ROD was signed on September 1999. The signing of the FFA marked the official beginning of the Comprehensive Environmental Restoration, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) investigation of the Base.

1.2 General PBR Scope and Requirements

The Contractor shall perform all the necessary environmental construction and engineering activities as required to achieve the performance objectives of this SOO.

Enclosure 1 lists the sites included in the scope of this contract.

08 February 2013

Revision 1

The Air Force (AF) is required to implement remedies as necessary to protect human health and the environment. The intent of the PBR initiative is to maximize the number of SCs or advance sites as close to SC as practicable during the Period of Performance (POP) in a cost effective manner. It is desirable to the AF that Life-Cycle Costs (LCC) be reduced. The AF is interested in substantial reduction of long-term environmental liabilities and life-cycle costs through accelerated achievement of SC and optimization of environmental restoration activities for all sites included in this contract while complying with applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations; and applicable base-specific orders, agreements, or rules. General performance objectives pursuant to the AFAF’s overarching goals are listed below in order of priority and defined in Enclosure 4:

1) Achieve SC during the POP.

2) For any site not achieving SC during the POP, achieve, in order of priority,

a. Response Complete (RC)

b. Remedy in Place (RIP)

c. The furthest objective within the regulatory structure for each site (e.g. Decision

Document (DD), Preliminary Assessment/Site Inspection (PA/SI), etc.)

3) The Contractor shall develop an Optimized Exit Strategy (OES) for sites identified in

Table 1 of this SOO that have an approved DD prior to, or during the POP, but do not achieve SC. The Contractor shall describe the strategy in an OES Plan to achieve the following objectives:

o Maintain compliance with all DDs and plans (currently in place or to be approved) until no longer required or an alternate approach is approved.

o Correct Five-Year Review deficiencies where identified as no longer protective of human health and the environment at all sites.

The next Five-Year Review for Kirtland AFB is scheduled in 2015.

The next Five-Year Review for Cannon AFB is scheduled in 2017.

The Five-Year Review for Holloman AFB is scheduled in 2017.

The Five-Year Review for Luke AFB is scheduled in 2017.

o Apply innovative technologies to minimize the cost and period of operating, monitoring and treatment.

o Improve the understanding of the Conceptual Site Model (CSM), existing systems, and contamination sources to support optimization.

o Provide an analysis of alternatives for each site to aggressively accelerate treatment and progress to expedite SC. Alternatives shall include engineering cost estimates, conceptual designs, and a business case analysis.

o Develop performance indicators, decision criteria, and objectives consistent with the performance model described below that will be used to optimize remedial efficiency, quantify how the response is progressing and demonstrate when the objective has been reached. The following are the minimum required OES deliverables: an OES

Plan shall be delivered within one year from either date of award or exercise of the option of the SubCLIN whichever is applicable. An OES Implementation

08 February 2013

Revision 1

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Completion Report shall be delivered upon completion of the implementation of the optimization efforts in the approved OES Plan, and one of the final milestones shall be an OES Effectiveness Report:

o The OES Effectiveness Report shall include:

a) Documentation of what remedial strategies were implemented, what remains to be implemented, and any modifications to the OES arising from performance to date.

b) A realistic schedule to achieve SC or RC after the POP (the Contractor shall identify which performance objective is the optimal endpoint). For sites with an indeterminate project completion date, a schedule for 30 years including the POP is required.

c) The remaining definable and measurable milestones after the POP.

4) For all sites listed in Table 1 of this SOO that have an approved DD prior to or during the

POP and are not being proposed to SC during the POP, the Contractor shall develop performance models that describe the expected course of the remediation process (i.e.

how conditions are expected to change over time as measured using appropriate performance indicators from the current state until the performance objective is achieved). For all sites being proposed to SC during the POP, the work planning documents are expected to contain the performance model. The Contractor shall provide monitoring reports that demonstrate whether or not the remedial approach is performing in accordance with the performance model. For purposes of reporting Contractor progress and status, these conditions shall be quantified by performance indicators relevant to the proposed remedial approach. A performance model is a graphic representation of a performance indicator value over time until a performance objective is achieved. Several indicators may be needed to adequately reflect performance. The

Contractor shall report the actual remedy performance compared to projected performance. The Contractor shall ensure consistency and continuity of information regarding performance (between the Project Management Plan (PMP), Integrated Master

Schedule (IMS)/Milestone Payment Schedule (MPS), and OES plan.

Within the construct of the goals and objectives above, the minimum performance objectives and specific performance objectives to be achieved for each site during the POP for this contract effort are outlined in Tables 1 and 2 of this SOO. If the Contractor anticipates the ability to achieve a stretch goal during the POP, the Contractor is encouraged to propose that stretch goal, which will then become the requirement of this contract (applicable to sites in Table 1 of this

SOO only).

08 February 2013

Revision 1

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

The Contractor shall specify the performance objective to include at least the minimum objective as listed for sites in Table 1 of this SOO, and the specific performance objectives for sites in

Table 2 of this SOO (with no stretch goal proposed) and date they intend to achieve it for each site within the POP. Contractors shall explain why the selected performance objective (including the minimum performance objective if that is what is proposed) is an optimum solution for the

Government. It should be noted that the AF reserves the right not to exercise all options not awarded at the time of contract award.

Table 1: Minimum Performance Objectives and Standards

Minimum Performance Objectives Minimum Performance Standards

All Sites

Approved Project Management Plan (PMP):

Draft Preliminary PMP within 30 calendar days of contract award.

Final Preliminary PMP within 14 calendar days of receipt of COR comments on the drafts.

Updated Final PMP expected approximately

4.5 years after the Final Preliminary PMP.

Time-phased updates, submitted annually (at minimum) or more frequently, as appropriate to maintain accuracy and completeness.

Air Force approval through the

Contracting Officer’s Representative

(COR).

Provide support (supplying documents to independent reviewers and participation in meetings/interviews) for Five-Year Reviews required for all site(s) identified in the contract for the duration of the contract. Correct any remedy or site deficiencies noted in Five-Year Reviews.

Air Force approval through the COR and

Regulator approval (e.g., formal documentation accepting correction of deficiencies).

08 February 2013

Revision 1

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Beginning at Notice to Proceed (NTP), or upon achievement of RIP or RC, or any performance objective that is not SC, conduct, as appropriate, RA-O and/or LTM and develop an OES to achieve

SC and implement the elements of the approved strategy that fall within the POP. RA-O/LTM and implementation of the OES shall continue through the duration of the POP or 1) until no longer required based on Air Force and regulatory concurrence that SC has been achieved, or 2) AF and regulators have approved implementation of an alternate approach.

AF approval through the COR for RA-

O/LTM reports and Regulatory approval as required (e.g., formal documentation accepting the RA-O/LTM report).

AF approval through the COR for OES

Plan and OES Effectiveness Report And approval of Regulatory required documents.

Minimum Performance Objectives Minimum Performance Standards

Site Specific

Achieve an approved RI Report within three (3) years from NTP for the following sites:

Holloman AFB:

SR859: Former Skeet Range 2

TS862: Jeep Target Area Skeet Range

SR864: Poorman Range

ML865: Ballistics Rain Field

RR869: Debris Field

Air Force approval through the COR and

Regulator approval of the RI Report (e.g., written confirmation of acceptance of RI report).

Achieve approved RFI within three (3) years from

NTP for the following sites:

Cannon AFB:

SD022: Storm water drainage & retention pond on GC

SS501: Former AGE Dispatch Facility spills

TU502: Former Gas Stations USTs

TU503: Base Support/ Operations

Generator Former UST

TU504: Hospital Abandoned UST

TU505: Flight line Generator USTs

SS507: POL Yard Refueling Area

DA508: Surface Disposal Area

Air Force approval through the COR and

Regulator approval (e.g., written confirmation of acceptance of documentation of achieving RFI).

08 February 2013

Revision 1

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Achieve approved RFI (including background study for Perchlorate) within three (3) years from

NTP for the following sites:

Kirtland AFB:

CG570: EOD Hill

Air Force approval through the COR and

Regulator approval (e.g., written confirmation of acceptance of documentation of achieving RFI including background study for Perchlorate).

Achieve RIP within five (5) years from NTP for the following sites:

ST070E: Oil/Water Separator (ST-219)

TU044: Leaking Underground Storage

Tank at remote Waterdog Recreational

Area

Upon achievement of RIP, perform any necessary

RA-O/LTM at the above sites for the duration of the contract or until achievement of SC, whichever comes first.

Air Force approval through the COR and

Regulator approval (e.g., written documentation demonstrating RIP).

Maintain all ongoing RA-O, O&M, and/or LTM activities at the following sites until SC is achieved or the required activities are replaced in accordance with the newly approved exit strategy.

O&M and Long Term Management will pick up at the conclusion of the current contract in 4 th

Quarter 2013 (September 2013). Refer to

Section 8.1.2.

Achieve RC within three (3) years from NTP for the following site:

DP036: MWR Body Shop

Upon achievement of RC, perform any necessary

LTM at the above sites for the duration of the contract or until achievement of SC, whichever comes first.

Air Force approval through the COR and

Regulator approval (e.g., written documentation demonstrating RC).

08 February 2013

Revision 1

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Achieve Response Complete (RC) within five (5)

OD20K: 20,000 Pound Open Detonation

Unit

TG100: Bomb Target

AL120A: Proximity Fuze Range

AL120B: Proximity Fuze Range

PT123: Tijeras Small Arms Range

DA130: Arroyo Del Coyote Demolition

Area

PL567: UST058

contract or until achievement of SC, whichever comes first.

Air Force approval through the COR and

Regulator approval (e.g. written regulator confirmation of acceptance of RC documentation).

Achieve Response Complete (RC) within nine (9) years from NTP with an interim objective of achievement of approved Decision Document within four (4) years from NTP for the following sites:

AL120: Proximity Fuze Range

ML125: Field Firing Range contract or until achievement of SC, whichever comes first.

Air Force approval through the COR and

Regulator approval (e.g. written regulator

08 February 2013

Revision 1

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Achieve Response Complete (RC) within seven (7)

OW967: SWMU 20 (Within T-38 Site)

OW968: SWMU 19 (Within T-38 Site)

SS059, SS524: T-38 Test Cell (SWMU

229)

FI857: Former Bunker

ML866: Former Bombing Range

SR867: Possible Firing Range contract or until achievement of SC, whichever comes first.

Air Force approval through the COR and

Regulator approval (e.g. written regulator

Project activities will commence no sooner than 2 nd

QTR 2015 (Mar 2015)

Achieve Site Closeout (SC) within two (2) years from NTP for the following sites:

Holloman:

SS013: Sodium Arsenite Spill Site

OT014: Former Entomology Shop Area

OT032: Former Primate Research Area

Sewer Lines

RW042: Radioactive Waste Disposal Area

SS067: Spill & Sand Blasting Residuals

Area

AF approval through the COR and

Regulator approval (e.g. written regulator confirmation of acceptance of SC documentation for unrestricted use).

Achieve Site Closeout (SC) within three (3) years

TS835: Former Skeet Range (VCA)

Holloman AFB:

TU503: Building 221

TU506: Building 901

TU508: Building 298

TU518: UST 7003

AF approval through the COR and

Regulator approval (e.g. written regulator confirmation of acceptance of SC documentation for unrestricted use).

08 February 2013

Revision 1

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Achieve Site Closeout (SC) within five (5) years

AT109: SWMU 109, FT-C109

FT-C110: SWMU 110

SW111: Unlined Pit (used with SWMU

109)

SW112: Oil/water separator No. 2336

CW571: Zia Park

OT572: Building 5700-1

OT573: Asphalt Dump Area

SS575: Transient Alert Pad

Air Force approval through the COR and

Regulator approval (e.g. written regulator confirmation of acceptance of SC documentation for unrestricted use).

Achieve Site Closeout (SC) within five (5) years

SD027: PAD 9 Washrack Area, RAD

Waste

OT037: Early Missile Testing Site

OT038: Test Sled Maintenance Area

SS065: Test Cell Surface Spill

SS069: Flight line Fuel Spill Area

TU515: Building 889

TS851: Former Skeet Range

XU853: Missile Test Stands Area

XU854: Able 51 Area

SR858: Former Small Arms Range

SR863: 1000 Inch Range

Air Force approval through the COR and

Regulator approval (e.g. written regulator confirmation of acceptance of SC documentation for unrestricted use).

Develop an OES to achieve SC and implement the elements of the approved strategy that fall within the POP for the following sites:

LF002: Landfill No. 2

SW002: Recovered tank no. 108

LF003: Landfill No. 3

LF004: Landfill No. 4

SW004: Recovered tank no. 121

Air Force approval of optimized exit strategy and Regulator concurrence with

Air Force approved reports confirming implementation of the strategy (e.g.

written confirmation of acceptance of sites until SC is achieved or the required

08 February 2013

Revision 1

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

LF005: Landfill No. 5, cell 3

FT006: Fire Training Area No. 1

SW006: POL Tank No. 129

SD-012: Stormwater Collection Point

South Playa (SWMU 85)

SD015: AGE drainage ditch

SD017: Old entomology rinse area

SD020: NE Stormwater Drainage Area

(SWMU 95)

LF025: Landfill No. 25, Concrete rubble pile

MY031: AGE maintenance shop pad

FL070: Oil/water separator & leach field

TU071: Recovered JP-4 Fuel Tank No.

SI101: Wastewater Treatment System – lagoons 1 & 2

WL102: Wastewater treatment effluent discharge

Develop an OES to achieve SC and implement the

Cannon AFB (cont.):

TU126: Inactive Underground Storage

Tank 3

SW127/128: Oil/water Separator

TA129: Waste Oil Storage Facility 244-

1 O&M and Long Term Management (preventive and corrective maintenance) at these sites will begin in 1 st Quarter 2014 (December 2013).

2 OES activities for Site SS017, Holloman AFB, will begin 2 nd

Quarter 2016 (January 2016)

Long Term Management at Luke AFB will pick up at the conclusion of the current contract in 3 rd

Quarter 2014 (May 2014).

Air Force approved reports confirming implementation of the strategy (e.g.

08 February 2013

Revision 1 formerly AOC I

SS017: BX Gas Station Fuel Leak

SS018: Chromic Acid Spill Site

LF029: Old Army Landfill

DP030: Grease Trap Disposal Pits, SD033: Cooking Grease Disposal Trench

SS039: Missile Fuel Spill Area, Groundwater only

TU904: Building 1194

LF001: Landfill No.1

LF002: Landfill No. 2

LF008: Landfill No. 4, 5 & 6

WP026: Base Sewage Lagoons & Golf

Course Pond

ST105: TCE and Nitrate Contaminated

Groundwater

RW002: Low-Level Radioactive Waste

Burial Site

LF003: Outboard Runway Landfill

FT007: North Fire-Training Area (West)

FT007E: North Fire-Training Area (East)

DP013: Drainage Ditch Disposal Area

LF014: Old Salvage Yard Burial Site

ST018: Facility 993

SD020: Oil/Water Separator Canal and

Earth Fissures

DP023: Surface impoundment west of

Facility 993

Develop an OES to achieve SC and implement the

Luke AFB (cont)

LF025: Northwest Landfill

SD038: Southwest Oil/Water Separator at the Auto Hobby Shop sites until SC is achieved or the required

1 O&M and Long Term Management (preventive and corrective maintenance) at these sites will begin in 1 st Quarter 2014 (December 2013). Refer to Section 8.1.2.

2 OES activities for Site SS017, Holloman AFB, will begin 2 nd

Quarter 2016 (January 2016)

Long Term Management at LukeAFB will pick up at the conclusion of the current contract in 3 rd

Quarter 2014 (May 2014).

Air Force approved reports confirming implementation of the strategy (e.g.

08 February 2013

Revision 1

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

and/or LTM activities at the following sites until SC is achieved or the required

Table 2: Performance Objectives (These are the only performance objectives – for sites in

Table 2, no higher stretch goal is desired or should be proposed.)

Site Specific

Conduct Long Term Management (LTM) at the following sites:

SS042: Bulk Fuels Storage Area

Implementation of LTM shall continue through the duration of the POP or until no longer required based on Air Force and regulatory concurrence that SC has been achieved.

Air Force approval through the COR and

Regulatory approval (e.g. written confirmation of implementation of LTM (e.g. Land Use

Controls, Institutional Controls, etc.)).

This SOO and enclosures listed below include general requirements of the project to meet the AF objectives:

Enclosure 1 – Site List

Enclosure 2 – Key Documents

Enclosure 3 – Government Furnished Equipment (GFE)/Government Furnished Property

(GFP)

Enclosure 4 – Acronyms and Definitions

Enclosure 5 –Format For Metadata and .pdf Documents

The Contractor shall function as an integral team member in support of the Air Force Civil

Engineer Center (AFCEC) mission, to include the sharing of information with other AFCEC contractors and AF personnel, and cooperation with community stakeholders, regulators, and other Government entities.

Requirements for efficient management of this contract include, but are not limited to, the submission of accurate, on-time, quality contract deliverables and timely identification and solution of impediments to successful project execution. Technical requirements include, but are not limited to, early involvement in the process to allow for the development of the most cost-effective and technically sound approach or solution. AFCEC will rely on the Contractor’s expertise in recognizing and addressing problematic issues and successful execution of this contract. The Contractor shall perform all work in accordance with federal, state, and local

08 February 2013

Revision 1

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

statutes and regulations. The Contractor shall also comply with base regulations. Remedies shall conform to environmental permits, decision document requirements, or other legal requirements.

2.0 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

The Contractor shall identify and comply with all applicable federal, state, and local statutes;

AF/Military/ instructions, manuals, handbooks, regulations, guidance, and policy letters

(including AF policy and guidance for IRP, CRP, and MMRP); Executive Orders (EOs);

American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM); American Petroleum Institute (API)

Codes; National Association of Corrosions Engineers (NACE); National Fire Protection (NFPA);

Steel Structures and Painting Counsel (SSPC); National Electrical Code (NEC); Uniform Fire

Code (UFC); and International Building Code (IBC) including all changes and amendments in effect on the date of issuance of this contract. It is the Contractor’s responsibility to identify and comply with all applicable requirements. In addition, the Contractor shall refer to the current versions of the Department of Defense (DoD) Policy and Guidelines for Acquisitions Involving

Environmental Sampling or Testing and The United States AF Construction Management

Implementation Guide.

The Contractor shall identify and comply with all applicable documents for the bases including

Records of Decision (RODs), ROD Amendments, Explanation of Significant Differences

(ESDs), RCRA Permits and subsequent modifications, Risk Evaluation Corrective Action

Program (RECAP) documents, the Endangered Species Act, other Decision Documents, Deeds, and conveyance notices. Key base-specific documents are listed in Enclosure 2.

The Contractor is solely responsible for reviewing all publicly available information and forming their independent, professional conclusions/interpretation of site conditions and requirements to meet the objectives of this contract. The information provided in this SOO is not intended as a substitute for complete analysis of technical data available, nor is it intended to be a guide on how the Contractor should address achievement of the performance objectives.

3.0 GOVERNMENT FURNISHED INFORMATION, EQUIPMENT, AND

PROPERTY (GFI, GFE, GFP)

Government Furnished Information is listed in Enclosure 3, GFE/GFP. The AF believes that documentation provided with the solicitation represents the most recent and appropriate documentation available for the Installation and sites identified in this contract. However, if there is a conflict between this information and other site documentation (the existing reports), the Contractor is solely responsible for reviewing all available information and forming their independent, professional conclusions/interpretation of site conditions and requirements to ahieve the performance objectives of this contract. Specific documents may be made available following a request to the Contracting Officer (CO), if the documentation can be distributed in a timely manner. Electronic format is not guaranteed.

08 February 2013

Revision 1

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

The Contractor shall properly account for and manage all new and existing GFE and/or GFP procured and utilized at the bases in accordance with the applicable Federal Acquisition

Regulation (FAR). Lists of GFE/GFP are provided in Enclosure 3:

Cannon AFB, NM:

Soil Vapor Extraction System Design and Construction is composed of one (1) SVE well and two (2) vapor monitoring wells that are plumbed to an SVE system which is connected to moisture separator, particulate filter, a blower, monitoring instrumentation, and GAC containers. The system is housed in a shed. The SVE system and all the related components can be explained in detail within Section 3 of the Interim Corrective

Measures, Construction Summary Report, SWMU ST-70 (Former ST-219), April 2009.

Holloman AFB, NM:

Currently there are no remedial systems at Holloman AFB.

Should remedial systems be required, the AF will provide electricity and water but the

Contractor is required to provide the connections and installations.

Kirtland AFB, NM:

Currently there are no remedial systems at Kirtland AFB.

Should remedial systems be required, the AF will provide electricity and water but the

Contractor is required to provide the connections and installations.

Luke AFB, AZ:

Currently there are no remedial systems at Luke AFB or at Waterdog Recreational Area.

Should remedial systems be required, the AF will provide electricity and water but the

Contractor is required to provide the connections and installations.

Contractor should note that NO utilities are available at the remote Waterdog site.

Contractor will have to make arrangements, from start to finish, for any and all utilities necessary for any planned activities at this site.

Remediation systems may or may not be listed as GFE and/or GFP. The Contractor is responsible for providing all other supplies and equipment, not already installed and not listed in

Enclosure 3, required to achieve the performance objectives of this contract. All AF owned property used for remediation purposes must be maintained by the Contractor in accordance with applicable maintenance requirements. The Contractor is responsible for proper return or disposal of excess or unserviceable equipment or materials as required during the duration of this contract. Prior to disposal of excess or unserviceable equipment listed in Enclosure 3, the

Contractor shall coordinate activities with the CO for disposition instructions.

4.0 MANAGEMENT, PLANNING, AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

The Contractor shall implement a full range of construction and engineering activities as required to meet objectives of this contract and in accordance with all applicable base, regulatory, and site requirements. The Contractor shall supply all labor, equipment, and

08 February 2013

Revision 1

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

materials necessary to accomplish the work. The Contractor shall perform management and planning functions, including performance measurement and fund status reporting.

4.1 Milestone Payment Schedule (MPS)

Milestone payments shall be based on the completion of definable and measurable steps, which are considered integral and necessary to the achievement of the stated performance objectives.

Completion of milestones shall demonstrate payment is appropriate and warranted. AF approval of the documentation supporting the completion of the milestone is required for payment (for example, AF approval of Draft Remedial Investigation report, AF acceptance that interim and final performance goals per approved performance models have been achieved.) Where regulatory acceptance/concurrence is required for this documentation, AF acceptance of the milestone will occur following regulatory acceptance/concurrence of the documentation (for example, EPA approval of Draft Record of Decision). For milestones where regulatory acceptance/concurrence is required and regulatory acceptance/concurrence cannot be obtained, the AF will evaluate the Contractor’s documents to determine if they are legally and technically acceptable to warrant payment for achieving that milestone.

The Contractor’s proposed MPS may require restructure of Contract Line Item Number

(CLIN)/SubCLINs, if necessary, to align with projected available funding prior to award;

however the MPS is not final with award of the contract. Changes made to the MPS prior to award are used to finalize the SubCLINs description and amount. Award of the contract does not equate to final acceptance of the MPS. The MPS shall be included as part of the PMP. The

MPS will be negotiated during development of the PMP and may require additional changes.

The Contractor shall submit the MPS in an electronic format consistent/compatible with the

AFCEC SharePoint website, e-DASH. Final decisions regarding the adequacy of milestone and deliverable completion resides solely with the COR. The COR will take into consideration the appropriate acceptance and/or concurrence of necessary site remediation documentation by regulators, consistent with applicable regulatory drivers of this SOO.

Management and overhead type costs (program/project management, monthly reporting, mobilization costs, etc.) do not provide measureable program advancement and are not appropriate milestone payments. These costs/expenses should be allocated into site, site grouping, or Operable Unit (OU)-related milestone payments that provide demonstrable value to the program. Milestones shall not represent a “progress” payment or a monthly payment for level of effort expended. Completing site mobilization/demobilization (unless exempted by CO), accomplishment of field activities, or submittal of a monthly status or Operations and

Maintenance (O&M) reports are examples of unacceptable milestone payments.

The first deliverable milestone required in the MPS is the Opening Phase PMP. The PMP deliverable milestone shall be contract inclusive. The Contractor shall not allocate costs to specific sites or include indirect costs associated with sites. Upon determination of bona fide need, a second PMP SubCLIN for the Closing phase may be exercised. Both PMPs shall be updated annually or as necessary to remain current with the approved execution strategy.

08 February 2013

Revision 1

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

The Contractor shall complete an MPS and identify milestone payments, and the associated payment schedule on a site by site basis. The Contractor may also propose logical groupings of sites or OUs for milestone payment purposes where an approach provides greater efficiency for the program; however, a SubCLIN involving multiple sites shall identify milestones by individual sites in order to support AF reporting requirements. Table 2 of this SOO includes the specific performance objectives (with no stretch goal proposed). Achievement of the awarded performance objective for Table 1 and Table 2 sites of this SOO shall be the final payment milestone for each SubCLIN. Potential CLIN and SubCLINs are described in the

CLIN/MPS/IMS Guidance.

The number of milestone payments per site should be limited to a reasonable amount based on the scope and anticipated duration to achieve the performance objective at the site. The

Contractor is limited to one invoice submitted to AFCEC per month. The invoice must itemize the milestone payments for each site or grouping associated with the invoice.

If the Contractor has to continue working beyond the performance objective date to achieve a final milestone (applies to SubCLIN dates only) the Contractor shall submit a period of performance extension request to the CO at least 60 days prior to the expiration date of the Sub-

CLIN. However, the Contractor shall not perform work after the funding associated with the milestone cancels. Specifically, completion of activities on an individual SubCLIN cannot exceed 30 days prior to the end of the fiscal year; five years from the date of exercising of the

SubCLIN. However, the Contractor will not receive payment until milestones are achieved in accordance with the MPS. The Contractor may receive a negative past performance rating for delay in achievement of the impacted performance objectives.

4.2 Project Management Plan (PMP)

The Contractor shall develop and maintain a detailed PMP. The PMP shall include the Technical

Approach, IMS, and MPS, prepared as part of the Contractor’s proposal. In addition, the PMP shall specify the resources required for the planning, execution, control, and completion of the stated performance objectives. At a minimum, the PMP shall include the following sections:

technical approach, performance objectives in accordance with the SOO, draft Performance

Models, organization and integration of the project team, schedule management and project controls, transitional activities, risk management, SubCLIN management, quality management, health and safety management, project communications and stakeholders, procurement management, and security management. The PMP should identify the project’s resources and project tasks corresponding to the SubCLINs for this contract.

In order to align with the availability and expiration of Government funds, the Contractor shall prepare two versions of the PMP. The initial (or opening phase) PMP will govern activities from award to the midpoint of the PoP. The closing phase PMP will govern activities from the midpoint of the PoP the end of the PoP and will be funded approximately 4.5 years from contract award or upon CO determination of bona fide need.

08 February 2013

Revision 1

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

The first draft of the opening phase PMP shall be due within 30 calendar days of contract award and subsequent revisions shall be subject to AF review and approval. The revised version of the opening phase PMP shall be due within 14 calendar days from receipt of AF comments. The

PMP shall be updated annually, or as necessary, throughout the contract to remain current with the approved execution strategy. The Final Preliminary PMP, annual updates, and the Final

PMP shall be submitted in an electronic format consistent/compatible with the AFCEC

SharePoint website, e-DASH.

The first draft of the closing phase PMP shall be due within 30 calendar days of SubCLIN award.

The closing phase PMP will be a logical follow-on of the final version of the opening phase

PMP. The revised version of the closing phase PMP shall be due within 14 calendar days from receipt of AF comments. The PMP shall be updated annually, or as necessary, throughout the contract to remain current with the approved execution strategy.

The final milestone for the opening phase PMP SubCLIN shall be a Project Status Summary and for the Closing phase PMP SubCLIN shall be a Project Closeout Summary.

The Project Status Summary and Project Closeout Summary shall include summaries of the following: progress on achievement of objectives, progress on achievement of milestones including performance models, schedule achievements or delays, issues and risks, and other project indicators as required by the CO or COR. In addition, the Project Closeout Summary shall include required information to support closeout of the contract as defined by the CO and

COR.

4.3 Project Web Site

The Contractor shall maintain a document repository for all PBR documents to include, but not limited to information on meetings, documents submitted, SubCLIN details, milestone status as agreed to in the PMP; current topics associated with the PBR, basic PBR statistics and objectives, stakeholder Point of Contact (POC) information; calendar of events, meetings milestones; laboratory results and reports, 3D conceptual models; groundwater reports, analysis, studies; links to administrative records/information repository records and to associated appropriate reference documents- state and federal policy guidance; and key performance indicator tracking.

The repository is intended to be a single access point repository for all PBR documentation. It shall be accessible to all stakeholders during the life of the PBC. The Contractor shall provide notifications to the COR, CO, and Base POC at the time data is included in the repository. At close-out, all repository documents will be transferred to DVD media and delivered to the AF, and placed on the AFCEC contractor drop-zone website (address provided under separate cover).

4.4 Schedule and Planning Requirements – Integrated Master Schedule (IMS)

The Contractor shall prepare and submit an IMS for approval that includes activities and milestones at a detailed level and presents sequenced events for completion of the proposed

08 February 2013

Revision 1

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

performance objectives within the time designated and any critical path items that may affect ability to meet the schedule. The Contractor shall include and identify all performance milestones and payments consistent with the approved MPS. Sites associated with each milestone/task shall be noted in the schedules using the Site IDs and referencing all site aliases noted in Table 1 and Table 2 of this SOO and SubCLINs. The schedule shall be provided in initial hardcopy and subsequently in electronic format consistent/compatible with AF software, currently Microsoft Project and in Adobe Acrobat portable document file (.pdf), Microsoft

Excel, and any other formats required upon request. Updated and revised schedules shall be submitted electronically to the AFCEC SharePoint website with monthly status reports with changes clearly identified by the Contractor.

4.5 Cost and Status Reporting

The Contractor shall prepare and submit a monthly Contractor’s Progress, Status, and

Management Report (CPSMR). The CPSMR shall be used to review and evaluate the overall progress of the project, along with any existing or potential problem areas. The report shall be prepared in a format coordinated with the COR. The CPSMR shall also be used to indicate whether efforts for each site are on target for meeting the Contractor’s proposed performance objective.

The CPSMR shall include a summary of the events that occurred during the reporting period, discussion of performance, identification of problems, proposed solutions, corrective actions taken, outstanding issues, and payments made toward the MPS to date.

The Contractor is required to report monthly, quarterly and yearly metrics. The reporting format will be via the Contractor’s PBR website and AFCEC’s SharePoint website, e-DASH. The

Contractor will be required to upload the following reports:

Monthly: % expensed, % complete, and % on time addressing each SubCLIN for an AF dashboard roll-up.

Quarterly: Performance indicators (PIs) associated with each site, for an AF dashboard roll-up. Examples for consideration include:

o Mass loading rate o Volumetric loading rate o Mass removal rate o Cumulative mass removed o Unit cost o Cumulative cost o Variable operating cost o Mass flux o Energy consumption rate o Greenhouse gas emission rate o Decay rate o Reaction rate

08 February 2013

Revision 1

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

o Center of mass o Disturbances o Water consumption rate o Percent time pump and treat systems are operating o gallons of GW treated;

o qty/pounds of contaminant removed from water;

o qty/pounds of contaminant removed from soil;

o energy saved using energy saving techniques compared to std approach;

o qty/pounds of recycled material;

o acreage returned for beneficial/mission use;

o Number of sites to SC, LTM, RC, RIP, RI, NFA, NFRAP, OES, of total anticipated for this PBR (i.e. 3/7 SC, 2/9 NFA, 5/15 NFRAP, 2/42 OES)

Yearly: Data in support of the Annual Report to Congress as applicable, to include, but not be limited to the following:

o gallons of GW treated;

o qty/pounds of contaminant removed from water;

o qty/ pounds of contaminant removed from soil;

o energy saved using energy saving techniques compared to std approach;

o qty/ pounds of recycled material;

o acreage returned for beneficial/mission use;

o Number of sites to SC, LTM, RC, RIP, RI, NFA, NFRAP, OES, of total anticipated for this PBR (i.e.: 3/7 SC, 2/9 NFA, 5/15 NFRAP, 2/42 OES)

The Contractor shall provide the cost for reporting the data as a separate line item in the CPSMR.

The AF will use approved performance indicators and models, in addition to the PMP to establish and execute a surveillance plan. The Surveillance Plan will highlight key quality control activities or events. The COR will use the Surveillance Plan to determine when AF

(COR and/or CO) surveillance activities can be conducted to assess progress toward and/or verify completion of payment milestones. The AF will communicate surveillance activities internally and with the Contractor. Current guidance on how the AF will develop and implement surveillance will be provided in the Surveillance Plan.

4.6 Meeting and Conference Requirements

4.6.1 Meeting/Teleconference Support

The Contractor shall participate in post-award meetings and Project Management Review (PMR) meetings or teleconferences with the AF, as necessary to achieve the performance objectives in this SOO. The Contractor shall coordinate meetings; provide logistical support (e.g., facilities, audio/visual); present materials and lead technical discussions. The Contractor shall prepare, and submit for AF review and concurrence, any presentation materials and agendas for meetings.

The Contractor shall prepare minutes for all meetings attended.

08 February 2013

Revision 1

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

The Contractor also shall attend and/or support meetings and teleconferences to discuss technical or regulatory issues and project progress and status with the AF and regulatory agency representatives as required, including applicable meetings such as Restoration Advisory Board

(RAB) meetings, partnering, Tier 1, Tier II meetings and teleconferences. Monthly teleconferences shall also be required to discuss in detail progress and any technical or management issues. Also other periodic meetings/teleconferences shall be required, as necessary. However, the frequency of meetings may change based on the status of the environmental restoration program. The AF will be present for all technical and public meetings with the regulatory agencies. The Contractor shall clearly identify themselves as “Contractors” in all situations involving stakeholders. The Contractor shall prepare, and submit for AF review and concurrence, any presentation materials and agendas for meetings. Travel to/from the Base and to other CONUS locations for such purposes as meeting attendance, briefings and/or presentations may be required in support of this remedial action. These activities are considered incidental to the effort required and shall not be included for separate milestone payments.

The Contractor shall notify the AF (Installation) prior to any contact with a regulatory agency.

4.6.2 Public Meetings and Hearings

The Contractor shall support all community involvement requirements to meet CERCLA, RCRA, and other regulatory requirements including public meetings, public notices, RAB meetings, Technical Working Group, Community Advisory Group meetings, public comment periods, and responsiveness summary preparation. The frequency of meetings listed below may change based on the status of the environmental restoration program.

Cannon AFB: An active RAB is in place with meetings held semi-annually.

Hol…