260728_Atch1_FCR_Vendor QA_RevA.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 21 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA8612_RFI_C3BM_2026_0001
About this file
This file is a Vendor Questions and Answers (Q&A) matrix for the Department of the Air Force Fire Control Radar (FCR) Request for Information (RFI), issued by AFLCMC/C3BM at Wright Patterson Force Base, Ohio under solicitation number FA8612_RFI_C3BM_2026_0001. The document represents Revision A of the Q&A responses, published on July 28, 2026, and incorporates newly received industry inquiries with corresponding Government responses, with new additions highlighted in blue text. This RFI is issued solely for market research purposes and does not constitute a Request for Proposal or commit the Government to contract for any supply or service.
Key clarifications provided in the Q&A include confirmation that the FCR system architecture is strictly ground-based deployment rather than air platform-based, and that the low-cost objective targets a unit cost of less than $10 million. The Government does not accept unsolicited proposals at this time. The matrix serves to address vendor questions regarding system requirements, specifications, and program scope as part of the Air Force's market research efforts to gauge industry capability and interest in developing an affordable fire control radar capability.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 260729_Atch1_FCR_Vendor QA_RevB.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 260720_Atch1_FCR_Vendor QA.pdf | ||
| 260715_RFI_FCR.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1 Department of the Air Force (DAF)
AFLCMC/C3BM
Fire Control Radar (FCR) Request for Information (RFI)
| Vendor Questions and Answers, Revision A | |
| Notice ID: | FA8612_RFI_C3BM_2026_0001 |
| Revision Status | # | Vendor Question | USG Response |
| Original | 1 | Is this for an air platform or ground based? | Ground-Based. The system architecture is strictly for ground-based deployment. |
| Original | 2 | What is considered low cost? | Low-Cost Objective: The target unit cost objective is less than $10 million (<$10M). |
| Original | 3 | Assuming ground based, is a rotating radar with stop and stare acceptable? | Yes, a rotating radar with stop-and-stare capability is acceptable. Vendors should address how this design impacts overall Life Cycle Costs, specifically regarding reliability, maintainability, and long-term sustainment. |
| Original | 4 | Is 360 capabilities required for staring AESA array (IE Must engage multiple targets simultaneously)? | Yes, 360-degree coverage and engagement capabilities are required, regardless of whether an active electronically scanned array (AESA) or a rotating system is proposed. The Fire Control Radar (FCR) must possess the capability to simultaneously engage multiple targets using two or more distinct types of kinetic effectors. |
| Original | 5 | Is desire to mount to a turret or keep separate from the effector? | The preferred configuration is to keep the FCR separate from the effector. However, vendors are encouraged to provide technical details and trade-offs regarding alternative integration methods if it enhances the overall operational success or survivability of the system. |
| Original | 6 | Is objective detection, tracking and engagement ranges for a remote weapon station that has a very limited effector range (<1Km)? Counter UAS missile with a 3-7Km range? or for ballistic missile defense for large missile and extended ranges? | The System Program Office (SPO) is seeking capability details for the FCR against cruise missiles and Unmanned Aircraft Systems Groups 1 through 5. The SPO is not seeking information regarding ballistic missile defense capabilities at this time. Specific effector engagement ranges will be determined by the defense design laydown or Concept of Employment. Vendors should detail their FCR's maximum detection, tracking, and engagement ranges per target type to assist in this planning. |
| Rev A | 7 | Could the Government provide the minimum system accuracy requirements (or a range) and specific Size, Weight, and Power (SWAP) thresholds for the Fire Control Radar to help us narrow down our potential offerings? | The specific technical thresholds for system accuracy and SWAP metrics are currently classified. The primary purpose of this RFI is to conduct broad market research and gather information on the full spectrum of industry capabilities. Vendors are encouraged to submit data on their existing product lines or conceptual designs across various SWAP profiles and accuracy ranges. In the event of a future formal solicitation, detailed requirements and specific technical thresholds will be provided in a classified annex to authorized cleared bidders. |
&P of &N
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .