RFI QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS 4.pdf
PDF 32 KB Posted
- Attached to
- LONG-DISTANCE WIRED TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES
- Solicitation number
- FA850126Q0056_Robins_AFB_Long_Distance_Commercial_Telecommunication_Services
About this file
This is a Questions and Answers document from Robins Air Force Base addressing contractor inquiries regarding a service cutover contract.
The document addresses two key contractor questions. First, a contractor requested consideration of extending the cutover schedule from 90 days to 120 days after award. Robins rejected this request, citing that the Performance Work Statement (PWS) specifies 90 days and that the government is already constrained on time. Second, a contractor inquired whether Robins would accept responsibility for disconnecting all circuits, equipment, and services provided by the incumbent contractor upon successful cutover, rather than the new contractor bearing this responsibility as stated on page 9 of the Statement of Work (SOW). Robins again declined, confirming that the contractor will retain responsibility for disconnection as specified in the SOW. Both responses indicate that the contract terms are firm and non-negotiable.
View the file
Other files
Show all 20
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFI QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS #4
Q - WOULD ROBINS CONSIDER A CUTOVER SCHEDULE CLOSER TO 120 DAYS INSTEAD
OF THE CURRENT 90 DAYS AFTER AWARD?
A - NO, THE PWS STATES 90 DAYS AND WE ALREADY ARE SHORT ON TIME.
Q - WOULD ROBINS REMOVE OR OTHERWISE ACCEPT THE RESPONSIBILITY OF
DISCONNECTING “ALL CIRCUITS, EQUIPMENT, AND SERVICE PROVIDED BY THE
INCUMBENT, UDNER THE PRIOR CONTRACT,” UPON SUCCESSFUL CUTOVER, AS
OPPOSED TO BEING THE CONTRACTOR’S RESPONISIBLTIY? (AS FOUND ON PAGE 9 OF
THE SOW)
A - NO, THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE AS STATED IN THE SOW.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .