RFI 2 11 Feb 22.pdf
PDF 158 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Exterior Construction Contract Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA8501-22-R-0002
About this file
This document contains a request for information and related federal contract opportunity. The request for information seeks clarification on whether teaming agreements and past performance will be recognized for a forthcoming solicitation for exterior construction contract work at Robins Air Force Base in Georgia. The government confirms it will recognize valid teaming arrangements but the prime contractor must still meet special standards of responsibility. The related federal contract opportunity is a firm-fixed price indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity contract for one base year and four option years to provide all labor, materials, equipment, supervision and components for site preparation, demolition, repair, replacement and minor construction projects for facility and building exteriors at Robins Air Force Base, to be issued by the Air Force Sustainment Center on behalf of the Air Force Materiel Command.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 28
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFI#2 Exterior Construction Contract
Question: 1. The Government's response (Attached), states in part that:
"Teaming agreements/commitment letters will not be recognized because the Government is only contractually bound to the prime contractor."
2. However, FAR 9.603 states that "The Government will recognize the integrity and validity of contractor team arrangements; provided, the arrangements are identified and company relationships are fully disclosed in an offer or, for arrangements entered into after submission of an offer , before the arrangement becomes effective."
My interpretation as it currently reads is that the Government response is not consistent with FAR 9.603.
Please advise?
As an example: Concierge Business Solutions, Inc. (Prime contractor, licensed Georgia general contractor, 8a, HUBZone, SDVOSB).
Intends to form a teaming arrangement with an Architectural Services firm (Subcontractor, licensed, architect, 8a, SDVOSB) and a national roofing firm (subcontractor)
Based on the example above, does the Government's response mean that this teaming arrangement and combined past performance will not be recognized by the Government even if it is clearly identified and fully disclosed in our proposal?
Government Response: The Government will recognize and permit valid teaming arrangements for this solicitation. However, in accordance with FAR 9.604(b) the policy recognizing teaming arrangement does not limit the Government’s rights to determine the responsibility of the prime contractor (see subpart 9.1). The Special Standards of Responsibility must be met and obtained from the prime contractor and/or approved Joint Venture Partner. Past performance is not being evaluated as a part of this solicitation.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .