SectionLAtchSixRevised13Dec2011.pdf

PDF 108 KB Posted

Attached to
Landing Gear Repair 2 - Final RFP Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA8252-11-R-80682
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Lifecycle Management Center Hill Air Force Base

About this file

SectionL Attachment 6

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Landing Gear Repair 2 - Final RFP, newest first.
File Type Posted
TEP18Jan12.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
FA825211R80682______0005.pdf PDF
QuestionsDated9January2012.pdf PDF
FA825211R80682______0006.pdf PDF
FA825211R80682______0004.pdf PDF
Questions Dated 22 December 2011.pdf PDF
FA825211R80682______0003.pdf PDF
exhibitC21dec.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
exhibitB21Dec.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
exhibitD21dec.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
FA825211R80682______0002.pdf PDF
ExhibitBRevised19Dec11.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Post RFP QA for FBO 15Dec11.pdf PDF
PackagingExhibitA.pdf PDF
ExhibitCRevised15Dec11.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
PWSRevised13Dec2011.pdf PDF
ExhibitARevised19Dec11.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RevisedAppB15Dec11.pdf PDF
FA825211R806820001.pdf PDF
ExhibitDRevised19Dec11.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
LGR2PackagingSOW.pdf PDF
PackagingExhibitD.pdf PDF
Exhibit B.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit C.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
tepworksheet18nov1.pdf.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit A.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit D.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
CDRLAFTO22.pdf PDF
ExhibitBelinlist.pdf PDF
CDRLforMishapRep.pdf PDF
CDRLSmallBusinessParticipation.pdf PDF
CDRLTDR.pdf PDF
ExhibitCelinlist.pdf PDF
AppCnov18.pdf PDF
smallbusinessparticipationreport.pdf PDF
CDRLConfMinutes.pdf PDF
CDRLAFTO202.pdf PDF
CDRLCAVAF.pdf PDF
SectionLattachmentsevenrolesandresponsibilities.pdf PDF
FA825211R8068218nov.pdf PDF
ExhibitDelinlist.pdf PDF
appendixb18nov.pdf PDF
CDRLAFTO95.pdf PDF
PWS10Nov11.pdf PDF
ExhibitAelinlist.pdf PDF
attachmentelevensamplefacilitylayout.pdf PDF
Industry Notice —
TEPSpreadsheet2 —
ELIN Delivery Schedule —
LGR2 Industry Comment Responses.pdf PDF
Show all 50

Landing Gear Repair 2 - Final RFP has more files on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Revised: 13 Dec 2011 ATTACHMENT L- SIX Past Performance Information Sheet

Section L, ATTACHMENT SIX: PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION SHEET Section I: Purpose

(a) The purpose of the Past Performance Information Sheet (PPIS) is to communicate to the Air Force your project's relevancy as it relates to this source selection. It includes sections that ask the offeror to submit information to aid the Air Force in its relevancy determination. The offeor may submit up to three past performance information sheets PPISs on the prime contractor and up to three for its proposed subcontractors individually, (one per project) for the Air Force's consideration. In general, the Offeror should complete those areas requesting information in Sections II & III. Section IV includes more detailed completion instructions.

(b) Prime Contractor Project number

One Two Three

(c) Subcontractor Project number

One Two Three

Section II: Offeror Information (if project for prime complete (a, b, c) if for subcontractor complete (d, e, f))

(a) Offeror Name (company/division):

(d) Subcontractor Name (company/division):

(b) CAGE Code:

(e) CAGE Code:

(c) DUNS Number:

(f) DUNS Number:

Section III: Basic Project Information

(a) Provide the information requested below.

(i) Program Title:

(ii) Contract Agency/Customer:

(iii) Contract #: (iv) Contract type:

(v) Period of Performance:

(vi) Original Contract $ Value

(vii) Current Contract $ Value:

(viii) Annual Contract $ Value (actual)

(b) Was your firm the prime contractor or a subcontractor on the listed project?

Prime Contractor Subcontractor

(c) Primary Customer Points of Contact

Name Telephone Email Organization/Division

(i) Program Manager

(ii) Contracting Officer

(iii) Administrative CO

Section IV: Detailed Project Information

(a) Section IV specifically relates your firm's project to the subfactors considered in this source selection. (Refer Section M, Table III.B and Table III.C for relevance.)

(b) In considering the project your firm is submitting for relevancy purposes please provide the information requested. Note: When itemizing the number of repair/overhauls on the project(s) your firm submits, the number of repair/overhauled should match the Solicitation’s Schedule B/ELIN quantities as closely as possible. (E.g., if an item consists of 7 components and it closely matches an item in the schedule that is ordered as 1(ea)/unit, it should be counted as ONE repair/overhaul.)

(i) Aircraft(s) landing gear repaired/ overhauled

(ii) NSN and Part Number

(iii) In the Offeror's opinion what NSN(s) on the Air Force's requirement relate to the offeror listed (in IV.b.ii)

(iv) Average number of assemblies repaired/ overhauled per month (by NSN/PN)

(iv) Major Assembly (Yes/No)

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (22) (23) (24) (25) (26) (27) (28) (29) (30)

Offeror’s may attach a Section IV(b) Continuation Sheet if necessary

(c) Total the number of assemblies and major assemblies (listed in Section IV(b) completed on the project below.

Assemblies (#/mo.) (magnitude) Major Assemblies (#/mo.) (complexity) Subtotals

Assemblies (#/mo.) Major Assemblies (#/mo.)

Very Relevant 275 170 Relevant 220 130

Somewhat Relevant 165 100

(d) For each item listed in section IV.b, locate (or fill in) the aircraft on the table below (Subfactors 2, 3, & 4 as applicable) and cite the average number of assemblies and major assemblies per month completed on the project.

Begin Subfactor 1:

Describe your projects relevance to Subfactor 1 (Program Management) specifically addressing its scope, magnitude, and complexity in not more than 100 words.

Narrative (fill in):

Number of Words (fill in): ____________

Begin Subfactor 2: Very Relevant Scope Assm

(#/mo.)

Maj

Assm (#/Mo.) U.S. Military Aircraft Maximum Takeoff Weight (lbs.)

0 0 C-5 Galaxy 840,000

0 0 VC-25 - YAL-1 833,000

0 0 E-4B 800,000 0 0 KC-10 Extender 590,000 0 0 C-17 Globemaster III 585,000 0 0 B-52 Stratofortress 488,000 0 0 B-1B Lancer 477,000 0 0 E-3 Sentry (AWACS) 347,000

Assm (#/mo.)

Maj Assm (#/Mo.) Other U.S. Military Aircraft MTOW (lbs.) (> 347,000)

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

End Subfactor 2: Very Relevant Scope

Begin Subfactor 2: Relevant Scope

(#/mo.)

Maj

Assm (#/Mo.) Boeing Maximum Takeoff Weight (lbs.)

0 0 747-8 975,000

0 0 747-400ER 910,000

0 0 747-400 875,000 0 0 747-200B 833,000 0 0 747-300 833,000

0 0 777-300ER 775,000

0 0 777-Freighter 766,800

0 0 777-200LR 766,000

0 0 747-100B 735,000 0 0 777-300 660,000

0 0 777-200ER 656,000

0 0 787-9 545,000 0 0 777-200 545,000 0 0 787-8 502,550

0 0 767-400ER 450,000

0 0 767-300ER 412,000

0 0 767-300F 412,000

0 0 767-200ER 395,000

0 0 767-300 350,000

Assm (#/mo.)

Maj Assm (#/Mo.) Douglas Maximum Takeoff Weight (lbs.)

0 0 MD-11ER 630,500

0 0 MD-11CF 625,000

0 0 MD-11F 610,000

0 0 MD-11C 610,000

0 0 MD-11 602,500

0 0 DC-10-30 572,000

0 0 DC-10-40 555,000

0 0 DC-10-15 455,000

0 0 DC-10-10 430,000

Assm (#/mo.)

Maj Assm (#/Mo.) Airbus Maximum Takeoff Weight (lbs.)

0 0 A380-800F 1,300,000 0 0 A380-800 1,250,000 0 0 A350-900R 657,000 0 0 A350-900F 657,000 0 0 A350-1000 657,000 0 0 A350-900 591,000 0 0 A350-800 571,000 0 0 A300-600R 379,000 0 0 A300-600F 376,000 0 0 A300B4 360,000

Assm (#/mo.)

Maj Assm (#/Mo.) Other (not listed) Commercial Aircraft MTOW (lbs.) (> 347,000)

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

End Subfactor 2: Relevant Scope

End Subfactor 2: Somewhat Relevant Scope A “Somewhat Relevant” project includes all those aircraft listed as “Very Relevant” or “Relevant,” but at lower levels of magnitude and complexity than indicated by the “Relevant” characteristics.

End Subfactor 2: Somewhat Relevant Scope

Begin Subfactor 3: Very Relevant Scope

(#/mo.)

Maj

Assm (#/Mo.) U.S. Military Aircraft Maximum Takeoff Weight (lbs.)

0 0 B-2 Spirit 336,500 0 0 E-8C Joint Stars 336,000

0 0 NC-135/KC-135 322,500

0 0 KC-135 Stratotanker 322,500

Assm (#/mo.)

Maj Assm (#/Mo.) Other U.S. Military Aircraft MTOW (lbs.) (> 322,500)

0 0

End Subfactor 3: Very Relevant Scope

Begin Subfactor 3: Relevant Scope Assm

(#/mo.)

Maj

Assm (#/Mo.) Boeing Maximum Takeoff Weight (lbs.)

0 0 707-320B 333,600 0 0 767-200 315,000

Assm (#/mo.)

Maj Assm (#/Mo.) Other (not listed) Commercial Aircraft MTOW (lbs.) (> 322,500)

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

End Subfactor 3: Relevant Scope

Begin Subfactor 3: Somewhat Relevant Scope A “Somewhat Relevant” project includes all those aircraft listed as “Very Relevant” or “Relevant,” but at lower levels of magnitude and complexity than indicated by the “Relevant” characteristics.

End Subfactor 3: Somewhat Relevant Scope

Begin Subfactor 4: Very Relevant Scope Assm

(#/mo.)

Maj

Assm (#/Mo.) U.S. Military Aircraft Maximum Takeoff Weight (lbs.)

0 0 WC-135 Constant Phoenix 300,500 0 0 OC-135B Open Skies 297,000 0 0 RC-135U Combat Sent 297,000 0 0 RC-135V/W Rivet Joint 297,000 0 0 C-32 255,000 0 0 P-8 Poseidon 189,200 0 0 C-40A/B/C 171,000 0 0 C-22B 170,000 0 0 EC-130J Commando Solo 164,000

0 0 AC-130H/U 155,000

0 0 C-130 Hercules 155,000 0 0 EC-130H Compass Call 155,000 0 0 HC-130P/N King 155,000 0 0 MC-130E/H Combat Talon I/II 155,000 0 0 MC-130P Combat Shadow 155,000 0 0 MC-130W Combat Spear 155,000 0 0 WC-130 Hercules 155,000

Assm (#/mo.)

Maj Assm (#/Mo.) Other U.S. Military Aircraft MTOW (lbs.) (> 322,500)

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

End Subfactor 4: Very Relevant Scope

Begin Subfactor 4: Relevant Scope

(#/mo.)

Maj

Assm (#/Mo.) Boeing Maximum Takeoff Weight (lbs.)

0 0 757-300 272,500 0 0 707-120B 257,000 0 0 757-200 255,000 0 0 757-200F 255,000 0 0 707-020 (720) 220,000 0 0 727-200 209,500 0 0 727-200F 194,800

0 0 737-900ER 187,700

0 0 737-800 174,200

0 0 737-700ER 171,000

0 0 727-100 169,000

Assm (#/mo.)

Maj Assm (#/Mo.) Douglas Maximum Takeoff Weight (lbs.)

0 0 MD-90-30ER 168,000

0 0 MD-83 160,000

0 0 MD-90-30 156,000

Assm (#/mo.)

Maj Assm (#/Mo.) Airbus Maximum Takeoff Weight (lbs.)

0 0 A321-200 206,000 0 0 A320-200 170,000 0 0 A318-100 166,000

0 0 A319-100/LR/CJ 166,000

Assm (#/mo.)

Maj Assm (#/Mo.) Other (not listed) Commercial Aircraft MTOW (lbs.) (> 155,000)

0 0 E.g.: Tupolex/TU-204(X) 230,000 0 0 E.g.: Embraer/KC-390 178,574 0 0 E.g.: Kawasaki P-1 176,000 0 0 E.g.: Lockheed L-100 155,000

End Subfactor 4: Relevant Scope

Begin Subfactor 4: Somewhat Relevant Scope A “Somewhat Relevant” project includes all those aircraft listed as “Very Relevant” or “Relevant,” but at lower levels of magnitude and complexity than indicated by the “Relevant” characteristics.

End Subfactor 4: Somewhat Relevant Scope

Aircraft identified below are examples of platforms that DO NOT meet any definition of "large" described in the Solicitation U.S. Military Aircraft Maximum Takeoff Weight (lbs.)

P-3 142,000 C-9B Skytrain 110,000 C-37A 90,500 F-22 Raptor 83,500 F-15E Strike Eagle 81,000 C-20 74,600 F-15 Eagle 68,000 F/A-18 66,000

EA-6B 61,500

CV-22 Osprey 60,500 C-2 Greyhound 60,000 E-2C 53,000 S-3 Viking 52,539 A-10 Thunderbolt II 51,000

U-2S/TU-2S 40,000

F-16 Fighting Falcon 37,500 E-9A 34,500 HH-60G Pave Hawk 22,000 C-21 18,300 T-1A Jayhawk 16,100

MC-12 15,000

T-38 Talon 12,093 T-6A Texan II 12,000 UH-1N Iroquois 10,500

Boeing Maximum Takeoff Weight (lbs.)

717 121,000 Bombardier Maximum Takeoff Weight (lbs.)

CS100 121,100

CS100ER 128,200

CS300 131,300

CS300XT 131,300

CS300ER 139,100

CRJ700 77,000

CRJ705 84,500

CRJ900 84,500

CRJ1000 91,800

Embraer Maximum Takeoff Weight (lbs.)

E-170 85,000 E175 89,000 E-190 114,000 E-195 115,300 Other (Mfgr./Model) Maximum Takeoff Weight (lbs.)

Kawasaki/C-2 120,100 Mitsubishi/MRJ(X) 94,400 Antonov/An-70 145,000 Sukhoi/100(X) 109,000 Yakovlev/42(X) 126,765 Comac/ARJ21 104,020 Kawasaki/C-2 120,100

Revised: 13 Dec 2011

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .