FA822425R0001 AMARG Engineering Support Services Questions And Responses.pdf
PDF 103 KB Posted
- Attached to
- AMARG Engineering Support Services
- Solicitation number
- FA822425R0001
About this file
This document is a Questions and Responses file for the FA822425R0001 AMARG Engineering Support Services solicitation. The document addresses five key clarification questions from potential offerors regarding proposal submission requirements, including formatting guidelines, past performance submission criteria, and technical staffing classifications. Key details include: submissions should use 1" margins with professional fonts like Times New Roman or Arial in 10-12pt size, single-spaced; past performance examples can be ongoing or completed within 60 months as long as there is at least one year of performance; and certain engineering roles (Process Engineer, Industrial Engineer, Facilities Engineer, Technical Insertion Engineer) are classified as professional/learned professionals with occupation codes available through the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The document also notes a technical change where "Engineering Technician" was updated to "Engineering Technician III" to align with Department of Labor occupation codes in the Davis-Monthan AFB Wage Determination.
View the file
Other files
Show all 24
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA822425R0001
AMARG Engineering Support Services
Questions and responses
1. The instructions do not provide any guidance on fonts, margins, or line spacing for offeror submissions. Does the Government have any applicable preferences or standards?
No less than 1” margin – Times New Roman – Arial – Calibri or similar professional
PRINT Font – 10 – 12pt – single space.
2. Section 4.4.3 of the instructions states, "Inclusion of a TOC is optional but is strongly encouraged ..." Does the table of contents count against any prescribed page limits (e.g., the 20 pages allocated for offeror-specific content for the technical approach)?
No the TOC will not count against the page count.
3. Section 4.4.8 of the instructions states, "The offeror shall provide up to three (3) verifiable past performance examples of recent (within the past 60 months) and relevant successfully completed projects ..." Will the Government accept past performance examples that are ongoing at the time of submission?
Yes – as long as there is at least one year of performance at the time of submission
4. Similarly, will the Government accept past performance examples that were completed within the past 60 months, but include performance that occurred more than 60 months prior to submission (e.g., a task order with a period of performance starting 78 months prior and ending 30 months prior)?
Yes – as long as there is at least year of performance within the 60 months prior to submission.
5. On page 7 of the "Updated 3 Feb 25 52.212-1 Instructions 02Dec24.pdf" file under section "4.4.9.1. Specific Pricing Content" the table provided shows DoL codes which do not correspond to the provided "Davis-Monthan AFB Wage Determination 2015-5473
Rev 24.pdf" file. Will the Government be providing a revised WD with those codes included or a revised Instruction sheet mapping to the WD provided?
The Process Engineer/Industrial Engineer, Facilities Engineer, and Technical Insertion
Engineer are considered professional employees/ Learned Professionals under the
Anticipated Bureau of Labor Statistics Occupation Profile and will not correspond to the
Davis-Monthan AFB Wage Determination 2015-5473 Rev 24.pdf. The occupational codes can be found at https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_stru.htm#17-0000.
https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_stru.htm#17-0000
Engineering Technician has been changed to Engineering Technician III to reflect the corresponding DoL Occupation Code – Title found in Davis-Monthan AFB Wage
Determination 2015-5473 Rev 24.
The following documents have been updated to reflect these changes:
52.212-1 Instructions, page 7, 4.4.9.1 Specific Pricing Content
52.212-2 Evolutions, page 9 under attachments to include “52.222-46 Evaluation of
Compensation for Professional Employees”
TEP Worksheet
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .