Tab_12_Statement_of_Work.pdf

F-22 Horizontal Stabilizer Fixture Contract

Statement of Work

7 January 2019

1. Scope

This Statement of Work (SOW) identifies the work to be done by the contractor during the course of the F‐22 Horizontal Stabilizer Fixture contract. Eight fixtures shall be delivered in accordance with (IAW) the requirements in the Performance Specification (Appendix B).

1.1. Background

The F‐22 depot facility is in need of fixtures to accommodate holding and manipulating the horizontal stabilizer of the United States Air Force F‐22 aircraft during the coating removal and coating application processes.

2. Applicable Documents

2.1. Issues of Documents

The following documents shall be used based off the revision on the date of the request for proposal, unless otherwise specified, form a part of this SOW to the extent specified herein.

When documents revisions conflict, this SOW shall govern.

2.2. Documents

Federal Acquisition Regulations 2.101

ANSI/ISO/ASQC Q9001‐2008 Quality Systems ‐ Model for Quality Assurance in Design, Development, Production, Installation and Servicing

DFARS 252.223‐7001 Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation System

3. Design

The contractor shall design fixtures meeting all requirements of the Performance Specification

(Appendix B) maximizing the use of commercial items as defined in Federal Acquisitions Regulations

Section 2.101. The goal is to supply the commercial or modified commercial equipment and/or components, with a production history and proven track record to the Government.

4. Program Management

Upon request by the government, the contractor shall provide cost, schedule, and technical risk updates throughout the life of the contract. These requests may include but are not limited to:

‐ Contract Status, Progress Tracking, and Reporting of Milestones

‐ Risk and Opportunity Management

‐ Technical Reviews

‐ Product Drawings/Models and Associated Lists Status

‐ Configuration Management

‐ Review of Critical Application Items (CAI) and Critical Safety Items (CSI)

‐ Subcontract management activity status (if applicable)

‐ Quality and Corrective Action Plan Status

‐ Action items

5. Systems Engineering

A standard systems engineering process utilizing Technical Interchange Meetings (TIM) will be used during the performance of this contract. The following will be supported by the contractor.

5.1. System Requirements Review (SRR)

The SRR is to ensure the contractor and Government teams understand and agree that the contract requirements, including the Performance Specification, SOW, etc. have been completely represented in the contractor’s proposal and can be executed within cost, schedule and technical constraints. The understanding of technical requirements and verification methods will be characterized in a technical risk assessment of the contractor to comply with the Performance Specification. This SRR will be conducted in person on Hill AFB. The SRR shall be conducted within 30 calendar days of contract award.

Entrance Criteria

‐ Initial Risk and Opportunity Management Plan

Exit Criteria

‐ Closing of action items that come as a result of the SRR

5.2. Critical Design Review (CDR)

The CDR is a technical assessment that establishes the complete physically allocated baseline to ensure that the system under review has a reasonable expectation of being judged operationally effective and suitable. The CDR shall be conducted within 30 calendar days of the

SRR. The CDR will be conducted at the contractor facility. Design changes after the CDR must be authorized in writing by the Government Program Manager. Upon Government approval of the

CDR the contractor shall produce and deliver the fixtures IAW paragraph 5.4. The contractor shall include in the CDR:

‐ Present draft Product Drawings/Models and Associated Lists (CDRL A001)

‐ Analysis showing how the design meets rotational, translational and transportation capacities and that it meets or exceeds the Performance Specification requirements. Analysis shall be documented in the Acceptance Test Report (CDRL A003).

‐ Present results/status (including inputs and associated safety margin) of all structural analyses including static and dynamic analysis results in the Performance Specification. Analysis shall be documented in the Acceptance Test Report (CDRL A003)

‐ Describe initial test planning (tentative schedules and locations)

‐ Present cost, schedule, and performance risks as well as risk mitigation plans

‐ Show and/or demonstrate that evaluations of materials, lead times, tooling, fabrication techniques, assembly methods, test equipment, skills, processes, and inspection techniques are in place for each hardware configuration item. Provide a CAI/CSI list, if applicable, with criticality justification

Entrance Criteria

‐ Completion of SRR

‐ Updated Risk and Opportunity Management Plan

‐ Draft Product Drawings/Models and Associated Lists (CDRL A001)

‐ Analysis section of Acceptance Test Report (CDRL A003)

Exit Criteria

‐ Updated Product Drawings/Models and Associated Lists (CDRL A001)

‐ Completion of any Action Items that result from the CDR

‐ Government approval of successful CDR milestone

5.3. Test and Evaluation

The contractor shall establish, plan, maintain, conduct and support a test program to verify that the Performance Specification requirements are met through successful completion of all methods identified in Section 3 of the Performance Specification. The Government reserves the right to witness any of the inspections, demonstrations and tests. Records of analysis, inspections, and demonstrations shall be kept complete and available to the

Government.

5.3.1. Responsibility for Compliance. All items shall meet all requirements of the Performance

Specification, section 2. The absence of any analysis, inspection or demonstration requirement in the specification shall not relieve the contractor of the responsibility of assuring that all products or supplies submitted to the Government for acceptance comply with all requirements of the contract. Table 1 of the Performance Specification contains the Verification Cross Reference Matrix. Each requirement paragraph (Section 2) in the specification is listed in this matrix providing a reference to the verification paragraph in

Section 3 that directs how the requirement is to be verified. The matrix should be referenced while writing test procedures to ensure that they correctly cover all relevant requirements. The contractor shall deliver the Acceptance Test Report (CDRL A003) as early as practical after each fixture has been tested but shall be delivered prior to the delivery of the associated fixture.

5.4. Delivery and Acceptance. Upon Government approval of the CDR the contractor shall produce and deliver the first two fixtures to the Hill AFB F‐22 Depot within 120 calendar days. The remainder of the fixtures shall be delivered to Hill AFB at a cadence of at least two per 60 calendar days. For example, Fixtures 3 and 4 shall be delivered no later than 180 calendar days from CDR approval, Fixtures 5 and 6 shall be delivered no later than 240 calendar days from

CDR approval, etc. Contractor test and evaluation shall be conducted IAW paragraph 5.3 and shall be complete along with the delivery of the Acceptance Test Report (CDRL A003) prior to the delivery of each fixture. The contractor shall accompany the delivery of at least the first set of fixtures in order to address any potential issues with acceptance. The contractor shall be responsible for correcting any failures to meet the requirements of the Performance

Specification (Appendix B) at no cost to the government. This shall include but is not limited to design changes along with associated fixture modifications and documentation updates, shipping and/or travel required to correct deficiencies. The contractor shall correct these deficiencies within 30 calendar days of identification at acceptance, unless otherwise agreed upon by the Government.

5.5. Physical Configuration Audit (PCA)

The contractor shall coordinate with the Government to conduct a PCA on a production unit within 30 days after the first production unit is complete. The objective of this TIM is to verify that the final drawing package matches the Configuration Item (production unit) being produced. A PCA is a technical audit consisting of a direct comparison of the characteristics of a production unit with the characteristics specified on the applicable Product Configuration

Identification (drawings, associated lists, specifications, etc.).

5.6. Quality Assurance

The contractor shall continually manage and improve the quality of all products and services delivered under this contract and the processes by which they are realized. The system used by the contractor to manage quality shall be compliant with all requirements of, and at a minimum be functionally equal to, a current active version of the ANSI/ISO/ASQ Q9001, Quality

Systems ‐ Model for Quality Assurance in Design, Development, Production, Installation and

Servicing. The Government shall have the right to audit the contractor's quality system for

ANSI/ISO/ASQ Q9001 compliance.

5.7. Product Drawings/Models and Associated Lists

5.7.1. The contractor shall deliver the Product Drawings/Models and Associated Lists that provides the Government with unlimited data rights. This data shall include everything that is required to reproduce or modify the fixtures. Models shall be delivered in a format that is compatible with SolidWorks 2017. Drawings and other documentation may be delivered in contractor’s format. The contractor is responsible for selecting the types of drawings/models and associated lists. A draft shall be delivered to support the CDR in accordance with paragraph 5.2 and the final delivery shall be delivered in conjunction with the first fixture delivery. (CDRL A001)

5.7.2. The fixtures are planned to be supported by a Government organic repair depot. As such, any item identified in the Technical Manual shall have overhaul source data such as configuration drawings. (CDRL A001)

5.8. Technical Order Data/User’s Manual

This section specifies the requirements for development, validation, verification and delivery of the Technical Manuals. The requirements established herein are designed to provide accurate, comprehensive, and usable manuals. Th Usability and Maintainability Report shall be a one time delivery in conjunction with the first fixture delivery. Its contents will become property of the U. S. Government (CDRL A002).

5.8.1. The contractor shall provide technical data to accommodate the fixture. Technical data to include, but is not limited to, the following:

‐ List of Commercial off the Shelf items used and associated vendors

‐ Maintenance Instructions. Maintenance instructions for items that will require sustainment to include all materials used for maintenance and step by step instructions to complete required tasks.

‐ Operating Instructions. Clear and easy to follow instructions for fully and safely operating the fixture to its capacity.

‐ Installation Instructions. Instructions for preparing the stand for use, to include areas that should be protected/covered during coating removal or application

‐ Disassembly Instructions (if applicable)

‐ Assembly Instructions (if applicable)

5.9. Configuration. The contractor shall provide the following in order to maintain Configuration

Management of the fixtures throughout the term of the contract.

5.9.1. Product Drawings/Models and Associated Lists ‐ Modified Bill of Materials (CDRL A001)

A Modified Bill of Materials (BOM) shall be provided in the form of a spreadsheet or database which identifies a top‐down breakdown of the fixtures to the lowest level component and hardware. The BOM shall include the full complement of technical drawings with the revision letter and revision date. This is needed to ensure any future engineering changes during program development are easily identifiable to the Program technical team. In addition, any future engineering changes during program development must be properly incorporated into the Product Drawings/Models and Associated Lists.

At a minimum the format shall provide the following information:

‐ Drawing Number

‐ Drawing Nomenclature

‐ Number of Sheets

‐ Revision Letter

‐ Revision Date

‐ Parent Drawing Number

‐ Manufacturer Prime Part Number or Specification Number

‐ Manufacturer Cage Code

‐ Configuration Item Quantity

‐ Change Description (from previous revision) ie. Add, Delete, Revision

‐ Manufactures projected end date

5.10. Contractor Data Requirements List (CDRL)

DATA ITEM TITLE DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION (DID)

A001 Product Drawings/Models and

Associated Lists

DI‐SESS‐81000

A002 Technical Report‐Study/Services:

Usability and Maintainability

Report

DI-MISC-80508B/T

A003 Acceptance Test Report DI‐QCIC‐91891

Appendix A ‐ ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

BOM Bill of Materials

CAI Critical Application Items

CDR Critical Design Review

CM Configuration Management

CSI Critical Safety Items

IAW In accordance with

OEM Original Equipment Manufacturer

PCA Physical Configuration Audit

PRR Production Readiness Review

SOW Statement of Work

SRR System Requirements Review

SVR System Verification Review

TIM Technical Interchange Meeting

Appendix B – PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION

1. Applicable Documents

The following shall be used in development of the fixtures to comply with best military support equipment practices.

Specifications

MIL‐DTL‐53022

Primer, Epoxy Coating, Corrosion Inhibiting Lead and Chromate Free

MIL‐DTL‐5541

Chemical Conversion Coatings on Aluminum and Alloys

MIL‐PRF‐23377 Primer Coatings: Epoxy, High‐Solids MIL‐A‐8625 Anodic Coatings for Aluminum and Aluminum

Alloys

MIL‐PRF‐85285 Coating: Polyurethane, Aircraft and Support Equipment

MIL‐PRF‐23236 Coating Systems for Ship Structures Standards

AFI 91‐203 Air Force Consolidated Occupational Safety Instruction

MIL‐STD‐1472

Human Engineering Design Criteria for Military Systems, Equipment and Facilities

MIL‐STD‐1568

Materials and Processes for Corrosion Prevention and Control in Aerospace Weapons Systems

MIL‐STD‐889 Dissimilar Metals

2. Definition and Concept of Operations

The fixtures shall be used to hold and manipulate the horizontal tail during processes that will remove and replace several coatings. Tools for loading and unloading the stabilizer from the aircraft and fixture are already in place with set processes. The tail will be supported on the surface of the tail using a hand operated crane on caster wheels that will accommodate positioning of the tail at the fixture.

2.1. Performance Characteristics

2.1.1. Attach Point

The fixtures shall be capable of supporting the tail utilizing the pivot shaft as the only attach point. Dimension of the pivot shaft are shown below.

All dimensions shown +/‐ 0.01”

Figure 1: Attach Point

2.1.2. Rotational Constraint

The fixture shall be capable of utilizing the existing geometry of the pivot shaft to accommodate controlled rotation of the horizontal tail.

Figure 2: Rotational Constraint

2.1.3. Rotation about Center of Gravity

The fixture shall also be capable of controlled rotation of the horizontal stabilizer by placing the axis of rotation in line with the center of gravity of the stabilizer. The center of gravity is measured from the centerline axis of the pivot shaft and where the pivot shaft meets the edge of the horizontal tail as shown in the figure below.

Figure 3: Center of Gravity Location

2.1.4. Weight of Part Support

The fixture shall be capable of supporting the part with full coatings without tipping. The part with full coatings applied will not exceed a weight of 600 pounds.

2.1.5. Orientation Capabilities of the Fixture

The fixture shall meet the following orientation capabilities while also preventing rotation of the tail except when located in a position such that tail rotation will not contact the ground or parts of the fixture.

2.1.5.1. Rotational Motion Capability

The fixture shall be able to rotate 360 degrees about an axis parallel to the pivot shaft centerline to accommodate the tail being located perpendicular to the ground with both the forward and aft end being located at the highest point. This will allow sufficient access to all surfaces of the tail for coating removal and application. See Figure 4: Rotational

Capability, below.

2.1.5.2. Rotational Locking Feature

The fixture shall be equipped with a locking feature that will accommodate fixing the rotational angle of the part at any desired orientation at increments of 15 degrees.

Figure 4: Rotational Capability

2.1.5.3. Translational Motion Capability

The fixture shall have translational capability that will allow the pivot shaft centerline to be located a maximum of 30” from ground level and fixed at any position at increments of 12 inches. The fixture shall also allow for travel to allow the rotational motion mentioned in 3.1.5.1 above.

Figure 5: Translational Capability

Figure 6: Lowest Translation Position

2.1.5.3.1. Required Translational Height

The fixture shall be capable of rotating the part 360 degrees without needing to remove or alter the fixture. For reference the distance from the pivot shaft centerline where it enters the tail to the furthest point on the tail is 87”.

Figure 7: Minimum Translational Height

2.1.5.3.2. Height Locking Feature

The fixture shall be equipped with a locking feature that will accommodate fixing the height of the part at any desired location.

2.1.6. Loading and Unloading of the fixture

The fixture shall be capable of being loaded utilizing the existing system that loads and unloads the part from the aircraft. This system consists of an overhead crane, manually operated, that attaches to the horizontal tail by means of a clamp (“clam shell”) that attaches on both sides of the tail and has hoist points to attach to the crane. This leaves the pivot shaft free to be raised and lowered but not rotated such that the pivot shaft can be loaded into the fixture as its axis is parallel to the ground. Additionally the pivot shaft is the only surface of the part that shall be contacted as all the other surfaces will need to have coatings applied or removed. See Figure 8: Loading and Unloading of Part, below.

Clam Shell and Attach Points Reference for where hoist points are located

Figure 8: Loading and Unloading of Part

2.1.7. Operating environment

The coating bays in which the fixtures will be utilized are classified using the National

Electric Code as a Class 1 Div 1 environment. Any fixture components or systems shall be qualified to operate in this environment.

2.1.8. Fixture Life Expectancy

The fixture shall be designed to be continuously used for a minimum of 12 years. Designs shall minimize the amount of maintenance required to be performed on the fixtures.

Where required, maintenance actions shall be documented in Technical Manuals as described in the Statement of Work.

2.1.9. Manipulation of the fixture

The fixture shall be capable of being manipulated through the full range of translational and rotational motion within 90 seconds by a single person (size, weight, height) using average strength and skills without exceeding limitations set forth by AFI 91‐203.

2.1.10. Transportation of the fixture

The fixture will not be transported with the part loaded, but will be positioned. The fixture shall be capable of being transported (without tail loaded) without tipping by use of wheels as well as being lifted by forklift. The fixture shall be capable of being positioned

(with tail loaded) by 3 persons or less. The wheels shall have the capability of being pinned to accommodate straight line travel or unpinned to allow rotation in any direction. The fixture will not be transported long distances or at transportation speeds with the tail loaded.

2.1.10.1. Tow vehicle

The fixture shall be capable of being transported (without tail loaded) by means of tow vehicle at speeds not to exceed 5 mph. The fixture shall be equipped with standard tow interface for attaching to tow vehicle.

2.1.10.2. Forklift tubes

Additionally the fixture shall be equipped with forklift tubes to accommodate transportation by forklifts.

2.1.10.3. Wheel brakes/parking brakes

The fixture wheels shall be equipped with brakes that prevent rolling motion of the wheels once engaged. This will allow the fixture to be rolled into position and

“parking brakes” to keep it in place to resist small input forces including incidental contact and loads from hand held coating removal tools.

2.1.11. Free standing

The fixture shall be capable of being free standing. The fixture shall not be required to be fixed to the floor or walls in order to maintain stability when the tail is in the fixture and being manipulated.

2.1.12. Storage/Footprint

The fixture shall be designed to accommodate outdoor storage when the fixture is not in use. Any parts/components that would be susceptible to severe weather or environment should be protected or instructions for maintenance should be considered.

The fixture shall be designed to minimize the operational footprint while in use as well as the storage footprint. It is understood that some level of assembly and disassembly may be required to support optimal footprint designs.

It is anticipated that the fixture shall be stored outdoors at Hill AFB and subjected to weather elements including, UV rays, rain, snow, ice, temperatures between 20 – 120 degrees Fahrenheit, etc. The fixture shall come equipped with any protective covers or shielding required to be stored in the described environment without compromising the capabilities mentioned in this document.

2.1.13. Protection from coatings

When in use the fixture will be subjected to various aircraft coatings and overspray of coatings. Consideration shall be given to the protection of these systems. Instructions should be provided to ensure that masking, if any, is accomplished before the use of the fixture to ensure that the buildup of coatings over extended periods of use does not eventually impact the functionality of the fixture.

2.2. Design and Construction

2.2.1. Analysis of fixture

Analysis shall be performed ensuring design meets safety requirements including a safety factor of 3.

2.2.1.1. Static Loading Condition

Analysis shall be performed to show that the fixture can accommodate the 600 pound part with the center of gravity located as shown in Figure 3: Center of Gravity

Location, above.

2.2.1.2. Dynamic Loading Condition

Analysis shall be performed to show that rotation of the part about its center of gravity is possible without inducing tipping or other instabilities. Additionally the fixture shall be capable of resisting loads applied at part surface locations representing the forces required to remove coatings manually. The analysis shall also confirm that the locking feature is capable of positioning the part at any height and orientation angle.

Analysis shall be performed to show that the locking features of both translational and rotational capabilities are sufficient to secure the part from additional motion when engaged as mentioned in section 2.1.5, above.

2.2.2. Interchangeability/Commercial off the Shelf Components

The fixture shall be optimized and designed for interchangeability using standard methods and practices and using Commercial off the Shelf (COTS) components, where possible, to accommodate repairs and sustainment of the fixture.

2.2.3. Disassembly Capability

Where applicable construction of the fixture should include methods that will accommodate disassembly of the fixture without destructive means.

2.2.4. Materials

2.2.4.1. Fixture Coatings

2.2.4.1.1. Pretreatments

Conversion coating pretreatment shall be applied to aluminum substrates prior to coating including one of the following;

‐ MIL‐A‐8625 Type IC anodize

‐ MIL‐DTL‐5541, Type II, Class 1A

2.2.4.1.2. Coatings

Coating systems shall consist of one of the following or equivalent by

Government approval

‐ Primer ‐ MIL‐DTL‐53022 Type IV; or MIL‐PRF‐23377 Type I, Class N

‐ Topcoat ‐ MIL‐PRF‐85285 Type II

OR

‐ Primer ‐ MIL‐PRF‐23236 Type VII, CL5, Grade C

‐ Topcoat ‐ MIL‐PRF‐23236 Type VII, CL 5, Grade C, color off‐white

2.2.4.2. Hazardous Materials (HAZMAT)

In fabricating, manufacturing, testing, operating, maintaining and disposing of the unit, all forms of pollution shall be prevented or reduced whenever feasible. The emphasis shall be on eliminating or reducing hazardous materials early in the design and properly controlling hazardous materials, which are not eliminated, throughout the life cycle.

The following is a list of materials that, if used, require approval;

‐ Hexavalent Chromium

‐ Beryllium & Beryllium Compounds

‐ Cadmium & Cadmium Compounds

‐ Chromium & Non‐Hexavalent Chromium Compounds

Approval will not be given unless the application can be documented as having no technically feasible alternative. Non‐hexavalent chromate conversion coatings shall be used preferentially to hexavalent chromate conversion coatings.

2.2.4.3. Dissimilar Metals

Use of dissimilar metals in contact, as specified in MIL‐STD‐889, shall be limited to applications where similar metals cannot be used due to design requirements. When it is necessary to use dissimilar metals in contact, the metals shall be protected against galvanic corrosion.

2.2.4.4. Alloy Selection

The selection of aluminum alloys for structural applications requires consideration of their resistance to stress‐corrosion cracking (SCC). Maximum use shall be made of alloys and heat treatments that minimize susceptibility to SCC. All low alloy, high strength steel parts shall be selected and heat treated in accordance with (IAW) MIL‐

STD‐1568, paragraph 4.6.2.1.

2.2.4.5. Gaskets and Seals

All gaskets, seals and insulating materials shall be able to resist exposure to all environments, petroleum products, lubricants or other materials encountered in service and extended storage of at least 5 years.

2.2.4.6. Bearings

The fixture shall be designed and constructed such that rotating parts shall be mounted on ball or roller bearings to the extent normally provided in standard commercial practice. Bearing load capacity including applicable safety and life factors recommended by the bearing manufacturer shall be equal to or greater than the maximum bearing loading under loading conditions described above.

2.2.4.7. Lubrication

All bearings, mating gears, and sliding parts on the fixture shall be designed and constructed with means to apply lubrication. Lubrication fittings shall be located in a protected location but accessible for maintenance purposes and covered in maintenance instructions.

2.2.5. Safety/Ergonomics

The fixture shall be accommodated such that any parts the present safety hazards to operations or personnel shall be designed and constructed with safety devices, covers, guards and IAW AFI 91‐203. Warning decals shall be added as applicable as well as detailed in associated user/technical manuals. Additionally the fixture shall be designed to meet the size and reach of an average person.

3. Quality Assurance Provisions

Testing shall be accomplished to ensure the fixture meets the requirements outlined throughout section 2 for each of the delivered units. The following tests shall be accomplished:

3.1. Inspections

Performance Spec Section

Requirement

2.1.1 Attach Point

2.1.2 Rotational Constraint

2.1.3 Rotation About Center of Gravity

2.1.6 Loading and Unloading of the Fixture

2.1.7 Operating Environment

2.1.12 Storage/Footprint

2.2.2 Interchangeability/Commercial off the Shelf Components

2.2.4 Materials

3.2. Demonstrations

Performance Spec Section

Requirement

2.1.5.1 Rotational Motion Capability

2.1.5.2 Rotational Locking Feature

2.1.5.3 Translational Motion Capability

2.1.5.3.1 Required Translational Height

2.1.5.3.2 Height Locking Feature

2.1.9 Manipulation of the Fixture

2.1.10 Transportation of the Fixture

2.1.10.1 Tow Vehicle

2.1.10.2 Fork Lift Tubes

2.1.10.3 Wheel brakes/Parking Brakes

2.1.11 Free Standing

2.1.13 Protection From Coatings

2.2.3 Disassembly Capability

3.3. Analysis

Performance Spec Section

Requirement

2.1.8 Fixture Life Expectancy

2.2.1.1 Static Loading Conditions

2.2.1.2 Dynamic Loading Conditions

3.3.1. Acceptance of Production Units

The contractor shall demonstrate the functionality of every fixture as a means to verify all requirements in the performance specification have been met. In the event a fixture fails acceptance tests; it shall be the contractor’s responsibility to take corrective action to ensure all requirements mentioned are met. These tests may include but are not limited to the inspection, demonstration and analyses activities mentioned above as determined by the Government.

Table 1. Verification Cross Reference Matrix

Name & Identifier Method Verified (Y/N), Comments

2.1.1 Attach Point Inspection

2.1.2 Rotational Constraint Inspection

2.1.3 Rotation about Center of

Gravity

Inspection

2.1.4 Weight of Part Support (see 3.2.1.1 &

3.2.1.2)

2.1.5.1 Rotational Motion Capability Demonstration

2.1.5.2 Rotational Locking Feature Demonstration

2.1.5.3 Translational Motion

Capability

Demonstration

2.1.5.3.1 Required Translational

Height

Demonstration

2.1.5.3.2 Height Locking Feature Demonstration

2.1.6 Loading and Unloading of the

Fixture

Inspection

2.1.7 Operating Environment Inspection

2.1.8 Fixture Life Expectancy Analysis

2.1.9 Manipulation of the Fixture Demonstration

2.1.10 Transportation of the Fixture Demonstration

2.1.10.1 Tow Vehicle Demonstration

2.1.10.2 Fork Lift Tubes Demonstration

2.1.10.3 Wheel Brakes/Parking

Brakes

Demonstration

2.1.11 Free Standing Demonstration

2.1.12 Storage/Footprint Inspection

2.1.13 Protection from Coatings Demonstration

2.2.1.1 Static Loading Condition Analysis

2.2.1.2 Dynamic Loading Condition Analysis

2.2.2 Interchangeability/Commercial

off the Shelf Components

Inspection

2.2.3 Disassembly Capability Demonstration

2.2.4 Materials Inspection