Company_C_answers.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 55 KB Posted Nov 30, 2016

Attached to: Automated Test System Sustainment Initiative Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number: FA8224-17-R-0001
Issued by: Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Lifecycle Management Center Hill Air Force Base

About this file

From the source

Government answers to Company C questions

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Automated Test System Sustainment Initiative, newest first.
File	Type	Posted
Company_B_answers_2.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Nov 30, 2016
Amendment.docx	DOCX document	Nov 29, 2016
Company_D_Comment_Res_Matrix_ATSSI_2016-1114_(002).xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Nov 29, 2016
Company_B_Comment_Res_Matrix_ATSSI_FINAL_v2_111416_(002)_(002)_.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Nov 29, 2016
Company_B_responses.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Nov 9, 2016
Company_C_Responses.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Nov 9, 2016
ppi_tool.accdb	—	Nov 3, 2016
dd0254_ATSSI_Draft2.pdf	PDF	Nov 3, 2016
ATTSI_Labor_Category_Descriptions.pdf	PDF	Nov 3, 2016
Exhibit_B.pdf	PDF	Nov 3, 2016
ATSSI_TEP__24OCT2016_FINAL.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Nov 3, 2016
ATSSI_Section_L_Final_02_Nov_16.pdf	PDF	Nov 3, 2016
ATSSI_PWS_Final_11.2.16.pdf	PDF	Nov 3, 2016
ATSSI_Section_M_Final_02_Nov_16.pdf	PDF	Nov 3, 2016
client_authorization_letter_attachment.docx	DOCX document	Nov 3, 2016
ADCTO_Final_11.02.16.pdf	PDF	Nov 3, 2016
GFP_ATSSI_2_November.pdf	PDF	Nov 3, 2016
FA8224-17-R-0001.docx	DOCX document	Nov 3, 2016
Comment_Res_Matrix_ATSSI.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Nov 3, 2016
Exhibit_A.pdf	PDF	Nov 3, 2016
Comment_Res_Matrix_ATSSI_Oct_20.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Oct 24, 2016
Comment_Res_Matrix_ATSSI-CO.B__20_Oct_2016.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Oct 24, 2016
Comment_Res_Matrix_ATSSI.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Oct 17, 2016
DRAFT_CDRLs_Exhibit_B.pdf	PDF	Oct 17, 2016
DRAFT_Labor_Category_Descriptions.pdf	PDF	Oct 17, 2016
DRAFT_DD254.pdf	PDF	Oct 17, 2016
DRAFT_ATSSI_Section_M.pdf	PDF	Oct 17, 2016
DRAFT_CDRLs_Exhibit_A.pdf	PDF	Oct 17, 2016
DRAFT_Solicitation_FA8224-17-R-0001.pdf	PDF	Oct 17, 2016
DRAFT_ATSSI_Section_L.pdf	PDF	Oct 17, 2016
ATSSI_TEP_13OCT2016_FINAL.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Oct 17, 2016
Wage_Determination.pdf	PDF	Oct 17, 2016
DRAFT_ADC_Task_Order_PWS.pdf	PDF	Oct 17, 2016
DRAFT_ATSSI_PWS.pdf	PDF	Oct 17, 2016

Show all 34

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Basic PWS

Solicitation #: FA8224-17-R-0001 AUTOMATED TEST SYSTEM SUSTAINMENT INITIATIVE (ATSSI) Comment Resolution Matrix - Attachment #01 X					For Government Use
Question #	Basic PWS Reference	Discussion	Question/Comment	Sensitivity		Government Response
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

Sheet3

Sample Task Order PWS

Solicitation #: FA8224-17-R-0001 AUTOMATED TEST SYSTEM SUSTAINMENT INITIATIVE (ATSSI) Comment Resolution Matrix - Attachment #02					For Government Use
Question #	TO PWS Reference	Discussion	Question/Comment	Sensitivity		Government Response
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Pricing Matrix

	Solicitation #: FA8224-17-R-0001 AUTOMATED TEST SYSTEM SUSTAINMENT INITIATIVE (ATSSI) Comment Resolution Matrix - Attachment #05					For Government Use
	Question #	Pricing Matrix Reference	Discussion	Question/Comment	Sensitivity		Government Response
	1	FY columns	TEP instructions note that all rates for all years must be populated; the years columns are labeled as FY.	Please define the FY time period as Government Fiscal Year, Calendar Year or Contract Year.			Government Fiscal Year (Oct 1 - Sep 30)
	2 & 3	CLINS	The STO tab allows offerors to populate all the CLINS with hours.	Does the Government intend for the offeror to determine which CLIN/CLINs to use for the STO price proposal inclusive of program management FFP hours?
Is it the government's intention to fund the Program management Clin within each separate task order?			Bid program hours direct. They will be funded separately on each task order.
	4	TEP	Section M states “This requirement is met when the offeror’s proposal indicates, at a minimum, specific interface personnel for the functions of Logistics, Configuration Control, and Program Management.”	Please add a Logistic Labor Category to the TEP			The government is looking for an engineering solution to the logistics, not logistics support
	4
	5
	6
	7
	8
	9
	10
	11
	12
	13
	14
	15
	16
	17
	18
	19
	20

Sec L

	Solicitation #: FA8224-17-R-0001 AUTOMATED TEST SYSTEM SUSTAINMENT INITIATIVE (ATSSI) Comment Resolution Matrix- Attachment #03					For Government Use
	Question #	Sec L Reference	Discussion	Question/Comment	Sensitivity		Government Response
	1	Proposal Submittal Instructions	Sect. L Table 2.2 provides for the number of copies required for each proposal volume, however, 2.4 Distribution shows a different mix	Should offerors submit 2 hard copies and 1 electronic copy/CD of ALL volumes including the Pricing volume?			The pricing volume requires the contractor to submit 1 hard copy and 2 Electronic CD's for this effort
	2	5.1.3 Cost/Price Data	Section notes that "All data relating to the proposed price, including all required supporting doucmentation, must be included…."	Please confirm the government does not require any Subcontractor pricing submission.			No separate subcontractor pricing will be required. However bear in mind Note 7 of the Pricing Matrix: THE RATES IN THIS TABLE WILL BE CONTRACTUALLY BINDING AND WILL BE USED AS A NTE TABLE FOR ALL SUBSEQUENT TASK ORDERS IN ALL PRICING ARRANGEMENTS FOR ALL TEAM MEMBERS INCLUDING THE PRIME OFFEROR, INTERDIVISIONAL ORDERS, AND SUBCONTRACTORS.
	3	2.2 Proposal Organization	Table 2.2 calls for "Redacted" copy of Volume I.	Can the government explain what information should be redacted and how should it be redacted??			The contractor shall redact company name from their proposal and all other marks and logos that would be identifiable to their company
	4	2.2.1 Page Limitations		Do the page limitations for Volume I include the Small Business Participation Plan??			Yes, the page limits include the Small Business Participation Plan
	5	6.3.5 Attachments	"If the offeror is other than a small business, the offeror shall submit a Small Business Subcontracting Plan in accordance with FAR 52-219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan"…."Failure to submit and negotiate the subcontracting plan shall make the offeror ineligible for award of a contract."	Given that we are only submitting rates, how should offerors develop the dollar amounts and percentages for the small business plan??
Should we use the total price of the ADCTO as representative to develop goals/percentages?			This is amended from the posting on 29 November The Government requests that Contractors use the ADCTO to show their rates and dollar figures
	6	Technical Volume Response	Section L, 3.3.1, 2) a-b, “Staffing”	Please confirm the staffing matrix, which includes labor category descriptions, will not count against the page count for the ADCTO response.			This will not count against the page count for this response
	9
	10
	11
	12

Sec M

Solicitation #: FA8224-17-R-0001 AUTOMATED TEST SYSTEM SUSTAINMENT INITIATIVE (ATSSI) Comment Resolution Matrix - Attachment #04					For Government Use
Question #	Sec M Reference	Discussion	Question/Comment	Sensitivity		Government Response
1	2.3.2.1 Team Structure	Minimum labor categories are listed as part of the team structure, but not all of those labor categories are included on the TEP matrix.	Will Section M be modified to include only those Labor Categories indentified in the TEP??			No, the contractor may propose addiditional labor categories, but section M will not be modified
2
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

CDRLs

Solicitation #: FA8224-17-R-0001 AUTOMATED TEST SYSTEM SUSTAINMENT INITIATIVE (ATSSI) Comment Resolution Matrix- Attachment #06					For Government Use
Question #	CDRLs Reference	Discussion	Question/Comment	Sensitivity		Government Response
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

MISC Questions

	Solicitation #: FA8224-17-R-0001 AUTOMATED TEST SYSTEM SUSTAINMENT INITIATIVE (ATSSI) Comment Resolution Matrix					For Government Use
	Question #	Reference	Discussion	Question/Comment	Sensitivity		Government Response
	1	Sect. B RFP	The CLIN states "performed in accordance with the PWS dated 20 October 2016."	There is no PWS dated 20 October 2016 in any of the previous drafts. Shouldn't this be "IAW PWS dated 2 November 2016"			Yes, this should state 2 November 2016 an amendment will be posted on Monday 29 November to reflect this change
	2	Section B, CLIN 0008	FFP CLIN 0008 details the attendance and mandatory documents required for the Post Award Conference, but also notes that the CLIN is not required to be priced and will not be included in the TEP calculations.	Will a task order be issued for the Post Award Conference requirements? Will the Government consider a plug number total CLIN price submitted, or will the Government provide a pricing template for the CLIN?			The Government will award this CLIN at the time of award. The offeror does not need to submit pricing for this CLIN. The Government will award this CLIN for the amount of $5,000 at the time of award
	3 & 4	HUB Zone Preference	The Notice of Price Evaluation Preference for HUB Zone small business Concerns clause is included 52.219-4.	Will the 10% price premium be added to small business offers that are NOT HUBZone?
Does the government intend to waive this requirement??			The Government will waive this requirement and will remove this clause in the amendment that will post on 28 November
	5	Section B Tables	Clin descriptions 0001, 0002, 0003, 0004, 1001, 1002, 1003 and 1004 contain the last sentence "…will be required to perform engineering trade study services", but only CLINS 0001 and 1001 are for Engineering Trade Studies.	Please confirm that only 0001 and 1001 efforts pertain to Engineering Trade Studies.			Engineering Trade Studies will only be required for CLINS 0001 and 1001. This was changed in the amendment dated 29 November
	6	Section A Solicitation	Box 9 Solicitation Due Date/time	Since no answers have been released from questions submitted on 11/14, we request a proposal due date extension of ten (10) days from release of the final Q&A in order to provide a compliant response to the solicitation.			The Government is not extending the solicitaiton at this time.
	7		Section H - Special Contract Clauses has NOT been included in the solicitation documents.	Will a modification be issued to include Section H into the final solicitation??			There are no Special Clauses for this contract
	12

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Nov 14, 2017.