Comment_Res_Matrix_ATSSI-CO.B__20_Oct_2016.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 40 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Automated Test System Sustainment Initiative Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA8224-17-R-0001
About this file
Company B Draft RFP Responses
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 34
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Basic PWS
| Solicitation #: FA8224-16-R-0055 AUTOMATED TEST SYSTEM SUSTAINMENT INITIATIVE (ATSSI) Comment Resolution Matrix - Attachment #01 X | For Government Use | |||||
| Question # | Basic PWS Reference | Discussion | Question/Comment | Sensitivity | Government Response | |
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | ||||||
| 3 | ||||||
| 4 | ||||||
| 5 | ||||||
| 6 | ||||||
| 7 | ||||||
| 8 | ||||||
| 9 | ||||||
| 10 | ||||||
| 11 | ||||||
| 12 | ||||||
| 13 | ||||||
| 14 | ||||||
| 15 | ||||||
| 16 | ||||||
| 17 | ||||||
| 18 | ||||||
| 19 | ||||||
| 20 |
Sheet3
Sample Task Order PWS
| Solicitation #: FA8224-16-R-0055 AUTOMATED TEST SYSTEM SUSTAINMENT INITIATIVE (ATSSI) Comment Resolution Matrix - Attachment #02 | For Government Use | |||||
| Question # | TO PWS Reference | Discussion | Question/Comment | Sensitivity | Government Response | |
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | ||||||
| 3 | ||||||
| 4 | ||||||
| 5 | ||||||
| 6 | ||||||
| 7 | ||||||
| 8 | ||||||
| 9 | ||||||
| 10 | ||||||
| 11 | ||||||
| 12 |
CDRLs
| Solicitation #: FA8224-16-R-0055 AUTOMATED TEST SYSTEM SUSTAINMENT INITIATIVE (ATSSI) Comment Resolution Matrix- Attachment #06 | For Government Use | |||||
| Question # | CDRLs Reference | Discussion | Question/Comment | Sensitivity | Government Response | |
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | ||||||
| 3 | ||||||
| 4 | ||||||
| 5 | ||||||
| 6 | ||||||
| 7 | ||||||
| 8 | ||||||
| 9 | ||||||
| 10 | ||||||
| 11 | ||||||
| 12 |
Pricing Matrix
| Solicitation #: FA8224-16-R-0055 AUTOMATED TEST SYSTEM SUSTAINMENT INITIATIVE (ATSSI) Comment Resolution Matrix - Attachment #05 | For Government Use | |||||
| Question # | Pricing Matrix Reference | Discussion | Question/Comment | Sensitivity | Government Response | |
| 1 | Pricing Matrix | Burden rates differ by site of performance. Client will be afforded flexibility by soliciting rates for both Government and Contractor sites. | Would the Government provide additional space within the TEP worksheet to allow for the inclusion of both Government and Contractor site rates? | Low | Another Tab was added for the contractor sites | |
| 2 | Pricing Matrix | With exeption to Technical Writer III (30463), SCA Categories do not map to provided Wage Determination. | Would the Government revise the SCA categories to map to the provided Wage Determination? | Low | The Government has updated the TEP spreadsheet to update the labor categories | |
| 3 | ||||||
| 4 | ||||||
| 5 | ||||||
| 6 | ||||||
| 7 | ||||||
| 8 | ||||||
| 9 | ||||||
| 10 | ||||||
| 11 | ||||||
| 12 | ||||||
| 13 | ||||||
| 14 | ||||||
| 15 | ||||||
| 16 | ||||||
| 17 | ||||||
| 18 | ||||||
| 19 | ||||||
| 20 |
Sec L
| Solicitation #: FA8224-16-R-0055 AUTOMATED TEST SYSTEM SUSTAINMENT INITIATIVE (ATSSI) Comment Resolution Matrix- Attachment #03 | For Government Use | |||||
| Question # | Sec L Reference | Discussion | Question/Comment | Sensitivity | Government Response | |
| 1 | Section L.4.3 Proposal Submittal Information | Section L.4.1 "Each offeror shall submit a past performance volume with its proposal, containing past performance information in accordance with the format contained in Section L, Attachment 1." and, Section L..4.3 , Offeror shall submit Past Performance Volume II, 2 weeks after RFP release date. PPI sheets shall be submitted using the EZ Source PPI Tool (reference Section L, Attachment 1: Project Submissions). All PPI sheets shall contain contract number and/or task order number and shall be saved as Access Database files (.accdb). | Would the Government please clarify that reference to Attachment 1 was meant to reference Attachment 2, "Instructions to Offerors Past Performance Information (PPI) for Offerors"? | |||
| Low | The Government has updated the in-document references to reflect the correct attachment. |
NOTE: To create less confusion, the Section L attachments have been change from Attachment 1 and Attachment 2 to Appendix A and Appendix B respectively.
| 2 | Section L, Attachment 1: Project Submissions | |
| Section L, Attachment 1 Project Submissions states "Provide the information requested in this attachment for each contract/program (limit of three) being described." | ||
| Would the Government please clarfiy the correct title for Attachment 1 as the reference document that is "Past Performance Questionnaire Package For Services"? | Low | The Government has updated this information to reflect the correct title, Past Performance Questionnaire. |
| 3 | ||
| 4 | ||
| 5 | ||
| 6 | ||
| 7 | ||
| 8 | ||
| 9 | ||
| 10 | ||
| 11 | ||
| 12 |
Sec M
| Solicitation #: FA8224-16-R-0055 AUTOMATED TEST SYSTEM SUSTAINMENT INITIATIVE (ATSSI) Comment Resolution Matrix - Attachment #04 | For Government Use | |||||
| Question # | Sec M Reference | Discussion | Question/Comment | Sensitivity | Government Response | |
| 1 | 2.3.3 Subfactor 3: Air Data Computer Task Order | Sec M now states: "For purposes of evaluation, the Contractor shall select the ATS Support Alternative deemed most appropriate for this particular application. Full justification shall be provided for the selection of this support alternative (ref PWS Section 3.1.4.1)." The referenced PWS para states: "ATS Selection Process – In order to avoid any Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI), the ATS support alternative evaluation and selection will be performed according to the documented process found in DoD ATS Selection Process Guide (2009), located on the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics web page (http://www.acq.osd.mil/ats/). The Contractor will follow this process utilizing information from the IMP to determine the appropriate ATS Seclection and shall submit it to the Government for approval. Once the Government approves the selection, the Contractor shall then proceed to development (or Subcontracting) of that chosen ATS support alternative." | As this full justification, per the DoD ATS Selection Process Guide (2009), requires (1) definition of weapon system support/test requirements, (2) definition of ATS alternatives, (3) cost & benefit analysis of alternatives, and (4) alternative selection, would the Govt please inform offerors whether it will place cost and tech data on the candidate ATEs needed for the analysis in the bidders library, or should offerors make assumptions about the candidate ATEs to use in their analyses? | Medium | Offerors should make assumptions about candidate ATEs to use in their analysis, but should identify and fully explain such assumptions and how it affected their analysis. |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
MISC Questions
| Solicitation #: FA8224-16-R-0055 AUTOMATED TEST SYSTEM SUSTAINMENT INITIATIVE (ATSSI) Comment Resolution Matrix | For Government Use | |||||
| Question # | Reference | Discussion | Question/Comment | Sensitivity | Government Response | |
| 1 | The CLIN descriptions provided in the solicitation do not clearly map to the service and system deliverables required by the PWS. | Please clarify what is to be priced and delivered under each CLIN by annotating each of the CLINS with the PWS paras or subparagraphs that call out the services or systems to be delivered under each CLIN. | Medium | The Government has included PWS references on each CLIN | ||
| 2 | ||||||
| 3 | ||||||
| 4 | ||||||
| 5 | ||||||
| 6 | ||||||
| 7 | ||||||
| 8 | ||||||
| 9 | ||||||
| 10 | ||||||
| 11 | ||||||
| 12 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .