Company_B_answers_2.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 33 KB Posted

Attached to
Automated Test System Sustainment Initiative Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA8224-17-R-0001
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Lifecycle Management Center Hill Air Force Base

About this file

From the source

Government answers to Company B questions

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Automated Test System Sustainment Initiative, newest first.
File Type Posted
Company_C_answers.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Amendment.docx DOCX document
Company_D_Comment_Res_Matrix_ATSSI_2016-1114_(002).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Company_B_Comment_Res_Matrix_ATSSI_FINAL_v2_111416_(002)_(002)_.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Company_B_responses.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Company_C_Responses.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
dd0254_ATSSI_Draft2.pdf PDF
ATTSI_Labor_Category_Descriptions.pdf PDF
ppi_tool.accdb —
Exhibit_B.pdf PDF
ATSSI_TEP__24OCT2016_FINAL.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
ATSSI_Section_L_Final_02_Nov_16.pdf PDF
ATSSI_PWS_Final_11.2.16.pdf PDF
ATSSI_Section_M_Final_02_Nov_16.pdf PDF
client_authorization_letter_attachment.docx DOCX document
ADCTO_Final_11.02.16.pdf PDF
GFP_ATSSI_2_November.pdf PDF
FA8224-17-R-0001.docx DOCX document
Comment_Res_Matrix_ATSSI.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit_A.pdf PDF
Comment_Res_Matrix_ATSSI_Oct_20.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Comment_Res_Matrix_ATSSI-CO.B__20_Oct_2016.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
DRAFT_CDRLs_Exhibit_A.pdf PDF
DRAFT_Solicitation_FA8224-17-R-0001.pdf PDF
DRAFT_ATSSI_Section_L.pdf PDF
Comment_Res_Matrix_ATSSI.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
DRAFT_CDRLs_Exhibit_B.pdf PDF
DRAFT_Labor_Category_Descriptions.pdf PDF
DRAFT_DD254.pdf PDF
DRAFT_ATSSI_Section_M.pdf PDF
ATSSI_TEP_13OCT2016_FINAL.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Wage_Determination.pdf PDF
DRAFT_ADC_Task_Order_PWS.pdf PDF
DRAFT_ATSSI_PWS.pdf PDF
Show all 34

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Basic PWS

Solicitation #: FA8224-16-R-0055 AUTOMATED TEST SYSTEM SUSTAINMENT INITIATIVE (ATSSI) Comment Resolution Matrix - Attachment #01 XFor Government Use
Question #Basic PWS ReferenceDiscussionQuestion/CommentSensitivityGovernment Response
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

Sheet3

ADCTO PWS

Solicitation #: FA8224-16-R-0055 AUTOMATED TEST SYSTEM SUSTAINMENT INITIATIVE (ATSSI) Comment Resolution Matrix - Attachment #02For Government Use
Question #TO PWS ReferenceDiscussionQuestion/CommentSensitivityGovernment Response
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Pricing Matrix

Solicitation #: FA8224-16-R-0055 AUTOMATED TEST SYSTEM SUSTAINMENT INITIATIVE (ATSSI) Comment Resolution Matrix - Attachment #05For Government Use
Question #Pricing Matrix ReferenceDiscussionQuestion/CommentSensitivityGovernment Response
1There is a reference to the labor category entitled "Geographic Information System (GIS) Analyst/Programmer listed in Section J Attachment 06 Labor Category Descriptions that is not listed in the TEPWas this labor category added to the Descriptions in error? Or is the Government intending to add this to the TEP WorksheetLowThis was listed in the Descriptions by error
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

Sec L

Solicitation #: FA8224-16-R-0055 AUTOMATED TEST SYSTEM SUSTAINMENT INITIATIVE (ATSSI) Comment Resolution Matrix- Attachment #03For Government Use
Question #Sec L ReferenceDiscussionQuestion/CommentSensitivityGovernment Response
1SECTION L
Table 2.2; Section L 4.3Section L Table 2.2 states, “Past Performance Volume Shall be submitted 2 weeks after RFP release date.” However, Section L 4.3 states, “The Government requests the offeror submit Past Performance Volume, 2 weeks after RFP release date but no later than the proposal due date.”Question: Please clarify which reference provides the correct due date for Offeror's Past Performance Volumes.
N/AThe Government requests all Past Performace Volumes by submitted by 18 November 16. However, the Government will accept submittals up until the RFP due date of 6 December 2016.
2 & 3SECTION L
Table 2.2Section L Table 2.2 requires submission of Technical Volume “CD to include Original Volume and Redacted Volume.” However, there are no further instructions or the Government's definition of “Redacted Volume.”Question: Please provide instructions for preparing the “Redacted Volume.”
Question: Please clarify whether or not the hard copy submission must include the “Redacted Volume.”N/AFor the redacted copy, please redact any place that says the name of the Offeror including all symbols, addresses etc.

Only an electronic copy is required. A hard copy submission of the redacted copy is not needed

4SECTION L 4.1Section L 4.1 Client Authorization Letter, Attachment 09 states, “For each identified effort for a commercial customer, the offeror shall also submit a client authorization letter, authorizing release to the Government of requested information on the offeror's performance.”Question: Please clarify that the RFP also intends that for each identified effort for a Government customer, the offeror shall submit a consent authorization letter authorizing release to the Government of requested information on the offeror's performance.”N/AA client authorization letter is needed at the RFP for evaluation of Past Performance, but will not be needed on any subsequent Task Orders
1L.4.1Section L.4.1 states “Each offeror shall submit a Past Performance Volume with its proposal, containing past performance information in accordance with the format contained in Section L, Appendix A, Past Performance Questionnaire (maximum of three contracts, if available)”
Would the Government please clarify that reference was intended for Section L, Appendix B Instructions to Offerors Past Performance (PPI) for Offerors?
N/AThe Government does want the submissions to be submitted utilizing Appendix A. Appendix B gives offerors instructions on how to submit these forms into the PPI tool
2Section L.4.1 and Section L Table 2.2.Section L.4.1 and Section L Table 2.2. “There is no reference to the Business Relationships content generated from the Past Performance Information (PPI) tool as part of the Past Performance Volume II submittal.
Would the Government please confirm this Business Relationships content will not be counted against page limitation?
N/AThe Business Relationships will not be counted against page counts
3L.2.3Section 2.3 – Electronic Offers indicates that electronic copies of the proposal shall be submitted in a format readable by MS Office Word 2007, Excel 2007, Project 2007, Power Point 2007, as applicable. Often the Government provides offerors the option to submit proposals in a PDF format. PDFs will enable increased searchability of key words in embedded graphics and illustrations that MS Office Word format does not offer. The Government may find that this searchability feature in PDFs will aid in the evaluation process.Would the Government consider revising the submission requirement to accept PDF as a proposal submission format?
N/ANo, Adobe PDF will not be accepted
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Sec M

Solicitation #: FA8224-16-R-0055 AUTOMATED TEST SYSTEM SUSTAINMENT INITIATIVE (ATSSI) Comment Resolution Matrix - Attachment #04For Government Use
Question #Sec M ReferenceDiscussionQuestion/CommentSensitivityGovernment Response
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

CDRLs

Solicitation #: FA8224-16-R-0055 AUTOMATED TEST SYSTEM SUSTAINMENT INITIATIVE (ATSSI) Comment Resolution Matrix- Attachment #06For Government Use
Question #CDRLs ReferenceDiscussionQuestion/CommentSensitivityGovernment Response
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

MISC Questions

Solicitation #: FA8224-16-R-0055 AUTOMATED TEST SYSTEM SUSTAINMENT INITIATIVE (ATSSI) Comment Resolution MatrixFor Government Use
Question #ReferenceDiscussionQuestion/CommentSensitivityGovernment Response
1In the Solicitation Document entitled "FA8224-17R-0001.docx" page 6 of 89, contains a CLIN 0007 entitled data. There is no CLIN listed type such as FFP in previous drafts and only referenced as "Data".Would the Government provide some additional information on the intention of this CLIN since all CDRLs are linked to this CLIN item? In previous drafts is appeared this CLIN was FFP for intended use of acquiring OEM products/services under FFP.This CLIN is Not Separately priced. This CLIN will be utilized to reflect what CDRL's are needed on each Task Order
2Draft DD From 254Draft DD From 254 (dd254_ATSSI-Draft2) indicates in Block 14 additional security requirements apply: “See attached sheet”. However, no sheet is attached.
Would the Government please provide the “attached sheet” referenced in Block 14 of the draft DD Form 254?
N/AThe Government will attach this sheet with this question and answer
1In the Solicitation Document entitled "FA8224-17R-0001.docx" page 6 of 89, contains a CLIN 0007 entitled data. There is no CLIN listed type such as FFP in previous drafts and only referenced as "Data".Would the Government please confirm CLIN 007 “Data” is intended for acquiring OEM products/services under FFP? If not, would the Government please define the services or materials it plans to acquire through this CLIN?N/AThis CLIN is Not Separately priced and is to be utilized with for CDRL's A001-031
2RFP Pg 13 of 88 first Paragraph; Pg 14 of 88 Delivery Information CLINs 1001 thru 1007; and Pg 52 of 88 DFARS 252.216-7006 ORDERING.The referenced sections of the RFP indicate the Base Period PoP ends 30 March 2023, however, the OP PoP begins a year earlier on 31 March 2022 (18 month OP).Please clarify if the OP PoP is correctly stated in the RFP or if the Base Period PoP should end 30 March 2023, with the OP PoP beginning the next day 31 March 2023 thru 30 September 2023 (6 month OP).N/AThis is stated correctly. This would allow for an 18 month Task Order to be executed on 29 March 2022.
3Model Contract Section I Pg 19 of 89 FAR 52.222-51; 52.222-52; and, 52.222-53The referenced Service Contract Labor Standards Exemption clauses are listed in the RFP, however, FAR 52.222-41; 52.222-42; 52.222-43; 52.222-44 and 52.222-49 are not included. Furthermore, no Wage Determination was provided with the RFP.Would the Government please verify that because FA8224-17-R-0001 ATSSI requires support from only those employees in a bona fide executive, administrative, or professional capacity, this effort will be exempt from Service Contract Labor Standards coverage? If this assumption is not accurate, will the Government modify the RFP to include the applicable FAR clauses and provide the current Wage Determination for the locality?N/AThe Service Contract Act does not apply to this contract, so the Wage Determinations is not required.
4Model Contract Section I Pg 18 of 89 FAR 52.219-9The referenced FAR clause requires "The Offeror’s subcontracting plan shall include the following:

(1) Separate goals, expressed in terms of total dollars subcontracted, and as a percentage of total planned subcontracting dollars, for the use of small business, veteran-owned small business, service-disabled veteran-owned small business, HUBZone small business, small disadvantaged business, and women-owned small business concerns as subcontractors. For individual subcontracting plans, and if required by the Contracting Officer, goals shall also be expressed in terms of percentage of total contract dollars, in addition to the goals expressed as a percentage of total subcontract dollars.

Because the Government has not published hours by labor category, Offeror's responses to Solicitation #FA8224-17-R-0001 are "Rates Only" at the IDIQ level, would the Government please confirm it is acceptable for Offeror's to submit a Small Business Subcontracting Plan with percentages and no dollars indicated due to the unknown value of future Task Orders?** This is amended from the posting on 29 November** The Government requests that Contractors use the ADCTO to show their rates and dollar figures
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .