Company_B_responses.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 10 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Automated Test System Sustainment Initiative Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA8224-17-R-0001
About this file
Responses to Company B
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 34
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sec L
| Solicitation #: FA8224-16-R-0055 AUTOMATED TEST SYSTEM SUSTAINMENT INITIATIVE (ATSSI) Comment Resolution Matrix- Attachment #03 | For Government Use | ||||||
| Question # | Sec L Reference | Discussion | Question/Comment | Sensitivity | Government Response | ||
| 1 | SECTION L | ||||||
| Table 2.2; Section L 4.3 | Section L Table 2.2 states, “Past Performance Volume Shall be submitted 2 weeks after RFP release date.” However, Section L 4.3 states, “The Government requests the offeror submit Past Performance Volume, 2 weeks after RFP release date but no later than the proposal due date.” | Question: Please clarify which reference provides the correct due date for Offeror's Past Performance Volumes. | |||||
| N/A | The Government requests all Past Performace Volumes by submitted by 18 November 16. However, the Government will accept submittals up until the RFP due date of 6 December 2016. | ||||||
| 2 & 3 | SECTION L | ||||||
| Table 2.2 | Section L Table 2.2 requires submission of Technical Volume “CD to include Original Volume and Redacted Volume.” However, there are no further instructions or the Government's definition of “Redacted Volume.” | Question: Please provide instructions for preparing the “Redacted Volume.” | |||||
| Question: Please clarify whether or not the hard copy submission must include the “Redacted Volume.” | N/A | For the redacted copy, please redact any place that says the name of the Offeror including all symbols, addresses etc. |
Only an electronic copy is required. A hard copy submission of the redacted copy is not needed 4 SECTION L 4.1 Section L 4.1 Client Authorization Letter, Attachment 09 states, “For each identified effort for a commercial customer, the offeror shall also submit a client authorization letter, authorizing release to the Government of requested information on the offeror's performance.” Question: Please clarify that the RFP also intends that for each identified effort for a Government customer, the offeror shall submit a consent authorization letter authorizing release to the Government of requested information on the offeror's performance.” N/A A client authorization letter is needed at the RFP for evaluation of Past Performance, but will not be needed on any subsequent Task Orders
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .