Solicitation Amendment FA821326RB0020002 SF 30.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

J

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

30 Apr 2026

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE

REQUISITION NUMBER

5. PROJECT NUMBER (if applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE FA8213

FA8213 AFLCMC EBHK

CP 801 586 8482, 6072 FIR AVE BLDG 1233

HILL AFB, UT 84056-5820

UNITED STATES

Nicholas Padgett, Email: ryan.mitchell.21@us.af.mil Telephone: 8015860683 Ryan Mitchell, Email: ryan.mitchell.21@us.af.mil Telephone: 8015860683

7. ADMINISTERED BY (if other than Item 6)

CODE

SCD: PAS:

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code)

CODE: FACILITY CODE:

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

FA821326RB002

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

25 Mar 2026

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER

NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; 0 or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (if required) See Section G - Contract Administration Data

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK

ONE

A.THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.)

SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

See Schedule

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Computer generated. Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA-FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Created On:

30 Apr 2026, 11:16 AM Central Daylight Time

SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

The purpose of this amendment is to attach a revised L&M and post a question and comment received, as well as Block 14 (Description of Amendment/Modification):

USAF response. This amendment also provides an extension to the proposal deadline.

Changes to the L&M are described in Section L of this amendment.

Solicitation question and comment received are as follows along with USAF response:

Q: With this solicitation being competitive and Lowest Technically Acceptable Offer, are you going to require certified pricing?

A: Certified cost or pricing data will not be required if there is competition. However, if there is only one offeror with no competition, then USG would require certified cost data at that time. Also, as stated in the solicitation, data than other certified cost or pricing data is required for the cost realism evaluation of the CPFF CLINs.

Section A - Solicitation/Contract Form

The following modifications were made:

Information From To Response Due Date 08 May 2026 22 Jun 2026

Section B - Supplies or Services & Prices or Costs

Header Miscellaneous Text (Modified):

Section B

1 - NOTICE: This contract action will utilize a nongovernment advisor to assist by providing technical clarification. This advisor will NOT be a voting member of the evaluation team, will not take part in any decision-making discussions, and will only be involved by providing clarification to any technical questions.

Technical Advisor: David Johnson

Company: Amentum

Please reach out to the Contracting Officer if there are any concerns.

2 - Munitions shall ship the bomb variants specified at the Task Order Level within 90 calendar days of Task Order Award.

3 - This action is to establish a 5-year IDIQ to acquire projected aging and life models for Air Delivered Munitions.

4 - Funds are not presently available for this contract. The Government's obligation under this contract is contingent upon the availability of appropriated funds from which payment for contract purposes can be made. No legal liability on part of the Government for any payment may arise until funds are made available to the contracting officer for this contract and until the Contractor receives notice of such availability, to be confirmed in writing by the contracting officer. The solicitation is not an authorization to begin performance and in no way obligates the Government for any costs incurred by the contractor for this requirement. The Government reserves the right to not award a contract in response to this solicitation. Prior to commencement of any activities associated with performance of this requirement, the Government will issue a written directive or contractual document signed by the contracting officer with appropriate consideration established.

5 - The minimum guaranteed order amount under this IDIQ, for the life of the IDIQ, shall not be less than $3,000,000.00. This amount is expected to be met in task order

1. Upon meeting this minimum amount, the USG is not obligated to meet any additional minimum requirements for the remaining ordering periods. The estimated maximum on this IDIQ is $25,000,000.00. The contractor is reminded that the Government is not obligated to place any orders beyond the initial minimum guaranteed order amount.

6 - All proposal pricing shall be valid for from the solicitation due date.150 calendar days

Below is a comprehensive list of the Solicitation questions and comments received along with USAF responses:

Q: How is aging of Tritonal to be accomplished?

FA821326RB0020002

A: Tritonal-filled bombs that have known number of diurnal cycles will be provided for sectioning, coring, and subscale testing.

Q: The paragraph references in Table 2 are a bit confusing. Paragraph 2.0 is the section heading for everything contained in this section with subparagraphs 2.1-2.7. Is the intent to impose paragraphs 2.1 - 2.6? This same question applies to each instance where a major section heading is called out, ie (2.0, 3.0, 4.0)

A: Major headings typically have contextual info, so those headings have been included in Table 2 as well.

Q: With regards to paragraph 2.2.4.3, in the past DAX and CYLEX testing has been performed by government labs such as LLNL. Mandating the contractor SHALL use these techniques implies the contractor either has the equipment to perform these tests or will need to procure the equipment. Is that the intent of this paragraph?

A: Added the words "data from" to indicate contractor will not need to purchase equipment and perform this testing.

Q: The subparagraphs in 2.2.4.4 include "shall" language that dictates the contractor must create the methods, purchase the tooling and provide facilities necessary to perform LPWG testing. The first subparagraph in this section provides an "If possible" statement about transitioning this work to contractor facilities. How do we interpret "shall" in these paragraphs? What is the expectation of the Air Force.

A: Modified 2.2.4.4 to clarify USAF requirement.

Q: In Table 8, there is no direction on how to age the subscale performance test specimens:

A: Updated PWS provides detail.

Q: In Table 8, It seems the total core count is not correct. 10 cores are required to perform each Dent Rate test and 15 is a minimum number of cores to perform the Gap Test. To properly do these two tests 25 cores is needed for the zero time test and 200 cores to satisfy 8 pulls to support 4 additional test events. That is a total of 225 cores and that is for one aging temperature profile. The same number of cores would be required for each additional temperature profile.

A: Updated PWS provides defined quantities.

Q: Regarding Table 8, it is not possible to get enough cores from single bombs of any size to perform Dent Rate and Gap Testing properly to get viable data.

A: Updated PWS to account for bomb size limitations for total number of cores that can be tested.

Q: In Table 10, a discreet number of Microtome samples and cores for Firm Fixed Pricing required by Ordering group #25.

A: 2 Samples/cores are required

Q: Paragraph 2.4 Fill/Liner Subscale Testing is too open ended for Firm Fixed Pricing. Performance parameters must be specific.

A: Modified 2.4 Fill/Liner Subscale Testing section.

Q: With this solicitation being competitive and Lowest Technically Acceptable Offer, are you going to require certified pricing?

A: Certified cost or pricing data will not be required if there is competition. However, if there is only one offeror with no competition, then USG would require certified cost data at that time. Also, as stated in the solicitation, data than other certified cost or pricing data is required for the cost realism evaluation of the CPFF CLINs.

Section C - Description/Specifications/Statement of Work

Header Miscellaneous Text (Modified):

Changes to the PWS on the amendment, FA8213RB00200002 include the following:

Changes to the PWS on the amendment, FA821326RB0020001 include the following:

- Corrected Table of Contents

- Formatting Changes throughout

- Changes to Table 2 - Specific Requirements for Each Ordering Group

Ordering Group 32 should read 2.7(A), 3.0-3.3,4.0-6.1

Ordering Group 33 should read 2.7(B), 3.0-3.3,4.0-6.1

Ordering Group 35 should read 2.7(A),2.73.0-3.3, 4.0-6.1

Ordering group 36 should read 2.7(B), 3.0-3.3,4.0-6.1

- Modified verbiage to 2.2.4.2 Coring paragraph to remove ambiguity regarding FFP approach

- Changes to Table 4 - Explosive Core Summary

Edited column heading of last column to read "Minimum Required Number of Cores per Test Series"

Edited many of the numbers under the last column, "Minimum Required Number of Cores per Test Series"

Added Notes 3 and Note 4 to table.

- In paragraph 2.2.4.3, removed the sentence "Other aging periods and/or thermal cycling of energetic samples may be explored using the same or similar tests at the discretion of the AF." This was done is response to a comment received, recommending this effort be cost reimbursable.

- Added verbiage "data from" to 2.2.4.3 as described in the Q&A section, shown in Block 14 Continuation Page of the amendment SF 30.

- Changes to Table 7 - Modified PoP to 36 months to align with paragraph 2.2.4.3 and modified table for clarification.

- Modified Table 7 to make it more amenable to FFP in response to a comment stating the USAF direction on how to apply Tables 6 and Table 7 is vague and cannot be appropriately priced for FFP.

- Modified 2.2.4.4 in response to question seen below about how the USAF interprets "shall" in these paragraphs.

- Modified Table 8, editing the table title and including separating the table into 500-lb, 1,000-lb, and 2,000-lb sections.

- Modified Table 9, including the title and notes,2,6, and 7.

- Modified Table 10, including title, sample and core numbers, and changes to the notes.

- Modified 2.4 Fill/Liner Subscale Testing section.

Section J - List of Attachments

The following Attachment(s) were added:

Section L and M_ADM Aging and Surveillance Revised 28Apr2026

The following Attachment(s) were deleted:

Section L&M_ADM Aging and Surveillance

Section L - Instructions, Conditions, & Notices to Offerors or Quoters

Header Miscellaneous Text (Added):

Changes to Section L on the amendment, FA821326RB0020002 include the following:

In section 5.2, Table 6.2 was changed to Table 9.0. Table 9.0 has been added to Section M of this contract.