RFP_Attach_4_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 47 KB Posted
- Attached to
- A-10 Thunderbolt Advanced-Wing Continuation Kitting (ATTACK) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA8202-18-R-1001
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a contractor responding to the Department of the Air Force's RFP FA8202-18-R-1001 for the A-10 Thunderbolt Advanced-Wing Continuation Kitting (ATTACK) program. The questionnaire requests information on the contractor's performance on relevant prior contracts, including contract details, schedules, values, and performance ratings in areas such as meeting specifications, quality, management, and customer satisfaction. Responses are due by close of business on June 27, 2016 and should be sent electronically to the named point of contact. The questionnaire will be considered sensitive and will not be released to the offeror.
RFP Attach 4 - Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
A-10 Thunderbolt Advanced-Wing Continuation Kitting (ATTACK) has more files on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PRESENT/PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
RFP FA8202-18-R-1001
Name Company Office Phone
Return your completed questionnaire electronically BY COB MONDAY 27 JUNE 16 to wade.appel.1@us.af.mil.
If you have questions regarding this Questionnaire, please contact the Past Performance Team Lead:
Captain Wade Appel wade.appel.1@us.af.mil 801-586-5769
NOTICE: WHEN COMPLETED, THIS QUESTIONNAIRE WILL BE CONSIDERED SENSITIVE AND SHALL NOT BE RELEASED TO THE OFFEROR.
Instructions to Evaluator: Please assist our source selection team as we evaluate sources for our solicitation. Expand the document as needed to fit answers. Lines are a placeholder (delete as necessary).
PART I. SPECIFIC PROGRAM INFORMATION.
Contractor/Business: Company CAGE Code: ####
Program Title and Brief Description: RFP Contract Title Narrative from RFP Contract Intro
Role in the Program/Work Performed As: Prime Subcontractor Vendor/Supplier
Contract Number: XXX
Contract Type(s): XXX
PART II. GENERAL PROGRAM INFORMATION.
Period of Performance:
Number of Years?: Basic: Option:
1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised): Beginning Date through
2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised): Beginning Date through
3. Reason for difference (if applicable)
Contract Dollar Value:
1. Original MAX Contract $ Value (assuming all options are exercised:
| 2. Current MAX $ Value (assuming all options exercised): |
| 3. Primary Causes of Changes: |
NOTE: In Part III, should your response be other than “satisfactory,” please provide supporting documentation in “Additional Remarks” on page 3.
PART III.PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS.
Please check the appropriate rating for each of the following questions (see definitions on page 4):
E = Exceptional VG = Very Good S = Satisfactory M = Marginal US = Unsatisfactory NA = Not Available
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| US |
1. Extent to which Company’s products and/or services met the specification /performance requirements
2. Configuration Management (first product delivered same as last)
3. Quality of Completed Product
4. Overall management of subcontracting efforts
5. Quality of Technical Manuals or Commercial Manuals
6. Customer’s Satisfaction with warranty response times and corrective actions
7. Adequate Number of Dedicated Resources For Your Program
8. Timely recognition and notification of administrative, engineering, production, problems affecting the program
9. Company performed independently without significant customer direction/oversight
10. Monitoring of Program Schedules and Critical Milestones
11. Company demonstrated positive responsiveness to unscheduled requirements or contract changes
12. Has action been initiated to cancel or terminate the contract for default? If yes, explain.
13. Have there been any disputes/claims relative to the contract? If yes, explain.
14. Describe the contractor’s or company’s strong and/or weak points identified as a result of technical performance and any technical performance risk identified during the life of the contract.
15. If given a choice, would you award to this contractor again? If not, please explain.
16. Do you feel you “got what you paid for?” Please explain.
17. Additional Remarks: In Part III, should your response be other than “satisfactory,” please provide supporting documentation
QUESTIONNAIRE RATING SYSTEM
CONTRACT PERFORMANCE
| Rating |
| Description |
| Exceptional |
| During the contract period, contractor performance outstanding, meeting all contract requirements and consistently exceeded many. Very few, if any, minor problems encountered. Contractor took immediate and effective corrective action. |
| Very Good |
| During the contract period, contractor performance very good, meeting all contract requirements and consistently exceeded some. Some minor problems encountered. Contractor took timely corrective action. |
| Satisfactory |
| During the contract period, contractor performance acceptable, meeting all contract requirements. For any problems encountered, contractor took effective corrective action. |
| Marginal |
| During the contract period, contractor performance less than acceptable, not meeting some contract requirements. For problems encountered, corrective action appeared only marginally effective, not effective, or not fully implemented. Government involvement was required. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| During the contract period, contractor performance unacceptable, failing to meet most contract requirements. Serious problems encountered. Corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent. Extensive government oversight and involvement was required. |
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION
SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page 1
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .