The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.
VENDOR QUESTIONS
| Solicitation #/MFT #: |
| SOLICITATION # FA813222Q0053 |
| Contract Specialist: |
| Michael Acree; michael.acree.8@us.af.mil |
| Contracting Officer: |
| Elizabeth C Fanning; elizabeth.fanning@us.af.mil |
The questions below have been submitted to us by vendors for the aforementioned requirement. Please have these questions answered by the End User and returned to me no later than 12:00 PM CST on 09 Jan 2023.
| 1 |
| Would it be possible to get fabrication level drawings for all electrical test harness cables that connect the test stand fixtures to the test stand? |
| Yes |
| 2 |
| SOW 3.1 states testing is fully automatic or semi-automatic. Can you please clarify the requirement? |
| Semi-automatic: test stand is controlled by a technician to analyze the UUT performance. The technician is responsible for initiating the stimulus and analyzing the UUT response to |
determine it the UUT has performed to its specifications. The technician is also responsible for analyzing UUTs that fail to meet performance specifications to determine the components of the UUT that require replacement or adjustment.
Automatic: test stand analyzes the UUT performance.
| 3 |
| SOW 3.4 states installation plan to be provided 90 days ADC. It will likely take longer than 90 days to get to CDR and complete installation plan. Is it acceptable for Bauer to propose a timeline? Contracting will answer. |
| Contracting will answer this. |
| 4 |
| SOW para 9 details payment term %s and timing per CLIN. PDR, IDR, CDR will take much longer than the dates specified in the SOW. Is it acceptable if Bauer supplies proposed dates/timelines with our proposal? |
| Contracting will answer this. |
