Attachment_3_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_Contract_Management_History.pdf

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE MANAGEMENT

A. UGENERAL INFORMATIONU: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:

Your Name________________________________________________________________________________

Position/Duty Title__________________________________________________________________________

Organization_______________________________________________________________________________

Phone______________________________________Email__________________________________________

Contracting Officer’s Name___________________________________________________________________

Phone______________________________________Email__________________________________________

COR’s Name_______________________________________________________________________________

Phone______________________________________Email__________________________________________

Contract Number____________________________________________________________________________

Project Title _______________________________________________________________________________

Brief Description of Work____________________________________________________________________

Location of Performance______________________________________________________________________

Contract Period or Date of Performance (Including Options) _________________________________________

Value of Annual Price________________________________________________________________________

Aggregate Value____________________________________________________________________________

Contractor performed as the ☐Prime Contractor ☐Sub-Contractor ☐Key Personnel

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: _______________________ CONTRACT NUMBER: _____________________

Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

B. UPERFORMANCE INFORMATIONU: Choose the appropriate rating that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation.

PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF “EXCEPTIONAL”,

“MARGINAL” OR “UNSATISFACTORY”

Performance Ratings Matrix Exceptional Performance meets/met contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Good Performance meets/met contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Marginal Performance does not meet/did not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet/did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Neutral Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

The contractor in regards to management: E xceptional

G ood

Satisfactory

M arginal

U nsatisfactory

N eutral

1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

2. Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.

3. Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.

4. Home office participated in solving significant local problems.

5. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

6. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.

7. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.

8. Identified problems as they occurred.

9. Suggested alternative approaches to problems.

10. Displayed initiative to solve problems.

The contractor in regards to processing: E xceptional

G ood

Satisfactory

M arginal

U nsatisfactory

N eutral

11. Was responsive to contract changes.

12. Provided adequate project supervision.

13. Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.

14. Cooperated with Government personnel after award.

Overall Performance

21. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance on this contract?

22. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”

23. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in

“remarks.”

Please provide comments for any rating of “Exceptional”, “Marginal” or “Unsatisfactory”.

Other Remarks