Atch_3_-_MERC-G_PPQ.docx

DOCX document 78 KB Posted

Attached to
Management, Engineering & Research Concepts - Geophysical (MERC-G) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA7022-14-R-0012
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Air Combat Command

About this file

MERC-G Past and Present Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Management, Engineering & Research Concepts - Geophysical (MERC-G), newest first.
File Type Posted
Q As_-_12_Dec_2014.pdf PDF
Q As_-_24_Nov_2014.pdf PDF
Exhibit_B_-_MERC-G_QASP.docx DOCX document
Atch_2_-_MERC-G_DD_254.pdf PDF
Exhibit_A_-_MERC-G_CDRLs.pdf PDF
Atch_1_-_MERC-G_PWS.docx DOCX document
FA7022-14-R-0012_MERC-G_Rev_1.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Source Selection Information -- See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SUBJECT: Request for Past and Present Performance Evaluation

TO:

You have been identified as a point of contact for a past and or present performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire. This firm is currently being considered for an advisory and assistance service contract at Patrick AFB, FL.

Your prompt attention to this questionnaire will be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions concerning this request, please contact Ms. Denise Adams at 321-494-9683 or denise.adams.5@us.af.mil or the undersidned at 321-494-5206 or laurie.rowe@us.af.mil.

Laurie A. Rowe Contracting Officer

Attachment: Past and Present Performance Questionnaire When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104

When Filled

In

This

Document Is

Source

Selection

Sensitive

IAW

FAR

2.101 and

FAR

3.104

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:

Offeror’s Name: Address:

Telephone Number: Fax Number: Point of Contact:

(The offeror must enter this information in accordance with L-III, paragraph 6., E. to the references stated in the Past Performance Volume.)

Project Title and Brief Description of Work:*
* Contract Number Provided by Offeror:*

Contract Period or Dates of Performance:_______________________________________* Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.

Contract type: _________________Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No ____ Period of performance: ____________________________________________________ Initial contract cost: $______________________ Current/final contract cost: $________________ Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs: ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent: Title:

Address: _____________________

Telephone Number:

Fax Number:

Email Address:

Contractor Cage Code: __________ _______

C. EMAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO: Ms Denise Adams; Email: denise.adams.5@us.af.mil or Ms. Laurie Rowe; Email: laurie.rowe@us.af.mil.

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation.

PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.

E
G
S
M
U
N
Exceptional
Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral
Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s/Industry’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s/Industry’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub- element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub- element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

*CONTRACTOR’S NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

*Note: Include this information on each page of the questionnaire form to ensure there is no mix up in information among contracts surveyed for respective primes/subs, etc.

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

The contractor:
E
G
S
M
U
N
1.
Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
2.
Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
3.
Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.
The contractor:
E
G
S
M
U
N
4.
Home office participated in solving significant local problems.
5.
Followed approved quality control plan.
6.
Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
7.
Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
8.
Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.
9.
Identified problems as they occurred.
10.
Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
11.
Displayed initiative to solve problems.
12.
Developed realistic progress schedules.
13.
Met established project schedules.
14.
Provided timely resolution of warranty defects.
15.
Was responsive to contract changes.
16.
Provided adequate project supervision.
17.
Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.
18.
Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.
19.
Cooperated with Government personnel after award.
20.
How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?
21.
Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”

YES/NO

22.
Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”

YES/NO

23.
Is the contractor rated in CPARS?
YES/NO

CONTRACTOR’S NAME:

CONTRACT NUMBER

Remarks:

CONTRACTOR’S NAME:

CONTRACT NUMBER

Source Selection Information -- See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .