Task 2 RMF_Security Planning.docx

DOCX document 71 KB Posted

Attached to
SAF/FMB Support Services Follow-on
Solicitation number
FA7014-FMBFollowon
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Sources Sought Inquiry for the SAF/FMB Support Services Follow-on contract. The Department of the Air Force Headquarters District Washington is conducting market research to identify potential sources capable of providing the required services, which include financial management support and continuous process improvement, FMB systems support, and contingency financial operations support.

The key objectives for this contract are to assist the SAF/FMB organization in budget formulation, execution, and reporting activities, as well as to develop and implement innovative financial management initiatives across the Department of the Air Force. The contract has three main tasks: 1) Financial Management Support Team, 2) FMB Systems Support, and 3) Silver Flag - Contingency Financial Operations. Interested parties are requested to submit capability statements by June 26, 2024. After reviewing the capability statements, the government plans to hold an industry review to ensure understanding of the requirements and provide feedback. No solicitation is available at this time, and this notice is for market research purposes only.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Task 1 --2. dafi38-401 BPR Reference.pdf PDF
TASK_3 AFI10-403.pdf PDF
Task 2 RMF_System and Communications Protection Plan.docx DOCX document
Task 2 RMF_Identification and Authentication Plan.docx DOCX document
Task 2 RMF_Program Management Plan.docx DOCX document
DOD INSTRUCTION 8510.01.pdf PDF
Task 2 RMF_System and Services Acquisition Plan.docx DOCX document
Task 2 RMF_Risk Assessment Plan.docx DOCX document
Task 2 RMF_Media Protection Plan.docx DOCX document
Task 2 RMF_Audit and Accountability Plan.docx DOCX document
Task 2 RMF_Contingency Plan.docx DOCX document
Task 2 RMF_Security Assessment and Authorization Plan.docx DOCX document
Task 1 --1. FM StrategicPlan_Bklet_Jun22 Objective 3.1 and 3.4 Apply.pdf PDF
Task 1 --3. FMBOI Process Overview.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TASK 3_FM Contingency Training SOP Apr 2022.pdf PDF
Task 2 RMF Access Control Plan.docx_safe.pdf PDF
Task 2 RMF_Incident Response Plan.docx DOCX document
Task 2 RMF_Physical And Environmental Protection Plan.docx DOCX document
Task 2 RMF_Personnel Security Plan.docx DOCX document
TASK 3 _ DOD FMR Volume_05.pdf PDF
Task 2 RMF_Configuration Management Plan.docx DOCX document
Task 2 RMF_System and Information Integrity Plan.docx DOCX document
Task 2 RMF_Information System Maintenance Plan.docx DOCX document
Task 2 RMF_Security Awareness and Training Plan.docx DOCX document
AFI17-101.pdf_safe.pdf PDF
DRAFT SAF-FMB Performance Work Statement.pdf PDF
Show all 26

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

{COMMAND}

{SYSTEM NAME} {ACRONYM}

System Version: {VERSION} eMASS# {EMASS#}

Confidentiality: {CONFIDENTIALITY} Integrity: {INTEGRITY} Availability: {AVAILABILITY}

Department of the {SERVICE}

{LOGO}

Security Planning Document Version: 1.0.0

{DATE}

Prepared by: {ORGANIZATION}

DISTRIBUTION IS LIMITED TO U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCIES AND THEIR CONTRACTORS.

OTHER REQUESTS FOR THIS DOCUMENT MUST BE REFERRED TO: {ORGANIZATION}

Change Record

Date
Version
Author
Changes Made / Section(s)
{DATE}
1.0.0
{ORGANIZATION}
Initial Document

Amplifying Guidance

i. DoD Instruction 8510.01, "Risk Management Framework (RMF) for DoD Information Technology (IT)"

ii. DoD Instruction 8500.01, "Cybersecurity", as amended

iii. Committee on National Security Systems (CNSS) Instruction No. 1253, " Security Categorization and Control Selection for National Security Systems"

Table of Contents

1.0OVERVIEW1
2.0SECURITY PLANNING POLICY AND PROCEDURES1
3.0SYSTEM SECURITY PLAN (SSP)2
4.0RULES OF BEHAVIOR3
5.0SECURITY CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS4
6.0INFORMATION SECURITY ARCHITECTURE4
7.0CENTRAL MANAGEMENT5
APPENDIX A – DETAILED COMPLIANCE MATRIX6

Table 1 - SP-800-53v4 Compliance Matrix 1

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

{ACRONYM} {DATE}

SECURITY PLANNING

Template developed by:

http://www.i-assure.com FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

1.0 OVERVIEW

The objective of security planning is to improve protection of information system resources. All federal systems have some level of sensitivity and require protection as part of good management practice. The protection of a system must be documented in a system security plan. The completion of system security plans is a requirement of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-130, “Management of Federal Information Resources,” Appendix III, “Security of Federal Automated Information Resources,” and” Title III of the E-Government Act, entitled the Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA).

The DoD has established an integrated enterprise-wide decision structure for cybersecurity risk management (the Risk Management Framework (RMF)) that includes cybersecurity requirements for DoD information technologies will be managed through the RMF consistent with the principals established in National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publication (SP) 800-37.

This plan ensures that {ACRONYM} follows the established guidelines and requirements for security planning. The formal System Security Plan is documented separately. The purpose of this document is to consolidate information and provide traceability to security control requirements.

This document complies with the following requirements from NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4, "Security and Privacy Controls for Federal Information Systems and Organizations". A detailed compliance matrix can be found in Appendix A, “Detailed Compliance Matrix”.

CNTL NO.
CONTROL NAME
PRIORITY
LOW
MOD
HIGH
PL-1
Security Planning Policy and Procedures
P1
PL-1
PL-1
PL-1
PL-2
System Security Plan
P1
PL-2
PL-2 (3)
PL-2 (3)
PL-3
System Security Plan Update
Not Selected
Not Selected
Not Selected
Not Selected
PL-4
Rules of Behavior
P2
PL-4
PL-4 (1)
PL-4 (1)
PL-5
Privacy Impact Assessment
Not Selected
Not Selected
Not Selected
Not Selected
PL-6
Security-Related Activity Planning
Not Selected
Not Selected
Not Selected
Not Selected
PL-7
Security Concept of Operations
P0
Not Selected
Not Selected
Not Selected
PL-8
Information Security Architecture
P1
Not Selected
PL-8
PL-8
PL-9
Central Management
P0
Not Selected
Not Selected
Not Selected

Table 1 - SP-800-53v4 Compliance Matrix

2.0 SECURITY PLANNING POLICY AND PROCEDURES

{ACRONYM} is automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered by DoD level policy, DoDI 8510.01, “Risk Management Framework (RMF) for DoD Information Technology (IT)”. DoDI 8510.01 meets the requirements for a security planning policy. DoD has defined the roles as organizational personnel with planning responsibilities or information security responsibilities.

The RMF has the following characteristics:

· Promotes the concept of near real-time risk management and ongoing information system authorization through the implementation of robust continuous monitoring processes;

· Encourages the use of automation to provide senior leaders the necessary information to make cost-effective, risk-based decisions with regard to the organizational information systems supporting their core missions and business functions;

· Integrates information security into the enterprise architecture and system development life cycle;

· Provides emphasis on the selection, implementation, assessment, and monitoring of security controls, and the authorization of information systems;

· Links risk management processes at the information system level to risk management processes at the organization level through a risk executive (function); and

· Establishes responsibility and accountability for security controls deployed within organizational information systems and inherited by those systems (i.e., common controls).

3.0 SYSTEM SECURITY PLAN (SSP)

The purpose of the SSP is to provide an overview of the security requirements of {ACRONYM} and describe the controls in place or planned for meeting those requirements. The SSP also delineates responsibilities and expected behavior of all individuals who access {ACRONYM}. The SSP should be viewed as documentation of the structured process of planning adequate, cost-effective security protection for {ACRONYM}. The formal SSP for {ACRONYM} is documented separately. {ACRONYM} coordinates security-related activities affecting the information system with the following groups:

Group
Role
Command Staff
Maintain cyber situational awareness for {ACRONYM}
Enterprise Architecture
Ensure compliance with {ACRONYM} architecture standards
Configuration Management
Maintain control of {ACRONYM} configuration
Incident Response
Focal point for {ACRONYM} incidents
External Approvers
Review and approve SSP

Has an SSP been created for {ACRONYM}?

☐ No

☐ Yes

If Yes, does the SSP contain a list of the individuals or groups with whom security-related activities are planned and coordinated?

☐ No

☐ Yes

Within the {ACRONYM} SSP, is the following information defined:

1.
Is the system architecture consistent with the organization's enterprise architecture?
☐No
☐Yes
2.
Is the authorization boundary for the system defined?
☐No
☐Yes
3.
Is the operational context of the information system in terms of missions and business processes defined?
☐No
☐Yes
4.
Is the security categorization of the information system including supporting rationale defined?
☐No
☐Yes
5.
Is the operational environment for the information system and relationships with or connections to other information systems defined?
☐No
☐Yes
6.
Is an overview of the security requirements for the system defined?
☐No
☐Yes
7.
Are any relevant overlays, if applicable, defined?
☐No
☐Yes
8.
Are the security controls in place or planned for meeting those requirements including a rationale for the tailoring and supplementation decisions defined?
☐No
☐Yes
9.
Has security plan approval by the authorizing official or designated representative prior to plan implementation been obtained?
☐No
☐Yes
10.
Have copies of the security plan been distributed, to at a minimum, the ISSO, ISSM and SCA
☐No
☐Yes
11.
Has the security plan has been reviewed annually?
☐No
☐Yes
12.
Is the security plan current?
☐No
☐Yes

Is the security plan protected from unauthorized disclosure?

☐ No

☐ Yes

If Yes, describe the controls in place.

Click or tap here to enter text.

Is the security plan protected from unauthorized modification?

☐ No

☐ Yes

If Yes, describe the controls in place.

Click or tap here to enter text.

4.0 RULES OF BEHAVIOR

{ACRONYM} utilizes DD Form 2875 (System Access Authorization Agreement (SAAR)) as the methodology to request and grant access to {ACRONYM}.

The SAAR contains the following information:

· Explicit restrictions on the use of social media/networking sites IAW DoDI 8550.01

· Explicit restrictions on posting organizational information on public websites IAW DoDI 8550.01 The SAAR has clearly defined and established rules describing {ACRONYM} user responsibilities and expected behavior with regard to information and information system usage.

SAARs are stored with the ISSM and {ACRONYM} documentation. The SAAR is shared with required parties via email. The SAARs are reviewed annually. In the event the SAAR is revised or updated, the end user must read and resign the form.

5.0 SECURITY CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS

The Security Concept of Operations for {ACRONYM} is contained within its System Security Plan (SSP). The {ACRONYM} SSP is reviewed annually as confirmed by the Change Record contained within the SSP.

6.0 INFORMATION SECURITY ARCHITECTURE

The information security architecture for {ACRONYM} is a unified security design that addresses the RMF requirements.

Has a system architecture been created for {ACRONYM}?

☐ No

☐ Yes

If Yes, within the Security Architecture contained in the SSP is the following information defined:

1.
Does the security architecture use a defense-in-depth approach that allocates security safeguards?
☐No
☐Yes
2.
Does the security architecture use a defense-in-depth approach that allocates security safeguards to architectural layers?
☐No
☐Yes
3.
Are security safeguards allocated to organization-defined locations defined?
☐No
☐Yes
4.
Are security safeguards allocated to organization-defined architectural layers defined?
☐No
☐Yes
5.
Does the SSP define the locations to which it allocates organization-defined security safeguards in the security architecture?
☐No
☐Yes
6.
Does the SSP define the architectural layers to which it allocates organization-defined security safeguards in the security architecture?
☐No
☐Yes
7.
Does the security architecture use a defense-in-depth approach that ensures that the allocated security safeguards operate in a coordinated and mutually reinforcing manner?
☐No
☐Yes
8.
Are different suppliers used to procure security safeguards and allocated to locations and architectural layers?
☐No
☐Yes
9.
Has an information security architecture for the information system been developed?
☐No
☐Yes
10.
Is the overall philosophy, requirements, and approach to be taken with regard to protecting the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of organizational information defined?
☐No
☐Yes
11.
Is how the information security architecture is integrated into and supports the enterprise architecture defined?
☐No
☐Yes
12.
Does the information security architecture for the information system describe any information security assumptions about, and dependencies on, external services?
☐No
☐Yes
13.
Is the information security architecture updated annually to reflect updates in the enterprise architecture?
☐No
☐Yes
14.
Does the SSP include planned information security architecture changes?
☐No
☐Yes
15.
Does the SSP include planned information security architecture changes in the security CONOPS?
☐No
☐Yes
16.
Are planned information security architecture changes in organizational procurements/acquisitions documented?
☐No
☐Yes

7.0 CENTRAL MANAGEMENT

{ACRONYM} is automatically compliant with this requirement because they are covered at the DoD level. DoDI 8500.01, DoDI 8510.01, and CNSSI 1253 meet the DoD requirements for centrally managing security controls and related processes.

APPENDIX A – DETAILED COMPLIANCE MATRIX

The following table provides traceability between this document and the Assessment Procedures contained within NIST Special Publication 800-53A Revision 4, "Assessing Security and Privacy Controls in Federal Information Systems and Organizations".

Control Number
Assessment Number
CCI
Confidentiality
Integrity
Availability
Assessment Procedures
Reference
PL-1
PL-1 (a)
CCI-003047
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low The organization being inspected/assessed is automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level.

DoD has defined the roles as Organizational personnel with planning responsibilities or information security responsibilities.

Automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level

PL-1
PL-1 (a)
CCI-003048
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low The organization being inspected/assessed is automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level.

DoD has defined the roles as Organizational personnel with planning responsibilities or information security responsibilities.

Automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level

PL-1
PL-1 (a) (1)
CCI-000563
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low

DoD Components are automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered by DoD level policy, DoDI 8510.01.
Automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level
PL-1
PL-1 (a) (1)
CCI-000564
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low DoD Components are automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered by DoD level policy, DoDI 8510.01.

DoD has defined the roles as organizational personnel with planning responsibilities or information security responsibilities.

Automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level

PL-1
PL-1 (a) (2)
CCI-000566
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low

DoD Components are automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered by DoD level policy, DoDI 8510.01.
Automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level
PL-1
PL-1 (b) (1)
CCI-001636
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low The organization being inspected/assessed is automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level.

DoD has defined the frequency as reviewed annually - updated as appropriate but at least within 10 years of date of issuance.

Automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level

PL-1
PL-1 (b) (1)
CCI-001637
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low DoDI 8510.01 meets the requirements for a security planning policy.

DoD Components are automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered by DoD level policy, DoDI 8510.01.

DoD has defined the frequency as every 5 years.

Automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level

PL-1
PL-1 (b) (2)
CCI-001638
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low The organization being inspected/assessed is automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level.

DoD has defined the frequency as reviewed annually - updated as appropriate.

Automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level

PL-1
PL-1 (b) (2)
CCI-000568
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low DoDI 8510.01 meets the requirements for a security planning policy.

DoD Components are automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered by DoD level policy, DoDI 8510.01.

DoD has defined the frequency as reviewed annually - updated as appropriate.

Automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level

PL-1
PL-1 (b) (2)
CCI-000567
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low DoD Components are automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered by DoD level policy, DoDI 8510.01.

DoD has defined the roles as organizational personnel with planning responsibilities or information security responsibilities.

Automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level

PL-2 (3)
PL-2 (3)
CCI-003065
High

Moderate High Moderate High Moderate

The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the security plan to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed plans and coordinates of security-related activities affecting the information system with individuals or groups defined in PL-2 (3), CCI 3067 before conducting such activities in order to reduce the impact on other organizational entities.
Section 3
PL-2 (3)
PL-2 (3)
CCI-003067
High

Moderate High Moderate High Moderate The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the documented individuals or groups to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed defines the individuals or groups with whom security-related activities are planned and coordinated.

DoD has determined the individuals or groups are not appropriate to define at the Enterprise level.

Section 3

PL-2
PL-2 (a)
CCI-003049
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low

The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the documented security plan to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed develops a security plan for the information system.
eMASS SSP
PL-2
PL-2 (a) (1)
CCI-003050
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low

The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the security plan and the enterprise architecture to ensure the organization's security plan for the information system is consistent with the organization's enterprise architecture.
Section 3

eMASS SSP

PL-2
PL-2 (a) (2)
CCI-003051
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low

The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the security plan to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed explicitly defines within the security plan the authorization boundary for the system.
Section 3

eMASS SSP

PL-2
PL-2 (a) (3)
CCI-003052
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low

The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the security plan to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed describes within the security plan the operational context of the information system in terms of missions and business processes.
Section 3

eMASS SSP

PL-2
PL-2 (a) (4)
CCI-003053
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low

The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the security plan to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed defines within the security plan the security categorization of the information system including supporting rationale.
Section 3

eMASS SSP

PL-2
PL-2 (a) (5)
CCI-003054
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low

The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the security plan to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed describes within the security plan the operational environment for the information system and relationships with or connections to other information systems.
Section 3

eMASS SSP

PL-2
PL-2 (a) (6)
CCI-003055
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low

The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the security plan to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed their security plan for the information system provides an overview of the security requirements for the system
Section 3

eMASS SSP

PL-2
PL-2 (a) (7)
CCI-003056
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low

The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the security plan to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed identifies within the security plan any relevant overlays, if applicable.
Section 3

eMASS SSP

PL-2
PL-2 (a) (8)
CCI-003057
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low

The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the security plan to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed describes within the security plan the security controls in place or planned for meeting those requirements including a rationale for the tailoring and supplementation decisions.
Section 3

eMASS SSP

PL-2
PL-2 (a) (9)
CCI-000571
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low

The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the security plan approval to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed obtains security plan approval by the authorizing official or designated representative prior to plan implementation.
Section 3

eMASS SSP

PL-2
PL-2 (b)
CCI-003061
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low The organization conducting the inspection/assessment examines the organization's information sharing portal to ensure at a minimum, the ISSO, ISSM and SCA have been provided changes to the security plan.

DoD has defined the personnel or roles as at a minimum, the ISSO, ISSM and SCA.

Section 3 eMASS SSP

PL-2
PL-2 (b)
CCI-003059
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the security plan via the organization's information sharing portal to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed distributes copies of the security plan to at a minimum, the ISSO, ISSM and SCA via the organization's information sharing portal.

DoD has defined the personnel or roles as at a minimum, the ISSO, ISSM and SCA.

Section 3 eMASS SSP

PL-2
PL-2 (b)
CCI-003060
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low The organization being inspected/assessed is automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level.

DoD has defined the personnel or roles as at a minimum, the ISSO, ISSM and SCA.

Automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level

PL-2
PL-2 (b)
CCI-003062
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low The organization being inspected/assessed is automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level.

DoD has defined the personnel or roles as at a minimum, the ISSO, ISSM and SCA.

Automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level

PL-2
PL-2 (c )
CCI-000573
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the audit records of security plan reviews to verify the security plan has been reviewed annually.

DoD has defined the frequency as annually.

Section 3 eMASS SSP

PL-2
PL-2 (c )
CCI-000572
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low The organization being inspected/assessed is automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level.

DoD has defined the frequency as annually.

Automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level

PL-2
PL-2 (d)
CCI-000574
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the audit records of security plan updates to verify the security plan is current.

The purpose of the reviews is to validate the organization is updating the Information System (IS) security plan to address changes to the IS, its environment of operation, or problems identified during plan implementation or security control assessments.

Section 3 eMASS SSP

PL-2
PL-2 (e )
CCI-003063
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low

The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the documented process to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed protects the security plan from unauthorized disclosure.
Section 3
PL-2
PL-2 (e )
CCI-003064
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low

The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the documented process to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed protects the security plan from unauthorized modification.
Section 3
PL-4 (1)
PL-4 (1)
CCI-000594
High

Moderate

The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the rules of behavior to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed includes explicit restrictions on the use of social media/networking sites IAW DoDI 8550.01.
Section 4
PL-4 (1)
PL-4 (1)
CCI-000595
High

Moderate

The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the rules of behavior to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed includes explicit restrictions on posting organizational information on public websites IAW DoDI 8550.01.
Section 4
PL-4
PL-4 (a)
CCI-000592
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low

The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the organization's AUP to ensure the organization has clearly defined and established rules describing information system user responsibilities and expected behavior with regard to information and information system usage.
Section 4
PL-4
PL-4 (a)
CCI-001639
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low

The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines rules that describe information system user responsibilities via the inspected organization's information sharing capability (e.g. portal, intranet, email, etc.) to ensure it has been disseminated.
Section 4
PL-4
PL-4 (b)
CCI-000593
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low

The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains a list of individuals with active accounts and validates the existence of signed acknowledgements (paper or electronic signature) of the organizational AUP associated with a sampling of individuals selected from the list.
Section 4
PL-4
PL-4 (c )
CCI-003068
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the audit trail of reviews and updates to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed reviews and updates the rules of behavior annually.

DoD has defined the frequency as annually.

Section 4

PL-4
PL-4 (c )
CCI-003069
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low The organization being inspected/assessed is automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level.

DoD has defined the frequency as annually.

Automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level

PL-4
PL-4 (d)
CCI-003070
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low

The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the documented process to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed requires individuals who have signed a previous version of the rules of behavior to read and resign when the rules of behavior are revised/updated.
Section 4
PL-7
PL-7 (a)
CCI-003071
blank
blank
blank
The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the security CONOPS to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed develops a security CONOPS for the information system containing at a minimum, how the organization intends to operate the system from the perspective of information security.
NIST has not allocated this AP. Therefore, this AP is not applicable.
PL-7
PL-7 (b)
CCI-000578
blank
blank
blank
The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the audit trail of reviews and updates to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed reviews and updates the security CONOPS annually.

DoD has defined the frequency as annually.

NIST has not allocated this AP. Therefore, this AP is not applicable.

PL-7
PL-7 (b)
CCI-000577
blank
blank
blank
The organization being inspected/assessed is automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level.

DoD has defined the frequency as annually.

Automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level

PL-8 (1)
PL-8 (1) (a)
CCI-003081
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low

The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the security architecture to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed designs its security architecture using a defense-in-depth approach that allocates security safeguards defined in PL-8 (1), CCI 3083 to locations defined in PL-8 (1), CCI 3085.
Section 6

eMASS SSP

PL-8 (1)
PL-8 (1) (a)
CCI-003082
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low

The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the security architecture to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed designs its security architecture using a defense-in-depth approach that allocates security safeguards defined in PL-8 (1), CCI 3084 to architectural layers defined in PL-8 (1), CCI 3086.
Section 6

eMASS SSP

PL-8 (1)
PL-8 (1) (a)
CCI-003083
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the documented security safeguards to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed defines the security safeguards to be allocated to organization-defined locations.

DoD has determined the security safeguards are not appropriate to define at the Enterprise level.

Section 6 eMASS SSP

PL-8 (1)
PL-8 (1) (a)
CCI-003084
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the documented security safeguards to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed defines the security safeguards to be allocated to organization-defined architectural layers.

DoD has determined the security safeguards are not appropriate to define at the Enterprise level.

Section 6 eMASS SSP

PL-8 (1)
PL-8 (1) (a)
CCI-003085
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the documented locations to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed defines the locations to which it allocates organization-defined security safeguards in the security architecture.

DoD has determined the locations are not appropriate to define at the Enterprise level.

Section 6 eMASS SSP

PL-8 (1)
PL-8 (1) (a)
CCI-003086
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the documented architectural layers to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed defines the architectural layers to which it allocates organization-defined security safeguards in the security architecture.

DoD has determined the architectural layers are not appropriate to define at the Enterprise level.

Section 6 eMASS SSP

PL-8 (1)
PL-8 (1) (b)
CCI-003087
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low

The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines security architecture to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed designs its security architecture using a defense-in-depth approach that ensures that the allocated security safeguards operate in a coordinated and mutually reinforcing manner.
Section 6

eMASS SSP

PL-8 (2)
PL-8 (2)
CCI-003088
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low

The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines procurement records to ensure that different suppliers are used to procure security safeguards defined in PL-8 (1), CCIs 3083 and 3084 allocated to locations and architectural layers defined in PL-8 (1) CCIs 3085 and 3086.
Section 6

eMASS SSP

PL-8
PL-8 (a)
CCI-003072
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low

The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the documented information security architecture to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed develops an information security architecture for the information system.
Section 6

eMASS SSP

PL-8
PL-8 (a) (1)
CCI-003073
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low

The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the information security architecture to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed describes within the information security architecture for the information system, the overall philosophy, requirements, and approach to be taken with regard to protecting the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of organizational information.
Section 6

eMASS SSP

PL-8
PL-8 (a) (2)
CCI-003074
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low

The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the information security architecture to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed describes within the information security architecture for the information system, how the information security architecture is integrated into and supports the enterprise architecture.
Section 6

eMASS SSP

PL-8
PL-8 (a) (3)
CCI-003075
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low

The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the information security architecture to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed describes within the information security architecture for the information system, any information security assumptions about, and dependencies on, external services.
Section 6

eMASS SSP

PL-8
PL-8 (b)
CCI-003076
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the audit trail of reviews and updates to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed reviews and updates the information security architecture annually to reflect updates in the enterprise architecture.

DoD has defined the frequency as annually.

Section 6 eMASS SSP

PL-8
PL-8 (b)
CCI-003077
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low The organization being inspected/assessed is automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level.

DoD has defined the frequency as annually.

Automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level

PL-8
PL-8 (c )
CCI-003078
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low

The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the security plan to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed includes planned information security architecture changes in the security plan.
Section 6

eMASS SSP

PL-8
PL-8 (c )
CCI-003079
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low

The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines security CONOPS to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed includes planned information security architecture changes in the security CONOPS.
Section 6

eMASS SSP

PL-8
PL-8 (c )
CCI-003080
High

Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low

The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines a sampling of procurement materials to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed includes planned information security architecture changes in organizational procurements/acquisitions.
Section 6

eMASS SSP

PL-9
PL-9
CCI-003117
blank
blank
blank
DoDI 8500.01, DoDI 8510.01, and CNSSI 1253 meet the DoD requirements for centrally managing security controls and related processes.

DoD Components are automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered by the DoD level policy, DoDI 8500.01 and CNSSI 1253.

Automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level

PL-9
PL-9
CCI-003118
blank
blank
blank
The organization being inspected/assessed is automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level.

DoD has defined the security controls and related processes to be centrally managed as CNSSI 1253, DoDI 8510.01, and DoDI 8500.01.

Automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 12

image1.gif

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .