Task 2 RMF_Physical And Environmental Protection Plan.docx
DOCX document 113 KB Posted
- Attached to
- SAF/FMB Support Services Follow-on
- Solicitation number
- FA7014-FMBFollowon
About this file
This document is a Physical and Environmental Protection Plan for the {ACRONYM} system. It details the physical security controls and environmental safeguards implemented to preserve the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of {ACRONYM} information system resources.
The plan covers physical access authorizations and controls, access control for transmission medium and output devices, monitoring of physical access, visitor control procedures, emergency power and lighting, fire protection, temperature and humidity controls, water damage protection, delivery and removal of system components, alternate work sites, and asset monitoring and tracking. It includes compliance matrices tracing controls to NIST SP 800-53 requirements and provides sample forms for access lists, visitor logs, delivery/removal logs, and daily security checklists. The plan is tailored for {ACRONYM} as a tenant on a military base, leveraging base-level physical security infrastructure and services.
View the file
Other files
Show all 26
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
{COMMAND}
{SYSTEM NAME} {ACRONYM}
System Version: {VERSION} eMASS# {EMASS#}
Confidentiality: {CONFIDENTIALITY} Integrity: {INTEGRITY} Availability: {AVAILABILITY}
Department of the {SERVICE}
{LOGO}
Physical and Environmental Protection Plan Document Version: 1.0.0
{DATE}
Prepared by: {ORGANIZATION}
DISTRIBUTION IS LIMITED TO U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCIES AND THEIR CONTRACTORS.
OTHER REQUESTS FOR THIS DOCUMENT MUST BE REFERRED TO: {ORGANIZATION}
Change Record
| Date |
| Version |
| Author |
| Changes Made / Section(s) |
| {DATE} |
| 1.0.0 |
| {ORGANIZATION} |
| Initial Document |
Amplifying Guidance
i. DoD Instruction 5200.08, "Security of DoD Installations and Resources and the DoD Physical Security Review Board (PSRB)"
ii. DoD Regulation 5200.08-R, "Physical Security Program", as amended
Table of Contents
| 1.0 | OVERVIEW | 1 |
| 2.0 | PHYSICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION | 2 |
| 2.1 | Physical Access Authorizations | 2 |
| 2.2 | Physical Access Control | 2 |
| 2.2.1 | Penetration Testing | 2 |
| 2.2.2 | Facility Entry and Exit Points | 3 |
| 2.2.3 | Publicly Accessible Areas | 3 |
| 2.2.4 | Visitor Escorts and Monitoring | 3 |
| 2.2.5 | Key and Combination Procedures | 3 |
| 2.3 | Access Control for Transmission Medium | 3 |
| 2.4 | Access Control for Output Devices | 4 |
| 2.5 | Monitoring Physical Access | 4 |
| 2.5.1 | Video Surveillance | 4 |
| 2.5.2 | Inspection/Assessment Records | 5 |
| 3.0 | VISITOR CONTROL | 5 |
| 3.1 | Visitor Access Records | 5 |
| 4.0 | PHYSICAL CONTROLS | 5 |
| 4.1 | Power Equipment and Cabling | 5 |
| 4.2 | Emergency Shutoff | 6 |
| 4.3 | Emergency Power | 7 |
| 4.4 | Emergency Lighting | 7 |
| 5.0 | ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS | 8 |
| 5.1 | Fire Protection | 8 |
| 5.2 | Temperature and Humidity Controls | 9 |
| 5.3 | Water Damage Protection | 9 |
| 6.0 | DELIVERY AND REMOVAL | 10 |
| 7.0 | ALTERNATE WORK SITE | 11 |
| 8.0 | LOCATION OF INFORMATION SYSTEM COMPONENTS | 11 |
| 8.1 | System Position | 11 |
| 8.2 | System Hazards | 12 |
| 9.0 | INFORMATION LEAKAGE | 12 |
| 10.0 | ASSET MONITORING AND TRACKING | 13 |
| APPENDIX A – DETAILED COMPLIANCE MATRIX | 14 | |
| ENCLOSURE 1 – ACCESS LIST | 71 | |
| ENCLOSURE 2 – VISITOR ACCESS LOG | 73 | |
| ENCLOSURE 3 – DELIVERY AND REMOVAL LOG | 75 | |
| ENCLOSURE 4 – DAILY PHYSICAL SECURITY CHECKLIST | 77 |
| Table 1 - SP-800-53v4 Compliance Matrix | 1 |
| Table 2 – Physical Access Control | 2 |
| Table 3 – Facility Entry and Exit Points | 3 |
| Table 4 – Key and Combination Procedures | 3 |
| Table 5 – Distribution and Transmission Lines | 4 |
| Table 6 – Access Control for Output Devices | 4 |
| Table 7 – Video Surveillance | 4 |
| Table 8 – Emergency Power | 7 |
| Table 9 – Fire Protection Roles | 8 |
| Table 10 – Water Damage Control Roles | 10 |
| Table 11 – Water Presence Detection | 10 |
| Table 12 – Delivery and Removal Procedures | 11 |
| Table 13 – Alternate Worksite Controls | 11 |
| Table 14 – System Hazards | 12 |
| Table 15 – Asset Monitoring and Tracking | 13 |
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
{ACRONYM} {DATE}
PHYSICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PLAN
Template developed by:
http://www.i-assure.com FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
1.0 OVERVIEW
The physical security program is that part of security concerned with active and passive measures designed to prevent unauthorized access to personnel, equipment, installations, information, and to safeguard them against espionage, sabotage, terrorism, damage, and criminal activity. Physical security is a primary command responsibility.
This plan ensures that {ACRONYM} implements physical security to preserve the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of {ACRONYM} information system resources.
This document complies with the following requirements from NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4, "Security and Privacy Controls for Federal Information Systems and Organizations". A detailed compliance matrix can be found in Appendix A, “Detailed Compliance Matrix”.
| CNTL NO. |
| CONTROL NAME |
| PRIORITY |
| LOW |
| MOD |
| HIGH |
| PE-1 |
| Physical and Environmental Protection Policy and Procedures |
| P1 |
| PE-1 |
| PE-1 |
| PE-1 |
| PE-2 |
| Physical Access Authorizations |
| P1 |
| PE-2 |
| PE-2 |
| PE-2 |
| PE-3 |
| Physical Access Control |
| P1 |
| PE-3 |
| PE-3 |
| PE-3 (1) |
| PE-4 |
| Access Control for Transmission Medium |
| P1 |
| Not Selected |
| PE-4 |
| PE-4 |
| PE-5 |
| Access Control for Output Devices |
| P2 |
| Not Selected |
| PE-5 |
| PE-5 |
| PE-6 |
| Monitoring Physical Access |
| P1 |
| PE-6 |
| PE-6 (1) |
| PE-6 (1) (4) |
| PE-7 |
| Visitor Control |
| Not Selected |
| Not Selected |
| Not Selected |
| PE-8 |
| Visitor Access Records |
| P3 |
| PE-8 |
| PE-8 |
| PE-8 (1) |
| PE-9 |
| Power Equipment and Cabling |
| P1 |
| Not Selected |
| PE-9 |
| PE-9 |
| PE-10 |
| Emergency Shutoff |
| P1 |
| Not Selected |
| PE-10 |
| PE-10 |
| PE-11 |
| Emergency Power |
| P1 |
| Not Selected |
| PE-11 |
| PE-11 (1) |
| PE-12 |
| Emergency Lighting |
| P1 |
| PE-12 |
| PE-12 |
| PE-12 |
| PE-13 |
| Fire Protection |
| P1 |
| PE-13 |
| PE-13 (3) |
| PE-13 (1) (2) (3) |
| PE-14 |
| Temperature and Humidity Controls |
| P1 |
| PE-14 |
| PE-14 |
| PE-14 |
| PE-15 |
| Water Damage Protection |
| P1 |
| PE-15 |
| PE-15 |
| PE-15 (1) |
| PE-16 |
| Delivery and Removal |
| P2 |
| PE-16 |
| PE-16 |
| PE-16 |
| PE-17 |
| Alternate Work Site |
| P2 |
| Not Selected |
| PE-17 |
| PE-17 |
| PE-18 |
| Location of Information System Components |
| P3 |
| Not Selected |
| Not Selected |
| PE-18 |
| PE-19 |
| Information Leakage |
| P0 |
| Not Selected |
| Not Selected |
| Not Selected |
| PE-20 |
| Asset Monitoring and Tracking |
| P0 |
| Not Selected |
| Not Selected |
| Not Selected |
Table 1 - SP-800-53v4 Compliance Matrix
| 2.0 | PHYSICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION |
| 2.1 | Physical Access Authorizations |
Enclosure 1 lists the personnel that have access to the facility where {ACRONYM} resides. The Access List has been formally approved and is reviewed every 90 days. All personnel have been authorized based on the appropriate roles and positions. Personnel must have two forms of identification. Examples of valid identification are:
· DoD issued Common Access Card (CAC)
· Base issued ID
· Other Government issued ID
· State issued driver license
· Passport It is {ACRONYM} policy that all Visitors must be escorted at all times in controlled areas. Visitors are required to sign the Visitor Log for access to any controlled area. All Visitors must be monitored by the Escort at all times. {ACRONYM} has not identified any Publicly Accessible areas.
{ACRONYM} issues all credentials through Base Security. The Personnel Security office verifies clearance information prior to identification being issued.
For personnel no longer requiring access, the Personnel Security Plan contains the credential revocation process and the Access List is updated to remove that person.
2.2 Physical Access Control
The {ACRONYM} has not identified additional physical access authorizations. The following physical security safeguards have been implemented for {ACRONYM} to detect and prevent physical tampering or alteration of {ACRONYM} components:
· Base Security – guard access at gate
· Facility Security – facility manned during workday and locked at night
· Keycard/Combination – only authorized personnel are listed in Access List and have credentials The following table lists the {ACRONYM} components and the NIST SP 800-53 required information:
| Component |
| Location |
| Guard/Alarm 24/7 |
| Physical Casing |
| Security Safeguards |
All assets
| Base Guard and facility is alarmed |
| N/A |
| Yes. Listed above |
Table 2 – Physical Access Control
2.2.1 Penetration Testing
Physical security penetration testing is not required per NIST 800-53.
2.2.2 Facility Entry and Exit Points
The following table lists all entry/exit points for the facility housing {ACRONYM}:
| Component |
| Location |
| Entry/Exit Point |
| Access Control |
| Access List |
| Audit Log Required? |
All Assets
| Locked Room |
| Yes |
| No |
Table 3 – Facility Entry and Exit Points
2.2.3 Publicly Accessible Areas
The {ACRONYM} does not contain publicly accessible areas.
2.2.4 Visitor Escorts and Monitoring
A CAC is required when entering the {ACRONYM}. For those personnel without a CAC, a Visit Request for base access must be processed. All Visitors must be escorted at all times in controlled areas. Visitors are required to sign the Visitor Log for access to any controlled area. All Visitors must be monitored by the Escort at all times.
2.2.5 Key and Combination Procedures
{ACRONYM} has adequately secured its keys, combinations, and other physical devices.
The following devices are used for to gain physical access to {ACRONYM}:
| Component |
| Access Device |
| Annual Review? |
| Change Actions? |
| Notes |
| All assets |
| Physical key |
| Yes |
| None. |
| No security relevant events, lost keys, combinations compromised, or individuals are transferred or terminated |
| All assets |
| Base Badge / CAC |
| Yes |
| None. |
| Individuals are transfer or termination documented in Personnel Security Plan |
Table 4 – Key and Combination Procedures
2.3 Access Control for Transmission Medium
{ACRONYM} protects distribution and transmission lines to ensure unauthorized access does not occur. The following distribution and transmission lines, and their security safeguards, have been identified:
| Distribution and Transmission Lines |
| Security Safeguards |
| Notes |
| Ethernet |
| All connections contained within the physically secure facility |
| No lines are outside of the {ACRONYM} control |
Table 5 – Distribution and Transmission Lines
2.4 Access Control for Output Devices
The {ACRONYM} has not identified additional access controls for output devices. The process for determining authorization to {ACRONYM} is contained within the Personnel Security Plan. The following output devices have been identified for {ACRONYM}:
| Output Devices |
| Controlled? |
| Auditing set Per STIG |
| Marked/Labeled (only Classified systems) |
| All assets (visual and physical) |
| Yes. Only authorized personnel have access. |
| Yes. CCI 2936 |
| N/A. System is not Classified |
Table 6 – Access Control for Output Devices
2.5 Monitoring Physical Access
{ACRONYM} is actively monitoring all physical intrusion alarms and surveillance equipment. {ACRONYM} implements the following types of equipment:
· Door sensors
· Badge System {ACRONYM} recognizes the following types/classes of intrusions by automated mechanisms:
· Invalid CAC – scanned at {ACRONYM} Gate Guard station
· Invalid Entry – Base Badge system records card swipe actions The hardware/software associated with the intrusion system is separately accredited. All intrusions are reported to Base Security.
{ACRONYM} response actions include:
· Denial of access
· Alarm sent to Base Security. Base Security then determines the appropriate response
2.5.1 Video Surveillance
Does {ACRONYM} implement video surveillance?
☐ No
☐ Yes
If Yes:
| Location / Operational Area |
| Equipment |
| Retained for 90 days? |
| {ACRONYM} Monitored? |
| Procedures? |
Table 7 – Video Surveillance
2.5.2 Inspection/Assessment Records
The {ACRONYM} Access List is contained within Enclosure 1 and reviewed every 30 days. The following events or potential indications of events require an immediate review of physical access logs:
· Mishandled or lost resource: Equipment was stolen, lost, or left accessible to unauthorized parties.
· Local access: An unauthorized user was provided local physical access to {ACRONYM}.
· Abuse of resources: The physical destruction of {ACRONYM} by an unauthorized party.
The Incident Response Plan contains the review process and record of reviews concerning physical security events.
| 3.0 | VISITOR CONTROL |
| 3.1 | Visitor Access Records |
Visitor Access Records ensure only authorized personnel access the physical space in which {ACRONYM} resides. NIST SP 800-53 requires that these access records be automated.
Does {ACRONYM} implement automated mechanisms to facilitate the maintenance and review of access records?
☐ No
☐ Yes
If Yes, have they been observed?
☐ No
☐ Yes
If Yes, have they been maintained for at least one year?
☐ No
☐ Yes
If Yes, have they been reviewed at least every 30 days?
☐ No
☐ Yes
| 4.0 | PHYSICAL CONTROLS |
| 4.1 | Power Equipment and Cabling |
{ACRONYM} is required to protect power equipment and power cabling. {ACRONYM} is required to fulfill this requirement as {ACRONYM} is strictly a tenant of the facility.
The following protective measures have been implemented:
· All power equipment is located on a physically secure military base.
· All power cabling is contained within a physically secure facility.
· Only authorized personnel can access the base and facility.
Are redundant power cabling paths installed?
☐ No
☐ Yes
If Yes, are they physically separated by at least one foot?
☐ No
☐ Yes
Does the system contain critical information system components?
☒ No
☐ Yes
If Yes, are automatic voltage control mechanisms are in place?
☐ No
☐ Yes
4.2 Emergency Shutoff
{ACRONYM} is required to provide a capability to shut off the power to facilities or areas within facilities containing concentrations of information system resources (e.g., datacenters, server rooms, mainframe computer rooms) in emergency situations. {ACRONYM} must install the emergency shutoff switches or devices near more than one egress point of the IT area and ensure it is labeled and protected by a cover to prevent accidental shut-off to facilitate safe and easy access for personnel. {ACRONYM} is required to fulfill this requirement as {ACRONYM} is strictly a tenant of the facility.
Is an emergency shutoff switch or device installed?
☐ No
☐ Yes
If Yes, Is the switch/device near more than one egress point of the IT area?
☐ No
☐ Yes
If Yes, Is the switch/device labeled and protected by a cover?
☐ No
☐ Yes
4.3 Emergency Power
{ACRONYM} is required to provide a capacity to implement uninterruptible power supply to {ACRONYM}. Uninterruptible power supply must have sufficient capacity to support orderly shutdown of {ACRONYM} or transition {ACRONYM} to long-term alternate power in the event of a primary power source loss. {ACRONYM} is required to fulfill this requirement as {ACRONYM} is strictly a tenant of the facility.
| Assets |
| Power Requirements |
| Power Supply |
| Contingency Plan |
| All assets |
| 1 hour of alternate power |
| Generator/UPS |
| Yes |
Table 8 – Emergency Power Is a long-term alternate power supply self-contained?
☐ No
☐ Yes
If Yes, Is the alternate power supply reliant on external power generation?
☐ No
☐ Yes
If No, Is the alternate power supply capable of maintaining minimally required operational capability or full operational capability in the event of an extended loss of the primary power source?
☐ No
☐ Yes
4.4 Emergency Lighting
{ACRONYM} is required to comply with established OSHA requirements by employing and maintaining emergency lighting for {ACRONYM}. Emergency lighting activates in the event of a power outage or disruption, and it covers emergency exits and evacuation routes within the facility. {ACRONYM} is required to fulfill this requirement as {ACRONYM} is strictly a tenant of the facility.
Does {ACRONYM} support essential mission and/or business functions?
☒ No
☐ Yes
If yes, Is emergency lighting present?
☐ No
☐ Yes
If yes, does it cover emergency exits and evacuation routes within the facility?
☐ No
☐ Yes
| 5.0 | ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS |
| 5.1 | Fire Protection |
{ACRONYM} is required to implement fire detection and suppression. Fire detection devices/systems for {ACRONYM} must activate automatically. {ACRONYM} is required to fulfill this requirement as {ACRONYM} is strictly a tenant of the facility.
Are fire detection and suppression devices/systems available?
☐ No
☐ Yes
If Yes, are they supported by an independent energy source?
☐ No
☐ Yes
If Yes, do they activate automatically?
☐ No
☐ Yes
If Yes, do they activate automatically when the facility is not staffed?
☐ No
☐ Yes
If Yes, do they automatically activate to notify personnel or roles defined below in the event of a fire?
☐ No
☐ Yes
| Personnel/Role |
| Automatic Notification |
| Notes |
| Base Fire Department |
| Yes |
Table 9 – Fire Protection Roles Are fire protection systems inspected and documented at least annually?
☐ No
☐ Yes
If Yes, are all deficiencies identified resolved within 60 days?
☐ No
☐ Yes
5.2 Temperature and Humidity Controls
{ACRONYM} is required to implement automatic temperature and humidity controls. Automatic temperature and humidity controls for {ACRONYM} must prevent fluctuations potentially harmful to {ACRONYM}. {ACRONYM} is required to fulfill this requirement as {ACRONYM} is strictly a tenant of the facility.
Are automatic temperature and humidity controls available?
☐ No
☐ Yes
If Yes, do they provide an alarm or notification of changes potentially harmful to personnel or equipment?
☐ No
☐ Yes
If Yes, are they are set within DoD specified guidelines? (64.4 – 80.6 degrees F; 45% – 60% Relative Humidity; Dew Point 41.9 ° – 59°F; measured at the air intake inlet of the IT equipment casing; for other systems, levels within manufacturer specifications) ☐ No
☐ Yes
Are temperature and humidity levels continuously monitored unless manufacturer specifications allow for a wide enough tolerance that control is not required?
☐ No
☐ Yes
5.3 Water Damage Protection
{ACRONYM} is required to implement master shutoff valves for water sources. Master shutoff valves for {ACRONYM} must be installed and accessible. {ACRONYM} is required to fulfill this requirement as {ACRONYM} is strictly a tenant of the facility.
Are master shutoff valves installed?
☐ No
☐ Yes
If Yes, is inspection documentation (e.g., inspection form, tag attached to valve) available?
☐ No
☐ Yes
The following list of key personnel have knowledge of location and activation procedures for master shutoff valves and any other relevant documents or records:
| Personnel / Role |
| Master Shutoff Valve Location |
| Notes |
| Public Works |
| {REQUIRED} |
Table 10 – Water Damage Control Roles
Are water detection mechanisms installed?
☐ No
☐ Yes
If Yes, do they provide automated alerts upon water detection?
☐ No
☐ Yes
The following list identifies automated mechanisms to detect the presence of water in the vicinity of the information system and personnel or roles that are alerted:
| Automated Mechanisms |
| Personnel / Role |
| Notes |
Public Works
Table 11 – Water Presence Detection
6.0 DELIVERY AND REMOVAL
Delivery and removal of {ACRONYM} components must be documented to ensure the actions were authorized. The following process/documentation exists to ensure a detailed and accurate record of all {ACRONYM} components that enter and exit the facility exists:
| Action |
| Process / Documentation |
| Notes |
| Entrance into Facility |
| Base Receiving |
| All components must be delivered to the Base Receiving office prior to distribution to the system. Base Receiving applies a unique tracking number to the component for inventory purposes. |
| Exit from Facility |
| Disposal Process |
| All components follow the {COMMAND} Disposal Policy or Surplus process for components that exit the facility. |
Table 12 – Delivery and Removal Procedures This plan documents all system components entering and exiting the facility and visually inspects the controls (e.g., logs, scans, etc.) to ensure implementation. Logs are contained in Enclosure 3.
7.0 ALTERNATE WORK SITE
{ACRONYM} is required to implement physical security controls for alternate worksites. {ACRONYM} must define security controls to employ at alternate work sites, which must include all applicable building and safety codes for the {ACRONYM} environment. {ACRONYM} is required to fulfill this requirement as {ACRONYM} is strictly a tenant of the facility. This requirement does not apply to Telework activities.
Are alternate worksites authorized?
☐ No
☐ Yes
If Yes, are all security controls identified and all applicable to all building and safety codes?
☐ No
☐ Yes
The following list designates alternate worksite locations and requirement status:
| Alternate Worksite Location |
| Security Controls |
| Contact Information |
| Assessment Date |
| Notes |
PE-2 thru PE-16, PE18 thru PE-20
Table 13 – Alternate Worksite Controls
| 8.0 | LOCATION OF INFORMATION SYSTEM COMPONENTS |
| 8.1 | System Position |
It is {ACRONYM} policy to position all system components in the following manner:
· Deter viewing from unauthorized personnel
· Do not locate near water hazards
· Ensure proper HVAC temperature Is {ACRONYM} positioned according to the environmental policy?
☐ No
☐ Yes
8.2 System Hazards
{ACRONYM} planned the location of the facility where {ACRONYM} resides with regard to physical and environmental hazards. {ACRONYM} has determined that the following environmental and physical hazards are applicable:
| Hazard |
| Risk Level |
| Risk Mitigation |
| Notes |
ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS
| Dirt/Dust |
| Low |
| N/A |
| Facility is cleaned weekly |
| Water/Fluids |
| Low |
| N/A |
| Assets not located near water/fluid |
| Heat |
| Low |
| N/A |
| Temperature controls in place |
| Cold |
| Low |
| N/A |
| Temperature controls in place |
| Flooding/Hurricane |
| Low |
| N/A |
| Facility built to code |
| Snowfall |
| Low |
| N/A |
| Facility built to code |
| Fire |
| Low |
| N/A |
| Fire alarm and suppression systems are in place |
PHYSICAL HAZARDS
| Unlocked doors |
| Low |
| N/A |
| All doors are locked |
| Exposed wiring |
| Low |
| N/A |
| All wiring is to code |
| Facility structurally unsound |
| Low |
| N/A |
| Facility built to code |
| Spills |
| Low |
| N/A |
| Spills immediately cleaned |
Table 14 – System Hazards
9.0 INFORMATION LEAKAGE
TEMPEST is a National Security Agency specification referring to spying on information systems through leaking emanations, including unintentional radio or electrical signals, sounds, and vibrations. TEMPEST applies to Classified systems.
Is {ACRONYM} considered Classified?
☐ No
☐ Yes
If Yes, have measures to protect against compromising emanations been implemented according to DOD Directive S-5200.19?
☐ No
☐ Yes
If Yes, has an examination of the TEMPEST countermeasures been reviewed and inspected to ensure those countermeasures have been implemented?
☐ No
☐ Yes
10.0 ASSET MONITORING AND TRACKING
Asset monitoring and tracking ensures {ACRONYM} components are accounted for. {ACRONYM} tracks and monitor the location and movement of all components within controlled areas utilizing the following technologies:
| Asset |
| Controlled Area |
| Technology Used |
| Applicable Laws, Directives, Regulations, Policies? |
| All Assets |
| Defined in SSP |
| Documentation – Hardware List |
| None |
| All Assets |
| Defined in SSP |
| ACAS – verify hardware list against scans |
| None |
| All Assets |
| Defined in SSP |
| {LOCAL TECHNOLOGY} |
| None |
Table 15 – Asset Monitoring and Tracking
APPENDIX A – DETAILED COMPLIANCE MATRIX
The following table provides traceability between this document and the Assessment Procedures contained within NIST Special Publication 800-53A Revision 4, "Assessing Security and Privacy Controls in Federal Information Systems and Organizations".
| Control Number |
| Assessment Number |
| CCI |
| Confidentiality |
| Integrity |
| Availability |
| Assessment Procedures |
| Reference |
| PE-1 |
| PE-1 (a) |
| CCI-002908 |
| High |
Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low The organization being inspected/assessed is automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level.
DoD has defined the roles as organizational personnel with physical and environmental protection responsibilities.
Automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level
| PE-1 |
| PE-1 (a) |
| CCI-002909 |
| High |
Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low The organization being inspected/assessed is automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level.
DoD has defined the roles as organizational personnel with physical and environmental protection responsibilities.
Automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level
| PE-1 |
| PE-1 (a) (1) |
| CCI-000904 |
| High |
Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low DoDI 5200.08 and DoD 5200.08-R meet the requirement for Physical and Environmental Policy and procedures.
DoD Components are automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered by the DoD level policies, DoDI 5200.08 and DoD 5200.08-R.
Automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level
| PE-1 |
| PE-1 (a) (1) |
| CCI-000905 |
| High |
Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low DoD Components are automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered by the DoD level policy, DoDD 5200.08 and DoD 5200.08-R
DoD has defined the personnel or roles as organizational personnel with physical and environmental protection responsibilities.
Automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level
| PE-1 |
| PE-1 (a) (2) |
| CCI-000908 |
| High |
Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low
| DoD Components are automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered by the DoD level policies, DoDI 5200.08 and DoD 5200.08-R. |
| Automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level |
| PE-1 |
| PE-1 (a) (2) |
| CCI-000909 |
| High |
Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low DoD Components are automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered by the DoD level policy, DoDD 5200.08 and DoD 5200.08-R
DoD has defined the personnel or roles as organizational personnel with physical and environmental protection responsibilities.
Automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level
| PE-1 |
| PE-1 (b) (1) |
| CCI-000907 |
| High |
Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low The organization being inspected/assessed is automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level.
DoD has defined the frequency reviewed annually - updated as appropriate but at least within 10 years of date of issuance.
Automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level
| PE-1 |
| PE-1 (b) (1) |
| CCI-000906 |
| High |
Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low DoDI 5200.08 and DoD 5200.08-R meet the requirement for Physical and Environmental Policy and procedures.
DoD Components are automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered by the DoD level policies, DoDI 5200.08 and DoD 5200.08-R.
DoD has defined the frequency reviewed annually - updated as appropriate but at least within 10 years of date of issuance.
Automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level
| PE-1 |
| PE-1 (b) (2) |
| CCI-000911 |
| High |
Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low The organization being inspected/assessed is automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level.
DoD has defined the frequency reviewed annually - updated as appropriate.
Automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level
| PE-1 |
| PE-1 (b) (2) |
| CCI-000910 |
| High |
Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low DoD Components are automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered by the DoD level policies, DoDI 5200.08 and DoD 5200.08-R.
DoD has defined the frequency reviewed annually - updated as appropriate.
Automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level
| PE-10 |
| PE-10 (a) |
| CCI-000956 |
High Moderate The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines documentation of the capability to shut off the power to facilities or areas within facilities containing concentrations of information system resources (e.g., datacenters, server rooms, mainframe computer rooms) in emergency situations.
The purpose is to validate the organization has provided the capability of shutting off power in emergency situations.
Section 4.2
| PE-10 |
| PE-10 (b) |
| CCI-000957 |
High
The organization conducting the inspection/assessment will physically inspect emergency shutoff switches or devices for placement to validate the organization has installed the emergency shutoff switches or devices near more than one egress point of the IT area and ensure it is labeled and protected by a cover to prevent accidental shut-off to facilitate safe and easy access for personnel.
DoD has defined the location as near more than one egress point of the IT area and ensure it is labeled and protected by a cover to prevent accidental shut-off.
Section 4.2
| PE-10 |
| PE-10 (b) |
| CCI-000958 |
High
The organization being inspected/assessed is automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level.
DoD has defined the location as near more than one egress point of the IT area and ensures it is labeled and protected by a cover to prevent accidental shut-off.
Automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level
| PE-10 |
| PE-10 (c) |
| CCI-000959 |
High
The organization conducting the inspection/assessment will ensure that the inspected organization has protected emergency power shutoff capability.
DoD has defined the location as near more than one egress point of the IT area and ensures it is labeled and protected by a cover to prevent accidental shut-off.
Section 4.2
| PE-11 |
| PE-11 |
| CCI-002955 |
High
| The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines documentation identifying the capacity of the implemented uninterruptible power supply, documentation identifying the power requirements of the system, and documentation identifying the contingency plan in the event of primary power source loss to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed provides uninterruptible power supply with sufficient capacity to support orderly shutdown of the system or transition the system to long-term alternate power in the event of a primary power source loss. |
| Section 4.3 |
| PE-11 (1) |
| PE-11 (1) |
| CCI-000961 |
| High |
| The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the list of physical IT assets within the boundary of the information system that require a long term alternate power supply. Physically inspect a sample from the list to ensure that long term power supply capability supporting minimal operational capability has been provided. |
| The system is not considered a HIGH level. Therefore, this AP is not applicable. |
| PE-11 (2) |
| PE-11 (2) (a) |
| CCI-002956 |
| blank |
| blank |
| blank |
| The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines documentation identifying the implemented alternate power supply to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed implements a long-term alternate power supply for the information system that is self-contained. |
| NIST has not allocated this AP. Therefore, this AP is not applicable. |
| PE-11 (2) |
| PE-11 (2) (b) |
| CCI-002957 |
| blank |
| blank |
| blank |
| The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines documentation identifying the implemented alternate power supply to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed implements a long-term alternate power supply for the information system that is not reliant on external power generation. |
| NIST has not allocated this AP. Therefore, this AP is not applicable. |
| PE-11 (2) |
| PE-11 (2) (c ) |
| CCI-002958 |
| blank |
| blank |
| blank |
| The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines documentation identifying the implemented alternate power supply to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed implements a long-term alternate power supply for the information system that is capable of maintaining minimally required operational capability or full operational capability in the event of an extended loss of the primary power source. |
| NIST has not allocated this AP. Therefore, this AP is not applicable. |
| PE-12 |
| PE-12 |
| CCI-000963 |
High
Low
| The organization conducting the inspection/assessment conducts visual inspections and interviews physical security personnel to validate the organization is in compliance with established OSHA requirements by employing and maintaining emergency lighting for the information system, the emergency lighting activates in the event of a power outage or disruption, and it covers emergency exits and evacuation routes within the facility |
| Section 4.4 |
| PE-12 (1) |
| PE-12 (1) |
| CCI-002959 |
| blank |
| blank |
| blank |
| The organization conducting the inspection/assessment inspects areas within the facility supporting essential missions to ensure emergency lighting is implemented. |
| NIST has not allocated this AP. Therefore, this AP is not applicable. |
| PE-12 (1) |
| PE-12 (1) |
| CCI-002960 |
| blank |
| blank |
| blank |
| The organization conducting the inspection/assessment inspects areas within the facility supporting essential business functions to ensure emergency lighting is implemented. |
| NIST has not allocated this AP. Therefore, this AP is not applicable. |
| PE-13 |
| PE-13 |
| CCI-000965 |
High
Low
| The organization conducting the inspection/assessment will conduct visual observation and interview organizational personnel with responsibilities for fire detection and suppression devices/systems. The purpose of the reviews and interviews is to validate the fire suppression and detection devices/systems for the information system are supported by an independent energy source. |
| Section 5.1 |
| PE-13 (1) |
| PE-13 (1) |
| CCI-002961 |
| High |
| The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the documented evidence of fire detection devices/systems to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed employs fire detection devices/systems for the information system that activate automatically. |
| The system is not considered a HIGH level. Therefore, this AP is not applicable. |
| PE-13 (1) |
| PE-13 (1) |
| CCI-002962 |
| High |
| The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the documented evidence of fire detection devices/systems to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed employs fire detection devices/systems for the information system that automatically activate to notify personnel or roles defined in PE-13 (1), CCI 2963 and emergency responders defined in PE-13 (1), CCI 2964 in the event of a fire. |
| The system is not considered a HIGH level. Therefore, this AP is not applicable. |
| PE-13 (1) |
| PE-13 (1) |
| CCI-002963 |
| High |
| The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the documented personnel or roles to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed defines the personnel or roles to be notified in the event of a fire. |
DoD has determined the personnel or roles are not appropriate to define at the Enterprise level.
The system is not considered a HIGH level. Therefore, this AP is not applicable.
| PE-13 (1) |
| PE-13 (1) |
| CCI-002964 |
| High |
| The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the documented emergency responders to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed defines the emergency responders to be notified in the event of a fire. |
DoD has determined the emergency responders are not appropriate to define at the Enterprise level.
The system is not considered a HIGH level. Therefore, this AP is not applicable.
| PE-13 (2) |
| PE-13 (2) |
| CCI-002965 |
| High |
| The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the documented evidence of fire detection devices/systems to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed employs fire suppression devices/systems for the information system that provide automatic notification of any activation to organization-defined personnel or roles and organization defined emergency responders. |
| The system is not considered a HIGH level. Therefore, this AP is not applicable. |
| PE-13 (2) |
| PE-13 (2) |
| CCI-002966 |
| High |
| The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the documented personnel or roles to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed defines the personnel or roles to be automatically notified of any activation of fire suppression devices/systems for the information system. |
DoD has determined the personnel or roles are not appropriate to define at the Enterprise level.
The system is not considered a HIGH level. Therefore, this AP is not applicable.
| PE-13 (2) |
| PE-13 (2) |
| CCI-002967 |
| High |
| The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the documented emergency responders to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed defines the emergency responders to be automatically notified of any activation of fire suppression devices/systems for the information system. |
DoD has determined the emergency responders are not appropriate to define at the Enterprise level.
The system is not considered a HIGH level. Therefore, this AP is not applicable.
| PE-13 (3) |
| PE-13 (3) |
| CCI-000968 |
High
| The organization conducting the inspection/assessment conducts visual inspections and interviews physical security/safety personnel to validate the organization has installed and implemented an automatic fire suppression capability which is operational during those times the facility is not staffed. |
| Section 5.1 |
| PE-13 (4) |
| PE-13 (4) |
| CCI-002968 |
| High |
| The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the record of inspections to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed implements a process to undergo fire protection inspections by authorized and qualified inspectors annually. |
DoD has defined the frequency as annually.
The system is not considered a HIGH level. Therefore, this AP is not applicable.
| PE-13 (4) |
| PE-13 (4) |
| CCI-002970 |
| High |
| The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines past facility fire protection inspection reports and inspects the facility to ensure all deficiencies identified are resolved in 60 days. |
DoD has defined the time period as 60 days.
The system is not considered a HIGH level. Therefore, this AP is not applicable.
| PE-13 (4) |
| PE-13 (4) |
| CCI-002969 |
| High |
| The organization being inspected/assessed is automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level. |
DoD has defined the frequency as annually.
Automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level
| PE-13 (4) |
| PE-13 (4) |
| CCI-002971 |
| High |
| The organization being inspected/assessed is automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level. |
DoD has defined the time period as 60 days.
Automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level
| PE-14 (1) |
| PE-14 (1) |
| CCI-000975 |
| blank |
| blank |
| blank |
| The organization conducting the inspection/assessment conducts visual inspections and interviews personnel responsible for maintaining automatic temperature and humidity controls to validate the organization is employing automatic temperature and humidity controls for the information system to prevent fluctuations potentially harmful to the information system. |
| NIST has not allocated this AP. Therefore, this AP is not applicable. |
| PE-14 (2) |
| PE-14 (2) |
| CCI-000976 |
| blank |
| blank |
| blank |
| The organization conducting the inspection/assessment conducts visual inspections and interviews personnel responsible for maintaining automatic temperature and humidity controls to validate the inspected organization is employing automatic temperature and humidity controls that provide an alarm or notification of changes potentially harmful to personnel or equipment. |
| NIST has not allocated this AP. Therefore, this AP is not applicable. |
| PE-14 |
| PE-14 (a) |
| CCI-000971 |
High
Low The organization conducting the inspection/assessment reviews temperature and humidity controls to validate that they are set within DoD specified guidelines.
DoD has defined the acceptable levels as for commercial grade information systems: 64.4 – 80.6 degrees F; 45% – 60% Relative Humidity; Dew Point 41.9 ° – 59°F; measured at the air intake inlet of the IT equipment casing; for other systems, levels within manufacturer specifications.
Section 5.2
| PE-14 |
| PE-14 (a) |
| CCI-000972 |
High
Low The organization being inspected/assessed is automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level.
DoD has defined the acceptable levels as for commercial grade information systems: 64.4 – 80.6 degrees F; 45% – 60% Relative Humidity; Dew Point 41.9 ° – 59°F; measured at the air intake inlet of the IT equipment casing; for other systems, levels within manufacturer specifications.
Automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level
| PE-14 |
| PE-14 (b) |
| CCI-000973 |
High
Low The organization conducting the inspection/assessment will visually observe the inspected organization's independent monitoring device, obtain and examine audit logs, and interview physical security/safety personnel to validate the inspected organization monitors temperature and humidity levels continuously unless manufacturer specifications allow for a wide enough tolerance that control is not required.
DoD has defined the frequency as continuously unless manufacturer specifications allow for a wide enough tolerance that control is not required.
Section 5.2
| PE-14 |
| PE-14 (b) |
| CCI-000974 |
High
Low The organization being inspected/assessed is automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level.
DoD has defined the frequency as continuously unless manufacturer specifications allow for a wide enough tolerance that control is not required.
Automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level
| PE-15 |
| PE-15 |
| CCI-000977 |
High
Low
| The organization conducting the inspection/assessment will inspect the master shutoff valves to ensure they are installed and accessible. |
| Section 5.3 |
| PE-15 |
| PE-15 |
| CCI-000978 |
High
Low
| The organization conducting the inspection/assessment will visually inspect master shutoff valve inspection documentation (e.g., inspection form, tag attached to valve). |
| Section 5.3 |
| PE-15 |
| PE-15 |
| CCI-000979 |
High
Low
| The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines list of key personnel with knowledge of location and activation procedures for master shutoff valves and any other relevant documents or records. Interview key personnel from the list to determine if identified key personnel within the organization have knowledge of the master shutoff valves. |
| Section 5.3 |
| PE-15 (1) |
| PE-15 (1) |
| CCI-002972 |
| High |
| The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines documentation identifying water detection mechanisms to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed implements automated mechanisms to detect the presence of water in the vicinity of the information system and alerts personnel or roles defined in PE-15 (1), CCI 2973. |
| The system is not considered a HIGH level. Therefore, this AP is not applicable. |
| PE-15 (1) |
| PE-15 (1) |
| CCI-002973 |
| High |
| The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the documented personnel or roles to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed defines the personnel or roles to be alerted when automated mechanisms detect the presence of water in the vicinity of the information system. |
DoD has determined the personnel or roles are not appropriate to define at the Enterprise level.
The system is not considered a HIGH level. Therefore, this AP is not applicable.
| PE-16 |
| PE-16 |
| CCI-000981 |
| High |
Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines records authorizing all system components entering and exiting the facility.
DoD has defined the types of information system components as all system components.
Section 6.0
| PE-16 |
| PE-16 |
| CCI-000982 |
| High |
Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines records monitoring all system components entering and exiting the facility.
DoD has defined the types of information system components as all system components.
Section 6.0
| PE-16 |
| PE-16 |
| CCI-000983 |
| High |
Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the physical and environmental protection plan to determine if controls have been documented for all system components entering and exiting the facility and visually inspects the controls (e.g., logs, scans, etc.) to ensure implementation.
DoD has defined the types of information system components as all system components.
Section 6.0
| PE-16 |
| PE-16 |
| CCI-000984 |
| High |
Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines records of physical entry and exit events to the facility. The purpose of the reviews is to ensure the organization is maintaining detailed and accurate records of information system components that enter and exit the facility.
If the organization is following GRS 18, Section 12 they are automatically compliant.
Section 6.0
| PE-16 |
| PE-16 |
| CCI-002974 |
| High |
Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low The organization being inspected/assessed is automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level.
DoD has defined the types of information system components as all system components.
Automatically compliant with this CCI because they are covered at the DoD level
| PE-17 |
| PE-17 (a) |
| CCI-000985 |
| High |
Moderate High Moderate High Moderate
| The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the alternate work site policy of the organization being inspected/assessed to ensure the organization implements security controls defined in PE-17, CCI 2975 at alternate work sites. |
| Section 7.0 |
| PE-17 |
| PE-17 (a) |
| CCI-002975 |
| High |
Moderate High Moderate High Moderate The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the documented security controls to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed defines security controls to employ at alternate work sites, which must include all applicable building and safety codes for the information system's environment.
DoD has determined the security controls are not appropriate to define at the Enterprise level, but must include all applicable building and safety codes for the information system's environment.
Section 7.0
| PE-17 |
| PE-17 (b) |
| CCI-000987 |
| High |
Moderate High Moderate High Moderate The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines:
1. The procedures for assessing the effectiveness of alternate work site security controls.
2. The audit records of assessments they have conducted of security controls effectiveness for alternate work sites.
Section 7.0
| PE-17 |
| PE-17 (c) |
| CCI-000988 |
| High |
Moderate High Moderate High Moderate
| The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines contact information for appropriate security personnel to ensure its accuracy and dissemination. |
| Section 7.0 |
| PE-18 |
| PE-18 |
| CCI-000989 |
| High |
| The organization conducting the inspection/assessment reviews the physical and environmental protection policy developed in PE-1, CCI 000904 to validate that the systems have been positioned according to the environmental policy. |
| The system is not considered a HIGH level. Therefore, this AP is not applicable. |
| PE-18 |
| PE-18 |
| CCI-000991 |
| High |
| The organization conducting the inspection/assessment reviews the physical and environmental protection policy developed in PE-1, CCI 000904 to validate that the systems have been positioned according to the environmental policy. |
| The system is not considered a HIGH level. Therefore, this AP is not applicable. |
| PE-18 |
| PE-18 |
| CCI-002976 |
| High |
| The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the documented physical and environmental hazards to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed defines physical and environmental hazards that could cause potential damage to information system components within the facility. |
DoD has determined the physical and environmental hazards are not appropriate to define at the Enterprise level.
The system is not considered a HIGH level. Therefore, this AP is not applicable.
| PE-18 (1) |
| PE-18 (1) |
| CCI-002977 |
| blank |
| blank |
| blank |
| The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the documented rationale to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed plans the location or site of the facility where the information system resides with regard to physical and environmental hazards. |
| NIST has not allocated this AP. Therefore, this AP is not applicable. |
| PE-18 (1) |
| PE-18 (1) |
| CCI-002978 |
| blank |
| blank |
| blank |
| The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the physical and environmental risk assessment to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed considers the physical and environmental hazards in its risk mitigation strategy for existing facilities. |
| NIST has not allocated this AP. Therefore, this AP is not applicable. |
| PE-19 |
| PE-19 |
| CCI-000993 |
| blank |
| blank |
| blank |
| The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the TEMPEST countermeasures review and inspects the information system to ensure those countermeasures have been implemented. |
| NIST has not allocated this AP. Therefore, this AP is not applicable. |
| PE-19 (1) |
| PE-19 (1) |
| CCI-000994 |
| blank |
| blank |
| blank |
| The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the TEMPEST countermeasures review and inspects the information system to ensure those countermeasures have been implemented. |
| NIST has not allocated this AP. Therefore, this AP is not applicable. |
| PE-2 (1) |
| PE-2 (1) |
| CCI-000916 |
| blank |
| blank |
| blank |
| The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines: |
1. The list of roles or positions that have access to the facility where the information system resides.
2. The list of personnel assigned to those roles Recommended:
3. Access logs to verify access to the facility was authorized based on the appropriate roles and positions NIST has not allocated this AP. Therefore, this AP is not applicable.
| PE-2 (2) |
| PE-2 (2) |
| CCI-000917 |
| blank |
| blank |
| blank |
| The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the inspected organization's physical security policy for requirements and implementation guidance to have two forms of identification defined in PE-2 (2), CCI 2912 and physical access control logs or records; and any other relevant documents or records to validate compliance. |
| NIST has not allocated this AP. Therefore, this AP is not applicable. |
| PE-2 (2) |
| PE-2 (2) |
| CCI-002912 |
| blank |
| blank |
| blank |
| The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the documented a list of acceptable forms of identification to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed defines a list of acceptable forms of identification for visitor access to the facility where the information system resides. |
DoD has determined the list of acceptable forms of identification are not appropriate to define at the Enterprise level.
NIST has not allocated this AP. Therefore, this AP is not applicable.
| PE-2 (3) |
| PE-2 (3) |
| CCI-002913 |
| blank |
| blank |
| blank |
| The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the physical security policy to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed has selected one or more of the physical security requirements that must be met before unescorted access to the facility where the information system resides is granted |
| NIST has not allocated this AP. Therefore, this AP is not applicable. |
| PE-2 (3) |
| PE-2 (3) |
| CCI-002914 |
| blank |
| blank |
| blank |
| The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the documented credentials to ensure the organization being inspected/assessed defines the credentials required for personnel to have unescorted access to the facility where the information system resides. |
DoD has determined the credentials are not appropriate to define at the Enterprise level.
NIST has not allocated this AP. Therefore, this AP is not applicable.
| PE-2 |
| PE-2 (a) |
| CCI-000912 |
| High |
Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the list of personnel with authorized access to facilities where information systems reside to ensure it is current within every 90 days.
The review process should also determine if the organization has identified and officially designated its publicly accessible areas where access authorization is not required.
DoD has defined the frequency as every 90 days.
Enclosure 1
| PE-2 |
| PE-2 (a) |
| CCI-002910 |
| High |
Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low
| The organization conducting the inspection/assessment obtains and examines the list of individuals currently authorized to access the facility where the information system resides and ensures it is formally approved. |
| Enclosure 1 |
| PE-2 |
| PE-2 (a) |
| CCI-002911 |
| High |
Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .