Atch 4 PPQ updated.doc
DOC document 63 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA561322Q0013
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a contract to clean household appliances at an Air Force base in Germany. The solicitation is for a firm fixed-price contract to clean appliances including removing mold, mildew and debris. Responses are requested within four business days of receipt and are to be sent to two contracting officers. The questionnaire asks the respondent to rate the past performance of the contractor on a scale of exceptional to unsatisfactory for various criteria including quality control, timeliness, responsiveness and overall performance. It also requests the number of appliances serviced and whether quality standards were followed under the referenced contract. This will be used to evaluate contractors for award of the follow-on contract to provide the same appliance cleaning services.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-Proposal Slides Appliances_11Aug22.pptx | PPTX presentation | |
| Conformed 11Aug2022 Solicitation Amendment - FA561322Q00130001.pdf | ||
| Updated Solicitation Amendment FA561322Q00130001 SF 30.pdf | ||
| Amendment for FA561322Q0013.pdf | ||
| Atch 5 EMS Flyer.pdf | ||
| Updat Sol 22Q0013 01Aug2022.pdf | ||
| Atch 3 Past Exp Reference Sheet.doc | DOC document | |
| Atch 4 PPQ.doc | DOC document | |
| Atch 1 PWS revised dated 24 Jun2022.pdf | ||
| Atch 2 Workload Estimates.pdf | ||
| COMBO Household Appliances.pdf |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 4
FA5613-22-Q-0013/0001
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
This Acquisition is for the Cleaning of the U.S. Government Household Appliances at Einsiedlerhof Air Station.
A.
GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name:
Address:
Telephone Number:
Email Address:
Point of Contact:
Project Title or Brief Description of Work*:
Contract Number*:
Contract Amount:
Contract Period or Dates of Performance*:
Contractor performed as the ( Prime Contractor ( Sub-Contractor ( Key Personnel.
To be completed by the respondent and returned directly to the contracting office.
* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 5 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
B.
RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent:
Name of Respondent:
Title:
Title:
Telephone Number:
Telephone Number:
Email Address:
Email Address:
C. RETURN COMPLETED SURVEY FORM WITHIN 4 WORKING DAYS AFTER RECEIPT TO:
Anja Steil/Contract Specialist Shannon Hochmuth/Contracting Officer
700 CONS/PKA
and
700 CONS/PKA
anja.steil.de@ramstein.af.mil shannon.hochmuth@us.af.mil +49-631-536-7587 or DSN 489-7587 +49-631-536- 3015 or DSN 489-3015
CONTRACTOR’S NAME:
CONTRACT NUMBER:
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| Exceptional |
| Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Neutral |
Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to your organization’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to your organization’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.
CONTRACTOR’S NAME:
CONTRACT NUMBER:
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
| The contractor: |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| 1. |
| Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
| 2. |
| Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period. |
| 3. |
| Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements. |
| 4. |
| Followed Government accepted Quality Control Plan. |
| 5. |
| Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements. |
| 6. |
| Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures. |
| 7. |
| Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies. |
| 8. |
| Identified problems as they occurred. |
| 9. |
| Suggested alternative approaches to problems. |
| 10. |
| Displayed initiative to solve problems. |
| 11. |
| Provided timely resolution of defects. |
| 12. |
| Was responsive to contract changes. |
| 13. |
| Provided adequate project supervision. |
| 14. |
| Complied with environmental requirements. |
| 15. |
| Did contractor consistently respond within the required time frames? |
| 16. |
| Did contractor assign personnel with required skills to accomplish the work? |
| 17. |
| Cooperated with Government personnel after award? |
| 18. |
| How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? |
| 19. |
| How many household appliances have been serviced under this contract? |
| Qty: |
| 20. |
| Did the contractor follow the quality standards, as defined in the Performance Work Statement (PWS). |
| YES /NO |
| 21 |
| Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? |
If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”
YES / NO
| 22. |
| For US Government contracts only: Is the contractor rated in CPARS? |
| YES / NO |
| 23. |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” |
| YES / NO |
Remarks:
For Official Use Only
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .