Amendment 1 - Attachment 2 FA560626QA002 Questions and Answers.pdf
PDF 233 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Group Exercise Instructor
- Solicitation number
- FA560626QA002
About this file
This document is a Questions and Government Responses file for a fitness group exercise contract recompete located in Germany. The contract (previous number FA560621P0012) will be a near contract for fitness classes, with 100% of group exercise classes to be delivered physically on-site at a military base. Key requirements include:
Contractors must provide instructors who are physically present at the base, with the government allowing subcontracting or local instructor hiring as long as contract requirements are met. The Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) is a full-time military member, and all instructors must be on-site in the Fitness Center to teach classes. The procurement will use a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) evaluation method, with pricing to be submitted per Contract Line Item Number (CLIN). The solicitation emphasizes on-site presence and direct management of fitness class operations by the contractor.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Questions Government Response
1. Is this is a brand new contract OR if there is (was) an incumbent performing these services
This requirement is a recompete of a contract that expired 30 November 2025,. The previous contract number is
FA560621P0012
2. Are the group exercise classes expected to be delivered physically on-site in Germany?
Yes, 100% of the classes.
3. If so, is the contractor required to provide instructors who will be physically present at the base?
Yes, for 100% of the classes.
4. Or is the intention to subcontract or hire local instructors in Germany under our management?
Yes, as long as the Contract is fulfilled
5. Can the Government confirm if this is a follow-on contract? If so, can you provide the contract number for the previous/current contract?
This will be a near Contract.
6. If an incumbent doing this work, is the incumbent contractor performing all requirements in the PWS?
They are responsible for assuring all requirements in the PWS are met.
7. The PWS requires offerors provide a Contract Manager who is available on site working in an hourly capacity and will be responsible for day to day operations. Does this mean the Government wants and requires someone on site working in an hourly capacity? If required, please confirm if this Contract Manager is a Full Time Equivalent employee?
Yes, the COR is a full time militray member.
8. If a Contract Manager is required on site, how would the Government like us to price this? For example, should we add the hourly rate on top of our class rates?
we are asking for the total of the CLIN as stated in the Solicitation. we are only asking for the overall pricing per CLIN and this is an LPTA evaluation.
9. Is an off-site remote Contract Manager sufficient for managing this contract?
All instructors needs to be in the Fitness Center to teach the classes.
10. The old PWS 2.5 and the new PWS has been reworded to require on site versus available. Was the purpose for this to assure a Full Time Employee is at the site for day to day operations?
Yes, we request that all our contractors teach on-site.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .