Past Performance Survey.doc
DOC document 142 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Spangdahlem Static Display Restoration
- Solicitation number
- FA5606-09-R-0035
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Statement of Work 11Sep09.docx | DOCX document | |
| Performance Plan 11Sep09.doc | DOC document | |
| Summary_of_Changes_11Sep09.docx | DOCX document | |
| Performance Plan 04Sep09.doc | DOC document | |
| Summary of Changes 04Sep09.docx | DOCX document | |
| Statement of Work 04Sep09.docx | DOCX document | |
| Summary of Changes.docx | DOCX document | |
| Statement of Work dtd 03Sep09.docx | DOCX document | |
| NEW Performance Plan.doc | DOC document | |
| AF IMT 3952.pdf | ||
| Performance Plan.doc | DOC document | |
| Statement of Work.docx | DOCX document | |
| FBO Pictures.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 3
FA5606-09-R-0035
SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation
TO:
You have been identified as a point of contact for a past and/or present performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached survey form. This firm is currently being considered for a Static Display Aircraft Restoration and Maintenance contract at Spangdahlem Air Base, Germany.
Your prompt attention to this survey will be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions concerning this request, please contact Tamerra Hite at (49) or (0) 6565619543 or by email at tamerra.hite@spangdahlem.af.mil. Thank you.
A.
GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name:
Address:
Telephone Number:
Fax Number:
Point of Contact:
Project Title or Brief Description of Work:
| Contract Number Provided by Offeror: |
| ____________________ |
| Dollar Amount |
| _________________* |
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror:
*Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 5 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
Contractor performed as the ( Prime Contractor ( Sub-Contractor ( Key Personnel.
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent:
Title:
Address:
Telephone Number:
Fax Number:
Email Address:
C. Instructions on how to forward questionnaire. When you have completed your portion of this questionnaire you then need to forward to the 52nd Contracting Squadron, attention Ms. Tamerra Hite, before the Offer Due Date and Time. It is preferred that you forward this via electronic means to tamerra.hite@spangdahlem.af.mil. It is advised that you use return receipt. The 52nd Contracting Squadron should receive this completed questionnaire via electronic means directly from the Reference. Copies will also be accepted via Fax at (49) or (0) 6565619106
D.
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 6 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 1 OR 2.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Marginal |
| None |
| Satisfactory |
| Very Good |
| Exceptional |
| Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective. |
| Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective. |
| No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive. |
| Performance met contract requirements. There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. |
| Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit. There were a few minor problems, which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner. |
| Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the government’s benefit. Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner |
QUALITY OF SERVICE
a. Ability to meet minimum quality standards specific for performance
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| b. Ability to effectively control the quality of services provided |
| 1 |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| c. Compliance with contractual terms and conditions |
| 1 |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| d. Overall rating of contractor’s quality of service |
| 1 |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE
a. Ability to meet specific response time and scheduled time-frames for completion of specific tasks
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| b. Responsiveness/timeliness for providing administrative reports/documents required by the contract |
| 1 |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| c. Overall rating of contractor’s responsiveness/timeliness |
| 1 |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
BUSINESS RELATIONS
a. Ability to identify problems and potential problems, and promptly notify the Contracting Officer
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| b. Ability to correct problems and prevent or mitigate potential problems in a timely manner |
| 1 |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| c. Willingness to improve and correct noncompliance issues or concerns |
| 1 |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| d. Ability to use effective approaches and provide technical expertise and resources to solve contract problems |
| 1 |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| e. Extent to which the contractor has demonstrated reasonable and cooperative behavior |
| 1 |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| f. Working relationship with the Contracting Officer, quality assurance personnel, and customers |
| 1 |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| g. Flexibility in satisfying the requirements of its customers |
| 1 |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| h. Extent to which the contractor provided prompt and courteous service when responding to customer complaints |
| 1 |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| i. Overall rating of customer satisfaction |
| 1 |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| j. Overall rating of business relations |
| 1 |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL
a. Ability to select and retain cooperative and effective key personnel, such as contract manager and quality control personnel
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
b. Extent key personnel were knowledgeable about contractual requirements
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
c. Ability to meet appropriate staffing levels with qualified personnel in order to provide required services
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
d. Ability to effectively manage subcontractors
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
e. Overall rating of contractor’s management of key personnel
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL, SAFETY, HEALTH, AND SECURITY REQUIREMENTS
| YES |
| NO |
a. Has the contractor ever received Notices of Violations for noncompliance with environmental laws or regulations?
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
b Compliance with environmental requirements
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
c. Compliance with safety requirements
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| d. Compliance with health requirements |
| 1 |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| e. Compliance with security requirements |
| 1 |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
CONTRACTUAL CONSIDERATIONS
| YES |
| NO |
| a. Has an election ever been made not to exercise an option or continue relations because of contractor’s poor performance? |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
| b. Has a Contract Discrepancy Report ever been issued? |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
| c. Has a cure notice or show cause notice ever been issued? |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
d. Extent to which the contractor provided reliable supportable cost estimates or proposals
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| e. Overall rating of contractor’s performance under this contract |
| 1 |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| YES |
| NO |
| f. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
Remarks:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .