RFP_Attachment_1_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

For Official Use Only When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

Attachment 1: Past Performance Questionnaire – Amendment 5

For Official Use Only Page 1 of 7

The 48th Contracting Squadron, RAF Lakenheath, United Kingdom is in the process of competitively selecting a source for UK Wide Grounds Maintenance Services.

The contractor shall provide non-personal services to include all personnel, equipment, tools, and supervision to ensure grounds maintenance for eleven locations, geographically separated across the United Kingdom. This shall include but is not limited to; mowing, edging, trimming and weed control; remove debris/police grounds; dead animals and leaf removal; lawn conditioning; fertilization, and aeration; pest control; lawn renovation; prune shrub, hedges and other plants; maintaining semi-improved grounds; mow, and trim; maintaining perimeter fence line;

maintain Bird Area Strike Hazard (BASH)/ SSSI (Site of Special Scientific Interest) areas; maintain un-improved grounds; maintain surface drainage ditches; perform snow/ice removal and ice control, and road sweeping.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past performance on contracts or other work efforts which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts or work efforts.

Our areas of interest regarding the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. In order to meet the acquisition milestones, we request your written response by 1600 hours British Summer Time, 17 October 2018.

This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data prior to the start of any negotiations.

To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out electronically and e-mailed to kim.baker.3.gb@us.af.mil and maria.calimlim@us.af.mil. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official source selection records.

Your assistance is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

KAZZANDRA DEXTER, USAF, CIV

Contracting Officer, 48th Contracting Squadron

1 Attachement Past Performance Questionnaire http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/02.htm#P10_602 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/03.htm#P41_5836 mailto:kim.baker.3.gb@us.af.mil mailto:maria.calimlim@us.af.mil

Attachment 1: Past Performance Questionnaire – Amendment 5

For Official Use Only Page 2 of 7

Section 1: Contract Identif ication

A. Contractor (Company/Division):

B. Contractor Cage Code:

C. Contract Number:

D. Contract Type (e.g., (Firm Fixed Price (FFP), Fixed Price Incentive (Firm Target) (FPIF), Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF), Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF), etc.):

E. Program Title:

F. Brief Program Description:

G. Program Phase (e.g., Engineering & Manufacturing Development (EMD)):

H. Period of Performance

1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

3. Reason for difference (if applicable):

I. Contract Dollar Value

1. Original maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $/£

2. Current maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $/£

3. Reasons for difference between original and current contract dollar value (if applicable):

J. Description of work performed:

K. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No

L. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor ☐ Key Personnel

Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last three (3) years, please complete separate Past Performance Questionnaire forms for those contracts as well.

Section 2: Customer or Agency Identif ication

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/02.htm#P10_602 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/03.htm#P41_5836

For Official Use Only Page 3 of 7

C. Geographic description of work performed under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands, please state location):

Section 3: Respondent Identif ication

A. Respondent’s name:

B. Respondent’s title:

C. Respondent’s phone/fax number/e-mail address:

D. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:

E. Other suggested points of contact:

Section 4: Performance Information

In the table below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided.

Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

Code Performance Rating

E EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the

Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.

For Official Use Only Page 4 of 7

The Contractor: E V S M U N/A

1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

2. Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.

3. Demonstrated the ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.

4. Provided a sufficient number of qualified personnel to meet contract requirements?

5. Followed approved quality control plan.

6. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

7. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.

8. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.

For Official Use Only Page 5 of 7

The Contractor: E V S M U N/A

9. Identified problems as they occurred.

10. Suggested alternative approaches to problems.

11. Displayed initiative to solve problems.

12. Met established mobilization plan.

13. Was responsive to contract changes.

14. Provided adequate project supervision.

15. Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.

16. Cooperated and communicated with government/company personnel after award.

17. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance on this contract?

For Official Use Only Page 6 of 7

The Contractor: E V S M U N/A

18. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract?

If yes, explain.

EXPLANATION:

☐ Yes

☐ No

19. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain.

20. Has the contractor managed at least four (4) separate locations simultaneously?

21. Has the contractor performed services across multiple counties/regions simultaneously?

22. Has the contractor provided services for a minimum of 10,000 acres?

23. Has the contractor performed a full range of grounds maintenance services of the scope of the PWS (to include the management of subcontractors)?

24. Does the contractor use subcontractors? If yes, has the performance experienced any gaps in service or had any issues? Please state the issues (if applicable).

25. Are your services for grounds maintenance services performed within the European Union?

26. Is the contract annual dollar value worth a minimum of $2 million dollars. If no, please state the estimated value.

For Official Use Only Page 7 of 7

The Contractor: E V S M U N/A

27. Has the contractor displayed a high turnover of employees or displayed signs of employee retention issues?

EXPLANATION

Additional remarks:

[click and pick the date]

Respondent’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

E-Mail to: kim.baker.3.gb@us.af.mil and maria.calimlim@us.af.mil.

http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/03.htm#P41_5836 mailto:kim.baker.3.gb@us.af.mil mailto:maria.calimlim@us.af.mil