Attch L-3 PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE - 10-R-7001.pdf

Solicitation No. FA5215-10-R-7001

ATTACHMENT L-3

THIS QUESTIONNAIRE IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE WHEN COMPLETED

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

RFP NO. FA5215-10-R-7001

EXERCISE PLANNER SUPPORT SERVICES FOR

13TH AIR FORCE, HICKAM AFB, HI

Please fax or email the completed questionnaire to:

Jocelyn McChesney COM: (808) 448-2941

15CONS/LGCZ DSN: 448-2941

90 G Street Fax: (808) 448-2911/12 Hickam AFB, HI 96853-5230 E-Mail: jocelyn.mcchesney@hickam.af.mil

1. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION************The Contractor Must Fill In This Section*******************

Contractor: ___________________________________ Prime or Subcontractor _____________________ (If Applicable) Cage Code contract was awarded to: ____________

Contract Number and Task Order(s): ___________________________________________________________

Description of Service: _______________________________________________________________________

Contract Type: _____________________________ Period of Performance _____________________

Contract Value at Award: _________________________ Current: _______________________________

Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____

Geographic description of services under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other commands): _________________________________________________________________________________

2. EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

a. Evaluator’s name/title: _____________________________________________________________________

b. Evaluator’s phone/fax number/email address: ________________________________________________

c. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract: ________________________________________

3. EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided. This scale is defined as follows:

EXCEPTIONAL: Performance meets contractual requirements and EXCEEDS MANY to the customer’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD: Performance meets contractual requirements and EXCEEDS SOME to the customer’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY: Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

MARGINAL: Performance DOES NOT MEET SOME contractual requirements. The contractual Performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only Marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

UNSATISFACTORY: Performance DOES NOT MEET MOST contractual requirements and recovery is Not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

NOT APPLICABLE: Performance is this area is not applicable to effort being assessed or answer is unknown.

E VG S M U NA

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT

PM1. Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage, and control the program)

PM2. Contractor was reasonable, flexible, and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)

PM3. Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations

PM4. Ability to effectively perform sub-contractor management PM5. Adherence to contract quality assurance requirements PM6. Effectiveness of material management (including Government Furnished Property or Equipment)

PM7. Effectiveness of acquisition/procurement management PM8. Timeliness/completeness/accuracy of submission of required reports and documentation

PM9. Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

PM10. Ability to work with government personnel during budget cuts and contract descope

PM11. Ability to meet the schedule or deliver early to the schedule on work activities or projects

PM12. Timeliness/completeness/accuracy of invoices PM13. Managed travel costs to ensure most economical travel arrangements were obtained to minimize expenses charged to the government

PERSONNEL

P1. Adequately provide a trained and certified workforce during transition, contract start date and during life of contract

P2. Maintained a workforce that possessed requisite technical knowledge and minimum education, skills, certifications (as required), and appropriate security clearance throughout the life of the contract

P3. Provided a stable work force with minimal personnel turnover that maintained project management continuity

TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

TP1. Ability to understand/comply with customer objectives and technical requirements

TP2. Identify and implement technical improvements or cost savings that benefit the government

TRANSITION

T1. Contractor successfully transitioned resources and personnel to assume work under new contract, continuity of services was maintained and seamless

T2. Effectiveness transitioning to a new contract without compromising mission support

COST

C1. Accuracy in forecasting contract costs C2. Ability to meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs C3. Ability to alert Government of unforeseen costs before they occur C4. Sufficiency and timeliness of cost reporting C5. Ability to accurately identify costs for all work activities or projects

a. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default of convenience or are they any pending terminations?

Yes____ Default____ Convenience_____ Pending Termination_____ No ___

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedule, etc.)

5. NARRATIVE SUMMARY

a. What were the contractor’s greatest strengths in the performance of the contract?

b. What were the contractor’s greatest weaknesses in the performance of the contract?

c. Has there been any security issues that may/may not have caused a security instance but raised a security concern with this contractor on this contract?

d. Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform on one of your critical and demanding programs?

e. Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance.

Evaluator’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!