AMD0001_replacement_pages.pdf
PDF 130 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA5209-16-T-1011
About this file
Amendment 0001 Replacement Pages
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| QA4_20161013.pdf | ||
| QA3_20161012.doc | DOC document | |
| FA520916T10110002.pdf | ||
| AMD0002_PWS_replacemet_page.pdf | ||
| AMD0002_Exhibits_replacemet_pages.pdf | ||
| QA2_20161005.pdf | ||
| QA1_20161003.pdf | ||
| FA5209T10110001.pdf | ||
| Precon_Minutes_20160928.pdf | ||
| 08._Atch3_PP_information.pdf | ||
| 06._Atch2_PPQ_Cvrltr.pdf | ||
| 05._Atch1_PWS.pdf | ||
| 02._NTO_20160913.pdf | ||
| 01._GovtPlcyLtr.pdf | ||
| 07._Atch2_Past_Performance_Quesionnaire.pdf | ||
| 04._Atch_Pricing_Schedule.pdf | ||
| 09._OF17_offerlabel.pdf | ||
| 03._SF1449_20160913.pdf |
Show all 18
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA5209-16-T-1011
Amendment 0001
(d) The evaluation of past performance information will take into account past performance regarding (i) predecessor companies, and/or (ii) subcontractors that will perform major aspects of the requirement when such information is relevant to this acquisition. Major aspects are identified in PWS paragraphs 1.2.3, 1.2.4, 1.2.7, 1.3, 1.4, and 1.7.
(e) If a teaming arrangement is contemplated, provide complete information as to the arrangement, including any relevant and recent past performance information on previous teaming arrangements with same partner. If this is a first time joint effort, each party to the arrangement must provide a list of past contracts of relevance.
(f) Subcontractor Consent: Past performance information pertaining to a subcontractor cannot be disclosed to the prime offeror without the subcontractor’s consent. Provide with the proposal a letter from each subcontractor that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement, consenting to the release of its past performance information to the prime contractor.
C. Documents submitted in response to this RFQ must be consistent with the following:
1. Requirements of the solicitation (CLINs and PWS) and government standards and regulations pertaining to the
PWS.
2. FAR 52.212-2, Evaluation – Commercial Items, of this solicitation.
3. If a Part in a proposal exceeds the specified page limit cited in the Part Content, the excessive pages will not be evaluated.
4. Format for proposal Parts I and III shall be as follows:
(a) Each written Part of the proposal shall be separately bound and labeled. Cover pages, Table of Contents, and Tabs will not be counted against the page limits. However, pages depicting tables, charts, graphs and figures will count toward the page limit. The number of copies of each part is specified in paragraph B, Specific Instructions, above.
(b) The proposals will be on 8 1/2” x 11” or A4 size paper.
(c) A page is defined as one face of a sheet of paper containing information. Two pages may be printed on one sheet of paper.
(d) All printing shall be single-spaced. Spacing characteristics are applicable to charts and graphs.
(e) Typing shall not be less than 10 pitch. Size of print is applicable to charts and graphs.
(f) Page margins shall be a minimum of 1 inch top, bottom, and each side.
(g) In addition to the paper copies specified for each Part, one electronic copy of each Part of the entire offer must be submitted. The electronic version of the proposal shall be submitted in a format readable by Microsoft Office 2007 which includes software programs such as WORD, EXCEL, or PowerPoint. For those pages of the proposal that cannot be submitted using Microsoft Office, such as the Standard Form 1449, offerors shall include those pages electronically using Adobe Acrobat portable document files (.pdf) format. The Price Part shall be submitted in spreadsheet format, such as EXCEL, and MS WORD for price narrative. The electronic version shall be submitted on a compact disc (CD). USB flash drives, floppy disks, and zip disks are not acceptable.
Indicate on each CD the Part number and title. The paper copies and electronic versions shall be identical in all respects. In the event there are any discrepancies between the paper copies and electronic copies, the paper copies take precedence and will be used for evaluation. Ensure the electronic documents stored on the CD can be opened.
Use separate files and folders to permit rapid location of all portions, including exhibits and attachments, if any.
1503675567U Stamp
Labor Day First Monday in September Columbus Day Second Monday in October Veterans Day 11 November Thanksgiving Day Fourth Thursday in November Christmas Day 25 December
Note: No Japanese holidays will be observed.
(End of Addenda)
52.212-2, Evaluation—Commercial Items (Oct 2014)
(a) The government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the government, price and other factors considered. The following factors will be used to evaluate offers:
(1) Past Performance
(2) Price
(b) Options. The government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options will not obligate the government to exercise the option(s).
(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, will result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.
Addendum to FAR 52.212-2, Evaluation - Commercial Items
The following is inserted as new paragraph (d) of the provision:
“(d) BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD: This is a competitive best value acquisition utilizing the Lowest Price with Acceptable Past Performance source selection in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Parts 12 and 15 and Air Force FAR Supplement (AFFARS) Mandatory Procedure (MP) 5315.3. By submission of its offer in accordance with the instructions provided in clause FAR 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors –Commercial Items, the offeror accedes to the terms of this model contract. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being determined unacceptable. Award will be made to the lowest Total Evaluated Price (TEP) offer that meets the acceptability standards for non-price factors. The evaluation process will include the following:
(1) Past Performance Factor. The government will evaluate recent and relevant performance information on all offerors based on (i) the references provided by the offeror (Sample is shown in Attachment 3), and (ii) any past performance information obtained from Past Performance Questionnaire (Attachment 2), and (iii) any data independently obtained by the government. If a reference identified by the offeror in accordance with 52.212- 1(m)B.3.(c), does not submit a Past Perforamnce Questionnaire, the government will follow up with the reference POC, but it is not responsible for the failure of a reference POC to provide a Past Perforamnce Questionnaire.
Past performance regarding predecessor companies of the offeror and/or subcontractors, and subcontractors that will perform major aspects as identified in PWS paragraphs 1.2.3 (Hazardous freight), 1.2.4 (Sensitive freight), 1.2.7 (Dual Driver Protective Service), 1.3 (Type of Vehicles), 1.4 (Operating Rules and Vehicle Safety for Movement of
Amendment 0001 file://Periwinkle/SAF_AQC_ORG/AQCP/5640%20-%20AFFARS/AFAC%20Working%20Folders%20--%20PM/far/FAR31.doc#b522121 assigned, the offeror cannot be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror will be determined to have an unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” will be considered “Acceptable.”
(2) Price Evaluation Factor. The government will rank all offers by TEP. The price evaluation will document the fairness and reasonableness of the TEP. The government reserves the right to perform price realism analysis.
Total Evaluated Price (TEP): A TEP will be computed for each offer in order to meet the requirements of FAR Parts 6 and 17. The price of a six-month extension authorized by 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services, will be added to the proposed price for each potential contract performance period.
The TEP is a two-part computation. First, the offeror’s total proposed price will be determined by multiplying the quantities identified in the Pricing Schedule (SF 1449, continuation of blocks 19 – 24) by the unit price for each CLIN to confirm the extended total amount for each CLIN; the sum of all extended amounts will be the offeror’s total proposed price. Second, the total proposed price (total amount for CLINs 0001 – 4001) plus the sum of Option to Extend Services clause 52.217-8 formula (shown below) will constitute the TEP.
The formula for the Option to Extend Services amount is as follows:
Base Year = CLIN Estimated Total Amount x 0.5* Option Year 1 = CLIN Estimated Total Amount x 0.5* Option Year 2 = CLIN Estimated Total Amount x 0.5* Option Year 3 = CLIN Estimated Total Amount x 0.5* Option Year 4 = CLIN Estimated Total Amount x 0.5*
Note: *0.5 is the multiplicative factor used to derive the 6 months quantity value.
Evaluating the Option CLINs does not obligate the government to exercise the Options.
(3) Offerors are cautioned to submit sufficient information and in the format specified in 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors – Commercial Items, of this solicitation. Offerors may be asked to clarify certain aspects of their proposals. Exchanges conducted to resolve minor or clerical errors will not constitute discussions and the contracting officer reserves the right to award a contract without the opportunity for proposal revision. The government intends to award a contract without discussions with respective offerors. The government, however, reserves the right to conduct discussions if deemed in its best interest.
(4) Award will be made to the lowest priced offer(s), based on TEP, that meets the acceptability standards for non-price factors.”
(End of Provision)
52.212-3 OFFEROR REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (APR 2016)
ALTERNATE I (OCT 2014)
The offeror shall complete only paragraphs (b) of this provision if the Offeror has completed the annual representations and certification electronically via the System for Award Management (SAM) Web site accessed through http://www.acquisition.gov. If the Offeror has not completed the annual representations and certifications electronically, the Offeror shall complete only paragraphs (e) through (r) of this provision.
(Paragraphs (c), (d), (f), (g), (i), and (k) are not applicable to this solicitation due to the non-applicability of acquisition at overseas.)
(a) Definitions. As used in this provision--
Amendment 0001
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .