Atch 2 PreCon Smy QA MACC.pdf
PDF 90 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA520524R0004
About this file
This document is a Summary of Questions and Answers for RFP No. FA52024R0004, which is an Indefinite-Delivery/Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) at Misawa Air Base, Japan. The key details are:
The RFP allows for past performance information (PPI) of less than $1,000,000 to be submitted, and there is no requirement for a specific percentage of completion for ongoing projects. Offerors are required to send out a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) to Points-of-Contact regardless of the availability of a Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) record. Offerors can use a two-ring loose-leaf binder and A4 size paper if a three-ring binder is not available. The MACC has a not-to-exceed value of $990,000,000 and the government intends to award up to 10 contracts using a competitive Subjective Tradeoff (STO) best value source selection process. Successful awardees are guaranteed a minimum of $2,000.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Ltr_Response to Questions.pdf | ||
| Atch 1 Ltr Rspns QA Summary.pdf | ||
| Atch 1 PreCon Slides MACC.pdf | ||
| Pre-proposal Conf Minutes_MACC.pdf | ||
| Atch6_PPQ Cover Ltr.pdf | ||
| Atch3 Statement of Work for MACC Model Project.pdf | ||
| Atch7 Histrical Data.pdf | ||
| Atch1 Other Contract Requirements.pdf | ||
| Atch4 Price Proposal for MACC Model Project.docx | DOCX document | |
| Atch5_PPQ.docx | DOCX document | |
| Solicitation - FA520524R0004.pdf | ||
| Atch2 MACC Gen-Provisions.pdf |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SUMMARY OF QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
RFP No. FA52024R0004
Indefinite-Delivery/Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC), Misawa AB, Japan
Questions and Answers at Conference:
Q1: Is a past performance information (PPI) of amount less than $1,000,000.00 acceptable?
A1:Yes. The government will assess relevancy for each contract in similar scope, magnitude of effort and complexities to that required by this solicitation and has been performed in Japan IAW the Solicitation, Section M, para. M-900.B.
Q2: Is a past performance questionnaire (PPQ) not required for a PPI when Contractor Performance
Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) record is available?
A2: Offeror is required to send out a PPQ to each of the Points-of-Contact (POCs), IAW Section L, para. L-100.B.3.(b), regardless of availability of the CPARS record.
Q3: Is an on-going project acceptable for a PPI and does it require specific percentage of the project completion?
A3: PPI of the on-going project will be evaluated, and there is no requirement for percentage of the project completion. Selection of submitting PPI is of an offeror’s discretion.
Q4: Is a two-ring loose-leaf binder and A4 size paper acceptable?
A4: Offeror’s submitting documents must be consistent with Section L, para. L-100.C. If a three-ring loose-leaf binder is not available, other type of loose-leaf binder may be used.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .