Amended RTO- Combined Synopsis Solicitation.pdf

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

354TH CONTRACTING SQUADRON (PACAF)

EIELSON AIR FORCE BASE, AK

07 May 2026

Combined Synopsis/Solicitation

Requirement Title: Tactical Training and Range Support Solicitation Number: FA500426R0018 Solicitation Issue Date: 05/14/2026 Response Deadline: 06/05/2026 at 1:00 PM AKDT Contract Specialist: SrA Gonzalo Loaiza / Gonzalo.loaiza_alzate@us.af.mil Contracting Officer: SSgt Ryan Baudouin / ryan.baudouin@us.af.mil

1. General Information

This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial products or commercial services prepared in accordance with part 12. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation. Offers are being requested and a separate written solicitation will not be issued.

2. Acquisition Strategy

This solicitation is issued as a Request For Proposal (RFP) resulting in a single Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) contract.

This acquisition is being conducted as a 100% Service-Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business.

The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code is 611512. The Small Business Size Standard is $34.0M.

3. Description of Requirement

The Government requires support providing tactical control, threat emulation, post-mission data validation, and intelligence integration services essential for the successful execution of Large Force Exercises (LFE) Red Flag-Alaska (RF-AK) run by U.S. Air Force (USAF) 353rd Combat Training Squadron (CTS) within the Joint Pacific Alaska Range Complex (JPARC) as defined in Attachment 2: Performance Work Statement (PWS).

4. Place of Delivery/Performance

Services shall be provided from August 14, 2026, through September 4, 2026.

5. 52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors—Commercial Products and Commercial Services.

mailto:Gonzalo.loaiza_alzate@us.af.mil mailto:ryan.baudouin@us.af.mil

(Sep 2023), applies to this acquisition and is incorporated by reference.

As prescribed in RFO 12.205(a)(1), Addendum FAR 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors–

Commercial Products and Commercial Services is provided for this solicitation and is included as Attachment 04 - Addendum FAR 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors.

FAR 52.212-1 Addenda -Instructions to Offerors

Addendum to FAR 52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors- Commercial Products and

Commercial Services (September 2023)

1. Proposal Preparation Instructions

a. To ensure timely and equitable evaluation of offers, offerors must follow the instructions contained herein. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award. Offers shall not contain classified information.

b. By submission of its offer, the offeror agrees to hold the prices firm for 90 calendar days from the closing date.

c. Alternate offers will not be accepted.

d. Offers shall be submitted in digital format. Date of submission will be determined by the date and time of digital format receipt to the government point of contact.

e. A complete offer consists of three separate volumes:

Volume I - Technical

Volume II - Past Performance

Volume III - Price

2. Proposal Content.

Volume I - Technical (15-page limit):

a. The offeror shall submit a technical volume that addresses the following factors. The narrative shall demonstrate a clear understanding of and a sound approach to accomplishing the requirements specified in the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

Factor 1: Key Personnel Qualifications: (2-page limit per resume): The offeror shall submit verifiable documentation (e.g., resumes, certifications, training records) for all highly specialized personnel proposed to execute the PWS requirements. Documentation must detail relevant experience, qualifications, and certifications specifically for the roles of SAM-1 and MiG-1 Subject Matter Experts (SMEs), Air-to-Surface Range Training Officers, High-Speed Anti- Radiation Missile (HARM) Assessors, White Force Exercise Support SMEs (Airboss, Mission Planning, Tactical Mentorship), and Intelligence/Adversary SMEs.

Factor 2: Technical Approach & Methodology: Provide a comprehensive plan that demonstrates a clear understanding of the requirements by addressing the following three subfactors:

Subfactor 2.1: Tactical Control, Threat Emulation, & Debrief Readiness: The offeror must detail procedures for managing a minimum of two (2) distinct exercise vulnerability periods (vuls) per day. The narrative must explain the methodology for organizing Ground Based Air Defense (GBAD) and simulated Integrated Air Defense System (sIADS) integration.

Furthermore, the offeror must clearly outline their approach to executing the post-vul shot validation process and ensuring the Mission Commander is ready to begin the debrief no later than 2 hours and 15 minutes (2+15) after mission termination.

Subfactor 2.2: Operational and Intelligence Integration:

The offeror must provide a clear approach detailing how their SMEs will integrate into the Combat Training Squadron (CTS) Intelligence shop. This section must outline the procedures for providing continuous advisory support, assisting with weaponeering, developing scenarios, and ensuring accurate red air replication during mission planning and execution.

Subfactor 2.3: Contractor Provided Software Capability & Implementation:

The offeror must provide technical documentation or a detailed narrative proving the proposed software solution meets all standards outlined in PWS 3.4. Offerors must explicitly demonstrate how the software will validate Air-to-Surface weapons (GBU-31, GBU-38, etc.) with 99% accuracy within four feet of error for up to 400 targets. The submission must also verify the software accepts required coordinate formats (Degrees Minutes Decimal Minutes and MGRS 10-digit) and detail the quality control approach to maintain reliability limits (fewer than 2 critical issues per exercise).

Volume II - Past Performance (10-page limit):

a. The Government will consider contractors' past/present performance references of other relevant contracts they have recently performed, in conjunction with other information available to the Government (i.e. CPARS)

b. Past and present performance, for the purpose of satisfying the above requirement, means recent and relevant work, comparable to this acquisition. RECENT- Any contract effort with performance within three (3) years of issuance date of this solicitation.

RELEVANCY is defined in 52.212-2 Addendum, whether or not it was government work or commercial work. Identify the corporate division that performed the contract/subcontract, if applicable

c. Provide a comprehensive list of recent and relevant contracts as defined in paragraph above, over the past three- (3) years from the issuance date of this solicitation. If you believe a classified project is significant for this offers, then simply state "Classified" where appropriate and provide points of contract. Include the following:

(1) Contract Number

(2) Contracting Agency and Point of Contact (name, email, phone)

(3) Brief Description of Work

(4) Period of Performance

(5) Total Contract Value

Volume III - Price:

a. The offeror shall complete the pricing schedule in the SF1449 (to be provided as an attachment in the solicitation). `This volume will be evaluated for price fairness and reasonableness for the highest-technically rated offeror, but will not be scored.

Volume No. Volume Title Hard Copies Max Pages

I Technical 3 15

II Performance 3 10

III Price 3 N/A

b. A page is defined as each face of a sheet of paper containing information. When both sides of a sheet display printed material, it shall be counted as two pages. Page size shall be 8.5 x 11 inches, not including foldouts. Pages shall be single spaced with 1.5 line spacing. Except for the reproduced sections of the solicitation document, the text size shall be no less than 10 point. Tracking, kerning, and leading values shall not be changed from the default values of the word processing or page layout software. Use at least 1 inch margins on the top and bottom and ¾-inch side margins. Pages shall be numbered sequentially by volume. These page size and format restrictions shall apply to responses to evaluation notices.

c. To facilitate review and evaluation for this source selection, the Government proposes to transmit the data via commercial systems. Distributed material will be identified as source selection sensitive and distribution strictly limited to appropriate personnel.

(End of Provision Addendum)

6. Price Schedule

Prices shall be all-inclusive of rental, maintenance support, and delivery/pickup.

CLIN DESCRIPTION Qty Unit Unit Price Total Price

0001 RTO/ HARM Support for RFAK-3 (Labor, Travel, ODC's)

1 Job $ $

TOTAL

7. Addendum to RFO Provision 52.212-2, Evaluation

Evaluation-Commercial Products and Commercial Services (Feb 2026) (Deviation 2026- O0038)

(a) Evaluation factors. The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors will be used to evaluate offers:

Factor 1: Technical Factor 2: Past Performance Factor 3: Price

Basis for Award (HTRO): In accordance with RFO 15.103-3, the Government will utilize the Highest Technically Rated with a Fair and Reasonable Price (HTRO) approach. The Government will not consider tradeoffs between cost or price and non-cost or non-price factors. The highest technically rated proposal will be selected for award if it offers a fair and reasonable price. All proposals will be evaluated based on the non-price factors outlined above to determine the highest technically rated proposal. The price of the highest technically rated proposal will then be evaluated to determine if it is fair and reasonable. If the highest technically rated proposal’s price is fair and reasonable, the proposal is selected for award. If not, the Government will evaluate the next highest technically rated proposal for a fair and reasonable price.

(b) Options (if applicable). The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. The evaluation of options does not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(c) Notice of award. A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer furnished to the successful Offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(End of provision)

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-2 EVALUATION—COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND

COMMERCIAL SERVICES (NOV 2021)

1. Basis for Contract Award

a. The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose proposal, conforming to the solicitation, is determined to be the highest technically rated, with a fair and reasonable price. This is a Highest Technically Rated with a Fair and Reasonable Price (HTRO) source selection conducted in accordance with RFO 15.103-

3. The Government will not consider tradeoffs between price and non-price factors.

The evaluation process shall proceed as follows:

i. All proposals received will be evaluated on the non-price factors (Technical and Past Performance) and ranked in order from the highest technically rated to the lowest.

ii. The price of the highest technically rated proposal will then be evaluated for fairness and reasonableness.

iii. If the price for the highest technically rated proposal is determined to be fair and reasonable, that proposal will be selected for award.

iv. If the price is determined not to be fair and reasonable, the Government will move to the next highest technically rated proposal and evaluate its price for fairness and reasonableness. This process will continue until a contract is awarded to the highest technically rated responsible offeror with a fair and reasonable price.

Evaluation Factors for Award

Technical

a. The technical proposal will be evaluated to determine the degree to which the offeror demonstrates a thorough understanding of the requirements. The basis for evaluation of technical capability offers is described below. At minimum, the technical capability offers shall consist of the following:

Factor 1: Key Personnel Qualifications

Description: The Government will evaluate the qualifications, experience, and certifications of proposed personnel to ensure they meet or exceed the PWS requirements for highly specialized roles.

This requirement is met when the offeror provides verifiable documentation (e.g., resumes, certifications, training records) proving all proposed Key Personnel meet the baseline requirements outlined in the PWS. Specifically, the evaluation will assess the specialized expertise of personnel filling the following roles:

• SAM-1 and MiG-1 Subject Matter Experts (SMEs)

• Air-to-Surface Range Training Officers (RTOs)

• High-Speed Anti-Radiation Missile (HARM) Assessors

• White Force Exercise Support SMEs (Airboss, Mission Planning, Tactical Mentorship)

• Intelligence and Adversary SMEs

Note: Proposals that demonstrate Key Personnel possess relevant experience, tactical mentorship backgrounds, or qualifications that significantly exceed these minimum PWS requirements may be evaluated more favorably and receive a higher technical rating.

Factor 2: Technical Approach & Methodology

Description: The Government will evaluate the soundness, feasibility, and comprehensiveness of the offeror’s proposed methodology to meet the Description of Services in PWS 3.0. This factor is divided into three distinct subfactors.

Subfactor 2.1: Tactical Control, Threat Emulation, & Debrief Readiness

• Description: The Government will evaluate the offeror’s approach to executing continuous, high-fidelity threat and airspace management, as well as their methodology for mission data integrity.

• Standard for Meeting Requirement: The offeror’s narrative must demonstrate a sound, executable approach to managing a minimum of two (2) distinct exercise vulnerability periods (vuls) per day. The proposal must detail specific, effective procedures for:

• Organizing and executing Ground Based Air Defense (GBAD) and simulated Integrated Air Defense System (sIADS) integration.

• Supplementing White Force Exercise Support (Adversary Coordination, Tactical Mentorship, Airboss).

• Executing the post-vul shot validation process as MiG-1/SAM-1.

• Ensuring the Mission Commander is ready to begin the shot validation debrief no later than 2 hours and 15 minutes (2+15) after mission termination.

Subfactor 2.2: Operational and Intelligence Integration

• Description: The Government will evaluate the offeror's proposed methodology for integrating with the Combat Training Squadron (CTS) Intelligence shop and White Cell functions.

• Standard for Meeting Requirement: The offeror's narrative must demonstrate a highly effective approach to providing continuous advisory support for operations and intelligence. This includes a clear methodology for assisting with weaponeering, scenario development, and ensuring accurate red air replication during mission planning, briefing, execution, and debriefing.

Subfactor 2.3: Contractor Provided Software Capability & Implementation

• Description: The Government will evaluate the technical capabilities, accuracy, and reliability of the offeror's proposed software solution for real-time Air-to-Surface weapons validation.

• Standard for Meeting Requirement: The proposal must demonstrate that the offered software solution meets or exceeds all performance standards outlined in PWS 3.4. The offeror must provide technical documentation or a detailed narrative proving the software can:

• Validate weapons (GBU-31, GBU-38, GBU-54, GBU-39, GBU-12, JASSM, HARM) with 99% accuracy within four feet of accuracy for up to 400 targets in a single vul.

• Accept required coordinate formats (Degrees Minutes Decimal Minutes to four decimal places, and MGRS 10-digit).

• Provide real-time hit/miss and graphical depictions no later than 45 minutes prior to the debrief.

• Operate reliably on DoD NIPR or compliant Contractor-provided systems, demonstrating a quality control approach to maintain operations with <2 critical issues and <5 minor issues per exercise.

Overall Rating. A offers must meet all standards listed above to receive a rating of "Meets Expectations" for this factor. Failure to meet any one of these standards will result in the offers being rated "Does not meet expectations".

i. The Government will evaluate the offeror’s technical capability offers identified above. The Government’s evaluation team shall evaluate overall technical capability on a Far Exceed Expectations/Exceeds Expectations/Meets Expectations/Does Not Meet Expectations basis. All areas of the Technical Capability offer must be determined either “Meets Expectations” using the descriptions below for the Technical Capability offers to receive an “Meets Expectations” or “Far Exceeds Expectations” rating. If any of the areas are determined to be “Does Not Meet Expectations”, the Technical Capability offers will receive an Unacceptable rating.

ii. Technical Capability Rating. The technical capability rating provides an assessment of the quality of the offeror’s solution for meeting the Government’s requirements. Each technical capability area will receive one of the ratings described below. The focus of the technical rating is to identify if the contractor has an adequate approach and understanding of the requirement. This rating will be based on the Government’s technical knowledge and historical data

TECHNICAL RATINGS

Rating Description Far Exceeds Expectations The proposal demonstrates to far exceed an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths far outweigh any weaknesses. The approach has a very low risk of unsuccessful performance.

Exceeds Expectations Offers meets requirements and indicated to exceed expectations and understanding of the requirement

Meets Expectations Offers meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirement

Does not meet expectations Offers does not meet requirements and does not indicate an adequate approach and understanding of the requirement.

Past Performance

a. The Government will evaluate the offeror's probability of successfully performing the contract requirements, as demonstrated by their record of recent and relevant past performance. The Government will assign a Performance Confidence Assessment rating of Substantial Confidence, Satisfactory Confidence, Limited Confidence, No Confidence, or Unknown Confidence (Neutral).

b. The Government will use past performance information submitted by the offerors’ references, other sources such as other federal government offices, Contractor Performance Assessment Reports (CPARS), and private and commercial sources. The Government is not bound by the offeror’s opinion of relevancy. Relevancy is defined above. Consideration will be given to whether the past performance information is applicable to the prime contractor, teaming partners, and/or joint venture actually performing that part of the requirement. This information may include efforts performed by other divisions, critical subcontractors, or teaming contractors, if such resources will be brought to the current effort.

i. Where the relevant past and present performance record indicates performance problems, the Government will consider the number and severity of the problems and the appropriateness and effectiveness of any corrective actions taken (not just planned or promised). The Government may review more recent contracts, or performance evaluations, to ensure corrective actions have been implemented and to evaluate their effectiveness. If the offeror clearly demonstrates management actions employed in overcoming problems and the effects of those actions, in terms of improvements achieved or problems rectified, this may allow the offeror to be rated higher than might otherwise be indicated.

ii. The Government will evaluate/assess all past performance information, positive and negative.

Offerors will be offered the opportunity to respond to negative past performance reports if they had not had the opportunity to do so previously. An offeror without a record of relevant past performance will receive a past performance rating of “Unknown Confidence.”

d. Each offeror will be assessed a Performance Confidence Rating described below, taking into account the recency, relevancy, and quality of each citation reviewed:

PERFORMANCE CONFIDENCE ASSESMENTS

Rating Description Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the

Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort

No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Unknown Confidence (Neutral)

No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

Price

a. The price proposal will not be scored or rated. It will be evaluated for fairness and reasonableness only for the highest-rated technical offeror(s) in accordance with the HTRO process. The Government will also evaluate unbalanced pricing.

(End of Provision Addendum)

8. Applicable Provisions and Clauses (Per RFO 12.205)

The following are incorporated by reference:

52.203-3 Gratuities. Apr 1984 52.203-6 Restrictions on Subcontractor Sales to the Government. Jun 2020 52.203-19 Prohibition on Requiring Certain Internal Confidentiality Agreements or Statements.

Jan 2017 52.204-13 System for Award Management-Maintenance. (Deviation 2026-O0038) Feb 2026

52.209-6 Protecting the Government's Interest When Subcontracting With Contractors Debarred, Suspended, Proposed for Debarment, or Voluntarily Excluded. (Deviation 2026-O0038) Feb 2026 52.209-9 Updates of Publicly Available Information Regarding Responsibility Matters.

(Deviation 2026-O0038) Feb 2026 52.209-10 Prohibition on Contracting With Inverted Domestic Corporations. (Deviation 2026- O0038) Feb 2026 52.212-4 Terms and Conditions-Commercial Products and Commercial Services. (Deviation 2026-O0038) Feb 2026 52.219-6 Notice of Total Small Business Set-Aside. (Deviation 2026-O0038) Feb 2026 52.219-8 Utilization of Small Business Concerns. (Deviation 2026-O0038) Feb 2026 52.219-33 Nonmanufacturer Rule. (Deviation 2026-O0038) Feb 2026 52.222-3 Convict Labor. (Deviation 2026-O0038) Feb 2026 52.222-35 Equal Opportunity for Veterans. (Deviation 2026-O0038) Feb 2026 52.222-36 Equal Opportunity for Workers with Disabilities. (Deviation 2026-O0038) Feb 2026 52.222-37 Employment Reports on Veterans. (Deviation 2026-O0038) Feb 2026 52.222-40 Notification of Employee Rights Under the National Labor Relations Act. (Deviation 2026-O0038) Feb 2026 52.222-41 Service Contract Labor Standards. (Deviation 2026-O0038) Feb 2026 52.222-44 Fair Labor Standards Act and Service Contract Labor Standards-Price Adjustment.

(Deviation 2026-O0038) Feb 2026 52.222-50 Combating Trafficking in Persons. (Deviation 2026-O0038) Feb 2026 52.222-62 Paid Sick Leave Under Executive Order 13706. (Deviation 2026-O0038) Feb 2026 52.222-90 Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors. (Deviation 2026-O0038) Apr 52.223-23 Sustainable Products. (Deviation 2026-O0038) Feb 2026 52.226-8 Encouraging Contractor Policies to Ban Text Messaging While Driving. May 2024 52.229-12 Tax on Certain Foreign Procurements. Feb 2021 52.232-33 Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer-System for Award Management. Oct 2018 52.232-39 Unenforceability of Unauthorized Obligations. Jun 2013 52.232-40 Providing Accelerated Payments to Small Business Subcontractors. Mar 2023 52.233-3 Protest after Award. (Deviation 2026-O0038) Feb 2026 52.233-4 Applicable Law for Breach of Contract Claim. (Deviation 2026-O0038) Feb 2026 52.240-91 Security Prohibitions and Exclusions. (Deviation 2026-O0038) Feb 2026 52.240-92 Security Requirements. (Deviation 2026-O0038) Feb 2026 52.244-6 Subcontracts for Commercial Products and Commercial Services. (Deviation 2026- O0038)

The following are incorporated by full text:

1. Ombudsman

a. An ombudsman has been appointed to hear and facilitate the resolution of concerns from offerors, potential offerors, and others for this acquisition. When requested, the ombudsman will maintain strict confidentiality as to the source of the concern. The existence of the ombudsman does not affect the authority of the program manager, contracting officer, or source selection official. Further, the ombudsman does not participate in the evaluation of proposals, the source selection process, or the adjudication of protests or formal contract disputes. The ombudsman may refer the interested party to another official who can resolve the concern.

b. Before consulting with an ombudsman, interested parties must first address their concerns, issues, disagreements, and/or recommendations to the contracting officer for resolution. Consulting an ombudsman does not alter or postpone the timelines for any other processes (e.g., agency level bid protests, GAO bid protests, requests for debriefings, employee-employer actions, contests of OMB Circular A-76 competition performance decisions).

c. If resolution cannot be made by the contracting officer, the interested party may contact the ombudsman, AFICC/KH (Chief Enlisted Manager) at 25 E Street, Suite C-230 JBPH- H, HI 9685427, Phone: (808) 447-6128, e-mail: afica.kh@us.af.mil. Concerns, issues, disagreements, and recommendations that cannot be resolved at the enter/MAJCOM/FLDCOM/DRU ombudsman level, may be brought by the interested party for further consideration to the Department of the Air Force ombudsman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary (ADAS) (Contracting), SAF/AQC, 1060 Air Force Pentagon, Washington DC 20330-1060, phone number (571) 256-2395, facsimile number (571) 256-2431.

d. The ombudsman has no authority to render a decision that binds the agency.

e. Do not contact the ombudsman to request copies of the solicitation, verify offer due date, or clarify technical requirements. Such inquiries shall be directed to the contracting officer

2. Contractor Access to Department of the Air Force Installations

a. The contractor shall obtain base identification, and vehicle passes, if required, for all contractor personnel who make frequent visits to or perform work on the Department of the Air Force installation(s) cited in the contract. Contractor personnel are required to wear or prominently display installation identification badges or contractor-furnished, contractor identification badges while visiting or performing work on the installation.

b. The contractor shall submit a written request on company letterhead to the contracting officer listing the following: contract number, location of work site, start and stop dates, and names of employees and subcontractor employees needing access to the base. The letter will also specify the individual(s) authorized to sign for a request for base identification credentials or vehicle passes. The contracting officer will endorse the request and forward it to the issuing base pass and registration office or Security Forces for processing. When reporting to the registration office, the authorized contractor individual(s) should provide a valid driver's license, current vehicle registration, valid vehicle insurance certificate, and to obtain a vehicle pass.

c. During performance of the contract, the contractor shall be responsible for obtaining required identification for newly assigned personnel and for prompt return of credentials and vehicle passes for any employee who no longer requires access to the work site.

https://www.google.com/url?q=mailto%3Aafica.kh%40us.af.mil

d. When work under this contract requires unescorted entry to controlled or restricted areas, the contractor shall comply with AFI 31-101, Integrated Defense, and DODMAN5200.02_AFMAN 16-1405, Air Force Personnel Security Program.

e. Upon completion or termination of the contract or expiration of the identification passes, the prime contractor shall ensure that all base identification passes issued to employees and subcontractor employees are returned to the issuing office.

f. The contractor shall provide an after-hours contact number or after-hours email in the Emergency Mass Notification System (EMNS) for each of their personnel, whose normal place of duty is on a DoD installation or within a DoD facility. The contractor shall comply with any additional requirements in DAFMAN 10-206 for emergency operational reporting. Foreign Nationals may participate and may remove themselves from the Emergency Mass Notification System at any time. To update information, personnel can access the globe icon on their system desktop screens and choose the "Access Self- Service" option.

g. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in the withholding of final payment.

9. Attachments

1. Performance Work Statement (PWS)

2. RF-A 2026 SPINS

3. DOL Wage Determination 2015-5683

07 May 2026