FA489021R0012 Section L Amendment 0001 20Sep21.docx
DOCX document 60 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Aerial Targets III FY23
- Solicitation number
- FA489021R0012
About this file
This Request for Proposal solicits aircraft maintenance services at two Air Force bases. Offerors must provide maintenance for fixed- and rotary-wing aircraft, including fleet increases and sortie volume over baseline levels. The RFP requires base-level maintenance at Tyndall AFB, Florida and Holloman AFB, New Mexico. Response is due by October 13, 2021 with award anticipated in early 2022. Pricing must be proposed for firm-fixed-price contract line items along with rates for cost reimbursement items such as overtime, materials, and travel. Evaluation will consider technical factors like past performance, management approach, and small business participation in addition to total evaluated price. The solicitation provides detailed proposal instructions and seeks compliance with Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement requirements.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 86 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA489021R0012 Section L – Instruction to Offerors
L-1 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This is a full and open competition under NAICS code 488190, Other Support Activities for Air Transportation, size standard $35M.
The Government will award one contract from this solicitation to the responsible Offeror (IAW FAR Part 9) whose proposal represents the best value after evaluation in accordance with the factors in the solicitation (FAR 52.215-1(f)(1)).
Adequate price competition is expected; therefore, Offerors should submit their best terms for all factors in their initial proposal (FAR 52.215-1(f)(4)).
Offerors shall not submit more than one offer in response to this solicitation, and only offers submitted in accordance with the instructions herein will be accepted.
Proposals shall be clear and concise, and shall include sufficient detail to permit the Government to adequately evaluate and substantiate proposal statements.
The Government reserves the right to cancel this solicitation at any point before contract award. In the event this solicitation is canceled, the Government has no obligation to reimburse Offerors for any costs incurred.
Offerors without the required Top Secret Facility Clearance will not be permitted as the prime Contractor due to the required security classification. Offerors shall possess or acquire, prior to contract award, a facility clearance equal to the requirement on the DD 254 without additional authorization (i.e., National Interest Determination (NID)). Offerors that require a NID before receiving the required clearance are not eligible for award. For Joint Ventures, all parties to the joint venture must possess the required clearance.
L-2 QUESTIONS
Questions in response to this solicitation are due no later than 1300 Eastern on 3 Sept 2021. All questions shall be submitted via email and only to the POCs below. Forward all questions to all three POCs listed below. It is the Offeror’s responsibility to confirm receipt.
ACC AMIC/PKCA
Elijah Horner, elijah.horner.3@us.af.mil John Bonafede, john.bonafede@us.af.mil Carla Ashby, carla.ashby.1@us.af.mil Reference: Solicitation FA489021R0012
Questions shall be submitted in the following format, compatible with Microsoft Office 2013 or newer:
| Document / Section |
| Paragraph / Reference |
| Question / Issue / Concern |
All questions submitted by the deadline, and their responses, will be posted to the Government Point of Entry (GPE) without referencing the originating sources.
NOTE: This solicitation stands independently from prior draft notices. Any previous questions or concerns that may be outstanding must be asked or submitted again.
L-3 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION AND FORMAT
Proposals in response to this solicitation shall be valid for 365 calendar days (FAR 52.215-1(d)).
L-3.1 SAFE Submission Electronic proposals shall be submitted via DoD Safe Access File Exchange (SAFE) https://safe.apps.mil/ (FAR 52.215-1(c)(1)). The Government will not accept proposals through any other medium.
In order to submit a proposal, Offerors must notify all three Government POCs listed in L-2 no later than 29 Sept 2021 of their intent to propose. The notification email shall include the name and email address(s) of the Offeror representative submitting the proposal. On 6 Oct 2021, the Government will send a ‘drop-off request’ through DoD SAFE to the Offeror email provided. This request will provide the link required to submit proposals. It is the Offeror’s responsibility to confirm receipt once proposals are submitted.
Intent notifications due: 29 Sept 2021 Drop-off request sent: 6 Oct 2021 Proposals due: NLT 1400 Eastern on 13 Oct 2021
L-3.2 Operating System and Applications Proposals will be accessed with the Microsoft Windows 10 Operating System. Proposal files shall be searchable with copy/paste capability, and submitted using only the applications listed below:
| Application / File |
| Valid Extensions |
| Portable Document Files |
| Microsoft Word |
| .doc / .docx |
| Microsoft Excel |
| .xls / .xlsx |
| Microsoft Power Point |
| .ppt / .pptx |
L-3.3 File Naming Conventions Offerors shall follow the basic structure of the file naming convention below for file submissions, where "#" represents the sequential file number. Offerors shall keep the file name under 40 characters.
L-3.3, TABLE 1: NAMING CONVENTIONS
| Section |
| File Name |
Business Cover Page (FAR 52.215-1(c)(2)) AS9110 certification Model Contract Signed SF33 (and SF30s as applicable) Section B and Section K Pre-award Clearances documentation Approved System documentation Partnering documentation
Offeror name BUS Cover# Offeror name BUS AS9110# Offeror name BUS Kt#
Offeror name BUS Clear# Offeror name BUS Sys# Offeror name BUS PA#
Factors Small Business (Factor 1) Management Capability (Factor 2) Past Performance (Factor 3) Price (Factor 4)
Offeror name FAC1 SB# Offeror name FAC2 MC# Offeror name FAC3 PP# Offeror name FAC4 Price#
L-3.4 Hyperlinks Offerors may use hyperlinks within and among proposal factor files; however, there shall be no links from Price factor files to non-Price factor files. NOTE: Each factor submission shall be on a stand-alone basis. Any information required for evaluation, and not found in its designated file, is assumed omitted from the proposal.
L-3.5 Virus Free Electronic Submission Offerors shall ensure that proposals are virus free. The Offeror shall certify, in the proposal cover letter, that all electronic proposal information delivered throughout the evaluation (e.g., initial proposal, responses to evaluation notices, final proposal revisions) is virus free. Offerors should specify the software, version, and virus definition used to check the data.
L-3.6 Multimedia and Graphics Sound and video (e.g., MPEG) files shall not be imbedded within the proposal. Offerors should:
1. Avoid submitting large files
1. Simplify color palettes and minimize the use of color images or graphics;
1. Minimize size of graphics files; and
1. Avoid scanned images.
L-3.7 Pre-award Clearances EEO (FAR 52.222-24): Provide the information required by FAR 22.805(a)(5) for the prime and any subcontractors over $10M (total value), or a copy of the applicable Notices of Compliance; and
VETS-4212 (FAR 52.222-38): Provide documentation that the prime, and any subcontractors over $150k (total value), is/are current with their reporting as required by FAR Subpart 22.13.
L-3.8 Approved System Verification If available, provide documentation for any existing system approved, or deemed adequate, by the cognizant federal agency, such as:
1. Property Management System (FAR 45.105)
1. Accounting System (FAR 16.301-3)
1. Purchasing System (FAR 44.3)
L-3.9 Proposal Format Fonts: Proposal text fonts shall not be smaller than Microsoft Word Times New Roman 11 or Arial Narrow 12 point font, single column, normal character spacing and position. The text for charts, tables, graphs, and figures shall be no smaller than Microsoft Word, Times New Roman or Arial Narrow, 9 point font. Line spacing shall be at least single-spaced.
Pages: All pages shall be formatted as 8.5” x 11” letter size with one-inch margins all around. 11” x 17” is allowed for charts, tables, and graphs only. Any proposal text included on these pages, other than the information specific to the graphics, will not be considered in the evaluation. One 11” x 17” page will be counted as two pages. All material shall be contained within the page limits identified below for each section, and all appendices, charts, graphs, diagrams, tables, photographs, drawings, etc., are included in the page count. Not included in the page count are title pages, tables of content, glossaries of abbreviations, acronyms, or definitions, written consent from subcontractor or team members required in L-4.4, or copies of certificates (i.e., AS9110). Evaluators will only evaluate up to the maximum number of pages specified in Table 2 below.
Headers and Footers: Information contained in headers and footers shall only provide company name, solicitation number, proposal section (e.g., Factor 1, Small Business), disclosure markings (FAR 52.215-1(e)), dates, or page numbers. Text sizes shall be no smaller than Microsoft Word, Times New Roman or Arial Narrow, 9 point font.
L-3.9, TABLE 2: PROPOSAL PAGE LIMITS
| Section |
| Pages |
Business Cover Page (FAR 52.215-1(c)(2)) AS9110 certification Model Contract Pre-award Clearances documentation Approved System documentation Partnering documentation
3 pages No limit No limit No limit
Factors Small Business (Factor 1) Management Capability (Factor 2) Past Performance (Factor 3) PPIs PPQs Price Factor (Factor 4)
100 pages 3 pages 5 pages per reference
L-4 PROPOSAL CONTENT
L-4.1 Business Cover Page and Model Contract: Provide completion confirmation of the required Representations and Certifications (Section K) in System for Award Management (SAM) located at https://www.sam.gov. Please note this solicitation includes DFARS provision 252.204-7019, Notice of NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements.
Prerequisite: Submission of the Prime Offeror’s AS9110 certificate is required to be eligible for award. If the Offeror does not meet this prerequisite, the Government will not evaluate the proposal. For Joint Ventures, at least one company must be certified.
Pre-Award Documentation: Include any of the documentation provided in accordance with sections L-3.7 and 3.8 above.
Partnering Documentation: Provide documentation identifying the arrangement and disclosing company relationships (FAR 9.603) for any Joint Venture, Teaming Arrangement, Mentor-Protégé, etc., established for the purposes of this solicitation.
Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI): In accordance with AFFARs 5352.209-9001 Potential Organizational Conflict of Interest, there is the potential for a conflict of interest if potential Offerors have been involved with development, production, inspection, acceptance, or regeneration of the weapon systems/aircraft maintained under this contract. The Offeror shall provide the Contracting Officer with complete information of previous or ongoing work that is in any way associated with the contemplated acquisition. Describe this work and how any OCI that may impact this requirement can be neutralized, avoided, or mitigated. If there is not any OCI kind of work for DoD or Air Force, state so in your proposal. Open OCI instance(s) identified by the Offeror or Government and not neutralized or mitigated to the Government’s satisfaction renders an Offeror not eligible for award if so determined by the Government.
L-4.2 Factor 1, Small Business All Offerors (including small and other than small) shall submit a Small Business Participation Commitment Document (SBPCD) which will be incorporated in Section J of the contract at award. The evaluation of small business participation as a factor (DFARS 215.304) is separate from the requirement to submit a subcontracting plan (FAR 52.219-9). The SBPCD shall address the following:
1. list of small businesses, by name, and the products/services they will provide with the associated NAICS code;
1. the type and complexity of supplies/services to be provided by small business;
1. the extent of commitment (e.g., letters of intent, teaming agreements, mentor protégé, etc., and
1. both percentage of total contract value and dollar breakouts of total small business participation by socio-economic category.
1. For other than small businesses, the planned small business subcontracting dollars of the subcontracting plan shall be the same as the extent of utilization quantitatively in the SBPCD.
The Small Business volume of the proposal shall include Offeror’s past performance in complying with the requirements of FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns and FAR 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan.
Large business Offerors are required to submit a subcontracting plan that complies with all requirements in FAR 52.219-9 Alt II.
L-4.3 Factor 2, Management Capability L-4.3.1. Program Management:
Describe your integrated management approach to provide an organizational structure that consists of an appropriate leadership hierarchy, manning levels and skill sets by position, shop or function, assigned roles and responsibilities, lines of authority, and cohesive functional relationships to meet provided workload data and execute all PWS requirements.
Provide your communication approach with effective lines of communication, reporting, progress checkpoints, and interfaces between management, technical staff, subcontractors/teaming partners, and the Government to ensure continuity and mission success.
Provide your integrated approach for hiring, training, and retaining qualified management and technical personnel by job category/position.
L-4.3.2. Quality Management System:
Provide your approach to implement a Quality Management System (QMS) integrated with corporate management, maintenance, and routine business processes and which monitors and documents contract performance for all PWS requirements.
L-4.3.3. Logistics Management:
Describe your approach for cradle-to-grave life cycle planning, execution and management and control of Government Furnished Property including a methodology to establish timelines for replacement with a phased approach to control ownership costs.
Describe your approach to properly use and positively influence Air Force supply chain operations at retail and wholesale levels from acquisition of supplies materials and equipment to include demand planning, grounded weapon system mitigation, retrograde of line item replacement units, and disposition.
L-4.3.4. Transition Plan:
Provide a Transition Plan for establishing required management processes that will result in continuity of mission support and contract performance; and efficiently transitioning resources and personnel onto the contract. At a minimum, the Plan shall include the following:
1. Milestone chart that reflects transition tasks to execute your proposed approach during transition. Approach for interfacing with the incumbent Contractor in support of transition tasks.
1. Approach to hire incumbent personnel and/or fill incumbent vacancies with trained/qualified personnel to perform contract tasks and responsibilities at contract start.
1. Approach and processes to acquire and integrate open actions (work orders, requisitions etc.) at contract start to ensure continuity and timely completion of open items.
1. Approach to acquire or transfer ownership from incumbent a vehicle fleet necessary to support all contract requirements at contract start.
L-4.4 Factor 3, Past Performance The Offeror shall submit thorough, accurate, and complete past performance information (PPI). Offeror-submitted PPIs and Contractor Performance Assessment Reports (CPARs) will be the primary sources used in evaluation. The Government may use additional sources of information in its evaluation, at its discretion. Additional information may be obtained from any sources available to the Government.
Submit the CAGE codes and DUNS numbers of the Prime Offeror and each team member, partner, or subcontractor included in your proposal. Include written consent from all subcontractor or team members to allow the Government to address any evaluated past performance directly with the Prime Offeror.
If PPI is submitted from prior organization structures (e.g., mergers, subsidiaries, purchases, novations, etc.), submit a detailed change history, to include company names, CAGE codes, DUNS numbers, and specific dates.
L-4.4.1. Past Performance Information (PPI) Reference Sheets (Section L: Attachment 1):
Submit a minimum of three and a maximum of six separate PPIs for contracts, task orders, or calls that are recent and relevant as defined in Section M. It is the Offeror’s responsibility to explain how their chosen PPIs are relevant; however, the Government is not bound by the Offeror’s opinion in determining relevancy. Three of the submitted PPIs should be for the Prime Offeror, if available. PPIs submitted for a basic Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (ID/IQ) or Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) will be considered a single PPI reference.
L-4.4.2. Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) (Section L: Attachment 2):
If a submitted PPI reference does not have a Contractor Performance Assessment Report (CPAR), the Government shall use the attached PPQ as a tool for evaluating performance. All PPQs are to be submitted to the Government by the POC identified in Section 3 of the Attached PPQ via e-mail to the Government POC’s listed in L-2. Any PPQs submitted directly by an Offeror will not be considered. It is the responsibility of the Offeror to ensure the PPQ is received by the proposal deadline.
L-4.5 Factor 4, Price Pricing information shall not be included in any other factor volume. Offerors shall complete Section B of the solicitation by inserting the unit price for all Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract line item numbers (CLINs) listed below. The Government will calculate 50% of the last option period pricing in order to evaluate the FAR 52.217-8 option. Unit prices shall be in whole dollar amounts.
X001 – TAFB FSAT Maintenance X002 – HAFB FSAT Maintenance X003 – SSAT Maintenance X004 – FSAT Fleet Increases (firm fixed rate; over & above baseline) X005 – FSAT Sortie Increase (firm fixed rate; over & above baseline) X006 – SSAT Fleet Increases (firm fixed rate; over & above baseline) X007 – SSAT Sortie Increases (firm fixed rate; over & above baseline) X008 – Range Instrumentation System (RIS) Operation, Maintenance, & Engineering 0099 – Transition Support
Offerors shall use the Government-provided amounts for the Performance Incentive/Award Fee CLINs:
X009 – 1st Half of Contract Year Performance Incentive/Award Fee X010 – 2nd Half of Contract Year Performance Incentive/Award Fee
Offerors shall propose any rate (G&A, admin, handling, etc.) to be applied to reimbursable expenses or travel arrangements for CLINs X011, X012, X013, and X014. These rates shall be applied to the Government provided amounts and fixed in the CLIN description as a term and condition of the contract.
X011 – Overtime (Government pre-approval required) X012 – Materials Not in Government Supply X013 – Government-Directed Travel X014 – Deployments/Off-Station Activities
The Total Evaluated Price (TEP) consists of all Offeror-proposed amounts for all FFP CLINs, the Government-provided amounts for all Performance Incentive/Award Fee CLINs, the Government-provided amounts for all CR CLINs; and Offeror-proposed rates for the CR CLINs for the base year and all option periods (including the six-month extension option, FAR 52.217-8).
The Government reserves the right to request additional pricing information after receipt of an Offeror’s proposal and before evaluation of proposals is finalized.
In order to expedite the responsibility determination required by FAR 9.103(b), provide documentation of the Offeror’s adequate financial resources or the ability to obtain them (see FAR 9.104-3(a)). This documentation will only be used to establish responsibility in the event of contract award, and will NOT be used to evaluate proposed pricing.
SECTION L
ATTACHMENT 1 - RFP FA489021R0012
PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (PPI) CONTRACT REFERENCE SHEET
Provide the information requested in this form for each contract/program submitted. Provide frank, concise comments regarding your performance on the contracts you identify. Provide a separate completed form for each contract/program submitted. Limit the number of past efforts submitted and the length of each submission to the limitations set forth at paragraph L-3.9, Table 2.
A. Offeror Name (Company/Division):
(Note: Note if the company/division referenced is different than the Offeror (see L-4.4) DUNS Number:
CAGE Code:
Contract Number:
Delivery/Task Order (if applicable):
Contract Type:
Program Title:
Contracting Agency/Customer:
Period of Performance (Including all option years) Start Date:
Original End Date:
Current End Date:
(Explain difference in period of performance, if applicable) Contract Dollar Value Original Contract $ Value (Including all option years):
Current Contract $ Value (Including all option years):
(Explain difference in contract dollar value, if applicable)
B. Brief Description of Effort as: __Prime or __Subcontractor
Provide a brief description of the service provided and actual work performed under this contract reference. If submitting a reference for a subcontractor, teaming partner, joint venture, or a corporate division related to the Offeror, describe the nature and portion (percentage) of the work to be performed on Aerial Targets by the company referenced on the PPI sheet, and clearly define the relationship. Indicate place(s) of performance:
- State if performance was in multiple locations. If so, specify locations.
- State if performance was CONUS, OCONUS or both, and provide details.
- State if performance serviced state or federal Government, and provide details.
- State if performance serviced the Department of Defense, and provide details.
C. Contracting Agency/Customer Points of Contact: (For Government or non-government contracts provide current information on all individuals).
1. Program Manager, Site Manager and/or Contracting Officer Representative/Quality Assurance Evaluator Name:
Office:
Address:
Telephone:
E-mail:
2. Procuring Contracting Officer Name:
Office:
Address:
Telephone:
E-mail:
3. Administrative Contracting Officer Name:
Office:
Address:
Telephone:
E-mail:
4. Other (Please Specify Role) Name:
Office:
Address:
Telephone:
E-mail:
D. Explain how your experience and the experience of the contract references provided for your teaming partners, joint ventures, major or critical subcontractors is relevant IAW the relevancy criteria provided at M-5.
G. IAW FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iii), relevant experience from key personnel may be evaluated. If you wish to include the past performance of individual key personnel, include names of key personnel and their contractual roles in those acquisitions. If relying on experience of key personnel, clearly explain “whose” past performance, and “how” the past performance is relevant to the proposed effort. If you are relying on past performance of key personnel, explain how you will ensure the same experience and qualification levels will be met if a substitution is required.
SECTION L
ATTACHMENT 2 – RFP FA489021R0012
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
The Government may use the attached PPQ as a tool for conducting Past Performance telephonic or e-mail interviews or can be submitted by the POC in Section 3 below for PPIs that do not have CPAR reports by e-mail to the Government POCs listed in L-2.
In the event a PPQ is utilized, it will be treated as source selection information IAW FAR Part 2.101 and 3.104. Offerors shall not complete and submit any PPQ. Any PPQs submitted by Offerors will not be considered as part of the evaluation.
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
1. Contractor
1. Contractor CAGE Code
1. Role (check): Prime Subcontractor Teaming Partner Joint Venture Partner
Other (specify) If subcontractor, partner, or other, who is the Prime?
1. Prime Contract Task Order
Note: If the referenced contract is an overarching ID/IQ or BPA, the Government will not assess performance on the individual underlying task orders, call orders, etc. If the Offeror would like assessment of the task order or call order, the Offeror shall submit that information as a separate reference.
1. Contract Type
1. Period of Performance
1. Place(s) of Performance (CONUS, OCONUS)
1. Annual Contract/Task Order $ Value
1. Description of Service(s) provided (Provide details on type of work, locations worked, and organizations serviced, to include Department of Defense, Government, or commercial work).
SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
1. Customer or Agency Name
1. Customer or Agency Description
SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION
A. Name B. Title
C. Phone
D. E-mail
E. Years worked on Subject Contract
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
Please indicate your satisfaction with the Contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:
| CODE |
| PERFORMANCE LEVEL |
| E |
| EXCEPTIONAL – The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective. |
| VG |
| VERY GOOD – The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective. |
| S |
| SATISFACTORY – The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| M |
| MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the Contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| U |
| UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| N/A |
| NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a score or item is not applicable to the referenced contract. |
Please provide detailed narrative comments to support your ratings. At a minimum, please discuss each response for which you indicated E (Exceptional), M (Marginal) or U (Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions below (use additional sheets, if necessary).
| 1. Quality of Product or Service |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
Ability of Contractor to provide safe, reliable aircrew operations and/or aircraft maintenance services to meet and/or exceed service metrics/specifications of the contract; provide timely proposals; respond to short-notice requirements; provide and adhere to quality control/management plan (when required). Ability of Contractor to identify and/or respond to identified quality discrepancies with thorough root-cause analysis and effective remedies.
Page Break
Explanation:_________________________________________________________________________________
| 2. Schedule |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
Ability of Contractor to provide personnel, aircraft, equipment, and/or component readiness to support requirements in accordance with prescribed timelines. Ability to provide deliverables and reports required by the contract on time.
| 3. Cost/Price Control |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
Ability of Contractor to: provide and project accurate contract cost estimates involving new work requirements and cost reimbursables; track and control costs; meet and perform within negotiated costs; provide current, accurate and complete invoices/billing; submit cost reporting information in a timely manner; document annual costs; meet cost/price performance targets and contingencies (i.e., changes, claims, request for equitable adjustments, request for proposals, etc.). Ability of Contractor to develop/implement innovative initiatives resulting in aircrew operations and/or aircraft maintenance cost savings/cost avoidance.
| 4. Business Relations |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
Ability of Contractor to: maintain effective relationship between key Contractor personnel and key Government personnel; manage, resolve problems, and respond to and/or integrate changes in mission-related requirements; respond and act on customer feedback.
| 5. Management of Personnel |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
Ability of Contractor to: attract, recruit, hire, train and retain qualified management and technical personnel to accomplish PWS requirements; manage subcontractors to include identification and resolution of subcontractor problems; ensure continuation of services during personnel absences or vacancies; replace/fill vacancies within timeframe specified; maintain training/certification currency; maintain a work environment with incentives for employee performance and innovation.
| 6. Deployed Operations Management |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
Ability of Contractor to: implement approaches/innovations to decrease tasking/execution response times for new operational requirements; comply with foreign government requirements for Contractor personnel to include country entry/exit requirements, work visas/permits, residency permits, etc.; demonstrate effective management approach for maintaining capability to support combat line requirements.
| 7. Security |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
Ability of Contractor to: obtain appropriate company and personnel security clearances in a timely manner; ensure personnel comply with applicable security requirements; safeguard classified materials.
| 8. Utilization of Small Business |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
Ability of Contractor to: comply with requirements of FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns and FAR 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan (Large Businesses only); meet small business subcontracting goals as stated in the contract (Large Businesses only); and commitment of Contractor to use small business firms identified in their proposal post award.
| 9. Transition |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
Ability of Contractor to: meet transition milestones while assuming full performance responsibility from the incumbent Contractor and ensuring continuity; to attract, recruit, hire, train, and provide qualified management, and key and technical personnel during the transition period to accomplish mission requirements.
SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY
A. Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? (Place an “X” by all that apply.)
Yes No Default Convenience Pending Terminations
If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc.).
B. Would you have any reservations about having this Contractor perform again on one of your critical and demanding programs?
Evaluator’s Signature Date
Evaluator’s Name
The evaluator is requested to forward this signed PPQ to all three Government points of contact listed below:
Elijah.horner.3@us.af.mil John.bonafede@us.af.mil Carla.ashby.1@us.af.mil
11 Aug 21 image1.png image2.png image3.png image4.png image5.png image6.png image7.png image8.png image9.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .